Quality in e-learning: A framework for promoting and assuring quality in virtual institutions

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 27-41

  Masoumi, D ^a   Lindstrom B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Developing countries; E learning; E quality framework models; Quality; Virtual institution

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856007070     PISSN: 02664909     EISSN: 13652729     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00440.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Achtemeier S.D. & Simpson R.D. (2005) Practical considerations when using benchmarking for accountability in higher education. Innovative Higher Education 2, 117-128.
2. Arnseth H.C. & Ludvigsen S. (2006) Approaching institutional contexts: systemic versus dialogical research in CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 1, 167-185.
3. Biggs J. (2001) The reflective institution: assuring and enhancing the quality of teaching and learning. Higher Education 41, 221-238.
4. Chickering A.W. & Ehrmann S.C. (1996) Implementing the seven principles: technology as a lever. Available at: (last accessed 20 April 2006).
5. Chua A. & Lam W. (2007) Quality assurance in online education: the Universitas 21Global approach. British Journal of Educational Technology 38, 133-152.
6. Cohen M.S. & Ellis T.J. (2004) Validating a criteria set for an online learning environment. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education Conference. Savannah, GA.
7. Connolly M., Jones N. & O'Shea J. (2005) Quality assurance and e-learning: reflections from the front line. Quality in Higher Education 11, 59-67.
8. Dillon C. & Greene B. (2003) Learner differences in distance learning: finding differences that matter. In Handbook of Distance Education (eds M.G. Moore & W.G. Anderson ), pp. 235-244. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
9. Dirckinck-Holmfeld L., Jones C. & Lindström B., eds (2009) Analysing Networked Learning Practices in Higher Education and Continuing Professional Development. (Technology Enhanced Learning Vol. 4). Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
10. Dirr P.J. (2003) Distance education policy issues: towards 2010. In Handbook of Distance Education (eds M.G. Moore & W. Anderson ), pp. 461-480. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
11. Ehlers U.-D. (2009) Understanding quality culture. Quality Assurance in Education 17, 343-363.
12. Ehlers U.-D. & Pawlowski J.M. (2006) Quality in European e-learning: an introduction. In Handbook on Quality and Standardisation in E-Learning (eds U.-D. Ehlers & J. Pawlowski ), pp. 1-13. Springer, Berlin.
13. Ellis R.A. & Calvo R.A. (2007) Minimum indicators to assure quality of LMS-supported blended learning. Educational Technology & Society 10, 60-70.
14. Fresen J.W. & Boyd L.G. (2005) Caught in the web of quality. International Journal of Educational Development 25, 317-331.
15. Frydenberg J. (2002) Quality standards in eLearning: a matrix of analysis. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. Available at: (last accessed 26 February 2008).
16. Gagne R.M., Wager W.W., Goals K.C. & Keller J.M. (2005) Principles of Instructional Design. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
17. Harvey L. & Newton J. (2004) Transforming quality evaluation. Quality in Higher Education 10, 149-165.
18. Herrington J., Oliver R. & Herrington A. (2007) Authentic learning on the web: guidelines for course design. In Flexible Learning in An Information Society (ed. B.H. Khan ), pp. 26-35. Information Science Pub, Hershey, PA.
19. Holsapple C.W. & Lee-Post A. (2006) Defining, assessing, and promoting e-learning success: an information systems perspective. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education 4, 67-85.
20. Hosie P., Schibeci R. & Backhaus A. (2005) A framework and checklists for evaluating online learning in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30, 539-553.
21. Huddlestone J. & Pike J. (2007) Seven key decision factors for selecting e-learning. Cognition, Technology & Work 10, 237-247.
22. Husson W.J. & Waterman E.K. (2002) Quality measures in distance learning. Higher Education in Europe 27, 253-260.
23. Inglis A. (2005) Quality improvement, quality assurance, and benchmarking: comparing two frameworks for managing quality processes in open and distance learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. Available at: (last accessed 29 March 2009).
24. Khan B.H. (2005) E-Learning Quick Checklist. Information Science Pub, Hershey, PA.
25. Kyvik S. (2009) The Dynamics of Change in Higher Education Vol. 27. Springer, Oslo.
26. Laurillard D. (2002) Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies. Routledge, London.
27. Marshall S. (2006) MM version two process assessment workbook. Report to the New Zealand Ministry of Education.Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington.
28. Masoumi D. (2010) Quality in E-Learning Within a Cultural Context: The Case of Iran. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, Göteborg, Sweden.
29. Masoumi D. & Lindström B. (2009) Foundations of cultural design in e-learning. International Journal of Internet and Enterprise Management 6, 124-142.
30. McGorry S.Y. (2003) Measuring quality in online programs. The Internet and Higher Education 6, 159-177.
31. McKinnon K.R., Walker S.H. & Davis D. (2000) Benchmarking: A Manual for Australian Universities. Dept. of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Higher Education Division, Canberra.
32. Moore J.C. (2002) Elements of Quality: The Sloan-CTM Framework. Sloan Center for OnLine Education, Needham, MA.
33. Moore J.C. (2005) The Sloan Consortium quality framework and the five pillars. Available at: (last accessed 13 February 2007).
34. Moore M.G. & Kearsley G. (1996) Distance Education: A Systems View. Wadsworth Pub. Co, Belmont, CA.
35. Nisbet D. (2004) Measuring the quantity and quality of online discussion group interaction. Journal of eLiteracy 1, 122-139.
36. Novak R.J. (2002) Benchmarking distance education. New Directions for Higher Education 118, 79-92.
37. Oliver R. (2001) Strategies for assuring the quality of online learning in Australian higher education. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Moving Online II Conference. Southern Cross University, Lismore.
38. Oliver R. (2003) Exploring benchmarks and standards for assuring quality online teaching and learning in higher education. Paper presented at the Proceedings of 16th Open and Distance Learning. Association of Australia Biennial Forum, Canberra. Available at: (last accessed 8 February 2008).
39. Oliver R. (2005) Quality assurance and e-learning: blue skies and pragmatism. Research in Learning Technology 13, 173-187.
40. Pacey L. & Keough E. (2003) Public policy, institutional structures, and strategic implementation. In Handbook of Distance Education (eds M.G. Moore & W. Anderson ), pp. 171-184. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
41. Pat Brogan A. (2008) E-learning standards: a framework for enabling the creation and distribution of high-quality, cost-effective web-delivered instruction. In The E-Learning Handbook: Past Promises, Present Challenges (eds S. Carliner & P. Shank ), pp. 167-214. Pfeiffer, San Francisco, CA.
42. Phipps R. & Merisotis J. (2000) Quality on the Line: Benchmarks for Success in Internet-Based Distance Education. The Institute of Higher Education Policy, Washington, DC.
43. Rovai A.P. (2001) Classroom community at a distance: a comparative analysis of two ALN-based university programs. Internet and Higher Education 4, 105-118.
44. Shepherd C. (2003) E-Learning's Greatest Hits. Above and Beyond Ltd, Brighton, UK.
45. Sims R., Dobbs G. & Hand T. (2002) Enhancing quality in online learning: scaffolding planning and design through proactive evaluation. Distance Education 23, 135-148.
46. Stoyanov S. & Kirschner P. (2004) Expert concept mapping method for defining the characteristics of adaptive e-learning: ALFANET project case. Educational Technology Research and Development 52, 41-56.
47. Swedish National Agency of Higher Education (2008) E-Learning Quality: Aspects and Criteria for Evaluation of E-Learning in Higher Education. Swedish National Agency for Higher Education, Stockholm.
48. Tham C.M. & Werner J.M. (2005) Designing and evaluating e-learning in higher education: a review and recommendations. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 11, 15-25.
49. Volery T. & Lord D. (2000) Critical success factors in online education. The International Journal of Educational Management 14, 216-223.
50. Wahlstedt A., Pekkola S. & Niemelä M. (2008) From e-learning space to e-learning place. British Journal of Educational Technology 39, 1020-1030.
51. Watty K. (2003) When will academics learn about quality? Quality in Higher Education 9, 213-221.
52. Wirth M.A. (2005) EFMD certification of e-learning (CEL). Available at: (last accessed 27 February 2007).
53. Zhao F. (2003) Enhancing the quality of online higher education through measurement. Quality Assurance in Education 11, 214-221.