Semantic Web applications: a framework for industry and business exploitation – What is needed for the adoption of the Semantic Web from the market and industry

International Journal of Knowledge and Learning

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 93-108

  Lytras, Miltiadis D ^a   García, Roberto ^b  

^a AMERICAN COLLEGE OF GREECE   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LLEIDA   (Spain)

Author keywords

best practices; ontological engineering; Semantic Web applications; Semantic Web based information systems

Indexed keywords

EID: 56649085035     PISSN: 17411009     EISSN: 17411017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/IJKL.2008.019739     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Adamopoulou, P., Sakkopoulos, E., Tsakalidis, A. and Lytras, M. (2007) ‘Web Service selection based on QoS knowledge management’, JUCS, Vol. 13, No. 9, pp.1138–1156.
2. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D. and Patel-Schneider, P. (2003) The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications, Cambridge University Press.
3. Barriocanal, E.G., Sicilia, M.A. and Lytras, M. (2006) Pedagogical Classification Frameworks for Learning Objects: A Case Study, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 23, No. 6, pp.2641–2655.
4. Cardoso, J. (2007) Semantic Web Services: Theory, Tools and Applications, Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
5. Daconta, M.C., Obrst, L.J. and Smith, K.T. (2003) The Semantic Web: A Guide to the Future of XML, Web Services, and Knowledge Management, Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.
6. Fensel, D. (2004) Ontologies: A Silver Bullet for Knowledge Management and Electronic Commerce, Heidelberg, DE: Springer.
7. Herrero, G. and Pariente, T. (2008) ‘Towards the use of Networked Ontologies for dealing with knowledge-intensive domains: a pharmaceutical case study’, in R. García (Ed.) Semantic Web for Business: Cases and Applications, Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
8. Kanellopoulos, D., Sakkopoulos, E., Lytras, M. and Tsakalidis, A. (2007) ‘Using web-based teaching interventions in computer science courses’, IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp.338–344.
9. Lacy, L.W. (2005) OWL: Representing Information Using the Web Ontology Language, Trafford Publishing.
10. Lytras, M. (2005) ‘Semantic web and information systems: an agenda based on discourse with community leaders’, International on Semantic Web and Information Systems, Inaugural Issue, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp.i–xii.
11. Lytras, M. (2006) ‘The Semantic Electronic Government: knowledge management for citizen relationship and new assessment scenarios’, Electronic Government, An International, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp.5–17.
12. Lytras, M. and Naeve, A. (2006) ‘Semantic e-learning: synthesizing fantasies’, British of Educational Technology, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp.479–491.
13. Lytras, M., Naeve, A. and Pouloudi, A. (2005a) ‘A knowledge management roadmap for e-learning: the way ahead’, International of Distance Education Technologies, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp.1–11.
14. Lytras, M., Naeve, A. and Pouloudi, A. (2005b) ‘Knowledge management as a reference theory for e-learning: a conceptual and technological perspective’, International of Distance Education Technologies, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp.66–73.
15. Lytras, M. and Pouloudi, N. (2006) ‘Towards the development of a novel taxonomy of knowledge management systems from a learning perspective’, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 10, No. 6, pp.64–80.
16. Lytras, M. and Sicilia, M. (2005) ‘Knowledge society a manifesto for knowledge and learning’, International of Knowledge and Learning, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp.1–11.
17. Lytras, M., Pouloudi, N. and Poulymenakou, A. (2002) ‘Dynamic e-learning settings through advanced semantics. The value justification of a knowledge management oriented metadata schema’, International on E-learning, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp.49–61.
18. Naeve, A., Lytras, M., Nejdl, W., Harding, J. and Balacheff, N. (2006) ‘Advances of Semantic Web for e-learning: expanding learning frontiers’, British of Educational Technology, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp.321–330.
19. Sakkopoulos, E., Lytras, M. and Tsakalidis, A. (2006) ‘Adaptive mobile web services facilitate communication and learning internet technologies’, IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp.208–215, ISI.
20. Sampson, D., Lytras, M., Wagner, G. and Diaz, P. (2004) ‘Ontologies and the semantic web for e-learning’, Education and Technology, Vol. 7, No. 4, October 2004, pp.26–28, ISI, Rankings, Impact Factor 2006:0.469.
21. Schroeder, M., Kaminker, J. and Wagner, G. (2003) Rules and Rule Markup Languages for the Semantic Web: Second International Workshop, RuleML 2003, Sanibel Island, FL, Heidelberg-Berlin, DE: Springer, 20 October.
22. Sicilia, M. and Lytras, M. (2005a) ‘Scenario-oriented reusable learning object characterizations’, International of Knowledge and Learning, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp.332–341.
23. Sicilia, M. and Lytras, M. (2005b) ‘The semantic learning organization’, The Learning Organization, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp.402–410.
24. Sicilia, M., Lytras, M., Rodríguez, E. and García-Barriocanal, E. (2006) ‘Integrating descriptions of knowledge management learning activities into large ontological structures: a case study’, Data & Knowledge Engineering, Vol. 57, No. 2, pp.111–121.
25. Tauberer, J. (2008) ‘What is RDF and what is it good for?’, http://www.rdfabout.com/intro.
26. Vossen, G., Lytras, M. and Koudas, N. (2007) ‘Knowledge and data engineering in the semantic web era’, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp.145–148.
27. Yu, L. (2007) Introduction to Semantic Web and Semantic Web Services, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
28. Oracle Semantic Technologies Center, http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/semantic_technologies.
29. TopBraid Composer, http://www.topquadrant.com/topbraid/composer.
30. Eclipse development platform, http://www.eclipse.org.