Challenges for digital library evaluation

Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting

Volumn 37, Issue , 2000, Pages 341-350

  Saracevic, Tefko ^a   Covi, Lisa ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042582787     PISSN: 00447870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bishop, A. P. (1998).Measuring access, use, and success in digital libraries. The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 4 (2). URL: http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/04-02/bishop.html
2. Bishop, A. P. (1999). Document structure and digital libraries: How researchers mobilize information in journal articles. Information Processing & Management, 35 (3) 255-279.
3. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
4. Borgman, C.L. (1999) What are digital libraries? Competing visions. Information Processing & Management, 35 (3) 227-243.
5. Buttenfield, B (1999). Usability evaluation of digital libraries. Science & Technology Libraries, 17 (3/4) 39-59
6. . Cornell University (1999). MESL technical report. URL: http://cidc.library.cornell.edu/gateway.htm
7. Digital Library Federation (1999). URL: http://www.clir.org/diglib/dlfhomepage.htm
8. Hill, L. L et al (2000) Alexandria Digital Library: User evaluation studies and system design Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51 (3) 246-259.
9. Kilker, J. & Gay. G. (1998) The social construction of a digital library: A case study examining implications for evaluation. Information Technology and Libraries, 17 (2), 60-70.
10. Lancaster, F.W. (1993). If you want to evaluate your library... Univ. of Illinois, Grad. School of Library and Information Science.
11. Lesk, M.E. (1997). Practical digital libraries: Books, bytes, and bucks. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman.
12. Licklider, J.C.R. (1965). Libraries of the future. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Mackie-Mason, J.K, Riveros, J. F., Bonn, M. S., & Lougee, W.P. (1999). A Report on the PEAK Experiment Usage and economic behavior. D-Lib Magazine, 5 (7/8) URL: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july99/mackie-mason/07mackie-mason.html
14. Marchionini, G. & Crane, G. (1994). Evaluating hypermedia and learning: Methods and results from the Perseus Project ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12(1), 5-34.
15. Marchionini, G.; Plaisant, C.; & Komlodi, A. (in press) The people in digital libraries: Multifaceted approaches to assessing needs and impact. Chapter in: Bishop, A. Buttenfield, B. & VanHouse, N. (Eds.) Digital library use: Social practice in design and evaluation. MIT Press. URL: http://ils.unc.edu/~march/revision.pdf
16. Saracevic, T. & Kantor, P. (1997). Studying the value of library and information services. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48 (6), 527-563.
17. Saracevic, T. (1999). Information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50 (12), 1051-1063.
18. nd ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries, 161-168.
19. Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction (3nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
20. Su, L. T. (1992). Evaluation measures for interactive information retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 28(4), 503-516.