Digital libraries: A generic classification and evaluation scheme

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2163, Issue , 2001, Pages 187-199

  Fuhr, Norbert ^a   Hansen, Preben ^b   Mabe, Michael ^c   Micsik, Andras ^d   Sølvberg, Ingeborg ^e  

^a TU DORTMUND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b SWEDISH INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER SCIENCE   (Sweden)

^c ELSEVIER MASSON   (France)

^d INSTITUTE FOR COMPUTER SCIENCE AND CONTROL   (Hungary)

^e NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SURVEYS;

CLASSIFICATION AND EVALUATIONS; DESCRIPTION SCHEMES; DIGITAL LIBRARIES (DLS);

DIGITAL LIBRARIES;

EID: 84931825819     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44796-2_17     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. C. Borgman. From Gutenberg to the Global Information Infrastructure: Access to Information in the Networked World. MIT Press, 2000.
2. B. Buttenfield. User evaluation for the alexandria digital library project. Allerton Inst. WS, http://edfu.lis.uiuc.edu/allerton/95/s2/buttenfield, 1995.
3. J. Cram. Six impossible things before breakfast: A multidimensional approach to measuring the value of libraries. In Proc. 3rd Northumbria Intl. Conf. on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services, pages 19–29, Newcastle upon Tyne, 1999. Information North.
4. P. Hernon and E. Altman. Service quality in academic libraries. Ablex, Norwood, NJ, 1996.
5. L Hill, Ron Dolin, James Frew, R.B. Kemp, M. Larsgaard, D.R. Montello, Mary- Anna Rae, and J. Simpson. User evaluation: Summary of the methodologies and results for the alexandria digital library. In Proc. ASIS, pages 225–243, Medford, NJ, 1997. Information Today.
6. L. Kovacs and A. Micsik. A public service for surveys and decision polls. In Proc. DEXA 2000, pages 307-311, September 2000.
7. Roberta Lamb. Using online information resources: Reaching for the *.*’s. In Digital Libraries’95 Conference Proceedings., New York, 1995. ACM.
8. T. K. Landauer. The Trouble with Computers: Usefulness, Usability, and Productivity. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1995.
9. G. Marchionini, C Plaisant, and A. Komlodi. The people in digital libraries: Multifaceted approaches to assessing needs and impact. In Digital library use: Social practice in design and evaluation. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2001. (in press).
10. J. Nielsen and R.L. Mack, editors. Usability Inspection Methods. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1994.
11. Catherine Plaisant and Anita Komlodi. Evaluation challenges for a federation of heterogeneous information providers: The case of nasa’s earth science information partnerships. In Proc. WET ICE 2000, IEEE WS on Evaluating Collaborative Enterprises, 2000.
12. J. Preece, Y. Rogers, H. Sharp, D. Benyon, S. Holland, and T. Carey. Human-Computer Interaction. Addison Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1994.
13. T. Saracevic and L. Covi. Challenges for digital library evaluation. In Proceedings ASIS, volume 37, pages 341–350, 2000.
14. E. Voorhees and D. Harman. Overview of the eighth text retrieval conference (trec-8). In The Eighth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-8), pages 1–24. NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2000.