Evaluation of a Digital Library by Means of Quality Function Deployment (QFD) and the Kano Model

Journal of Academic Librarianship

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 125-132

  Garibay, Cecilia ^a   Gutiérrez, Humberto ^a   Figueroa, Arturo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUADALAJARA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649192929     PISSN: 00991333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2010.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. G. Dryden, y J. Vos, La revolución del aprendizaje (Editorial Tomo, México, 2002).
2. Drucker P. Los desafíos de la administración en el siglo XXI (1999), Editorial Sudamericana, Buenos Aires
3. B. Gates, The road ahead (Ed. Viking Penguin, EUA. 1995).
4. Saarti J. Libraries without walls: information technology in finish public libraries from the 1970 s to the 1990s. Library History Vol. 22 1 (2006) 33-43
5. MacCall S. Clinical digital libraries project: design approach and exploratory assessment of timely use in clinical environments. Journal of the Medical Library Association vol. 94 2 (2006) 190-198
6. Zhou Q. The development of digital libraries in China and the shaping of digital libraries in China and the shaping of digital librarians. The Electronic Library vol. 23 4 (2005) 433-442
7. Wang Z. The digital library quality. SCI/TECH Information Development and Economy Vol. 13 1 (2003) 32-34
8. Sharma R.K., and Vishwanathan K.R. Digital libraries: development and challenges. Library Review Vol. 50 1 (2001) 10-16
9. ISO 9001:2000, Quality management systems-Requirements.
10. Houghton J. Research practices, evaluation and infrastructure in the digital environment. Australian Academic and Research Libraries 35 No. 3 (2004) 161-176
11. McCrea R. Evaluation of two library-based and one expert reference service on the web. Library Review 53 1 (2004) 11-16
12. Jeng J. What is usability in the context of the digital library and how can it be measured?. Information technology and libraries Vol. 24 2 (2005) 47-57
13. Cullen R. Perspectives on user satisfaction surveys. Library Trends 49 4 (2001) 662-686
14. Breeding M. Strategies for measuring and implementing E-use. Library Technology Reports Vol. 38 Iss 3 (2002) 1
15. Xia W. Digital library services: perceptions and expectations of user communities and librarians in a New Zealand academic library. Australian academic and research libraries 34 No. 1 (2003) 56-70
16. Banwell L., et al. The JISC user behaviour monitoring and evaluation framework. Journal of Documentation 60 3 (2004) 302-320
17. Bawden D. Digital Libraries: to met or manage user expectations. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives Vol. 58 No. 4 (2006) 346-354
18. Schryer S. Real simple? Exploring online user satisfaction in Michigan. Library Journal, Tomo 131 No. 18 (2006) 34
19. Kani-Zabihi E., et al. Digital libraries: what do users want?. Online Information Review Vol. 30 Iss 4 (2006) 395-412
20. Parasurama A., Zeithaml V.A., and Berry L.L. SERVQUAL: A multiple item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing 64 1 (1998) 12-40
21. Van Dyke T.P., Prybutok V.R., and Kappelman L.A. Cautions on the use of the Servqual measure to assess the quality of information systems services. Decision Sciences Vol. 30 3 (1999) 877-891
22. Beck, Susan. Evaluation criteria. The good, the bad and the ugly: or why it's a good idea to evaluate web sources. Available: http://lib.nmsu.edu/instruction/evalcrit.html (May 5, 2005).
23. University of Alberta libraries. Critical evaluation of resources and the Internet. Available: http://www.library.ualberta.ca/guides/criticalevaluation/index.cfm (May 2, 2005).
24. Lopez Cordero M.G. (2003). La experiencia de validar un instrumento para evaluar revistas academicas electronicas en internet. Razon y Palabra, febrero-marzo; No. 31. Available: http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/anteriores/n31/mlopez.html. (May 2, 2005).
25. Sullivan L.P. Quality function deployment. Quality Progress 19 (1986) 39-50
26. D.L. Goetsch, Introduction to total quality (Ed. Macmillan Coll Div, EUA, 1994).
27. Tan K.C., and Shen X.X. Integrating Kano's model in the planning matrix of quality function deployment. Total quality management vol. 11 8 (2000) 1141-1152
28. Jiang J.C., Shiu M.L., and Tu M.H. QFD's evolution in Japan and the West. Quality Progress 40 7 (2007) 30-37
29. Kano N., Seraku K., Takahashi F., and Tsuji S. Attractive quality and must-be quality Hinshitsu Quality. The Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control vol. 14 No. 2 (1984) 39-48
30. Matzler K., and Hinterhuber H.H. How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano's model of costumer satisfaction into quality function deployment. Technovation 18 (1998) 25-38
31. Tan K.C., and Pawitra T.A. Integrating SERVQUAL and Kano's model into QFD for service excellence development. Managing Service Quality 11 6 (2001) 418-430
32. Asociación Mexicana de Bibliotecarios, A.C. (2003). La satisfaccion de los usuarios en la recuperacion de informacion en las bases de datos. Available: http://www.ambac.org.mx/publicaciones/V4N3art1.html. (May 2, 2005).
33. P. Mayfield, (2007). Introduction to quality function deployment, www.SigmaZone.com, (April 20, 2009).