Streams, structures, spaces, scenarios, societies (5S): A formal model for digital libraries

ACM Transactions on Information Systems

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 270-312

  Gonçalves, Marcos André ^a,b   Fox, Edward A ^a   Watson, Layne T ^a   Kipp, Neill A ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Applications; Definitions; Foundations; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX INFORMATION SYSTEMS; DEFINITIONS; FORMAL ANALYSIS; TAXONOMY;

DATA STORAGE EQUIPMENT; GRAPH THEORY; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; METADATA; SET THEORY; TOPOLOGY; VECTORS;

DIGITAL LIBRARIES;

EID: 3042786480     PISSN: 10468188     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/984321.984325     Document Type: Article

References (125)

1. ABITEBOUL, S., BUNEMAN, P., AND SUCIU, D. 1999. Data on the Web - From Relations to Semistructured Data and XML. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, Calif.
2. ABITEBOUL, S., QUASS, D., MCHUGH, J., WIDOM, J., AND WIENER, J. L. 1997. The Lorel query language for semistructured data. Int. J. Digit. Lib. 1, 1 (Apr.) 5-19.
3. ABRAMS, M., PHANOURIOU, C., BATONGBACAL, A. L., WILLIAMS, S. M., AND SHUSTER, J. E. 1999. UIML: An appliance-independent XML user interface language. Comput. Net. (Amsterdam, Netherlands: 1999) 31, 11-16 (May), 1695-1708.
4. ANDERSON, K. M., ANDERSEN, A., WADHWANI, N., AND BARTOLO, L. M. 2003. Metis: Lightweight, flexible, und web-based workflow services for digital libraries. In Proceedings of the 3rd Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (Houston, Tex.), 98-103.
5. ATKINS, A., Fox, E., FRANCE, R., AND SULEMAN, H. 2001. Interoperability metadata standard for electronic theses and dissertations. http://www.ndltd.org/ standards/metadata/current.html.
6. ATKINS, D. L., BALL, T., BRUNS, G., AND COX, K. 1999. Mawl: A domain-specific language for form-based services. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 25, 3 (May/June), 334-346.
7. BAEZA-YATES, R. AND NAVARRO, G. 2000. XQL and Proximal Nodes. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR 2000 - Workshop on XML and Information Retrieval (Athens, Greece, July). ACM, New York, Reading, Mass.
8. BAEZA-YATES, R. AND RIBEIRO-NETO, B. 1999. Modern Information Retrieval. Addison-Wesley.
9. BAYLEY, K. D. 1994. Typologies and Taxonomies - An Introduction to Classification Techniques. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif.
10. BAYRAKTAR, M., ZHANG, C., VADAPALLI, B., KIPP, N. A., AND FOX, E. A. 1998. A web art gallery. In DL'98: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries (Pittsburgh, Pa.) ACM, New York, 277-278.
11. BEERI, C. 1990. A formal approach to object-oriented databases. IEEE DKE 5, 353-382.
12. BELKIN, N. J., ODDY, R. N., AND BROOKS, H. M. 1982. ASK for information retrieval. J. Document. 33, 2 (June), 61-71.
13. BERNERS-LEE, T., HENDLER, J., AND LASSILA, O. 2001. The semantic web. Sci. Amer. 284, 5 (May).
14. BOOCH, G. 1999. UML in action. Commun. ACM 42, 10, 26-28.
15. BORGMAN, C. L. 1999. What are digital libraries? competing visions. Inf. Proc. Manage. 35, 3 (Jan.), 227-243.
16. BORLUND, P. AND INGWERSEN, P. 1997. The development of a method for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. J. Document. 53, 3 (June), 225-250.
17. CASTELLI, D., MEGHINI, C., AND PAGANO, P. 2002. Foundations of a multidimensional query language for digital libraries. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2458. Springer-Verlag, New York, 251-265.
18. CATTELL, R. G. G., ATWOOD, T., DUBL, J., FERRAN, G., LOOMIS, M., AND WADE, D. 1994. The Object Database Standard: ODMG. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Los Altos, Calif.
19. CLARKE, C. L., CORMACK, G. V., AND BURKOWSKI, F. J. 1995. An algebra for structured text search and a framework for its implementation. Comput. J. 38, 43-56.
20. CODD, E. F. 1970. A relational model for large shared data banks. Commun. ACM 13, 6, 377-387.
21. COOMBS, J. H., RENEAR, A. H., AND DEROSE, S. J. 1988. Markup systems and the future of scholarly text processing. Commun. ACM 30, 11, 933-947.
22. CORMEN, T. H., LEISERSON, C. E., AND RIVEST, R. L. 1990. Introduction to Algorithms. MIT Press/McGraw-Hill, Cambridge, Mass.
23. CRABTREE, A., TWIDALE, M. B., O'BRIEN, J., AND NICHOLS, D. M. 1997. Talking in the library: Implications for the design of digital libraries. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries. (New York), ACM, New York, 221-229.
24. CRESTANI, F., LALMAS, M., VAN RIJSBERGEN, C. J., AND CAMPBELL, I. 1998. "Is this document relevant?... probably": A survey of probabilistic models in information retrieval. ACM Comput. Surv. 30, 4 (Dec.), 528-552.
25. DAVIS, L. AND DAWE, M. 2001. Collaborative design with use case scenarios. In JCDL'01: Proceedings of the 1st Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (Roanoke, Va.), 146-147.
26. DAVIS, M. D., SIGAL, R., AND WEYUKER, E. J. 1994. Computation, Complexity, and Languages (2nd ed.). Academic Press, Orlando, Fla.
27. DE OLIVEIRA, M. C. F., TURINE, M. A. S., AND MASIERO, P. C. 2001. A statechart-based model for hypermedia applications. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 19, 1, 28-52.
28. DOMTEAM. 2003. Document object model (DOM) homepage. http://www.w3.org/ DOM/.
29. DONG, A. AND AGOGINO, A. M. 2001. Design principles for the information architecture of a SMET education digital library. In Proceedings of the 1st Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (Roanoke, Va.). 314-321.
30. DUSHAY, N. 2001. Using structural metadata to localize experience of digital content. Tech. Rep. cs.DL/0112017, The Computing Research Repository (CoRR).
31. ELLIS, D. 1992. The physical and cognitive paradigms in information retrieval research. J. Document. 48, 45-64.
32. FLANAGAN, J. W., FOX, E. A., AND FAN, W. 2003. Managing complex information applications: An archaeology digital library. http://feathers.dlib. vt.edu/.
33. FOSKETT, D. J. 1980. Thesaurus. In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science - Volume 30. Marcel Dekker, New York, 416-462.
34. FOX, E. A., AKSCYN, R. M., FURUTA, R. K., AND LEGGETT, J. J. 1995. Digital libraries. Commun. ACM 38, 4, 22-28.
35. FOX, E. A., EATON, J. L., MCMILLAN, G., KIPP, N. A., MATHER, P., MCGONIGLE, T., SCHWEIKER, W., AND DEVANE, B. 1997. Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations: An international effort unlocking university resources. D-Lib Mag. 3, 9 (Sept).
36. FOX, E. A. AND MARCHIONINI, G. 1998. Toward a worldwide digital library. Commun. ACM 41, 4, 22-28.
37. FRANCE, R. K., GONÇALVES, M. A., AND FOX, E. A. 2002. MARIAN digital library system. http://www.dlib.vt.edu/products/marian.html.
38. FUHR, N. AND GROBJOHANN, K. 2004. XIRQL - an XML query language based on information retrieval concepts. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. (accepted).
39. FUHR, N. 2000. XIRQL - An extension of XQL for information retrieval. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR 2000 - Workshop on XML and Information Retrieval (Athens, Greece, July). ACM, New York.
40. FURUTA, R. 1994. Defining and using structure in digital documents. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on the Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (College Station, Tex.).
41. FURUTA, R., QUINT, V., AND ANDRE, J. 1989. Interactively editing structured documents. Electron. Pub. - Origination, Dissemination, and Design 1, 1 (Apr.), 19-44.
42. GARZA-SALAZAR, D. A. 2001. Phronesis. http://copernico.mty.itesm.mx/ tempo/Proyectos/.
43. GLADNEY, H., FOX, E. A., AHMED, Z., ASHANY, R., BELKIN, N. J., AND ZEMANKOVA, M. 1994. Digital library: Gross Structure and Requirements: Report from a March 1994 Workshop. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on the Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (Texas), 101-107.
44. GLADNEY, H. M. AND CANTU, A. 2001. Authorization management for digital libraries. Commun. ACM 44, 5, 63-65.
45. GODEMENT, R. 1969. Algebra. Kershaw Publ. Co. Ltd, London, England.
46. GOH, D. AND LEGGETT, J. 2000. Patron-augmented digital libraries. In DL'00: Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries (San Antonio, Tex.). 153-163.
47. GOLDFARB, C. F. AND PRESCOD, P. 1998. The XML Handbook. Prentice-Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458, USA.
48. GONÇALVES, M. A. 2003. Digital libraries: Formal theory, language, design, generation, quality and evaluation. Ph.D. preliminary exam, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.
49. GONÇALVES, M. A. AND Fox, E. A. 2002. 5SL - A language for declarative specification and generation of digital libraries. In Proceedings of the 2nd Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL'2002) (Portland, Ore.). 263-272.
50. GONÇALVES, M. A., Fox, E. A., WATSON, L. T., AND KIPP, N. 2003. Streams, structures, spaces, scenarios, societies (5S): A formal model for digital libraries. Tech. Rep. 03-04, Virginia Tech.
51. GONÇALVES, M. A., FRANCE, R. K., AND Fox, E. A. 2001a. MARIAN: Flexible Interoperability for federated digital libraries. In Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (Darmsdadt, Germany), Springer-Verlag, New York, 173-186.
52. GONÇALVES, M. A., MATHER, P., WANG, J., ZHOU, Y., LUO, M., RICHARDSON, R., SHEN, R., XU, L., AND FOX, E. A. 2002. Java MARIAN: From an OPAC to a modern digital library system. In Proceedings of SPIRE'02 (Lisbon, Portugal), 194-209.
53. GONÇALVES, M. A., ZAFER, A. A., RAMAKRISHNAN, N., AND FOX, E. A. 2001, Modeling and building personalized digital libraries with PIPE and 5SL. In Proceedings of the Joint DELOS-NSF Workshop on Personalization and Recommender Systems in Digital Libraries (Dublin, Ireland).
54. HEATH, L. S., HIX, D., NOWELL, L. T., WAKE, W. C., AVERBOCH, G. A., LABOW, E., GUYER, S. A., BRUENI, D. J., FRANCE, R. K., DALAL, K., AND Fox, E. A. 1995. ENVISION: A user-centered database of computer science literature. Commun. ACM 38, 4, 52-53.
55. HSIA, P., SAMUEL, J., GAO, J., KUNG, D., TOYOSHIMA, Y., AND CHEN, C. 1994. Formal approach to scenario analysis. IEEE Softw. 11, 2 (Mar.), 33-41.
56. JONES, K. S. AND WILLETT, P., Eds. 1997. Readings in Information Retrieval. Multimedia Information and Systems. Morgan-Kaufmann, San Mateo, Calif.
57. KAHIN, B. AND VARIAN, H. R. 2000. Internet Publishing and Beyond: The Economics of Digital Information and Intellectual Property. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
58. KALINICHENKO, L. A., BRIUKHOV, D. O., SKVORTSOV, N. A., AND ZAKHAROV, V. N. 2000. Infrastructure of the subject mediating environment aiming at semantic interoperability of heterogeneous digital library collections. In Proceedings of the 2nd Russian Scientific Conference on Digital Libraries: Advanced Methods and Technologies.
59. KAUTZ, H., SELMAN, B., AND SHAH, M. 1997. Referral web: Combining social networks and collaborative filtering. Commun. ACM 40, 3, 63-65.
60. KELAPURE, R., GONÇALVES, M. A., AND Fox, E. A. 2003. Scenario-based generation of digital library services. In Proceedings 7th European Conference Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (ECDL). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2760, Springer-Verlag, New York. (Trondheim, Norway).
61. KOCHTANEK, T. AND HEIN, K. K. 1999. Delphi study of digital libraries. Inf. Proc. Manage. 35, 3, 245-254.
62. KYING, M. 1995. Creating contexts for design. In Scenario-Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development. Wiley, New York.
63. LAENDER, A. H. F., RIBEIRO-NETO, B. A., AND DA SILVA, A. S. 2002. DEByE - Data extraction by example. Data Knowl. Eng. 40, 2, 121-154.
64. LAGOZE, C. 1996. The Warwick framework: A container architecture for diverse sets of metadata. D-Lib Mag. 2, 7 (July 15).
65. LAGOZE, C. AND DE SOMPEL, H. V. 2001. The Open Archives Initiative. In Proceedings of the 1st Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL'2001) (Roanoke, Va.). 54-62.
66. LAMSWEERDE, A. V. AND WILLEMET, L. 1998. Inferring declarative requirements specifications from operational scenarios. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 24, 12 (Dec.), 1089-1114.
67. LESK, M. 1999. Expanding digital library research: Media, genre, place and subjects. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Digital Libraries 1999: ISDL'99 (Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan).
68. LEVY, D. M. AND MARSHALL, C. C. 1995. Going digital: a look at assumptions underlying digital libraries. Commun. ACM 38, 8, 77-84.
69. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS. 2003. METS - Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard, http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/.
70. LICKLIDER, J. C. R. 1965. Libraries of the Future. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
71. LORIE, R. A. 2001. Long term preservation of digital information. In Proceedings of the 1st Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL'2001) (Roanoke, Va.). 346-352.
72. LUCARELLA, D. AND ZANZI, A. 1996. A visual retrieval environment for hypermedia information systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 14, 1 (Jan.), 3-29.
73. MACKAY, W. E. AND BEAUDOUIN-LAFON, M. 1998. DIVA exploratory data analysis with multimedia streams. In Proceedings of CHI-98 (Los Angeles, Calif.). 416-423.
74. MILLER, T. 1999. Annotation system for a collection of ETDs. http://www.ndltd.org/ndltd-sc/990416/annsystem.pdf.
75. NAVARRO, G. AND BAEZA-YATES, R. 1997. Proximal nodes: A model to query document databases by content and structure. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 15, 4, 400-435.
76. NDLTD. 2003. Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations, http://www.ndltd.org.
77. NELSON, M. L. AND MALY, K. 2001. Buckets: Smart objects for digital libraries. Commun. ACM 44, 5, 60-61.
78. NESTOROV, S., ABITEBOUL, S., AND MOTWANI, R. 1997. Inferring structure in semistructured data. SIGMOD Rec. 26, 4, 39-43.
79. NEVES, F. D. AND Fox, E. A. 2000. A study of user behavior in an immersive virtual environment for digital libraries. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Digital Libraries (ACM DL'00). ACM, New York, 103-112.
80. OAI. 2001. Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting - v.2.0. http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/openarchivesprotocol.html.
81. OARD, D., PETERS, C., RUIZ, M., FREDERKING, R., KLAVANB, J., AND SHERIDAN, P. 1999. Multilingual Information Discovery and AccesS (MIDAS): A joint ACM DL'99/ACM SIGIR'99 workshop. D-Lib Mag. 5, 10 (Oct. 15).
82. OBERWEIS, A. AND SANDER, P. 1996. Information system behavior specification by high-level Petri nets. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 14, 4 (Oct.), 380-420.
83. OGAWA, R., HARADA, H., AND KANEKO, A. 1990. Scenario-based hypermedia: A model and a system. In Proceedings of the (ECHT'90) European Conference on Hypertext. 38-51.
84. PRINCE, R., SU, J., TANG, H., AND ZHAO, Y. 1999. The design of an interactive online help desk in the Alexandria Digital Library. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Work Activities and Collaboration (WACC '99). (San Francisco, Calif.). 217-226.
85. RAMAKRISHNAN, N. 2000. PIPE: Web personalization by partial evaluation. IEEE Internet Comput. 4, 6, 21-31.
86. RANGANATUAN, S. R. 1965. A Descriptive Account of Colon Classification. Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science, Bangalore, India.
87. REDDY, R. AND WLADAWSKY-BERGER, I. 2001. Digital libraries: Universal access to human knowledge - A report to the president. President's Information Technology Advisory Committee (PITAC), Panel on Digital Libraries, http://www.itrd.gov/pubs/pitac/pitac-dl-9feb01.pdf.
88. ROBERTSON, S. E. 1977. The probability ranking principle in IR. Doc. J. 33, 294-304.
89. ROBERTSON, S. E. AND JONES, K. S. 1976. Relevance weighting of search terms. J. ASIS 27, 3 (May-June), 129-146.
90. ROSSON, M. B. 1999. Integrating development of task and object models. Commun. ACM 42, 1, 49-56.
91. ROSSON, M. B. AND CARROLL, J. M. 1996. Object-oriented design from user scenarios. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI 96 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 342-343.
92. SALTON, G. AND LESK, M. E. 1965. The SMART automatic document retrieval system - An illustration. Commun. ACM 8, 6, 391-398.
93. SALTON, G., WONG, A., AND YANG, C. S. 1975. A vector space model for automatic indexing. Commun. ACM 18, 11, 613-620.
94. SARACEVIC, T. 1975. Relevance: a review and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. J. ASIS 26, 321-343.
95. SCHAUBLE, P. AND SMEATON, A. F. 1998. Summary report of the series of joint NSF-EU working groups on future directions for digital library research: An international research agenda for digital libraries, http://www.ercim.org/ publication/ws-proceedings.
96. SCHWARTZ, M. F. AND WOOD, D. C. M. 1993. Discovering shared interests using graph analysis. Commun. ACM 36, 8, 78.
97. SHACKELFORD, D. E., SMITH, J. B., AND SMITH, F. D. 1993. The architecture and implementation of a distributed hypermedia storage system. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Hypertext. 1-13.
98. SHANNON, C. E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379-423, 623-656.
99. SILVA DE MOURA, E., NAVARRO, G., ZIVIANI, N., AND BAEZA-YATBS, R. 2000. Fast and flexible word searching on compressed text. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 18, 2 (Apr.), 113-139.
100. SINGHAL, M. AND SHIVARATRI, N. 1994. Advanced Concepts in Operating Systems: Distributed, Database, and Multiprocessor Operating Systems. McGraw-Hill, New York.
101. SPIVEY, J. 1988. Introducing Z: A Specification Language and its Formal Semantics. Cambridge University Press.
102. STAPLES, T., WAYLAND, R., AND PAYETTE, S. 2003. The FEDORA project - An open-source digital object repository management system. D-Lib Maga. 9, 4 (Apr.).
103. SUTCLIFFE, A. 1997. A technique combination approach to requirements engineering. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (Annapolis, Md.). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, Calif., 65-77.
104. SUTCLIFFE, A. G., MAIDEN, N. A. M., MINOCHA, S., AND MANUEL, D. 1998. Supporting scenario-based requirements engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 24, 12, 1072-1088.
105. TAGUE, J., SALMINEN, A., AND MCCLELLAN, C. 1991. Complete formal model for information systems. In Proceedings of the 14th annual International ACM/SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. (Chicago, Ill.). ACM, New York, 14-20.
106. TANSLEY, R., BASS, M., STUVE, D., BRANSCHOFSKY, M., CHUDNOV, D., MCCLELLAN, G., AND SMITH, M. 2003. DSpace: An institutional digital repository system. In Proceedings of the 3rd Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. (Houston, Tex.). 87-97.
107. TURTLE, H. AND CROFT, W. B. 1991. Evaluation of an inference network-based retrieval model. ACM Trans. Inf. Sys. 9, 3, 187.
108. ULLMAN, J. D. 1988. Principles of Database and Knowledge-Base Systems. Volume I: Classical Database Systems. Computer Science Press, Rockville, Md.
109. VICKERY, B. C. 1965. Faceted classification schemes. In Rutgers Series for the Intellectual Organization of Information - Volume 5. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, N.J.
110. VTLS. 2001. VTLS. http://www.vtls.com.
111. W3C. 1998. Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification, http:// www.w3.org/TR/WD-rdf-syntax/.
112. W3C. 2000a. Resource Description Framework (RDF) Schema Specification 1.0. http://www.w3. org/TR/2000/CR-rdf-schema-20000327/.
113. W3C. 2000b. XML Schema Part 0: Primer, W3C Working Draft. http://www.w3.org/TR/ xmlschema-0.
114. W3C. 2001. Mathematical Markup Language (MathML). http://www.w3.org/Math/ .
115. WANG, B. 1999. A hybrid system approach for supporting digital libraries. Int. J. Dig. Lib. 2, 2-3, 91-110.
116. WANG, W. AND RADA, R. 1998. Structured hypertext with domain semantics. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 16, 4 (Oct.), 372-412.
117. WIEDERHOLD, G. 1995. Digital libraries, value, and productivity. Commun. ACM 38, 4, 85-96.
118. WILKISON, R. AND FULLER, M. 1996. Integration of information retrieval and hypertext via structure. In Inf. Ret. Hyper. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 257-271.
119. WINSKEL, G. 1993. The Formal Semantics of Programming Languages: An Introduction. Foundations of Computing Series. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
120. WITTEN, I. H., MCNAB, R. J., BODDIE, S. J., AND BAINBRIDGE, D. 2000. Greenstone: A comprehensive open-source digital library software system. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries. (San Antonio, Tex.). ACM, New York, 113-121.
121. YAN, T. W. AND GARCIA-MOLINA, H. 1999. The SIFT information dissemination system. ACM Trans. Datab. Syst. 24, 4, 529-565.
122. ZHU, Q., GONÇALVES, M. A., SHEN, R., CASSELL, L., AND FOX, E. A. 2003. Visual semantic modeling of digital libraries. In Proceedings 7th European Conference Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (ECDL). (Trondheim, Norway). Lecture Notes on Computer Science, vol. 2769. Springer-Verlag, New York.
123. ZIA, L. L. 2001. The NSF National Science, Mathematics, Enginnering, and Technology Education Digital Library Program. Commun. ACM 44, 5, 83.
124. ZIVIANI, N., DE MOURA, E. S., NAVARRO, G., AND BAEZA-YATES, R. 2000. Compression: A key for next-generation text retrieval systems. IEEE Comput. 33, 11 (Nov.), 37-44.
125. ZUBAIR, M., MALY, K., AMEERALLY, I., AND NELSON, M. 2000. Dynamic construction of federated digital libraries. In Proceedings of the 9th International World Wide Web Conference Amsterdam, The Netherlands.