Evaluating digital libraries: A longitudinal and multifaceted view

Library Trends

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 304-333

  Marchionini, Gary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034257331     PISSN: 00242594     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Bednarz, D. (1985). Quantity and quality in evaluation research: A divergent view. Evaluation and Program Planning, 8(4), 289-306.
2. Bloom, B., & Krathwahl D. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, by a committee of college and university examiners: Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: Longmans Green.
3. Campbell, D. (1979). "Degrees of freedom" and the case study. In T. Cook & C. Reichardt (Eds.), Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research (pp. 49-67). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4. Chavez, R. (2000). Generating and reintegrating geospatial data. In R. Furuta (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Digital Libraries (San Antonio, TX, June 2-7, 2000) (pp. 250-251). New York: ACM Press.
5. Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and the world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Clark, R. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445-459.
7. Cook, T., & Reichardt, C. (Eds.). (1979). Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8. Crane, G. (1988). Redefining the book: Some preliminary problems. Academic Computing, 2(5), 6-11, 36-41.
9. Crane, G. (Ed.). (n.d.-a). The Perseus Project. Retrieved August 29, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu.
10. Crane, G. (Ed.). (n.d.-b). Information about Perseus. The Perseus Project. Retrieved August 29, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/PerseusInfo.html.
11. Crane, G., & Mylonas, E. (1988). The Perseus Project: An interactive curriculum on classical Greek civilization. Educational Technology, 28(11), 25-32.
12. Crane, G., & Rydberg-Cox, J. (2000). New technology and new roles: The need for "corpus editors." In R. Furuta (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Digital Libraries (San Antonio, TX, June 2-7, 2000) (pp. 252-253). New York: ACM Press.
13. Daniels, M., & Chavez, R. (1999). A guide to photographing architecture, monuments, sites, and topography. Retrieved August 29, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.stoa.org/guides/sitestds.shtml.
14. Ericsson, K., & Simon, H. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
15. Evans, P. (1993). The enabling and disabling effects of a hypermedia information environment on information seeking and use in an undergraduate course. Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland at College Park. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54(10), 3621A.
16. Flagg, B. (1990). Formative evaluation for educational technologies. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Griffiths, J-M., & King, D. (1991). A manual for the evaluation of information centers and services (AGARDograph No. 310). New York: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Technical Information Service.
18. Harter, S., & Hert, C. (1997). Evaluation of information retrieval systems: Approaches, issues, and methods. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 32, 3-94.
19. Hert, C., & Marchionini, G. (1997). Seeking statistical information in federal Websites: Users, tasks, strategies, and design recommendations. Final report to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, July 1997. Retrieved August 29, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://ils.unc.edu/~march/blsreport/mainbls.html.
20. Kauffman, S. (1995). At home in the universe: The search for laws of self-organization and complexity. New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Kozma, R. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179-211.
22. Marchionini, G. (1995). The costs of educational technology: A framework for assessing change. In H. Maurer (Ed.), Educational multimedia and hypermedia, 1995 (Proceedings of ED-MEDIA '95 - World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, Graz, Austria, June 20, 1995) (pp. 33-38). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. Also available on the World Wide Web at: http://ils.unc.edu/~march/costet/costet.html.
23. Marchionini, G., & Crane, G. (1994). Evaluating hypermedia and learning: Methods and results from the Perseus Project. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12(1), 5-34.
24. Marchionini, G., & Fox, E. (1999). Progress toward digital libraries: Augmentation through integration. Information Processing & Management, 35(3), 219-225.
25. Marchionini, G.; Neuman, D.; & Morrell, K. (1994). Directed and undirected tasks in hypermedia: Is variety the spice of learning? In T. Ottman & I. Tomek (Eds.), Educational multimedia and hypermedia, 1994 (Proceedings of ED-MEDIA '94 - World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, Vancouver, BC, June 25-30, 1994) (pp. 373-378). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
26. Marchionini, G.; Neuman, D.; & Morrell, K. (1989). Perseus evaluation plan. Unpublished Perseus Project Working Paper Number 5, Dec. 1989.
27. Marchionini, G.; Plaisant, C.; & Komlodi, A. (forthcoming). The people in digital libraries: Multifaceted approaches to assessing needs and impact. In A. Bishop, B. Buttenfield, & N. VanHouse (Eds.), Digital library use: Social practice in design and evaluation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Marchionini, G.; Scaife, R.; & Crane, G. (2000). Final evaluation on the Perseus Project publication model, 1997-2000. Retrieved September 12, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.ils. une. edu/~march/perseus/final_report.pdf.
29. Morrell, K.; Marchionini, G.; & Neuman, D. (1993). Sailing Perseus: Instructional strategies for hypermedia in the classics. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 2(4), 337-353.
30. Mylonas, E. (1987). Using Perseus in a variety of educational settings. (Perseus Working Papers, 2), Cambridge, MA, December, 1987.
31. Neuman, D. (1991). Evaluating evolution: Naturalistic inquiry and the Perseus Project. Computers and the Humanities, 25(4), 239-246.
32. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. Boston: Academic Press.
33. Rossman, G., & Wilson, B. (1985). Numbers and words: Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a single large-scale evaluation study. Evaluation Review, 9(5), 627-643.
34. Salomon, G. (1979). Interaction of media, cognition, and learning: An exploration of how symbolic forms cultivate mental skills and affect knowledge acquisition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
35. Saxton, M. (1997). Reference service evaluation and meta-analysis: Findings and methodological issues. Library Quarterly, 67(3), 267-289.
36. Suchman, E. (1967). Evaluative research: Principles and practice in public service and social action programs. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
37. Timble, P. S. (2000). A question of trust. Federal Computer Week. Retrieved August 29, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.fcw.com/fcw/articles/2000/0522/pol-trust-05-22-00.asp.
38. Voorhees, E., & Harman, D. (2000). Overview of the sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6). Information Processing & Management, 36(1), 3-35.
39. White, H., & McCain, K. (1989). Bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 24, 119-186.
40. Williams, D. (Ed.) (1986). Naturalistic evaluation (New directions for program evaluation, No. 30). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.