Genome editing in zebrafish: A practical overview

Briefings in Functional Genomics

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 322-330

  Sertori, Robert ^b   Trengove, Monique ^b   Basheer, Faiza ^b   Ward, Alister C ^a   Liongue, Clifford ^b  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b NONE

Author keywords

CRISPR; Genome editing; HDR; TALENs; Zebrafish; Zinc finger nucleases

Indexed keywords

DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; TRANSCRIPTION ACTIVATOR LIKE EFFECTOR NUCLEASE; ZINC FINGER NUCLEASE;

ARTICLE; CLUSTERED REGULARLY INTERSPACED SHORT PALINDROMIC REPEAT; DNA END JOINING REPAIR; DNA MODIFICATION; DNA REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; ELECTROPHORESIS; GENE SEQUENCE; GENE TARGETING; GENETIC SCREENING; GENOME ANALYSIS; GENOME EDITING; HIGH RESOLUTION MELTING ANALYSIS; HOMOLOGY DEPENDENT REPAIR; MICROHOMOLOGY END JOINING; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; NONHUMAN; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; QUANTITATIVE ASSAY; RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; WORKFLOW; ZEBRA FISH; ANIMAL; CRISPR CAS SYSTEM; GENE EDITING; GENETICS; GENOME; PROCEDURES;

ANIMALS; CRISPR-CAS SYSTEMS; GENE EDITING; GENOME; ZEBRAFISH;

EID: 84980041512     PISSN: 20412649     EISSN: 20412657     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/elv051     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Lieschke GJ, Currie PD. Animal models of human disease: zebrafish swim into view. Nat Rev Genet 2007;8:353-67.
2. Mullins MC, Hammerschmidt M, Haffter P, et al. Largescale mutagenesis in the zebrafish: in search of genes controlling development in a vertebrate. Curr Biol 1994;4:189-202.
3. Patton EE, Zon LI. The art and design of genetic screens: zebrafish. Nat Rev Genet 2001;2:956-66.
4. Gibert Y, Trengove MC, Ward AC. Zebrafish as a genetic model in pre-clinical drug testing and screening. Curr Med Chem 2013;20:2458-66.
5. Bill BR, Petzold AM, Clark KJ, et al. A primer for morpholino use in zebrafish. Zebrafish 2009;6:69-77.
6. Kettleborough RN, Bruijn E, Eeden F, et al. High-throughput target-selected gene inactivation in zebrafish. Methods Cell Biol 2011;104:121-7.
7. Hogan BM, Verkade H, Lieschke GJ, et al. Manipulation of gene expression during zebrafish embryonic development using transient approaches. Methods Mol Biol 2008;469: 273-300.
8. Mosimann C, Zon LI. Advanced zebrafish transgenesis with Tol2 and application for Cre/lox recombination experiments. Methods Cell Biol 2011;104:173-94.
9. Miller JC, Holmes MC, Wang J, et al. An improved zinc-finger nuclease architecture for highly specific genome editing. Nat Biotechnol 2007;25:778-85.
10. Porteus MH, Baltimore D. Chimeric nucleases stimulate gene targeting in human cells. Science 2003;300:763.
11. Christian M, Cermak T, Doyle EL, et al. Targeting DNA doublestrand breaks with TAL effector nucleases. Genetics 2010;186:757-61.
12. Wood AJ, Lo TW, Zeitler B, et al. Targeted genome editing across species using ZFNs and TALENs. Science 2011;333:307.
13. Cade L, Reyon D, Hwang WY, et al. Highly efficient generation of heritable zebrafish gene mutations using homo-and heterodimeric TALENs. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40:8001-10.
14. Deveau H, Garneau JE, Moineau S. CRISPR/Cas system and its role in phage-bacteria interactions. Ann Rev Microbio 2010;64:475-93.
15. Horvath P, Barrangou R. CRISPR/Cas, the immune system of bacteria and archaea. Science 2010;327:167-70.
16. Hwang WY, Fu Y, Reyon D, et al. Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotechnol 2013;31:227-9.
17. Kim YG, Cha J, Chandrasegaran S. Hybrid restriction enzymes: zinc finger fusions to Fok I cleavage domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:1156-60.
18. Wolfe SA, Nekludova L, Pabo CO. DNA recognition by Cys2His2 zinc finger proteins. Ann Rev Biophys Biomol Structure 2000;29:183-212.
19. Doyon Y, McCammon JM, Miller JC, et al. Heritable targeted gene disruption in zebrafish using designed zinc-finger nucleases. Nat Biotechnol 2008;26:702-8.
20. Meng X, Noyes MB, Zhu LJ, et al. Targeted gene inactivation in zebrafish using engineered zinc-finger nucleases. Nat Biotechnol 2008;26:695-701.
21. Urnov FD, Rebar EJ, Holmes MC, et al. Genome editing with engineered zinc finger nucleases. Nat Rev Genet 2010;11:636-46.
22. Gaj T, Gersbach CA, Barbas CF, III. ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/ Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotech 2013;31:397-405.
23. McCammon JM, Doyon Y, Amacher SL. Inducing high rates of targeted mutagenesis in zebrafish using Zinc Finger Nucleases (ZFNs). Meth Mol Biol 2011;770:505-27.
24. Carroll D, Morton JJ, Beumer KJ, et al. Design, construction and in vitro testing of zinc finger nucleases. Nat Protoc 2006;1:1329-41.
25. Sood R, Carrington B, Bishop K, et al. Efficient methods for targeted mutagenesis in zebrafish using zinc-finger nucleases: data from targeting of nine genes using CompoZr or CoDA ZFNs. PLoS One 2013;8:e57239.
26. Sander JD, Maeder ML, Reyon D, et al. ZiFiT (Zinc Finger Targeter): an updated zinc finger engineering tool. Nucleic Acids Res 2010;38:W462-8.
27. Sander JD, Dahlborg EJ, Goodwin MJ, et al. Selection-free zincfinger-nuclease engineering by context-dependent assembly (CoDA). Nat Methods 2011;8:67-9.
28. Maeder ML, Thibodeau-Beganny S, Sander JD, et al. Oligomerized pool engineering (OPEN): an 'open-source' protocol for making customized zinc-finger arrays. Nat Protoc 2009;4:1471-501.
29. Zhu C, Smith T, McNulty J, et al. Evaluation and application of modularly assembled zinc-finger nucleases in zebrafish. Development 2011;138:4555-64.
30. Liu Y, Kretz CA, Maeder ML, et al. Targeted mutagenesis of zebrafish antithrombin III triggers disseminated intravascular coagulation and thrombosis, revealing insight into function. Blood 2014;124:142-50.
31. Ramirez CL, Foley JE, Wright DA, et al. Unexpected failure rates for modular assembly of engineered zinc fingers. Nat Methods 2008;5:374-5.
32. Pingoud A, Silva GH. Precision genome surgery. Nat Biotechnol 2007;25:743-4.
33. Foley JE, Maeder ML, Pearlberg J, et al. Targeted mutagenesis in zebrafish using customized zinc-finger nucleases. Nat Protoc 2009;4:1855-67.
34. Joung JK, Sander JD. TALENs: a widely applicable technology for targeted genome editing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2012;14:49-55.
35. Boch J, Scholze H, Schornack S, et al. Breaking the code of DNA binding specificity of TAL-type III effectors. Science 2009;326:1509-12.
36. Bogdanove AJ, Voytas DF. TAL effectors: customizable proteins for DNA targeting. Science 2011;333:1843-6.
37. Deng D, Yan C, Pan X, et al. Structural basis for sequencespecific recognition of DNA by TAL effectors. Science 2012;335:720-3.
38. Miller JC, Tan S, Qiao G, et al. A TALE nuclease architecture for efficient genome editing. Nat Biotechnol 2011;29:143-8.
39. Bedell VM, Wang Y, Campbell JM, et al. In vivo genome editing using a high-efficiency TALEN system. Nature 2012;491:114-18.
40. Doyle EL, Booher NJ, Standage DS, et al. TAL Effector-Nucleotide Targeter (TALE-NT) 2.0: tools for TAL effector design and target prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40:W117-22.
41. Cermak T, Doyle EL, Christian M, et al. Efficient design and assembly of custom TALEN and other TAL effectorbased constructs for DNA targeting. Nucleic Acids Res 2011;39:e82.
42. Sakuma T, Ochiai H, Kaneko T, et al. Repeating pattern of non-RVD variations in DNA-binding modules enhances TALEN activity. Sci Rep 2013;3:3379.
43. Sander JD, Cade L, Khayter C, et al. Targeted gene disruption in somatic zebrafish cells using engineered TALENs. Nat Biotechnol 2011;29:697-8.
44. Huang P, Xiao A, Zhou M, et al. Heritable gene targeting in zebrafish using customized TALENs. Nat Biotechnol 2011;29:699-700.
45. Zu Y, Tong X, Wang Z, et al. TALEN-mediated precise genome modification by homologous recombination in zebrafish. Nat Methods 2013;10:329-31.
46. Tatsumi Y, Takeda M, Matsuda M, et al. TALEN-mediated mutagenesis in zebrafish reveals a role for r-spondin 2 in fin ray and vertebral development. FEBS Lett 2014;588:4543-50.
47. Dahlem TJ, Hoshijima K, Jurynec MJ, et al. Simple methods for generating and detecting locus-specific mutations induced with TALENs in the zebrafish genome. PLoS Genet 2012;8:e1002861.
48. Mussolino C, Morbitzer R, Lutge F, et al. A novel TALE nuclease scaffold enables high genome editing activity in combination with low toxicity. Nucl Acids Res 2011;39:9283-93.
49. Talbot JC, Amacher SL. A streamlined CRISPR pipeline to reliably generate zebrafish frameshifting alleles. Zebrafish 2014;11:583-5.
50. Blackburn PR, Campbell JM, Clark KJ, et al. The CRISPR system-keeping zebrafish gene targeting fresh. Zebrafish 2013;10:116-18.
51. Garneau JE, Dupuis ME, Villion M, et al. The CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA. Nature 2010;468:67-71.
52. Gasiunas G, Barrangou R, Horvath P, et al. Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:E2579-E86.
53. Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 2012;337:816-21.
54. Ablain J, Durand EM, Yang S, et al. A CRISPR/Cas9 vector system for tissue-specific gene disruption in zebrafish. Dev Cell 2015;32:756-64.
55. Jao LE, Wente SR, Chen W. Efficient multiplex biallelic zebrafish genome editing using a CRISPR nuclease system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110:13904-9.
56. Ran FA, Hsu PD, Wright J, et al. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat Protoc 2013;8:2281-308.
57. Sander JD, Joung JK. CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes. Nat Biotechnol 2014;32:347-55.
58. McVey M, Lee SE. MMEJ repair of double-strand breaks (director's cut): deleted sequences and alternative endings. Trends Genet 2008;24:529-38.
59. Bae S, Kweon J, Kim HS, et al. Microhomology-based choice of Cas9 nuclease target sites. Nat Methods 2014;11:705-6.
60. Auer TO, Duroure K, De Cian A, et al. Highly efficient CRISPR/ Cas9-mediated knock-in in zebrafish by homologyindependent DNA repair. Genome Res 2014;24:142-53.
61. Oleykowski CA, Bronson Mullins CR, Godwin AK, et al. Mutation detection using a novel plant endonuclease. Nucleic Acids Res 1998;26:4597-602.
62. Auer TO, Duroure K, Concordet JP, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated conversion of eGFP-into Gal4-transgenic lines in zebrafish. Nat Protoc 2014;9:2823-40.
63. Moens CB, Donn TM, Wolf-Saxon ER, et al. Reverse genetics in zebrafish by TILLING. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 2008;7:454-9.
64. Martino A, Mancuso T, Rossi AM. Application of high-resolution melting to large-scale, high-throughput SNP genotyping: a comparison with the TaqMan method. J Biomol Screen 2010;15:623-9.
65. Parant JM, George SA, Pryor R, et al. A rapid and efficient method of genotyping zebrafish mutants. Dev Dyn 2009;238:3168-74.
66. Yu C, Zhang Y, Yao S, et al. A PCR based protocol for detecting indel mutations induced by TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9 in zebrafish. PLoS One 2014;9:e98282.
67. Gagnon JA, Valen E, Thyme SB, et al. Efficient mutagenesis by Cas9 protein-mediated oligonucleotide insertion and large-scale assessment of single-guide RNAs. PLoS One 2014;9:e98186.
68. Szczepek M, Brondani V, Buchel J, et al. Structure-based redesign of the dimerization interface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases. Nat Biotechnol 2007;25:786-93.
69. Guo J, Gaj T, Barbas CF, III Directed evolution of an enhanced and highly efficient FokI cleavage domain for zinc finger nucleases. J Mol Biol 2010;400:96-107.
70. Waugh DS, Sauer RT. Single amino acid substitutions uncouple the DNA binding and strand scission activities of Fok I endonuclease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993;90:9596-600.
71. Bitinaite J, Wah DA, Aggarwal AK, et al. FokI dimerization is required for DNA cleavage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:10570-5.
72. Ramirez CL, Certo MT, Mussolino C, et al. Engineered zinc finger nickases induce homology-directed repair with reduced mutagenic effects. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40:5560-8.
73. Kim E, Kim S, Kim DH, et al. Precision genome engineering with programmable DNA-nicking enzymes. Genome Res 2012;22:1327-33.
74. Jamal M, Khan FA, Da L, et al. Keeping CRISPR/Cas on-Target. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2015;20:1-20.
75. Koo T, Lee J, Kim JS. Measuring and reducing off-target activities of programmable nucleases including CRISPR-Cas9. Mol Cells 2015;38:475-81.
76. Moreno-Mateos MA, Vejnar CE, Beaudoin JD, et al. CRISPRscan: designing highly efficient sgRNAs for CRISPRCas9 targeting in vivo. Nat Methods 2015;12:982-8.
77. Yin L, Maddison LA, Li M, et al. Multiplex conditional mutagenesis using transgenic expression of Cas9 and sgRNAs. Genetics 2015;200:431-41.
78. Kleinstiver BP, Prew MS, Tsai SQ, et al. Engineered CRISPRCas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities. Nature 2015;523:481-5.
79. Sung YH, Kim JM, Kim HT, et al. Highly efficient gene knockout in mice and zebrafish with RNA-guided endonucleases. Genome Res 2014;24:125-31.
80. Liu D, Wang Z, Xiao A, et al. Efficient gene targeting in zebrafish mediated by a zebrafish-codon-optimized cas9 and evaluation of off-targeting effect. J Genet Genomics 2014;41:43-6.
81. Huang P, Xiao A, Tong X, et al. Targeted mutagenesis in zebrafish by TALENs. Methods Mol Biol 2016;1338:191-206.
82. Shin J, Chen J, Solnica-Krezel L. Efficient homologous recombination-mediated genome engineering in zebrafish using TALE nucleases. Development 2014;141:3807-18.
83. Bedell VM, Ekker SC. Using engineered endonucleases to create knockout and knockin zebrafish models. Methods Mol Biol 2015;1239:291-305.
84. Kok FO, Shin M, Ni CW, et al. Reverse genetic screening reveals poor correlation between morpholino-induced and mutant phenotypes in zebrafish. Dev Cell 2015;32:97-108.
85. Rossi A, Kontarakis Z, Gerri C, et al. Genetic compensation induced by deleterious mutations but not gene knockdowns. Nature 2015;524:230-3.