Why reinvent the wheel? Building new proteins based on ready-made parts

Protein Science

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 1179-1187

  Khersonsky, Olga ^a   Fleishman, Sarel J ^a  

^a WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

Author keywords

antibody; bioinformatics; evolution; protein design; Rosetta; propeller; barrel

Indexed keywords

ANTIBODY; PROTEIN;

BETA PROPELLER; BETA SHEET; BIOINFORMATICS; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY; EVOLUTION; HUMAN; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; TIM BARREL;

EID: 84976578559     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: 1469896X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pro.2892     Document Type: Review

References (72)

1. Huang PS, Oberdorfer G, Xu C, Pei XY, Nannenga BL, Rogers JM, DiMaio F, Gonen T, Luisi B, Baker D (2014) High thermodynamic stability of parametrically designed helical bundles. Sci 346:481–485.
2. Hill RB, Raleigh DP, Lombardi A, DeGrado WF (2000) De novo design of helical bundles as models for understanding protein folding and function. Acc Chem Res 33:745–754.
3. Hecht MH, Richardson JS, Richardson DC, Ogden RC (1990) De novo design, expression, and characterization of Felix: a four-helix bundle protein of native-like sequence. Science 249:884–891.
4. Regan L, DeGrado WF (1988) Characterization of a helical protein designed from first principles. Science 241:976–978.
5. Koga N, Tatsumi-Koga R, Liu G, Xiao R, Acton TB, Montellione GT, Baker D (2012) Principles for designing ideal protein structures. Nature 491:222–227.
6. Huang PS, Feldmeier K, Parmeggiani F, Fernandez Velasco DA, Höcker B, Baker D (2016) De novo design of a four-fold symmetric TIM-barrel protein with atomic-level accuracy. Nat Chem Biol. 12:29–34.
7. Kuhlman B, Dantas G, Ireton GC, Varani G, Stoddard BL, Baker D (2003) Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy. Science 302:1364–1368.
8. Fleishman SJ, Baker D (2012) Role of the biomolecular energy gap in protein design, structure, and evolution. Cell 149:262–273.
9. Fersht A (1999) Structure and mechanism in protein science: a guide to enzyme catalysis and protein folding. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
10. Strauch EM, Fleishman SJ, Baker D (2014) Computational design of a pH-sensitive IgG binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:675–680.
11. Tinberg CE, Khare SD, Dou J, Doyle L, Nelson JW, Schena A, Jankowski W, Kalodimos CG, Johnsson K, Stoddard BL, Baker D (2013) Computational design of ligand-binding proteins with high affinity and selectivity. Nature 501:212–216.
12. Procko E, Hedman R, Hamilton K, Seetharaman J, Fleishman SJ, Su M, Aramini J, Kornhaber G, Hunt JF, Tong L, Montelione GT, Baker D (2013) Computational design of a protein-based enzyme inhibitor. J Mol Biol 425:3563–3575.
13. Der BS, Machius M, Miley MJ, Mills JL, Szyperski T, Kuhlman B (2012) Metal-mediated affinity and orientation specificity in a computationally designed protein homodimer. J Am Chem Soc 134:375–385.
14. Fleishman SJ, Whitehead TA, Ekiert DC, Dreyfus C, Corn JE, Strauch EM, Wilson IA, Baker D (2011) Computational design of proteins targeting the conserved stem region of influenza hemagglutinin. Science 332:816–821.
15. Blomberg R, Kries H, Pinkas DM, Mittl PR, Grutter MG, Privett HK, Mayo SL, Hilvert D (2013) Precision is essential for efficient catalysis in an evolved Kemp eliminase. Nature 503:418–421.
16. Khersonsky O, Kiss G, Rothlisberger D, Dym O, Albeck S, Houk KN, Baker D, Tawfik DS (2012) Bridging the gaps in design methodologies by evolutionary optimization of the stability and proficiency of designed Kemp eliminase KE59. Proc Natl Acad Sci US 109:10358–10363.
17. Stranges PB, Kuhlman B (2013) A comparison of successful and failed protein interface designs highlights the challenges of designing buried hydrogen bonds. Protein Sci 22:74–82.
18. Khare SD, Fleishman SJ (2013) Emerging themes in the computational design of novel enzymes and protein–protein interfaces. FEBS Lett 587:1147–1154.
19. Baker D (2010) An exciting but challenging road ahead for computational enzyme design. Protein Sci 19:1817–1819.
20. Longo L, Lee J, Blaber M (2012) Experimental support for the foldability-function tradeoff hypothesis: segregation of the folding nucleus and functional regions in fibroblast growth factor-1. Protein Sci 21:1911–1920.
21. Tokuriki N, Stricher F, Serrano L, Tawfik DS (2008) How protein stability and new functions trade off. PLoS Comput Biol 4:e1000002.
22. Shoichet BK, Baase WA, Kuroki R, Matthews BW (1995) A relationship between protein stability and protein function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:452–456.
23. Li Z, Yang Y, Zhan J, Dai L, Zhou Y (2013) Energy functions in de novo protein design: current challenges and future prospects. Annu Rev Biophys 42:315–335.
24. Leaver-Fay A, O'Meara MJ, Tyka M, Jacak R, Song Y, Kellogg EH, Thompson J, Davis IW, Pache RA, Lyskov S, Gray JJ, Kortemme T, Richardson JS, Havranek JJ, Snoeyink J, Baker D, Kuhlman B (2013) Scientific benchmarks for guiding macromolecular energy function improvement. Methods Enzymol 523:109–143.
25. Ollikainen N, Smith CA, Fraser JS, Kortemme T (2013) Flexible backbone sampling methods to model and design protein alternative conformations. Methods Enzymol 523:61–85.
26. Punta M, Coggill PC, Eberhardt RY, Mistry J, Tate J, Boursnell C, Pang N, Forslund K, Ceric G, Clements J, Heger A, Holm L, Sonnhammer EL, Eddy SR, Bateman A, Finn RD (2012) The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 40:D290–D301.
27. Orengo CA, Michie AD, Jones S, Jones DT, Swindells MB, Thornton JM (1997) CATH—a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure 5:1093–1108.
28. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C (1995) SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 247:536–540.
29. Orengo CA, Thornton JM (2005) Protein families and their evolution—a structural perspective. Annu Rev Biochem 74:867–900.
30. Glasner ME, Gerlt JA, Babbitt PC (2006) Evolution of enzyme superfamilies. Curr Opin Chem Biol 10:492–497.
31. Gerlt JA, Babbitt PC (2001) Divergent evolution of enzymatic function: mechanistically diverse superfamilies and functionally distinct suprafamilies. Annu Rev Biochem 70:209–246.
32. Nepomnyachiy S, Ben-Tal N, Kolodny R (2014) Global view of the protein universe. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:11691–11696.
33. Farias-Rico JA, Schmidt S, Hocker B (2014) Evolutionary relationship of two ancient protein superfolds. Nat Chem Biol 10:710–715.
34. Tawfik DS (2006) Biochemistry. Loop grafting and the origins of enzyme species. Science 311:475–476.
35. Panchenko AR, Madej T (2005) Structural similarity of loops in protein families: toward the understanding of protein evolution. BMC Evol Biol 5:10.
36. Voigt CA, Martinez C, Wang ZG, Mayo SL, Arnold FH (2002) Protein building blocks preserved by recombination. Nat Struct Biol 9:553–558.
37. Nagano N, Orengo CA, Thornton JM (2002) One fold with many functions: the evolutionary relationships between TIM barrel families based on their sequences, structures and functions. J Mol Biol 321:741–765.
38. Dellus-Gur E, Toth-Petroczy A, Elias M, Tawfik DS (2013) What makes a protein fold amenable to functional innovation? Fold polarity and stability trade-offs. J Mol Biol 425:2609–2621.
39. Richter M, Bosnali M, Carstensen L, Seitz T, Durchschlag H, Blanquart S, Merkl R, Sterner R (2010) Computational and experimental evidence for the evolution of a (beta alpha)8-barrel protein from an ancestral quarter-barrel stabilised by disulfide bonds. J Mol Biol 398:763–773.
40. Chaudhuri I, Soding J, Lupas AN (2008) Evolution of the beta-propeller fold. Proteins 71:795–803.
41. Lee J, Blaber M (2011) Experimental support for the evolution of symmetric protein architecture from a simple peptide motif. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:126–130.
42. Main ER, Jackson SE, Regan L (2003) The folding and design of repeat proteins: reaching a consensus. Curr Opin Struct Biol 13:482–489.
43. Soding J, Lupas AN (2003) More than the sum of their parts: on the evolution of proteins from peptides. Bioessays 25:837–846.
44. Hocker B (2014) Design of proteins from smaller fragments-learning from evolution. Curr Opin Struct Biol 27:56–62.
45. Stemmer WPC (1994) Rapid evolution of a protein in-vitro by DNA shuffling. Nature 370:389–391.
46. Goldsmith M, Tawfik DS (2012) Directed enzyme evolution: beyond the low-hanging fruit. Curr Opin Struct Biol 22:406–412.
47. Heinzelman P, Romero PA, Arnold FH (2013) Efficient sampling of SCHEMA chimera families to identify useful sequence elements. Method Enzymol 523:351–368.
48. Sterner R, Hocker B (2005) Catalytic versatility, stability, and evolution of the (betaalpha)8-barrel enzyme fold. Chem Rev 105:4038–4055.
49. Akanuma S, Yamagishi A (2008) Experimental evidence for the existence of a stable half-barrel subdomain in the (beta/alpha)8-barrel fold. J Mol Biol 382:458–466.
50. Hocker B, Claren J, Sterner R (2004) Mimicking enzyme evolution by generating new (betaalpha)8-barrels from (betaalpha)4-half-barrels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:16448–16453.
51. Sperl JM, Rohweder B, Rajendran C, Sterner R (2013) Establishing catalytic activity on an artificial (betaalpha)8-barrel protein designed from identical half-barrels. FEBS Lett 587:2798–2805.
52. Claren J, Malisi C, Hocker B, Sterner R (2009) Establishing wild-type levels of catalytic activity on natural and artificial (beta alpha)8-barrel protein scaffolds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:3704–3709.
53. Shanmugaratnam S, Eisenbeis S, Hocker B (2012) A highly stable protein chimera built from fragments of different folds. Protein Eng Des Sel 25:699–703.
54. Eisenbeis S, Proffitt W, Coles M, Truffault V, Shanmugaratnam S, Meiler J, Hocker B (2012) Potential of fragment recombination for rational design of proteins. J Am Chem Soc 134:4019–4022.
55. Afriat-Jurnou L, Jackson CJ, Tawfik DS (2012) Reconstructing a missing link in the evolution of a recently diverged phosphotriesterase by active-site loop remodeling. Biochemistry 51:6047–6055.
56. Figueroa M, Oliveira N, Lejeune A, Kaufmann KW, Dorr BM, Matagne A, Martial JA, Meiler J, Van de Weerdt C (2013) Octarellin VI: using Rosetta to design a putative artificial (beta/alpha)(8) protein. PLoSOne 8:e71858.
57. Offredi F, Dubail F, Kischel P, Sarinski K, Stern AS, Van de Weerdt C, Hoch JC, Prosperi C, Francois JM, Mayo SL, Martial JA (2003) De novo backbone and sequence design of an idealized alpha/beta-barrel protein: evidence of stable tertiary structure. J Mol Biol 325:163–174.
58. Houbrechts A, Moreau B, Abagyan R, Mainfroid V, Preaux G, Lamproye A, Poncin A, Goormaghtigh E, Ruysschaert JM, Martial JA, Goraj K (1995) 2nd-Generation octarellins—2 new de-novo (beta/alpha)(8) polypeptides designed for investigating the influence of beta-residue packing on the alpha/beta-barrel structure stability. Protein Eng 8:249–259.
59. Goraj K, Renard A, Martial JA (1990) Synthesis, purification and initial structural characterization of octarellin, a de novo polypeptide modeled on the alpha beta-barrel proteins. Protein Eng 3:259–266.
60. Nikkhah M, Jawad-Alami Z, Demydchuk M, Ribbons D, Paoli M (2006) Engineering of beta-propeller protein scaffolds by multiple gene duplication and fusion of an idealized WD repeat. Biomol Eng 23:185–194.
61. Yadid I, Tawfik DS (2011) Functional beta-propeller lectins by tandem duplications of repetitive units. Protein Engin Des Sel 24:185–195.
62. Yadid I, Kirshenbaum N, Sharon M, Dym O, Tawfik DS (2010) Metamorphic proteins mediate evolutionary transitions of structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:7287–7292.
63. Yadid I, Tawfik DS (2007) Reconstruction of functional beta-propeller lectins via homo-oligomeric assembly of shorter fragments. J Mol Biol 365:10–17.
64. Voet ARD, Noguchi H, Addy C, Simoncini D, Terada D, Unzai S, Park SY, Zhang KYJ, Tame JRH (2014) Computational design of a self-assembling symmetrical beta-propeller protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:15102–15107.
65. Janeway CA, Travers P, Walport M (2001) Immunobiology: the immune system in health and disease. New York: Garland Science.
66. Padlan EA (1977) Structural basis for specificity of antibody-antigen reactions and structural mechanisms for diversification of antigen-binding specificities. Q Rev Biophys 10:35
67. Kabat EA, Wu TT, Bilofsky H (1977) Unusual distributions of amino-acids in complementarity-determining (hypervariable) segments of heavy and light-chains of immunoglobulins and their possible roles in specificity of antibody-combining sites. J Biol Chem 252:6609–6616.
68. Riechmann L, Clark M, Waldmann H, Winter G (1988) Reshaping human-antibodies for therapy. Nature 332:323–327.
69. Kettleborough CA, Saldanha J, Heath VJ, Morrison CJ, Bendig MM (1991) Humanization of a mouse monoclonal antibody by CDR-grafting: the importance of framework residues on loop conformation. Protein Eng 4:773–783.
70. Lapidoth GD, Baran D, Pszolla GM, Norn C, Alon A, Tyka MD, Fleishman SJ (2015) AbDesign: an algorithm for combinatorial backbone design guided by natural conformations and sequences. Proteins 83:1385–1406.
71. Chao G, Lau WL, Hackel BJ, Sazinsky SL, Lippow SM, Wittrup KD (2006) Isolating and engineering human antibodies using yeast surface display. Nat Protoc 1:755–768.
72. Fleishman SJ, Khare SD, Koga N, Baker D (2011) Restricted sidechain plasticity in the structures of native proteins and complexes. Protein Sci 20:753–757.