Understanding Spatial Genome Organization: Methods and Insights

Genomics, Proteomics and Bioinformatics

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 7-20

  Ramani, Vijay ^a   Shendure, Jay ^a,b   Duan, Zhijun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

4D nucleome; Chromatin; Chromosome; Epigenomics; Hi C

Indexed keywords

CELL COMPARTMENTALIZATION; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME STRUCTURE; EUKARYOTE; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENE CLUSTER; GENE CONTROL; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENOME; GENOME ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INTERPHASE; NONHUMAN; REVIEW; CHEMISTRY; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; CONFORMATION; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HUMAN GENOME; METABOLISM;

CHROMATIN; DNA; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; DNA; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENOME, HUMAN; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 84960088847     PISSN: 16720229     EISSN: 22103244     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gpb.2016.01.002     Document Type: Review

References (167)

1. Felsenfeld G., Groudine M. Controlling the double helix. Nature 2003, 421:448-453.
2. Zhou V.W., Goren A., Bernstein B.E. Charting histone modifications and the functional organization of mammalian genomes. Nat Rev Genet 2011, 12:7-18.
3. Talbert P.B., Henikoff S. Histone variants-ancient wrap artists of the epigenome. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010, 11:264-275.
4. Oudet P., Gross-Bellard M., Chambon P. Electron microscopic and biochemical evidence that chromatin structure is a repeating unit. Cell 1975, 4:281-300.
5. Fussner E., Strauss M., Djuric U., Li R., Ahmed K., Hart M., et al. Open and closed domains in the mouse genome are configured as 10-nm chromatin fibres. EMBO Rep 2012, 13:992-996.
6. Joti Y., Hikima T., Nishino Y., Kamada F., Hihara S., Takata H., et al. Chromosomes without a 30-nm chromatin fiber. Nucleus 2012, 3:404-410.
7. Ricci M.A., Manzo C., García-Parajo M.F., Lakadamyali M., Cosma M.P. Chromatin fibers are formed by heterogeneous groups of nucleosomes in vivo. Cell 2015, 160:1145-1158.
8. Gorkin D.U., Leung D., Ren B. The 3D genome in transcriptional regulation and pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell 2014, 14:762-775.
9. Misteli T. Beyond the sequence: cellular organization of genome function. Cell 2007, 128:787-800.
10. Gibcus J.H., Dekker J. The hierarchy of the 3D genome. Mol Cell 2013, 49:773-782.
11. Pombo A., Dillon N. Three-dimensional genome architecture: players and mechanisms. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2015, 16:245-257.
12. Cremer T., Cremer M. Chromosome territories. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2010, 2:a003889.
13. Finlan L.E., Sproul D., Thomson I., Boyle S., Kerr E., Perry P., et al. Recruitment to the nuclear periphery can alter expression of genes in human cells. PLoS Genet 2008, 4:e1000039.
14. Gonzalez-Sandoval A., Towbin B.D., Kalck V., Cabianca D.S., Gaidatzis D., Hauer M.H., et al. Perinuclear anchoring of H3K9-methylated chromatin stabilizes induced cell fate in C. elegans embryos. Cell 2015, 163:1333-1347.
15. Dundr M., Misteli T. Biogenesis of nuclear bodies. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2010, 2:a000711.
16. Schneider R., Grosschedl R. Dynamics and interplay of nuclear architecture, genome organization, and gene expression. Genes Dev 2007, 21:3027-3043.
17. Duan Z., Blau C.A. The genome in space and time: does form always follow function? How does the spatial and temporal organization of a eukaryotic genome reflect and influence its functions?. BioEssays 2012, 34:800-810.
18. Bouwman B.A., de Laat W. Getting the genome in shape: the formation of loops, domains and compartments. Genome Biol 2015, 16:154.
19. Sexton T., Cavalli G. The role of chromosome domains in shaping the functional genome. Cell 2015, 160:1049-1059.
20. van Steensel B., Dekker J. Genomics tools for unraveling chromosome architecture. Nat Biotechnol 2010, 28:1089-1095.
21. de Wit E., de Laat W. A decade of 3C technologies: insights into nuclear organization. Genes Dev 2012, 26:11-24.
22. Gaj T., Gersbach C.A., Barbas C.F. ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol 2013, 31:397-405.
23. Risca V.I., Greenleaf W.J. Unraveling the 3D genome: genomics tools for multiscale exploration. Trends Genet 2015, 31:357-372.
24. Daban J.R. Electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy studies of chromatin and metaphase chromosome structure. Micron 2011, 42:733-750.
25. Rapkin L.M., Anchel D.R., Li R., Bazett-Jones D.P. A view of the chromatin landscape. Micron 2012, 43:150-158.
26. Huang B., Babcock H., Zhuang X. Breaking the diffraction barrier: super-resolution imaging of cells. Cell 2010, 143:1047-1058.
27. Callaway E. The revolution will not be crystallized: a new method sweeps through structural biology. Nature 2015, 525:172-174.
28. Song F., Chen P., Sun D., Wang M., Dong L., Liang D., et al. Cryo-EM study of the chromatin fiber reveals a double helix twisted by tetranucleosomal units. Science 2014, 344:376-380.
29. Langer-Safer P.R., Levine M., Ward D.C. Immunological method for mapping genes on Drosophila polytene chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1982, 79:4381-4385.
30. Tsukamoto T., Hashiguchi N., Janicki S.M., Tumbar T., Belmont A.S., Spector D.L. Visualization of gene activity in living cells. Nat Cell Biol 2000, 2:871-878.
31. Cremer M., Grasser F., Lanctot C., Muller S., Neusser M., Zinner R., et al. Multicolor 3D fluorescence in situ hybridization for imaging interphase chromosomes. Methods Mol Biol 2008, 463:205-239.
32. Branco M.R., Branco T., Ramirez F., Pombo A. Changes in chromosome organization during PHA-activation of resting human lymphocytes measured by cryo-FISH. Chromosome Res 2008, 16:413-426.
33. Beliveau B.J., Joyce E.F., Apostolopoulos N., Yilmaz F., Fonseka C.Y., McCole R.B., et al. Versatile design and synthesis platform for visualizing genomes with Oligopaint FISH probes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:21301-21306.
34. Shachar S., Voss T.C., Pegoraro G., Sciascia N., Misteli T. Identification of gene positioning factors using high-throughput imaging mapping. Cell 2015, 162:911-923.
35. Linhoff M.W., Garg S.K., Mandel G. A high-resolution imaging approach to investigate chromatin architecture in complex tissues. Cell 2015, 163:246-255.
36. Toomre D., Bewersdorf J. A new wave of cellular imaging. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2010, 26:285-314.
37. Lakadamyali M., Cosma M.P. Advanced microscopy methods for visualizing chromatin structure. FEBS Lett 2015, 589:3023-3030.
38. Markaki Y., Smeets D., Fiedler S., Schmid V.J., Schermelleh L., Cremer T., et al. The potential of 3D-FISH and super-resolution structured illumination microscopy for studies of 3D nuclear architecture: 3D structured illumination microscopy of defined chromosomal structures visualized by 3D (immuno)-FISH opens new perspectives for studies of nuclear architecture. BioEssays 2012, 34:412-426.
39. Schermelleh L., Carlton P.M., Haase S., Shao L., Winoto L., Kner P., et al. Subdiffraction multicolor imaging of the nuclear periphery with 3D structured illumination microscopy. Science 2008, 320:1332-1336.
40. Wang W., Li G.W., Chen C., Xie X.S., Zhuang X. Chromosome organization by a nucleoid-associated protein in live bacteria. Science 2011, 333:1445-1449.
41. Liu Z., Lavis L.D., Betzig E. Imaging live-cell dynamics and structure at the single-molecule level. Mol Cell 2015, 58:644-659.
42. Miyanari Y., Ziegler-Birling C., Torres-Padilla M.E. Live visualization of chromatin dynamics with fluorescent TALEs. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2013, 20:1321-1324.
43. Chen B., Gilbert L.A., Cimini B.A., Schnitzbauer J., Zhang W., Li G.W., et al. Dynamic imaging of genomic loci in living human cells by an optimized CRISPR/Cas system. Cell 2013, 155:1479-1491.
44. Knight S.C., Xie L., Deng W., Guglielmi B., Witkowsky L.B., Bosanac L., et al. Dynamics of CRISPR-Cas9 genome interrogation in living cells. Science 2015, 350:823-826.
45. Shendure J., Lieberman Aiden E. The expanding scope of DNA sequencing. Nat Biotechnol 2012, 30:1084-1094.
46. Ay F., Noble W.S. Analysis methods for studying the 3D architecture of the genome. Genome Biol 2015, 16:183.
47. Park P.J. ChIP-seq: advantages and challenges of a maturing technology. Nat Rev Genet 2009, 10:669-680.
48. van Steensel B., Henikoff S. Identification of in vivo DNA targets of chromatin proteins using tethered dam methyltransferase. Nat Biotechnol 2000, 18:424-428.
49. Nemeth A., Conesa A., Santoyo-Lopez J., Medina I., Montaner D., Peterfia B., et al. Initial genomics of the human nucleolus. PLoS Genet 2010, 6:e1000889.
50. Guelen L., Pagie L., Brasset E., Meuleman W., Faza M.B., Talhout W., et al. Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions. Nature 2008, 453:948-951.
51. Kind J., Pagie L., Ortabozkoyun H., Boyle S., de Vries S.S., Janssen H., et al. Single-cell dynamics of genome-nuclear lamina interactions. Cell 2013, 153:178-192.
52. Kind J., Pagie L., de Vries S.S., Nahidiazar L., Dey S.S., Bienko M., et al. Genome-wide maps of nuclear lamina interactions in single human cells. Cell 2015, 163:134-147.
53. Chu C., Qu K., Zhong F.L., Artandi S.E., Chang H.Y. Genomic maps of long noncoding RNA occupancy reveal principles of RNA-chromatin interactions. Mol Cell 2011, 44:667-678.
54. Simon M.D., Pinter S.F., Fang R., Sarma K., Rutenberg-Schoenberg M., Bowman S.K., et al. High-resolution Xist binding maps reveal two-step spreading during X-chromosome inactivation. Nature 2013, 504:465-469.
55. Engreitz J.M., Pandya-Jones A., McDonel P., Shishkin A., Sirokman K., Surka C., et al. The Xist lncRNA exploits three-dimensional genome architecture to spread across the X chromosome. Science 2013, 341:1237973.
56. Quinn J.J., Ilik I.A., Qu K., Georgiev P., Chu C., Akhtar A., et al. Revealing long noncoding RNA architecture and functions using domain-specific chromatin isolation by RNA purification. Nat Biotechnol 2014, 32:933-940.
57. Dekker J., Rippe K., Dekker M., Kleckner N. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 2002, 295:1306-1311.
58. Lieberman-Aiden E., van Berkum N.L., Williams L., Imakaev M., Ragoczy T., Telling A., et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 2009, 326:289-293.
59. Kalhor R., Tjong H., Jayathilaka N., Alber F., Chen L. Genome architectures revealed by tethered chromosome conformation capture and population-based modeling. Nat Biotechnol 2012, 30:90-98.
60. Nagano T., Lubling Y., Stevens T.J., Schoenfelder S., Yaffe E., Dean W., et al. Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure. Nature 2013, 502:59-64.
61. Ma W., Ay F., Lee C., Gulsoy G., Deng X., Cook S., et al. Fine-scale chromatin interaction maps reveal the cis-regulatory landscape of human lincRNA genes. Nat Methods 2015, 12:71-78.
62. Rao S.S., Huntley M.H., Durand N.C., Stamenova E.K., Bochkov I.D., Robinson J.T., et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 2014, 159:1665-1680.
63. Deng X., Ma W., Ramani V., Hill A., Yang F., Ay F., et al. Bipartite structure of the inactive mouse X chromosome. Genome Biol 2015, 16:152.
64. Hsieh T.H., Weiner A., Lajoie B., Dekker J., Friedman N., Rando O.J. Mapping nucleosome resolution chromosome folding in yeast by Micro-C. Cell 2015, 162:108-119.
65. Horike S., Cai S., Miyano M., Cheng J.F., Kohwi-Shigematsu T. Loss of silent-chromatin looping and impaired imprinting of DLX5 in Rett syndrome. Nat Genet 2005, 37:31-40.
66. Simonis M., Klous P., Splinter E., Moshkin Y., Willemsen R., de Wit E., et al. Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C). Nat Genet 2006, 38:1348-1354.
67. Zhao Z., Tavoosidana G., Sjolinder M., Gondor A., Mariano P., Wang S., et al. Circular chromosome conformation capture (4C) uncovers extensive networks of epigenetically regulated intra- and interchromosomal interactions. Nat Genet 2006, 38:1341-1347.
68. Schoenfelder S., Sexton T., Chakalova L., Cope N.F., Horton A., Andrews S., et al. Preferential associations between co-regulated genes reveal a transcriptional interactome in erythroid cells. Nat Genet 2010, 42:53-61.
69. Dostie J., Richmond T.A., Arnaout R.A., Selzer R.R., Lee W.L., Honan T.A., et al. Chromosome Conformation Capture Carbon Copy (5C): a massively parallel solution for mapping interactions between genomic elements. Genome Res 2006, 16:1299-1309.
70. Fullwood M.J., Liu M.H., Pan Y.F., Liu J., Xu H., Mohamed Y.B., et al. An oestrogen-receptor-alpha-bound human chromatin interactome. Nature 2009, 462:58-64.
71. Tang Z., Luo O.J., Li X., Zheng M., Zhu J.J., Szalaj P., et al. CTCF-mediated human 3D genome architecture reveals chromatin topology for transcription. Cell 2015, 163:1611-1627.
72. Hughes J.R., Roberts N., McGowan S., Hay D., Giannoulatou E., Lynch M., et al. Analysis of hundreds of cis-regulatory landscapes at high resolution in a single, high-throughput experiment. Nat Genet 2014, 46:205-212.
73. Mifsud B., Tavares-Cadete F., Young A.N., Sugar R., Schoenfelder S., Ferreira L., et al. Mapping long-range promoter contacts in human cells with high-resolution capture Hi-C. Nat Genet 2015, 47:598-606.
74. Le T.B., Imakaev M.V., Mirny L.A., Laub M.T. High-resolution mapping of the spatial organization of a bacterial chromosome. Science 2013, 342:731-734.
75. Burton J.N., Liachko I., Dunham M.J., Shendure J. Species-level deconvolution of metagenome assemblies with Hi-C-based contact probability maps. G3 (Bethesda) 2014, 4:1339-1346.
76. Marbouty M., Le Gall A., Cattoni D.I., Cournac A., Koh A., Fiche J.B., et al. Condensin- and replication-mediated bacterial chromosome folding and origin condensation revealed by Hi-C and Super-resolution imaging. Mol Cell 2015, 59:588-602.
77. Duan Z., Andronescu M., Schutz K., McIlwain S., Kim Y.J., Lee C., et al. A three-dimensional model of the yeast genome. Nature 2010, 465:363-367.
78. Mizuguchi T., Fudenberg G., Mehta S., Belton J.M., Taneja N., Folco H.D., et al. Cohesin-dependent globules and heterochromatin shape 3D genome architecture in S. pombe. Nature 2014, 516:432-435.
79. Ay F., Bunnik E.M., Varoquaux N., Bol S.M., Prudhomme J., Vert J.P., et al. Three-dimensional modeling of the P. falciparum genome during the erythrocytic cycle reveals a strong connection between genome architecture and gene expression. Genome Res 2014, 24:974-988.
80. Feng S., Cokus S.J., Schubert V., Zhai J., Pellegrini M., Jacobsen S.E. Genome-wide Hi-C analyses in wild-type and mutants reveal high-resolution chromatin interactions in Arabidopsis. Mol Cell 2014, 55:694-707.
81. Grob S., Schmid M.W., Grossniklaus U. Hi-C analysis in Arabidopsis identifies the KNOT, a structure with similarities to the flamenco locus of Drosophila. Mol Cell 2014, 55:678-693.
82. Crane E., Bian Q., McCord R.P., Lajoie B.R., Wheeler B.S., Ralston E.J., et al. Condensin-driven remodelling of X chromosome topology during dosage compensation. Nature 2015, 523:240-244.
83. Hou C., Li L., Qin Z.S., Corces V.G. Gene density, transcription, and insulators contribute to the partition of the Drosophila genome into physical domains. Mol Cell 2012, 48:471-484.
84. Sexton T., Yaffe E., Kenigsberg E., Bantignies F., Leblanc B., Hoichman M., et al. Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome. Cell 2012, 148:458-472.
85. Dixon J.R., Selvaraj S., Yue F., Kim A., Li Y., Shen Y., et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 2012, 485:376-380.
86. Dixon J.R., Jung I., Selvaraj S., Shen Y., Antosiewicz-Bourget J.E., Lee A.Y., et al. Chromatin architecture reorganization during stem cell differentiation. Nature 2015, 518:331-336.
87. Dekker J., Marti-Renom M.A., Mirny L.A. Exploring the three-dimensional organization of genomes: interpreting chromatin interaction data. Nat Rev Genet 2013, 14:390-403.
88. Rotem A., Ram O., Shoresh N., Sperling R.A., Goren A., Weitz D.A., et al. Single-cell ChIP-seq reveals cell subpopulations defined by chromatin state. Nat Biotechnol 2015, 33:1165-1172.
89. Nagano T., Lubling Y., Yaffe E., Wingett S.W., Dean W., Tanay A., et al. Single-cell Hi-C for genome-wide detection of chromatin interactions that occur simultaneously in a single cell. Nat Protoc 2015, 10:1986-2003.
90. Urnov F.D., Rebar E.J., Holmes M.C., Zhang H.S., Gregory P.D. Genome editing with engineered zinc finger nucleases. Nat Rev Genet 2010, 11:636-646.
91. Maeder M.L., Angstman J.F., Richardson M.E., Linder S.J., Cascio V.M., Tsai S.Q., et al. Targeted DNA demethylation and activation of endogenous genes using programmable TALE-TET1 fusion proteins. Nat Biotechnol 2013, 31:1137-1142.
92. Mendenhall E.M., Williamson K.E., Reyon D., Zou J.Y., Ram O., Joung J.K., et al. Locus-specific editing of histone modifications at endogenous enhancers. Nat Biotechnol 2013, 31:1133-1136.
93. Therizols P., Illingworth R.S., Courilleau C., Boyle S., Wood A.J., Bickmore W.A. Chromatin decondensation is sufficient to alter nuclear organization in embryonic stem cells. Science 2014, 346:1238-1242.
94. Lupianez D.G., Kraft K., Heinrich V., Krawitz P., Brancati F., Klopocki E., et al. Disruptions of topological chromatin domains cause pathogenic rewiring of gene-enhancer interactions. Cell 2015, 161:1012-1025.
95. Thakore P.I., D'Ippolito A.M., Song L., Safi A., Shivakumar N.K., Kabadi A.M., et al. Highly specific epigenome editing by CRISPR-Cas9 repressors for silencing of distal regulatory elements. Nat Methods 2015, 12:1143-1149.
96. Guo Y., Xu Q., Canzio D., Shou J., Li J., Gorkin D.U., et al. CRISPR Inversion of CTCF sites alters genome topology and enhancer/promoter function. Cell 2015, 162:900-910.
97. Hilton I.B., D'Ippolito A.M., Vockley C.M., Thakore P.I., Crawford G.E., Reddy T.E., et al. Epigenome editing by a CRISPR-Cas9-based acetyltransferase activates genes from promoters and enhancers. Nat Biotechnol 2015, 33:510-517.
98. Sanborn A.L., Rao S.S., Huang S.C., Durand N.C., Huntley M.H., Jewett A.I., et al. Chromatin extrusion explains key features of loop and domain formation in wild-type and engineered genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015, 112:E6456-E6465.
99. Deng W., Blobel G.A. Manipulating nuclear architecture. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2014, 25:1-7.
100. Cremer T., Cremer M., Hubner B., Strickfaden H., Smeets D., Popken J., et al. The 4D nucleome: evidence for a dynamic nuclear landscape based on co-aligned active and inactive nuclear compartments. FEBS Lett 2015, 589:2931-2943.
101. Boyle S., Gilchrist S., Bridger J.M., Mahy N.L., Ellis J.A., Bickmore W.A. The spatial organization of human chromosomes within the nuclei of normal and emerin-mutant cells. Hum Mol Genet 2001, 10:211-219.
102. Croft J.A., Bridger J.M., Boyle S., Perry P., Teague P., Bickmore W.A. Differences in the localization and morphology of chromosomes in the human nucleus. J Cell Biol 1999, 145:1119-1131.
103. Grasser F., Neusser M., Fiegler H., Thormeyer T., Cremer M., Carter N.P., et al. Replication-timing-correlated spatial chromatin arrangements in cancer and in primate interphase nuclei. J Cell Sci 2008, 121:1876-1886.
104. Kosak S.T., Groudine M. Form follows function: the genomic organization of cellular differentiation. Genes Dev 2004, 18:1371-1384.
105. Takizawa T., Meaburn K.J., Misteli T. The meaning of gene positioning. Cell 2008, 135:9-13.
106. Heride C., Ricoul M., Kieu K., Hase von J., Guillemot V., Cremer C., et al. Distance between homologous chromosomes results from chromosome positioning constraints. J Cell Sci 2010, 123:4063-4075.
107. Gerlich D., Beaudouin J., Kalbfuss B., Daigle N., Eils R., Ellenberg J. Global chromosome positions are transmitted through mitosis in mammalian cells. Cell 2003, 112:751-764.
108. Walter J., Schermelleh L., Cremer M., Tashiro S., Cremer T. Chromosome order in HeLa cells changes during mitosis and early G1, but is stably maintained during subsequent interphase stages. J Cell Biol 2003, 160:685-697.
109. Thomson I., Gilchrist S., Bickmore W.A., Chubb J.R. The radial positioning of chromatin is not inherited through mitosis but is established de novo in early G1. Curr Biol 2004, 14:166-172.
110. Parada L.A., McQueen P.G., Misteli T. Tissue-specific spatial organization of genomes. Genome Biol 2004, 5:R44.
111. Tanabe H., Muller S., Neusser M., Hase von J., Calcagno E., Cremer M., et al. Evolutionary conservation of chromosome territory arrangements in cell nuclei from higher primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99:4424-4429.
112. Eskiw C.H., Cope N.F., Clay I., Schoenfelder S., Nagano T., Fraser P. Transcription factories and nuclear organization of the genome. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2010, 75:501-506.
113. Ryba T., Hiratani I., Lu J., Itoh M., Kulik M., Zhang J., et al. Evolutionarily conserved replication timing profiles predict long-range chromatin interactions and distinguish closely related cell types. Genome Res 2010, 20:761-770.
114. Fortin J.P., Hansen K.D. Reconstructing A/B compartments as revealed by Hi-C using long-range correlations in epigenetic data. Genome Biol 2015, 16:180.
115. Ciabrelli F., Cavalli G. Chromatin-driven behavior of topologically associating domains. J Mol Biol 2015, 427:608-625.
116. Dekker J., Heard E. Structural and functional diversity of Topologically Associating Domains. FEBS Lett 2015, 589:2877-2884.
117. Nora E.P., Lajoie B.R., Schulz E.G., Giorgetti L., Okamoto I., Servant N., et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 2012, 485:381-385.
118. Ulianov S.V., Khrameeva E.E., Gavrilov A.A., Flyamer I.M., Kos P., Mikhaleva E.A., et al. Active chromatin and transcription play a key role in chromosome partitioning into topologically associating domains. Genome Res 2015, 26:70-84.
119. Cook P.R., Brazell I.A. Supercoils in human DNA. J Cell Sci 1975, 19:261-279.
120. Eagen K.P., Hartl T.A., Kornberg R.D. Stable chromosome condensation revealed by chromosome conformation capture. Cell 2015, 163:934-946.
121. Flavahan W.A., Drier Y., Liau B.B., Gillespie S.M., Venteicher A.S., Stemmer-Rachamimov A.O., et al. Insulator dysfunction and oncogene activation in IDH mutant gliomas. Nature 2016, 529:110-114.
122. Cook P.R. A model for all genomes: the role of transcription factories. J Mol Biol 2010, 395:1-10.
123. Melnik S., Deng B., Papantonis A., Baboo S., Carr I.M., Cook P.R. The proteomes of transcription factories containing RNA polymerases I, II or III. Nat Methods 2011, 8:963-968.
124. Buckley M.S., Lis J.T. Imaging RNA Polymerase II transcription sites in living cells. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2014, 25:126-130.
125. Fraser J., Williamson I., Bickmore W.A., Dostie J. An overview of genome organization and how we got there: from FISH to Hi-C. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2015, 79:347-372.
126. Matheson T.D., Kaufman P.D. Grabbing the genome by the NADs. Chromosoma 2015.
127. van Koningsbruggen S., Gierlinski M., Schofield P., Martin D., Barton G.J., Ariyurek Y., et al. High-resolution whole-genome sequencing reveals that specific chromatin domains from most human chromosomes associate with nucleoli. Mol Biol Cell 2010, 21:3735-3748.
128. Peric-Hupkes D., Meuleman W., Pagie L., Bruggeman S.W., Solovei I., Brugman W., et al. Molecular maps of the reorganization of genome-nuclear lamina interactions during differentiation. Mol Cell 2010, 38:603-613.
129. Griffith J., Hochschild A., Ptashne M. DNA loops induced by cooperative binding of γ repressor. Nature 1986, 322:750-752.
130. Giorgetti L., Galupa R., Nora E.P., Piolot T., Lam F., Dekker J., et al. Predictive polymer modeling reveals coupled fluctuations in chromosome conformation and transcription. Cell 2014, 157:950-963.
131. Tolhuis B., Palstra R.J., Splinter E., Grosveld F., de Laat W. Looping and interaction between hypersensitive sites in the active beta-globin locus. Mol Cell 2002, 10:1453-1465.
132. Jin F., Li Y., Dixon J.R., Selvaraj S., Ye Z., Lee A.Y., et al. A high-resolution map of the three-dimensional chromatin interactome in human cells. Nature 2013, 503:290-294.
133. Li G., Ruan X., Auerbach R.K., Sandhu K.S., Zheng M., Wang P., et al. Extensive promoter-centered chromatin interactions provide a topological basis for transcription regulation. Cell 2012, 148:84-98.
134. Sanyal A., Lajoie B.R., Jain G., Dekker J. The long-range interaction landscape of gene promoters. Nature 2012, 489:109-113.
135. Zhang Y., Wong C.H., Birnbaum R.Y., Li G., Favaro R., Ngan C.Y., et al. Chromatin connectivity maps reveal dynamic promoter-enhancer long-range associations. Nature 2013, 504:306-310.
136. Ghavi-Helm Y., Klein F.A., Pakozdi T., Ciglar L., Noordermeer D., Huber W., et al. Enhancer loops appear stable during development and are associated with paused polymerase. Nature 2014, 512:96-100.
137. Deng W., Lee J., Wang H., Miller J., Reik A., Gregory P.D., et al. Controlling long-range genomic interactions at a native locus by targeted tethering of a looping factor. Cell 2012, 149:1233-1244.
138. Deng W., Rupon J.W., Krivega I., Breda L., Motta I., Jahn K.S., et al. Reactivation of developmentally silenced globin genes by forced chromatin looping. Cell 2014, 158:849-860.
139. Dekker J., Misteli T. Long-range chromatin interactions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2015, 7:a019356.
140. Lee J.T. Epigenetic regulation by long noncoding RNAs. Science 2012, 338:1435-1439.
141. Hacisuleyman E., Goff L.A., Trapnell C., Williams A., Henao-Mejia J., Sun L., et al. Topological organization of multichromosomal regions by the long intergenic noncoding RNA Firre. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2014, 21:198-206.
142. Yang F., Deng X., Ma W., Berletch J.B., Rabaia N., Wei G., et al. The lncRNA Firre anchors the inactive X chromosome to the nucleolus by binding CTCF and maintains H3K27me3 methylation. Genome Biol 2015, 16:52.
143. Wang K.C., Yang Y.W., Liu B., Sanyal A., Corces-Zimmerman R., Chen Y., et al. A long noncoding RNA maintains active chromatin to coordinate homeotic gene expression. Nature 2011, 472:120-124.
144. Phillips J.E., Corces V.G. CTCF: master weaver of the genome. Cell 2009, 137:1194-1211.
145. Lobanenkov V.V., Nicolas R.H., Adler V.V., Paterson H., Klenova E.M., Polotskaja A.V., et al. A novel sequence-specific DNA binding protein which interacts with three regularly spaced direct repeats of the CCCTC-motif in the 5'-flanking sequence of the chicken c-myc gene. Oncogene 1990, 5:1743-1753.
146. Bell A.C., West A.G., Felsenfeld G. The protein CTCF is required for the enhancer blocking activity of vertebrate insulators. Cell 1999, 98:387-396.
147. Wood A.J., Severson A.F., Meyer B.J. Condensin and cohesin complexity: the expanding repertoire of functions. Nat Rev Genet 2010, 11:391-404.
148. Dowen J.M., Fan Z.P., Hnisz D., Ren G., Abraham B.J., Zhang L.N., et al. Control of cell identity genes occurs in insulated neighborhoods in mammalian chromosomes. Cell 2014, 159:374-387.
149. Handoko L., Xu H., Li G., Ngan C.Y., Chew E., Schnapp M., et al. CTCF-mediated functional chromatin interactome in pluripotent cells. Nat Genet 2011, 43:630-638.
150. Ji X., Dadon D.B., Powell B.E., Fan Z.P., Borges-Rivera D., Shachar S., et al. 3D chromosome regulatory landscape of human pluripotent cells. Cell Stem Cell 2015.
151. Kagey M.H., Newman J.J., Bilodeau S., Zhan Y., Orlando D.A., van Berkum N.L., et al. Mediator and cohesin connect gene expression and chromatin architecture. Nature 2010, 467:430-435.
152. de Wit E., Vos E.S., Holwerda S.J., Valdes-Quezada C., Verstegen M.J., Teunissen H., et al. CTCF binding polarity determines chromatin looping. Mol Cell 2015, 60:676-684.
153. Alipour E., Marko J.F. Self-organization of domain structures by DNA-loop-extruding enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res 2012, 40:11202-11212.
154. Zuin J., Dixon J.R., van der Reijden M.I.J.A., Ye Z., Kolovos P., Brouwer R.W.W., et al. Cohesin and CTCF differentially affect chromatin architecture and gene expression in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014, 111:996-1001.
155. Shalem O., Sanjana N.E., Hartenian E., Shi X., Scott D.A., Mikkelsen T.S., et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells. Science 2014, 343:84-87.
156. Wang T., Wei J.J., Sabatini D.M., Lander E.S. Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Science 2014, 343:80-84.
157. Wang T., Birsoy K., Hughes N.W., Krupczak K.M., Post Y., Wei J.J., et al. Identification and characterization of essential genes in the human genome. Science 2015, 350:1096-1101.
158. Findlay G.M., Boyle E.A., Hause R.J., Klein J.C., Shendure J. Saturation editing of genomic regions by multiplex homology-directed repair. Nature 2014, 513:120-123.
159. Vierstra J., Reik A., Chang K.-H., Stehling-Sun S., Zhou Y., Hinkley S.J., et al. Functional footprinting of regulatory DNA. Nat Methods 2015, 12:927-930.
160. Canver M.C., Smith E.C., Sher F., Pinello L., Sanjana N.E., Shalem O., et al. BCL11A enhancer dissection by Cas9-mediated in situ saturating mutagenesis. Nature 2015, 527:192-197.
161. Schwartzman O., Tanay A. Single-cell epigenomics: techniques and emerging applications. Nat Rev Genet 2015, 16:716-726.
162. Cusanovich D.A., Daza R., Adey A., Pliner H.A., Christiansen L., Gunderson K.L., et al. Epigenetics. Multiplex single-cell profiling of chromatin accessibility by combinatorial cellular indexing. Science 2015, 348:910-914.
163. Lubeck E., Cai L. Single-cell systems biology by super-resolution imaging and combinatorial labeling. Nat Methods 2012, 9:743-748.
164. Lubeck E., Coskun A.F., Zhiyentayev T., Ahmad M., Cai L. Single-cell in situ RNA profiling by sequential hybridization. Nat Methods 2014, 11:360-361.
165. Lee J.H., Daugharthy E.R., Scheiman J., Kalhor R., Yang J.L., Ferrante T.C., et al. Highly multiplexed subcellular RNA sequencing in situ. Science 2014, 343:1360-1363.
166. Chen K.H., Boettiger A.N., Moffitt J.R., Wang S., Zhuang X. RNA imaging. Spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells. Science 2015, 348. aaa6090-0.
167. Trapnell C. Defining cell types and states with single-cell genomics. Genome Res 2015, 25:1491-1498.