Single-cell ChIP-seq reveals cell subpopulations defined by chromatin state

Nature Biotechnology

Volumn 33, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 1165-1172

  Rotem, Assaf ^a,b   Ram, Oren ^b,c,d   Shoresh, Noam ^b   Sperling, Ralph A ^a,e   Goren, Alon ^b   Weitz, David A ^a   Bernstein, Bradley E ^b,c,d  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BROAD INSTITUTE OF MIT AND HARVARD   (United States)

^c HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^e INSTITUT FÜR MIKROTECHNIK MAINZ GMBH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL CULTURE; GENE ENCODING; GENE EXPRESSION;

CELL SUBPOPULATIONS; CELL-TO-CELL VARIATION; FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS; GENE EXPRESSION DATA; INDIVIDUAL CELLS; SINGLE CELL RESOLUTION; SINGLECELL ANALYSIS; TRANSCRIPTIONAL ANALYSIS;

CHROMOSOMES;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL SUBPOPULATION; CHROMATIN; DNA BARCODING; EMBRYO; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; FIBROBLAST; GENE EXPRESSION; HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MALE; MICROFLUIDICS; MOUSE; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; ANIMAL; BIOLOGY; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; CLASSIFICATION; CYTOLOGY; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; MICROFLUIDIC ANALYSIS; PROCEDURES;

CHROMATIN;

ANIMALS; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DNA BARCODING, TAXONOMIC; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; HUMANS; MICE; MICROFLUIDIC ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84946545109     PISSN: 10870156     EISSN: 15461696     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3383     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Rivera, C.M., Ren, B. Mapping human epigenomes. Cell 155, 39-55 (2013).
2. Baylin, S.B., Jones, P.A. A decade of exploring the cancer epigenome-biological and translational implications. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11, 726-734 (2011).
3. ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489, 57-74 (2012).
4. Ernst, J. et al. Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types. Nature 473, 43-49 (2011).
5. Shalek, A.K. et al. Single-cell transcriptomics reveals bimodality in expression and splicing in immune cells. Nature 498, 236-240 (2013).
6. Kalisky, T., Quake, S.R. Single-cell genomics. Nat. Methods 8, 311-314 (2011).
7. Munsky, B., Neuert, G., van Oudenaarden, A. Using gene expression noise to understand gene regulation. Science 336, 183-187 (2012).
8. Nagano, T. et al. Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure. Nature 502, 59-64 (2013).
9. Brown, C.R., Mao, C., Falkovskaia, E., Jurica, M.S., Boeger, H. Linking stochastic fluctuations in chromatin structure and gene expression. PLoS Biol. 11, e1001621 (2013).
10. Cusanovich, D.A. et al. Multiplex single-cell profiling of chromatin accessibility by combinatorial cellular indexing. Science 348, 910-914 (2015).
11. Murphy, P.J. et al. Single-molecule analysis of combinatorial epigenomic states in normal and tumor cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 7772-7777 (2013).
12. Treutlein, B. et al. Reconstructing lineage hierarchies of the distal lung epithelium using single-cell RNA-seq. Nature 509, 371-375 (2014).
13. Patel, A.P. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblastoma. Science 344, 1396-1401 (2014).
14. Xu, X. et al. Single-cell exome sequencing reveals single-nucleotide mutation characteristics of a kidney tumor. Cell 148, 886-895 (2012).
15. Wang, Y. et al. Clonal evolution in breast cancer revealed by single nucleus genome sequencing. Nature 512, 155-160 (2014).
16. Sackmann, E.K., Fulton, A.L., Beebe, D.J. The present and future role of microfluidics in biomedical research. Nature 507, 181-189 (2014).
17. Guo, M.T., Rotem, A., Heyman, J.A., Weitz, D.A. Droplet microfluidics for high-throughput biological assays. Lab Chip 12, 2146-2155 (2012).
18. Klein, A.M. et al. Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells. Cell 161, 1187-1201 (2015).
19. Macosko, E.Z. et al. Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell 161, 1202-1214 (2015).
20. Rotem, A. et al. High-throughput single-cell labeling (Hi-SCL) for RNA-Seq using drop-based microfluidics. PLoS ONE 10, e0116328 (2015).
21. Adli, M., Zhu, J., Bernstein, B.E. Genome-wide chromatin maps derived from limited numbers of hematopoietic progenitors. Nat. Methods 7, 615-618 (2010).
22. Wu, A.R. et al. Automated microfluidic chromatin immunoprecipitation from 2,000 cells. Lab Chip 9, 1365-1370 (2009).
23. Lara-Astiaso, D. et al. Immunogenetics. Chromatin state dynamics during blood formation. Science 345, 943-949 (2014).
24. O'Neill, L.P., VerMilyea, M.D., Turner, B.M. Epigenetic characterization of the early embryo with a chromatin immunoprecipitation protocol applicable to small cell populations. Nat. Genet. 38, 835-841 (2006).
25. Hackett, J.A., Surani, M.A. Regulatory principles of pluripotency: from the ground state up. Cell Stem Cell 15, 416-430 (2014).
26. Hough, S.R. et al. Single-cell gene expression profiles define self-renewing, pluripotent, and lineage primed states of human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 2, 881-895 (2014).
27. Singer, Z.S. et al. Dynamic heterogeneity and DNA methylation in embryonic stem cells. Mol. Cell 55, 319-331 (2014).
28. Smallwood, S.A. et al. Single-cell genome-wide bisulfite sequencing for assessing epigenetic heterogeneity. Nat. Methods 11, 817-820 (2014).
29. Chambers, I. et al. Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development. Nature 450, 1230-1234 (2007).
30. Ben-Porath, I. et al. An embryonic stem cell-like gene expression signature in poorly differentiated aggressive human tumors. Nat. Genet. 40, 499-507 (2008).
31. Alexandrov, L.B. et al. Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer. Nature 500, 415-421 (2013).
32. Meshorer, E., Misteli, T. Chromatin in pluripotent embryonic stem cells and differentiation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 540-546 (2006).
33. Chen, X. et al. Integration of external signaling pathways with the core transcriptional network in embryonic stem cells. Cell 133, 1106-1117 (2008).
34. Li, Z. et al. Foxa2 and H2A.Z mediate nucleosome depletion during embryonic stem cell differentiation. Cell 151, 1608-1616 (2012).
35. Azuara, V. et al. Chromatin signatures of pluripotent cell lines. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 532-538 (2006).
36. Bernstein, B.E. et al. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 125, 315-326 (2006).
37. Zhu, J. et al. Genome-wide chromatin state transitions associated with developmental and environmental cues. Cell 152, 642-654 (2013).
38. Farlik, M. et al. Single-cell DNA methylome sequencing and bioinformatic inference of epigenomic cell-state dynamics. Cell Rep. 10, 1386-1397 (2015).
39. Nichols, J., Smith, A. Naive and primed pluripotent states. Cell Stem Cell 4, 487-492 (2009).
40. Ku, M. et al. Genomewide analysis of PRC1 and PRC2 occupancy identifies two classes of bivalent domains. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000242 (2008).
41. Kumar, R.M. et al. Deconstructing transcriptional heterogeneity in pluripotent stem cells. Nature 516, 56-61 (2014).
42. Mazutis, L. et al. Single-cell analysis and sorting using droplet-based microfluidics. Nat. Protoc. 8, 870-891 (2013).
43. Langmead, B., Salzberg, S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357-359 (2012).
44. Guttman, M. et al. Ab initio reconstruction of cell type-specific transcriptomes in mouse reveals the conserved multi-exonic structure of lincRNAs. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 503-510 (2010).
45. Venables, W.N. Modern Applied Statistics with S 4th edn. (Springer, New York, 2002).