Corrigendum: Enhancer loops appear stable during development and are associated with paused polymerase (Nature (2014) 512 (96-100) DOI: 10.1038/nature13417);Enhancer loops appear stable during development and are associated with paused polymerase

Nature

Volumn 512, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 96-100

  Ghavi Helm, Yad ^a   Klein, Felix A ^a   Pakozdi, Tibor ^a   Ciglar, Lucia ^a   Noordermeer, Daan ^b   Huber, Wolfgang ^a   Furlong, Eileen E M ^a  

^a EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

^b EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RNA POLYMERASE;

CELL ORGANELLE; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; DISEASE PREVALENCE; EMBRYO; FLY; GENOME; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RESOLUTION;

ARTICLE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; DROSOPHILA; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; ENHANCER REGION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE INTERACTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

ANIMALS; BINDING SITES; CHROMOSOMES, INSECT; DNA-DIRECTED RNA POLYMERASES; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; ENHANCER ELEMENTS, GENETIC; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENETIC LOCI; GENOME, INSECT; HUMANS; PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION, GENETIC; TRANSCRIPTIONAL ACTIVATION;

EID: 84905593782     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature18962     Document Type: Erratum

References (56)

1. Tolhuis, B., Palstra, R.-J., Splinter, E., Grosveld, F. & de Laat, W. Looping and interaction between hypersensitive sites in the active b-globin locus. Mol. Cell 10, 1453-1465 (2002).
2. Simonis, M. et al. Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncoveredbychromosome conformation capture-on-chip(4C). NatureGenet. 38, 1348-1354 (2006).
3. Montavon, T. et al. A regulatory archipelago controls Hox genes transcription in digits. Cell 147, 1132-1145 (2011).
4. de Laat, W. & Duboule, D. Topology of mammalian developmental enhancers and their regulatory landscapes. Nature 502, 499-506 (2013).
5. Van de Werken, H. J. G. et al. 4C technology: protocols and data analysis. Methods Enzymol. 513, 89-112 (2012).
6. Bonn, S. et al. Tissue-specific analysis of chromatin state identifies temporal signatures ofenhancer activity during embryonic development. Nature Genet. 44, 148-156 (2012).
7. Junion, G. et al. Atranscription factor collective defines cardiac cell fate and reflects lineage history. Cell 148, 473-486 (2012).
8. Zinzen, R. P., Girardot, C., Gagneur, J., Braun, M. & Furlong, E. E. M. Combinatorial binding predicts spatio-temporal cis-regulatory activity. Nature 462, 65-70 (2009).
9. Graveley, B. R. et al. The developmental transcriptome of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 471, 473-479 (2011).
10. Capovilla, M., Kambris, Z. & Botas, J. Direct regulation of the muscle-identity gene apterous by a Hox protein in the somatic mesoderm. Development 128, 1221-1230 (2001).
11. Tolhuis, B. et al. Interactions among Polycomb domains are guided by chromosome architecture. PLoS Genet. 7, e1001343 (2011).
12. Sanyal, A., Lajoie, B. R., Jain, G. & Dekker, J. The long-range interaction landscape of gene promoters. Nature 489, 109-113 (2012).
13. Jin, F. et al. Ahigh-resolution map ofthe three-dimensional chromatin interactome in human cells. Nature 503, 290-294 (2013).
14. Dixon, J. R. et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376-380 (2012).
15. Sexton, T. et al. Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome. Cell 148, 458-472 (2012).
16. Phillips-Cremins, J. E. et al. Architectural protein subclasses shape3Dorganization of genomes during lineage commitment. Cell 153, 1281-1295 (2013).
17. Nègre, N. et al. A comprehensive map of insulator elements for the Drosophila genome. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000814 (2010).
18. Schoenfelder, S. et al. Preferential associations between co-regulated genes reveal a transcriptional interactome in erythroid cells. Nature Genet. 42, 53-61 (2010).
19. Fanucchi, S., Shibayama, Y., Burd, S., Weinberg, M. S. & Mhlanga, M. M. Chromosomalcontactpermitstranscriptionbetweencoregulatedgenes. Cell155, 606-620 (2013).
20. Zhang, Y. et al. Chromatin connectivity maps reveal dynamic promoter-enhancer long-range associations. Nature 504, 306-310 (2013).
21. Cléard, F., Moshkin, Y., Karch, F. & Maeda, R. K. Probing long-distance regulatory interactions in the Drosophila melanogaster bithorax complex using Dam identification. Nature Genet. 38, 931-935 (2006).
22. Lanzuolo, C., Roure, V., Dekker, J., Bantignies, F. & Orlando, V. Polycomb response elements mediate the formation of chromosome higher-order structures in the bithorax complex. Nature Cell Biol. 9, 1167-1174 (2007).
23. Scuderi, A., Simin, K., Kazuko, S. G., Metherall, J. E. & Letsou, A. scylla and charybde, homologues of the human apoptotic gene RTP801, are required for head involution in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 291, 110-122 (2006).
24. Engström, P. G., Sui, S. J. H., Drivenes, Ø., Becker, T. S. & Lenhard, B. Genomic regulatory blocks underlie extensive microsynteny conservation in insects. Genome Res. 17, 1898-1908 (2007).
25. Deng, W. et al. Controlling long-range genomic interactions at a native locus by targeted tethering of a looping factor. Cell 149, 1233-1244 (2012).
26. Busturia, A. & Bienz, M. Silencers in abdominal-B, a homeotic Drosophila gene. EMBO J. 12, 1415-1425 (1993).
27. Zhou, J., Ashe, H., Burks, C. & Levine, M. Characterization of the transvection mediating region of the abdominal-B locus in Drosophila. Development 126, 3057-3065 (1999).
28. Saunders, A., Core, L. J., Sutcliffe, C., Lis, J. T. & Ashe, H. L. Extensive polymerase pausing during Drosophila axis patterning enables high-level and pliable transcription. Genes Dev. 27, 1146-1158 (2013).
29. Thomas, S. et al. Dynamic reprogramming of chromatin accessibility during Drosophila embryo development. Genome Biol. 12, R43 (2011).
30. Chopra, V. S., Cande, J., Hong, J.-W. & Levine, M. Stalled Hox promoters as chromosomal boundaries. Genes Dev. 23, 1505-1509 (2009).
31. Noordermeer, D. et al. ThedynamicarchitectureofHox gene clusters. Science 334, 222-225 (2011).
32. Bonn, S. et al. Tissue-specific analysis of chromatin state identifies temporal signaturesof enhancer activity during embryonic development. Nature Genet. 44, 148-156 (2012).
33. Campos-Ortéga, J. A. & Hartenstein, V. The Embryonic Development of Drosophila melanogaster (Springer, 1997).
34. Bonn, S. et al. Cell type-specific chromatin immunoprecipitation from multicellular complex samples using BiTS-ChIP. Nature Protocols 7, 978-994 (2012).
35. van de Werken, H. J. G. et al. Robust 4C-seq data analysis to screen for regulatory DNA interactions. Nature Methods 9, 969-972 (2012).
36. Bantignies, F. et al. Polycomb-dependent regulatorycontacts between distantHox loci in Drosophila. Cell 144, 214-226 (2011).
37. Venken, K. J. T., He, Y., Hoskins, R. A. & Bellen, H. J. P[acman]: a BAC transgenic platform for targeted insertion of large DNA fragments in D. melanogaster. Science 314, 1747-1751 (2006).
38. Barolo, S., Carver, L. A. & Posakony, J. W. GFP and b-galactosidase transformation vectors for promoter/enhancer analysis in Drosophila. Biotechniques 29, 726-732 (2000).
39. Rubin, G. M. & Spradling, A. C. Genetic transformation of Drosophila with transposable element vectors. Science 218, 348-353 (1982).
40. Furlong, E. E., Andersen, E. C., Null, B., White, K. P. & Scott, M. P. Patterns of gene expression during Drosophila mesoderm development. Science 293, 1629-1633 (2001).
41. Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 57, 289-300 (1995).
42. Ross-Innes, C. S. et al. Differential oestrogen receptor binding is associated with clinical outcome in breast cancer. Nature 481, 389-393 (2012).
43. Marygold, S. J. et al. FlyBase: improvements tothe bibliography. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D751-D757 (2013).
44. Hebenstreit, D. et al. RNAsequencingreveals two major classesofgene expression levels in metazoan cells. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 497 (2011).
45. Wilczynski, B., Liu, Y.-H., Yeo, Z. X. & Furlong, E. E. M. Predicting spatial and temporal gene expression using an integrative model of transcription factor occupancy and chromatin state. PLOS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002798 (2012).
46. Gallo, S. M. et al. REDfly v3. 0: toward a comprehensive database of transcriptional regulatory elements in Drosophila. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D118-D123 (2011).
47. Anders, S. & Huber, W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 11, R106 (2010).
48. Chen, K. et al. Aglobal changeinRNA polymeraseIIpausing duringthe Drosophila midblastula transition. eLife 2, e00861 (2013).
49. Nègre, N. et al. A cis-regulatory map of the Drosophila genome. Nature 471, 527-531 (2011).
50. Lai, W. K. M., Bard, J. E. & Buck, M. J. ArchTEx: accurate extraction and visualization of next-generation sequence data. Bioinformatics 28, 1021-1023 (2012).
51. Berman, B. P. et al. Computational identification of developmental enhancers: conservation and function of transcription factor binding-site clusters in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genome Biol. 5, R61 (2004).
52. Keleman, K. & Dickson, B. J. Short-and long-range repulsion by the Drosophila Unc5 netrin receptor. Neuron 32, 605-617 (2001).
53. Albrecht, S., Altenhein, B. & Paululat, A. The transmembrane receptor Uncoordinated5 (Unc5) is essential for heart lumen formation in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev. Biol. 350, 89-100 (2011).
54. Gaertner, B. et al. Poised RNA polymeraseIIchangesover developmental time and prepares genes for future expression. Cell Rep. 2, 1670-1683 (2012).
55. Tomancak, P. et al. Global analysis of patterns of gene expression during Drosophila embryogenesis. Genome Biol. 8, R145 (2007).
56. Core, L. J. & Lis, J. T. Transcription regulation through promoter-proximal pausing of RNA polymerase II. Science 319, 1791-1792 (2008).