A guide to mechanobiology: Where biology and physics meet

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Molecular Cell Research

Volumn 1853, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 3043-3052

  Jansen, Karin A ^a   Donato, Dominique M ^b   Balcioglu, Hayri E ^c   Schmidt, Thomas ^b   Danen, Erik H J ^c   Koenderink, Gijsje H ^a  

^a FOM INSTITUTE AMOLF   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

2D vs 3D; Cytoskeleton; Extracellular matrix; Integrins; Mechanosensing; Mechanotransduction

Indexed keywords

ACTIN; INTEGRIN; RHO GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE BINDING PROTEIN;

BIOENGINEERING; BIOLOGY; BIOPHYSICS; CYTOLOGY; CYTOSKELETON; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HUMAN; INTERMEDIATE FILAMENT; MECHANICS; MECHANOBIOLOGY; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; MICROTUBULE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; ANIMAL; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; NEOPLASM; PHYSIOLOGY; STEM CELL;

ANIMALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; STEM CELLS;

EID: 84944172791     PISSN: 01674889     EISSN: 18792596     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.05.007     Document Type: Review

References (202)

1. Engler A.J., Sen S., Sweeney H.L., Discher D.E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006, 126:677-689.
2. Orr A.W., Helmke B.P., Blackman B.R., Schwartz M.A. Mechanisms of mechanotransduction. Dev. Cell 2006, 10:11-20.
3. Lu P., Weaver V.M., Werb Z. The extracellular matrix: A dynamic niche in cancer progression. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 196:395-406.
4. Jaalouk D.E., Lammerding J. Mechanotransduction gone awry. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10:63-73.
5. Levental K.R., Yu H.M., Kass L., Lakins J.N., Egeblad M., Erler J.T., Fong S.F.T., Csiszar K., Giaccia A., Weninger W., Yamauchi M., Gasser D.L., Weaver V.M. Matrix crosslinking forces tumor progression by enhancing integrin signaling. Cell 2009, 139:891-906.
6. Campás O., Mammoto T., Hasso S., Sperling R.A., O'Connell D., Bischof A.G., Maas R., Weitz D.A., Mahadevan L., Ingber D.E. Quantifying cell-generated mechanical forces within living embryonic tissues. Nat. Methods 2014, 11:183-189.
7. Brunet T., Bouclet A., Ahmadi P., Mitrossilis D., Driquez B., Brunet A.-C., Henry L., Serman F., Béalle G., Ménager C., Dumas-Bouchiat F., Givord D., Yanicostas C., Le-Roy D., Dempsey N.M., Plessis A., Farge E. Evolutionary conservation of early mesoderm specification by mechanotransduction in bilateria. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4:2821.
8. Hynes R.O. Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell 2002, 110:673-687.
9. Moore S.W., Roca-Cusachs P., Sheetz M.P. Stretchy proteins on stretchy substrates: the important elements of integrin-mediated rigidity sensing. Dev. Cell 2010, 19:194-207.
10. Pasapera A.M., Schneider I.C., Rericha E., Schlaepfer D.D., Waterman C.M. Myosin II activity regulates vinculin recruitment to focal adhesions through FAK-mediated paxillin phosphorylation. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 188:877-890.
11. Diez G., Auernheimer V., Fabry B., Goldmann W.H. Head/tail interaction of vinculin influences cell mechanical behavior. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 406:85-88.
12. Carisey A., Tsang R., Greiner A.M., Nijenhuis N., Heath N., Nazgiewicz A., Kemkemer R., Derby B., Spatz J., Ballestrem C. Vinculin regulates the recruitment and release of core focal adhesion proteins in a force-dependent manner. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23:271-281.
13. del Rio A., Perez-Jimenez R., Liu R., Roca-Cusachs P., Fernandez J.M., Sheetz M.P. Stretching single talin rod molecules activates vinculin binding. Science 2009, 323:638-641.
14. Sawada Y., Tamada M., Dubin-Thaler B.J., Cherniavskaya O., Sakai R., Tanaka S., Sheetz M.P. Force sensing by extension of the src family kinase substrate, p130cas. Cell 2006, 127:1015-1026.
15. H. van Hoorn, D.M. Donato, H.E. Balcioglu, E.H. Danen, T. Schmidt, p130cas is a mechanosensor that modulates force exertion, (Unpublished results).
16. Novikova E.A., Storm C. Contractile fibers and catch-bond clusters: a biological force sensor?. Biophys. J. 2013, 105:1336-1345.
17. Elosegui-Artola A., Bazellières E., Allen M.D., Andreu I., Oria R., Sunyer R., Gomm J.J., Marshall J.F., Jones J.L., Trepat X., Roca-Cusachs P. Rigidity sensing and adaptation through regulation of integrin types. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13:631-637.
18. Kim D.-H., Chambliss A.B., Wirtz D. The multi-faceted role of the actin cap in cellular mechanosensation and mechanotransduction. Soft Matter 2013, 9:5516-5523.
19. Burridge K., Wittchen E.S. The tension mounts: stress fibers as force-generating mechanotransducers. J. Cell Biol. 2013, 200:9-19.
20. Hayakawa K., Tatsumi H., Sokabe M. Mechano-sensing by actin filaments and focal adhesion proteins. Commun. Integr. Biol. 2012, 5:572-577.
21. Kobayashi T., Sokabe M. Sensing substrate rigidity by mechanosensitive ion channels with stress fibers and focal adhesions. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2010, 22:669-676.
22. Huveneers S., de Rooij J. Mechanosensitive systems at the cadherin-F-actin interface. JCS 2013, 126:1-11.
23. Barry A.K., Wang N., Leckband D.E. Local VE-cadherin mechanotransduction triggers long-ranged remodeling of endothelial monolayers. J. Cell Sci. 2015, 128:1341-1351.
24. Humphries J.D., Byron A., Humphries M.J. Integrin ligands at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2006, 119:3901-3903.
25. Yurchenco P.D. Basement membranes: cell scaffoldings and signaling platforms. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011, 3:a004911.
26. Frantz C., Stewart K.M., Weaver V.M. The extracellular matrix at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2010, 123:4195-4200.
27. Wang A., de la Motte C., Lauer M., Hascall V. Hyaluronan matrices in pathobiological processes. FEBS J. 2011, 278:1412-1418.
28. Murphy-Ullrich J.E., Sage E.H. Revisiting the matricellular concept. Matrix Biol. 2014, 37:1-14.
29. Li B., Moshfegh C., Lin Z., Albuschies J., Vogel V. Mesenchymal Stem Cells Exploit Extracellular Matrix as Mechanotransducer. Scientific Reports 2013, 3:2425.
30. Chaudhuri O., Koshy S.T., Branco da Cunha C., Shin J.-W., Verbeke C.S., Allison K.H., Mooney D.J. Extracellular matrix stiffness and composition jointly regulate the induction of malignant phenotypes in mammary epithelium. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13:970-978.
31. Barcus C.E., Keely P.J., Eliceiri K.W., Schuler L.A. Stiff collagen matrices increase tumorigenic prolactin signaling in breast cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288:12722-12732.
32. Gaggioli C., Hooper S., Hidalgo-Carcedo C., Grosse R., Marshall J.F., Harrington K., Sahai E. Fibroblast-led collective invasion of carcinoma cells with differing roles for RhoGTPases in leading and following cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9:1392-1400. 10.1038/ncb1658.
33. Paszek M.J., Zahir N., Johnson K.R., Lakins J.N., Rozenberg G.I., Gefen A., Reinhart-King C.A., Margulies S.S., Dembo M., Boettiger D., Hammer D.A., Weaver V.M. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell 2005, 8:241-254.
34. Zampieri F., Coen M., Gabbiani G. The prehistory of the cytoskeleton concept. Cytoskeleton 2014, 71:464-471.
35. Ingber D.E. Tensegrity-based mechanosensing from macro to micro. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2008, 97:163-179.
36. Janmey P.A., Euteneuer U., Traub P., Schliwa M. Viscoelastic properties of vimentin compared with other filamentous biopolymer networks. JCB 1991, 113:155-160.
37. Michael Schopferer H.B., Hochstein B., Sharma S., Mücke N., Herrmann H., Willenbacher N. Desmin and vimentin intermediate filament networks: their viscoelastic properties investigated by mechanical rheometry. J. Mol. Biol. 2009, 388:133-143.
38. Storm C., Pastore J.J., MacKintosh F., Lubensky T., Janmey P.A. Nonlinear elasticity in biological gels. Nature 2005, 435:191-194.
39. Yeung T., Georges P.C., Flanagan L.A., Marg B., Ortiz M., Funaki M., Zahir N., Ming W., Waver V., Janmey P.A. Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 2005, 60:24-34.
40. Ghibaudo M., Saez A., Trichet L., Xayaphoummine A., Browaeys J., Silberzan P., Buguin A., Ladoux B. Traction forces and rigidity sensing regulate cell functions. Soft Matter 2008, 4:1836-1843.
41. Wen J.H., Vincent L.G., Fuhrmann A., Choi Y.S., Hribar K.C., Taylor-Weiner H., Chen S., Engler A.J. Interplay of matrix stiffness and protein tethering in stem cell differentiation. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13:979-987.
42. DiMilla P.A., Barbee K., Lauffenburger D.A. Mathematical model for the effects of adhesion and mechanics on cell migration speed. Biophys. J. 1991, 60:15-37.
43. Huttenlocher A., Ginsberg M.H., Horwitz A.F. Modulation of cell migration by integrin-mediated cytoskeletal linkages and ligand-binding affinity. J. Cell Biol. 1996, 134:1551-1562.
44. Wang N., Tytell J.D., Ingber D.E. Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10:75-82.
45. Reinhart-King C.A., Dembo M., Hammer D.A. Cell-cell mechanical communication through compliant substrates. Biophys. J. 2008, 95:6044-6051.
46. Zhang Q.-Y., Zhang Y.-Y., Zie J., Li C.-X., Chen W.-Y., Liu B.-L., An Wu X., Li S.-N., Huo B., Jiang L.-H., Zhao H.-C. Stiff substrates enhance cultured neuronal network activity. Sci. Rep. 2013, 4:6215.
47. Yang C., Tibbitt M.W., Basta L., Anseth K.S. Mechanical memory and dosing influence stem cell fate. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13:645-652.
48. Trappmann B., Gautrot J.E., Connelly J.T., Strange D.G.T., Li Y., Oyen M.L., Stuart M.A.C., Boehm H., Li B., Vogel V., Spatz J.P., Watt F.M., Huck W.T.S. Extracellular-matrix tethering regulates stem-cell fate. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11:642-649.
49. Yip A.K., Iwasaki K., Ursekar C., Machiyama H., Saxena M., Chen H., Harada I., Chiam K.-H., Sawada Y. Cellular response to substrate rigidity is governed by either stress or strain. Biophys. J. 2013, 104:19-29.
50. Maloney J.M., Walton E.B., Bruce C.M., Vliet K.J.V. Influence of finite thickness and stiffness on cellular adhesion-induced deformation of compliant substrata. PRE 2008, 78:041923.
51. Buxboim A., Rajagopal K., Brown A.E., Discher D.E. How deeply cells feel: methods for thin gels. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2010, 22:194116.
52. Leong W.S., Tay C.Y., Yu H., Li A., Wu S.C., Duc D.-H., Lim C.T., Tan L.P. Thickness sensing of hMSCs on collagen gel directs stem cell fate. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 401:287-292.
53. Winer J.P., Oake S., Janmey P.A. Non-linear elasticity of extracellular matrices enables contractile cells to communicate local position and orientation. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e6382.
54. Ma X., Schickel M.E., Stevenson M.D., Sarang-Sieminski A.L., Gooch K.J., Ghadiali S.N., Hart R.T. Fibers in the extracellular matrix enable long-range stress transmission between cells. Biophys. J. 2013, 104:1410-1418.
55. Rudnicki M.S., Cirka H.A., Aghvami M., Sander E.A., Wen Q., Billiar K.L. Nonlinear strain stiffening is not sufficient to explain how far cells can feel on fibrous protein gels. Biophys. J. 2013, 105:11-20.
56. Wang H., Abhilash A., Chen C.S., Wells R.G., Shenoy V.B. Long-range force transmission in fibrous matrices enabled by tension-driven alignment of fibers. Biophys. J. 2014, 107:2592-2603.
57. De R., Zemel A., Safran S.A. Do cells sense stress or strain? Measurement of cellular orientation can provide a clue. Biophys. J. 2008, 94:L29-L31.
58. Saez A., Buguin A., Silberzan P., Ladoux B. Is the mechanical activity of epithelial cells controlled by deformations or forces?. Biophys. J. 2005, 89:L52-L54.
59. Trichet L., Digabel J.L., Hawkins R.J., Vedula S.R.K., Gupta M., Ribrault C., Hersen P., Voituriez R., Ladoux B. Evidence of a large-scale mechanosensing mechanism for cellular adaptation to substrate stiffness. PNAS 2012, 109:6933-6938.
60. Zemel A., Rehfeldt F., Brown A.E.X., Discher D.E., Safran S.A. Optimal matrix rigidity for stress fiber polarization in stem cells. Nat. Phys. 2010, 6:468-473.
61. He S., Su Y., Ji B., Gao H. Some basic questions on mechanosensing in cell-substrate interaction. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 2014, 70:116-135.
62. Freyman T., Yannas I., Yokoo R., Gibson L. Fibroblast contractile force is independent of the stiffness which resists the contraction. Exp. Cell Res. 2002, 272:153-162.
63. Wen Q., Janmey P.A. Effects of non-linearity on cell-ECM interactions. Exp. Cell Res. 2013, 319:2481-2489.
64. Piechocka I., Bacabac R., Potters M., Mackintosh F., Koenderink G. Structural hierarchy governs fibrin gel mechanics. Biophys. J. 2010, 98:2281-2289.
65. Jansen K.A., Bacabac R.G., Piechocka I.K., Koenderink G.H. Cells actively stiffen fibrin networks by generating contractile stress. Biophys. J. 2013, 105:2240-2251.
66. Grinnell F. Fibroblast biology in three-dimensional collagen matrices. Trends Cell Biol. 2003, 13:264-269.
67. Cameron A.R., Frith J.E., Cooper-White J.J. The influence of substrate creep on mesenchymal stem cell behaviour and phenotype. Biomaterials 2010, 32:5979-5993.
68. Müller C., Müller A., Pompe T. Dissipative interactions in cell-matrix adhesion. Soft Matter 2013, 9:6207.
69. Chaudhuri O., Gu L., Darnell M., Klumpers D., Bencherif S.A., Weaver J.C., Huebsch N., Mooney D.J. Substrate stress relaxation regulates cell spreading. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6:6364.
70. Mohammadi H., Arora P.D., Simmons C.A., Janmey P.A., McCullock C.A. Inelastic behaviour of collagen networks in cell-matrix interactions and mechanosensation. J. R. Roc. Interface 2014, 12:20141074.
71. Ottania V., Martinia D., Franchia M., Ruggeria M.R.A. Hierarchical structures in fibrillar collagens. Micron 2002, 33:587-596.
72. Yang Z., Mochalkin I., Doolittle R.F. A model of fibrin formation based on crystal structures of fibrinogen and fibrin fragments complexed with synthetic peptides. PNAS 2000, 97:14156-14161.
73. Klotzsch E., Smith M.L., Kubow K.E., Muntwyler S., Little W.C., Beyeler F., Gourdon D., Nelson B.J., Vogel V. Fibronectin forms the most extensible biological fibers displaying switchable force-exposed cryptic binding sites. PNAS 2009, 106:18267-18272.
74. Nikkhah M., Edalat F., Manoucheri S., Khademhosseini A. Engineering microscale topographies to control the cell-substrate interface. Biomaterials 2012, 33:5230-5246.
75. Kim D.-H., Provenzano P.P., Smith C.L., Levchenko A. Matrix nanotopography as a regulator of cell function. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 197:351-360.
76. Janson I.A., Putnam A.J. Extracellular matrix elasticity and topography: material-based cues that affect cell function via conserved mechanisms. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2015, 103A:1246-1258.
77. Sun J., Ding Y., Lin N.J., Zhou J., Ro H., Soles C.L., Cicerone M.T., Lin-Gibson S. Exploring cellular contact guidance using gradient nanogratings. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11:3067-3072.
78. Brunetti V., Maiorano G., Rizzello L., Sorce B., Sabella S., Cingolani R., Pompa P.P. Neurons sense nanoscale roughness with nanometer sensitivity. PNAS 2010, 107:6264-6269.
79. Chen W., Sun Y., Fu J. Microfabricated nanotopological surfaces for study of adhesion-dependent cell mechanosensitivity. Small 2013, 9:81-89.
80. McNamara L.E., Sjöström T., Seunarine K., Meek R.D., Su B., Dalby M.J. Investigation of the limits of nanoscale filopodial interactions. J. Tissue Eng. 2014, 5. (2041731414536177).
81. Arnold M., Cavalcanti-Adam E.A., Glass R., Blümmel J., Eck W., Kantlehner M., Kessler H., Spatz J.P. Activation of integrin function by nanopatterned adhesive interfaces. ChemPhysChem 2004, 5:383-388.
82. Cavalcanti-Adam E.A., Volberg T., Micoulet A., Kessler H., Geiger B., Spatz J.P. Cell spreading and focal adhesion dynamics are regulated by spacing of integrin ligands. Biophys. J. 2007, 92:2964-2974.
83. Dalby M.J., Gadegaard N., Tare R., Andar A., Riehle M.O., Herzyk P., Wilkinson C.D.W., Oreffo R.O.C. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6:997-1003.
84. Ballo A., Agheli H., Lausmaa J., Thomsen P., Petronis S. Nanostructured model implants for in vivo studies: influence of well-defined nanotopography on de novo bone formation on titanium implants. Int. J. Nanomedicine 2011, 6:3415-3428.
85. Zaman M.H., Trapani L.M., Sieminski A.L., MacKellar D., Gong H., Kamm R.D., Wells A., Lauffenburger D.A., Matsudaira P. Migration of tumor cells in 3d matrices is governed by matrix stiffness along with cell-matrix adhesion and proteolysis. PNAS 2006, 103:10889-10894.
86. Ulrich T.A., Jain A., Tanner K., MacKay J.L., Kumar S. Probing cellular mechanobiology in three-dimensional culture with collagen-agarose matrices. Biomaterials 2010, 31:1875-1884.
87. Huebsch N., Arany P.R., Mao A.S., Shvartsman D., Ali O.A., Bencherif S.A., Rivera-Feliciano J., Mooney D.J. Harnessing traction-mediated manipulation of the cell/matrix interface to control stem-cell fate. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9:518-526.
88. Wolf K., te Lindert M., Krause M., Alexander S., te Riet J., Willis A.L., Hoffman R.M., Figdor C.G., Weiss S.J., Friedl P. Physical limits of cell migration: control by ECM space and nuclear deformation and tuning by proteolysis and traction force. J. Cell Biol. 2013, 201:1069-1084.
89. Yang Y.Li, Motte S., Kaufman L.J. Pore size variable type I collagen gels and their interaction with glioma cells. Biomaterials 2010, 31:5678-5688.
90. Miron-Mendoza M., Seemann J., Grinnell F. The differential regulation of cell motile activity through matrix stiffness and porosity in three dimensional collagen matrices. Biomaterials 2010, 31:6425-6435.
91. Pathak A., Kumar S. Independent regulation of tumor cell migration by matrix stiffness and confinement. PNAS 2012, 109:10334-10339.
92. Peyton S.R., Kalcioglu Z.I., Cohen J.C., Runkle A.P., Vliet K.J.V., Lauffenburger D.A., Griffith L.G. Marrow-derived stem cell motility in 3D synthetic scaffold is governed by geometry along with adhesivity and stiffness. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011, 108:1181-1193.
93. Lee J., Abdeen A.A., Zhang D., Kilian K.A. Directing stem cell fate on hydrogel substrates by controlling cell geometry, matrix mechanics and adhesion ligand composition. Biomaterials 2013, 34:8140-8148.
94. Kyburz K.A., Anseth K.S. Three-dimensional hMSC motility within peptide-functionalized PEG-based hydrogel of varying adhesivity and crosslinking density. Acta Biomater. 2013, 9:6381-6392.
95. Wang H., Cai L., Paul A., Enejder A., Heilshorn S.C. Hybrid elastin-like polypeptide-polyethylene gluco (ELP-PEG) hydrogels with improved transparency and independent control of matrix mechanics and cell ligand density. Biomacromolecules 2014, 15:3421-3428.
96. Kubow K.E., Conrad S.K., Horwitz A.R. Matrix microarchitecture and myosin II determine adhesion in 3D matrices. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23:1607-1619.
97. Polacheck W.J., German A.E., Mammoto A., Ingber D.E., Kamm R.D. Mechanotransduction of fluid stresses governs 3D cell migration. PNAS 2014, 111:2447-2452.
98. Doyle A.D., Wang F.W., Matsumoto K., Yamada K.M. One-dimensional topography underlies three-dimensional fibrillar cell migration. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 184:481-490.
99. Tolde O., Rösel D., Janoštiak R., P.V.Ý, Braábek J. Dynamics and morphology of focal adhesions in complex 3D environment. Folia Biol. 2012, 58:177-184.
100. Rehfeldt F., Brown A.E., Raab M., Cai S., Zajac A.L., Zemel A., Discher D.E. Hyaluronic acid matrices show matrix stiffness in 2D and 3D dictates cytoskeletal order and myosin-II phosphorylation within stem cells. Integr. Biol. 2012, 4:422-430.
101. Hakkinen K.M., Harunaga J.S., Doyle A.D., Yamada K.M. Direct comparisons of the morphology, migration, cell adhesions, and actin cytoskeleton of fibroblasts in four different three-dimensional extracellular matrices. Tissue Eng. A 2011, 17:713-724.
102. Beningo K.A., Dembo M., Li Wang Y. Responses of fibroblasts to anchorage of dorsal ecm receptors. PNAS 2004, 101:18024-18029.
103. Litvinov R.I., Barsegov V., Schissler A.J., Fisher A.R., Bennett J.S., Weisel J.W., Shuman H. Dissociation of bimolecular α IIb β3-fibrinogen complex under a constant tensile force. Biophys. J. 2011, 100:165-173.
104. Kong F., Garcia A.J., Mould A.P., Humphries M.J., Zhu C. Demonstration of catch bonds between an integrin and its ligand. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 185:1275-1284.
105. 1 function. Science 2009, 323:642-644.
106. Hertig S., Vogel V. Catch bonds. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22:R823-R825.
107. Altrock E., Muth C.A., Klein G., Spatz J.P., Lee-Thedieck C. The significance of integrin ligand nanopatterning on lipid raft clustering in hematopoietic stem cells. Biomaterials 2012, 33:3107-3118.
108. Frith J.E., Mills R.J., Cooper-White J.J. Lateral spacing of adhesion peptides influences human mesenchymal stem cell behaviour. J. Cell Sci. 2011, 125:317-327.
109. Koo L.Y., Irvine D.J., Mayes A.M., Lauffenburger D.A., Griffith L.G. Co-regulation of cell adhesion by nanoscale rgd organization and mechanical stimulus. J. Cell Sci. 2002, 115:1423-1433.
110. Massia S.P., Hubbell J.A. An rgd spacing of 440nm is sufficient for integrin alpha v beta 3-mediated fibroblast spreading and 140nm for focal contact and stress fiber formation. J. Cell Biol. 1991, 114:1089-1100.
111. Le Saux G., Magenau A., Gunaratnam K., Kilian K.A., Böcking T., Gooding J.J., Gaus K. Spacing of integrin ligands influences signal transduction in endothelial cells. Biophys. J. 2011, 101:764-773.
112. Huang J., Grater S.V., Corbellini F., Rinck S., Bock E., Kemkemer R., Kessler H., Ding J., Spatz J.P. Impact of order and disorder in rgd nanopatterns on cell adhesion. Nano Lett. 2009, 9:1111-1116.
113. Liu Y., Medda R., Liu Z., Galior K., Yehl K., Spatz J.P., Cavalcanti-Adam E.A., Salaita K. Nanoparticle tension probes patterned at the nanoscale: impact of integrin clustering on force transmission. Nano Lett. 2014, 14:5539-5546.
114. Lin G.L., Cohen D.M., Desai R.A., Breckenridge M.T., Gao L., Humphries M.J., Chen C.S. Activation of beta 1 but not beta 3 integrin increases cell traction forces. FEBS Lett. 2013, 587:763-769.
115. Schiller H.B., Hermann M.-R., Polleux J., Vignaud T., Zanivan S., Friedel C.C., Sun Z., Raducanu A., Gottschalk K.-E., Théry M., Mann M., Fässler R. β1- and αv-class integrins cooperate to regulate myosin II during rigidity sensing of fibronectin-based microenvironments. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013, 15:625-636.
116. Balcioglu H.E., van Hoorn H., Donato D.M., Schmidt T., Danen E.H.J. The integrin expression profile modulates orientation and dynamics of force transmission at cell-matrix adhesions. J. Cell Sci. 2015, 128:1316-1326.
117. Roca-Cusachs P., Gauthier N.C., del Rio A., Sheetz M.P. Clustering of alpha(5)beta(1) integrins determines adhesion strength whereas alpha(v)beta(3) and talin enable mechanotransduction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:16245-16250.
118. Fuhrmann A., Li J., Chien S., Engler A.J. Cation type specific cell remodeling regulates attachment strength. PLoS ONE 2014, 9:e102424.
119. White D.P., Caswell P.T., Norman J.C. αvβ3 and α5β1 integrin recycling pathways dictate downstream Rho kinase signaling to regulate persistent cell migration. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 177:515-525.
120. Danen E.H.J., Sonneveld P., Brakebusch C., Fassler R., Sonnenberg A. The fibronectin-binding integrins alpha 5 beta 1 and alpha v beta 3 differentially modulate rhoa-gtp loading, organization of cell matrix adhesions, and fibronectin fibrillogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 2002, 159:1071-1086.
121. Miao H., Li S., Hu Y.-L., Yuan S., Zhao Y., Chen B.P.C., Puzon-McLaughlin W., Tarui T., Shyy J.Y.-J., Takada Y., Usami S., Chien S. Differential regulation of Rho GTPases by β1 and β3 integrins: the role of an extracellular domain of integrin in intracellular signaling. J. Cell Sci. 2002, 115:2199-2206.
122. Goe H.L., Gritsko T., Pursell B., Chang C., Shultz L.D., Greiner D.L., Norum J.H., Toftgard R., Shaw L.M., Mercurio A.M. Regulated splicing of the α6 integrin cytoplasmic domain determines the fate of breast cancer stem cells. Cell Rep. 2014, 7:747-761.
123. Mao Y., Schwarzbauer J.E. Fibronectin fibrillogenesis, a cell-mediated matrix assembly process. Matrix Biol. 2005, 24:389-399.
124. Kadler K.E., Hill A., Canty-Laird E.G. Collagen fibrillogenesis: fibronectin, integrins, and minor collagens as organizers and nucleators. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2008, 20:495-501.
125. 1 integrin is a metastasis suppressor in mouse models and human cancer. J. Clin. Invest. 2011, 2011:226-237.
126. Moran-Jones K., Ledger A., Naylor M.J. β1 integrin deletion enhances progression of prostate cancer in the TRAMP mouse model. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2:526.
127. Parvani J.G., Galliher-Beckley A.J., Schiemann B.J., Schiemann W.P. Targeted inactivation of β1 integrin induces β3 integrin switching that drives breast cancer metastasis by TGF-β. Mol. Biol. Cell 2013, 24:3449-3459.
128. Truong H.H., Xiong J., Ghotra V.P.S., Nirmala E., Haazen L., Le Devedec S.E., Balcioglu H.E., He S., Snaar-Jagalska B.E., Vreugdenhil E., Meerman J.H.N., van de Water B., Danen E.H.J. β1 integrin inhibition elicits a prometastatic switch through the TGFbeta-mir-200-ZEB network in E-cadherin-positive triple-negative breast cancer. Sci. Signal. 2014, 7:ra15.
129. Munger J.S., Sheppard D. Cross talk among TGF-β signaling pathways, integrins, and the extracellular matrix. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011, 3:a005017.
130. Tong X., Yang F. Engineering interpenetrating network hydrogels as biomimetic cell niche with independently tunable biochemical and mechanical properties. Biomaterials 2014, 35:1807-1815.
131. Khetan S., Guvendiren M., Legant W.R., Cohen D.M., Chen C.S., Burdick J.A. Degradation-mediated cellular traction directs stem cell fate in covalently crosslinked three-dimensional hydrogels. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12:458-465.
132. Grashoff C., Hoffman B.D., Brenner M.D., Zhou R., Parsons M., Yang M.T., McLean M.A., Sligar S.G., Chen C.S., Ha T., Schwartz M.A. Measuring mechanical tension across vinculin reveals regulation of focal adhesion dynamics. Nature 2010, 466:263-267.
133. Kubow K.E., Horwitz A.R. Reducing background fluorescence reveals adhesions in 3d matrices. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:3-7.
134. Chiu C.-L., Aguilar J.S., Tsai C.Y., Wu G., Gratton E., Digman M.A. Nanoimaging of focal adhesion dynamics in 3d. PLoS ONE 2014, 9:e99896.
135. Fraley S.I., Feng Y., Krishnamurthy R., Kim D.-H., Celedon A., Longmore G.D., Wirtz D. A distinctive role for focal adhesion proteins in three-dimensional cell motility. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12:598-604.
136. Janmey P.A., Wells R.G., Assoian R.K., McCulloch C.A. From tissue mechanics to transcription factors. Differentiation 2013, 86:112-120.
137. Janoštiak R., Brábek J., Auernheimer V., Tatárová Z., Lautscham L.A., Dey T., Gemperle J., Merkel R., Goldmann W.H., Fabry B., et al. Cas directly interacts with vinculin to control mechanosensing and focal adhesion dynamics. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2014, 71:727-744.
138. Lu C., Wu F., Qiu W., Liu R. P130cas substrate domain is intrinsically disordered as characterized by single-molecule force measurements. Biophys. Chem. 2013, 180:37-43.
139. Hotta K., Ranganathan S., Liu R., Wu F., Machiyama H., Gao R., Hirata H., Soni N., Ohe T., Hogue C.W., et al. Biophysical properties of intrinsically disordered p130cas substrate domain-implication in mechanosensing. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2014, 10:e1003532.
140. Meenderink L.M., Ryzhova L.M., Donato D.M., Gochberg D.F., Kaverina I., Hanks S.K. P130cas src-binding and substrate domains have distinct roles in sustaining focal adhesion disassembly and promoting cell migration. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e13412.
141. Janoštiak R., Pataki A.C., Brábek J., Rösel D. Mechanosensors in integrin signaling: the emerging role of p130cas. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2014, 93:445-454.
142. Smith M., Hoffman L., Beckerle M. Lim proteins in actin cytoskeleton mechanoresponse. Trends Cell Biol. 2014, 24:575-583.
143. Fradelizi J., Noireaux V., Plastino J., Menichi B., Louvard D., Sykes C., Golsteyn R.M., Friederich E. Acta and human zyxin harbour arp2/3-independent actin-polymerization activity. Nat. Cell Biol. 2001, 3:699-707.
144. Drees B.E., Andrews K.M., Beckerle M.C. Molecular dissection of zyxin function reveals its involvement in cell motility. J. Cell Biol. 1999, 147:1549-1560.
145. Smith M.A., Blankman E., Gardel M.L., Luettjohann L., Waterman C.M., Beckerle M.C. A zyxin-mediated mechanism for actin stress fiber maintenance and repair. Dev. Cell 2010, 19:365-376.
146. Colombelli J., Besser A., Kress H., Reynaud E.G., Girard P., Caussinus E., Haselmann U., Small J.V., Schwarz U.S., Stelzer E.H. Mechanosensing in actin stress fibers revealed by a close correlation between force and protein localization. J. Cell Sci. 2009, 122:1665-1679.
147. Deakin N.O., Turner C.E. Paxillin inhibits HDAC6 to regulate microtubule acetylation, Golgi structure, and polarized migration. JCB 2014, 206:395-413.
148. Jaffe A.B., Hall A. Rho gtpases: biochemistry and biology. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2005, 21:247-269.
149. Gregor M., Osmanagic-Myers S., Burgstaller G., Wolfram M., Fischer I., Walko G., Resch G.P., Jörgl A., Herrmann H., Wiche G. Mechanosensing through focal adhesion-anchored intermediate filaments. FASEB J. 2014, 28:715-729.
150. Chen K., Zhang W., Chen J., Li S., Guo G. Rho-associated protein kinase modulates neurite extension by regulating microtubule remodeling and vinculin distribution. Neural Regen Res. 2013, 8:3027-3035.
151. Provenzano P.P., Inman D.R., Eliceiri K.W., Trier S.M., Keely P.J. Contact guidance mediated three-dimensional cell migration is regulated by Rho/ROCK-dependent matrix reorganization. Biophys. J. 2008, 95:5374-5384.
152. Putnam A.J., Cunningham J.J., Pillemer B.B., Mooney D.J. External mechanical strain regulates membrane targeting of rho gtpases by controlling microtubule assembly. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2003, 284:C627-C639.
153. Birukov K.G. Small gtpases in mechanosensitive regulation of endothelial barrier. Microvasc. Res. 2009, 77:46-52.
154. Khatiwala C.B., Peyton S.R., Metzke M., Putnam A.J. The regulation of osteogenesis by ecm rigidity in mc3t3-e1 cells requires mapk activation. J. Cell. Physiol. 2007, 211:661-672.
155. Hamamura K., Swarnkar G., Tanjung N., Cho E., Li J., Na S., Yokota H. RhoA-mediated signaling in mechanotransduction of osteoblasts. Connect. Tissue Res. 2012, 53:398-406.
156. Holle A.W., Tang X., Vijayraghavan D., Vincent L.G., Fuhrmann A., Choi Y.S., Álamo J.C., Engler A.J. In situ mechanotransduction via vinculin regulates stem cell differentiation. Stem Cells 2013, 31:2467-2477.
157. Gaspar P., Tapon N. Sensing the local environment: actin architecture and hippo signalling. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2014, 31:74-83.
158. Low B.C., Pan C.Q., Shivashankar G., Bershadsky A., Sudol M., Sheetz M. YAP/TAZ as mechanosensors and mechanotransducers in regulating organ size and tumor growth. FEBS Lett. 2014, 588:2663-2670.
159. Dupont S., Morsut L., Aragona M., Enzo E., Giulitti S., Cordenonsi M., Zanconato F., Le Digabel J., Forcato M., Bicciato S., et al. Role of yap/taz in mechanotransduction. Nature 2011, 474:179-183.
160. Wada K.-I., Itoga K., Okano T., Yonemura S., Sasaki H. Hippo pathway regulation by cell morphology and stress fibers. Development 2011, 138:3907-3914.
161. Aragona M., Panciera T., Manfrin A., Giulitti S., Michielin F., Elvassore N., Dupont S., Piccolo S. A mechanical checkpoint controls multicellular growth through yap/taz regulation by actin-processing factors. Cell 2013, 154:1047-1059.
162. Codelia V.A., Sun G., Irvine K.D. Regulation of YAP by mechanical strain through Jnk and Hippo signaling. Curr. Biol. 2014, 24:2012-2017.
163. Calvo F., Ege N., Grande-Garcia A., Hooper S., Jenkins R.P., Chaudhry S.I., Harrington K., Williamson P., Moeendarbary E., Charras G., et al. Mechanotransduction and yap-dependent matrix remodelling is required for the generation and maintenance of cancer-associated fibroblasts. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013, 15:637-646.
164. Zhao B., Li L., Wang L., Wang C.-Y., Yu J., Guan K.-L. Cell detachment activates the hippo pathway via cytoskeleton reorganization to induce anoikis. Genes Dev. 2012, 26:54-68.
165. Reginensi A., Scott R.P., Gregorieff A., Bagherie-Lachidan M., Chung C., Lim D.-S., Pawson T., Wrana J., McNeill H. Yap-and cdc42-dependent nephrogenesis and morphogenesis during mouse kidney development. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9:e1003380.
166. Wang D.-Z., Chang P.S., Wang Z., Sutherland L., Richardson J.A., Small E., Krieg P.A., Olson E.N. Activation of cardiac gene expression by myocardin, a transcriptional cofactor for serum response factor. Cell 2001, 105:851-862.
167. Miralles F., Posern G., Zaromytidou A.-I., Treisman R. Actin dynamics control srf activity by regulation of its coactivator mal. Cell 2003, 113:329-342.
168. Chan M.W., Chaudary F., Lee W., Copeland J.W., McCulloch C.A. Force-induced myofibroblast differentiation through collagen receptors is dependent on mammalian diaphanous. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285:9273-9281.
169. Huber F., Boire A., López M.P., Koenderink G.H. Cytoskeletal crosstalk: when three different personalities team up. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2014, 32:39-47.
170. Kim J.S., Lee C.-H., Su B.Y., Coulombe P.A. Mathematical modeling of the impact of actin and keratin filaments on keratinocyte cell spreading. Biophys. J. 2012, 103:1828-1838.
171. Murray M.E., Mendez M.G., Janmey P.A. Substrate stiffness regulates solubility of cellular vimentin. MBoC 2014, 25:87-94.
172. Solon J., Levental I., Sengupta K., Georges P.C., Janmey P.A. Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates. Biophys. J. 2007, 93:4453-4461.
173. Schwarz U.S., Gardel M.L. United we stand - integrating the actin cytoskeleton and cell-matrix adhesions in cellular mechanotransduction. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125:3051-3060.
174. Ciobanasu C., Faivre B., Clainche C.L. Actomyosin-dependent formation of the mechanosensitive talin-vinculin complex reinforces actin anchoring. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5:3095.
175. Ochsner M., Textor M., Vogel V., Smith M.L. Dimensionality controls cytoskeleton assembly and metabolism of fibroblast cells in response to rigidity and shape. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e9445.
176. Ho F.C., Zhang W., Li Y.Y., Chan B.P. Mechanoresponsive, omni-directional and local matrix-degrading actin protrusions in human mesenchymal stem cells microencapsulated in a 3D collagen matrix. Biomaterials 2015, 53:392-405.
177. Rhee S., Jiang H., Ho C.-H., Grinnell F. Microtubule function in fibroblast spreading is modulated according to the tension state of cell-matrix interactions. PNAS 2007, 104:5425-5430.
178. Stehbens S., Wittmann T. Targeting and transport: how microtubules control focal adhesion dynamics. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 198:481-489.
179. Palazzo A.F., Gundersen G.G. Microtubule-actin cross-talk at focal adhesions. Sci. STKE 2002, 2002:e31.
180. Ezratty E.J., Partridge M.A., Gundersen G.G. Microtubule-induced focal adhesion disassembly is mediated by dynamin and focal adhesion kinase. Nat. Cell Biol. 2005, 7:581-590.
181. Efimov A., Schiefermeier N., Grigoriev I., Ohi R., Brown M.C., Turner C.E., Small J.V., Kaverina I. Paxillin-dependent stimulation of microtubule catastrophes at focal adhesion sites. J. Cell Sci. 2008, 121:196-204.
182. Wu X., Kodama A., Fuchs E. ACF7 regulates cytoskeletal-focal adhesion dynamics and migration and has ATPase activity. Cell 2008, 135:137-148.
183. López M.P., Huber F., Grigoriev I., Steinmetz M.O., Akhmanova A., Koenderink G.H., Dogterom M. Actin-microtubule coordination at growing microtubule ends. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5:4778.
184. Rape A., Guo W.-H., Li Wang Y. Microtubule depolymerization induces traction force increase through two distinct pathways. J. Cell Sci. 2011, 124:4233-4240.
185. Danowski B.A. Fibroblast contractility and actin organization are stimulated by microtubule inhibitors. J. Cell Sci. 1989, 93:255-266.
186. Kolodney M.S., Elson E.L. Contraction due to microtubule disruption is associated with increased phosphorylation of myosin regulatory light chain. PNAS 1995, 92:10252-10256.
187. Kim A., Petroll W.M. Microtubule regulation of corneal fibroblast morphology and mechanical activity in 3-D culture. Exp. Eye Res. 2007, 85:546-556.
188. Ng D.H.J., Humphries J.D., Byron A., Millon-Frémillon A.lique, Humphries M.J. Microtubule-dependent modulation of adhesion complex composition. PLoS ONE 2014, 9:e115213.
189. Kraning-Rush C.M., Carey S.P., Califano J.P., Smith B.N., Reinhart-King C.A. The role of the cytoskeleton in cellular force generation in 2D and 3D environments. Phys. Biol. 2011, 8:015009.
190. Heck J.N., Ponik S.M., Garcia-Mendoza M.G., Pehlke C.A., Inman D.R., Eliceiri K.W., Keely P.J. Microtubules regulate GEF-H1 in response to extracellular matrix stiffness. MBoC 2012, 23:2583-2592.
191. Lang N.R., Münster S., Metzner C., Krauss P., Schürmann S., Lange J., Aifantis K.E., Friedrich O., Fabry B. Estimating the 3D pore size distribution of biopolymer networks from directionally biased data. Biophys. J. 2013, 105:1967-1975.
192. Myers K.A., Applegate K.T., Danuser G., Fischer R.S., Waterman C.M. Distinct ECM mechanosensing pathways regulate microtubule dynamics to control endothelial cell branching morphogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 2011, 192:321-334.
193. Minin A., Moldaver M. Intermediate vimentin filaments and their role in intracellular organelle distribution. Biochemistry 2008, 73:1453-1466.
194. Ivaska J., Pallari H.-M., Nevo J., Eriksson J.E. Novel functions of vimentin in cell adhesion, migration, and signaling. Exp. Cell Res. 2007, 313:2050-2062.
195. Shabbir S.H., Cleland M.M., Goldman R.D., Mrksich M. Geometric control of vimentin intermediate filaments. Biomaterials 2014, 35:1359-1366.
196. Wiche G., Winter L. Plectin isoforms as organizers of intermediate filament cytoarchitecture. BioArchitecture 2011, 1:14-20.
197. Ketema M., Kreft M., Secades P., Janssen H., Sonnenberg A. Nesprin-3 connects plectin and vimentin to the nuclear envelope of sertoli cells but is not required for sertoli cell function in spermatogenesis. MBoC 2013, 24:2454-2466.
198. Tsuruta D., Jones J.C. The vimentin cytoskeleton regulates focal contact size and adhesion of endothelial cells subjected to shear stress. J. Cell Sci. 2003, 116:4977-4984.
199. Burgstaller G., Gregor M., Winter L., Wiche G. Keeping the vimentin network under control: cell-matrix adhesion-associated plectin 1f affects cell shape and polarity of fibroblasts. Mol. Biol. Cell 2010, 21:3362-3375.
200. Bhattacharya R., Gonzalez A.M., DeBiase P.J., Trejo H.E., Goldman R.D., Flitney F.W., Jones J.C.R. Recruitment of vimentin to the cell surface by β3 integrin and plectin mediates adhesion strength. J. Cell Sci. 2009, 122:1390-1400.
201. Eckes B., Dogic D., Colucci-Guyon E., Wang N., Maniotis A., Ingber D., Merckling A., Langa F., Aumailley M., Delouvée A., Koteliansky V., Babinet C., Krieg T. Impaired mechanical stability, migration and contractile capacity in vimentin-deficient fibroblasts. J. Cell Sci. 1998, 111:1897-1907.
202. Mendez M., Restle D., Janmey P. Vimentin enhances cell elastic behavior and protects against compressive stress. Biophys. J. 2014, 107:314-323.