Directing stem cell fate on hydrogel substrates by controlling cell geometry, matrix mechanics and adhesion ligand composition

Biomaterials

Volumn 34, Issue 33, 2013, Pages 8140-8148

  Lee, Junmin ^a   Abdeen, Amr A ^a   Zhang, Douglas ^a   Kilian, Kristopher A ^a  

^a University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

Author keywords

Differentiation; Mesenchymal stem cells; Microcontact printing; Microenvironment; Polyacrylamide hydrogels

Indexed keywords

BIOCHEMICAL SIGNAL; MATRIX COMPOSITION; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; MICRO CONTACT PRINTING; MICRO-ENGINEERING; MICROENVIRONMENTS; POLYACRYLAMIDE HYDROGELS; SUBSTRATE STIFFNESS;

ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; DIFFERENTIATION (CALCULUS); ELECTRON DEVICE MANUFACTURE; GEOMETRY; HYDROGELS; LIGANDS; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; STEM CELLS; STIFFNESS MATRIX; SUBSTRATES;

BIOMECHANICS;

COLLAGEN; LAMININ; MATRIX PROTEIN; MICROTUBULE ASSOCIATED PROTEIN 2; TUBULIN;

ADIPOGENESIS; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; COMPLIANCE (PHYSICAL); GENE EXPRESSION; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYDROGEL; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; MICROENVIRONMENT; NERVOUS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; PHENOTYPE; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

DIFFERENTIATION; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS; MICROCONTACT PRINTING; MICROENVIRONMENT; POLYACRYLAMIDE HYDROGELS;

ACRYLIC RESINS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELLS, CULTURED; HUMANS; HYDROGEL; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS;

EID: 84881669648     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.074     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Frith J.E., Mills R.J., Hudson J.E., Cooper-White J.J. Tailored integrin-extracellular matrix interactions to direct human mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Stem Cells Dev 2012, 21:2442-2456.
2. Rowlands A.S., George P.A., Cooper-White J.J. Directing osteogenic and myogenic differentiation of MSCs: interplay of stiffness and adhesive ligand presentation. Am J Physiol 2008, 295:C1037-C1044.
3. Kilian K.A., Mrksich M. Directing stem cell fate by controlling the affinity and density of ligand-receptor interactions at the biomaterials interface. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2012, 51:4891-4895.
4. Guilak F., Cohen D.M., Estes B.T., Gimble J.M., Liedtke W., Chen C.S. Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. Cell Stem Cell 2009, 5:17-26.
5. Higuchi A., Ling Q.D., Chang Y., Hsu S.T., Umezawa A. Physical cues of biomaterials guide stem cell differentiation fate. Chem Rev 2013, 113:3297-3328.
6. Huebsch N., Arany P.R., Mao A.S., Shvartsman D., Ali O.A., Bencherif S.A., et al. Harnessing traction-mediated manipulation of the cell/matrix interface to control stem-cell fate. Nat Mater 2010, 9:518-526.
7. Khetan S., Guvendiren M., Legant W.R., Cohen D.M., Chen C.S., Burdick J.A. Degradation-mediated cellular traction directs stem cell fate in covalently crosslinked three-dimensional hydrogels. Nat Mater 2013, 12:1-8.
8. Engler A.J., Sen S., Sweeney H.L., Discher D.E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006, 126:677-689.
9. Keung A.J., Asuri P., Kumar S., Schaffer D.V. Soft microenvironments promote the early neurogenic differentiation but not self-renewal of human pluripotent stem cells. Integr Biol 2012, 4:1049-1058.
10. Flanagan L.A., Ju Y.E., Marg B., Osterfield M., Janmey P.A. Neurite branching on deformable substrates. Neuroreport 2002, 13:2411-2415.
11. Park S.A., Shin J.W., Yang Y.I., Kim Y.K., Park K.D., Lee J.W., et al. Invitro study of osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells on heat-treated porcine trabecular bone blocks. Biomaterials 2004, 25:527-535.
12. Saha K., Keung A.J., Irwin E.F., Li Y., Little L., Schaffer D.V., et al. Substrate modulus directs neural stem cell behavior. Biophys J 2008, 95:4426-4438.
13. Trappmann B., Gautrot J.E., Connelly J.T., Strange D.G., Li Y., Oyen M.L., et al. Extracellular-matrix tethering regulates stem-cell fate. Nat Mater 2012, 11:642-649.
14. Hudalla G.A., Murphy W.L. Chemically well-defined self-assembled monolayers for cell culture: toward mimicking the natural ECM. Soft Matter 2011, 7:9561-9571.
15. Klim J.R., Li L., Wrighton P.J., Piekarczyk M.S., Kiessling L.L. Adefined glycosaminoglycan-binding substratum for human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Methods 2010, 7:989-996.
16. McBeath R., Pirone D.M., Nelson C.M., Bhadriraju K., Chen C.S. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell 2004, 6:483-495.
17. Kilian K.A., Bugarija B., Lahn B.T., Mrksich M. Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:4872-4877.
18. Zhang D., Kilian K.A. The effect of mesenchymal stem cell shape on the maintenance of multipotency. Biomaterials 2013, 34:3962-3969.
19. Peng R., Yao X., Ding J. Effect of cell anisotropy on differentiation of stem cells on micropatterned surfaces through the controlled single cell adhesion. Biomaterials 2011, 32:8048-8057.
20. Wilson A., Trumpp A. Bone-marrow haematopoietic-stem-cell niches. Nat Rev Immunol 2006, 6:93-106.
21. Janmey P.A., Miller R.T. Mechanisms of mechanical signaling in development and disease. JCell Sci 2011, 124:9-18.
22. Fu J., Wang Y.K., Yang M.T., Desai R.A., Yu X., Liu Z., et al. Mechanical regulation of cell function with geometrically modulated elastomeric substrates. Nat Methods 2010, 7:733-736.
23. Aydin D., Louban I., Perschmann N., Blümmel J., Lohmüller T., Cavalcanti-Adam E.A., et al. Polymeric substrates with tunable elasticity and nanoscopically controlled biomolecule presentation. Langmuir 2010, 26:15472-15480.
24. Hynd M.R., Frampton J.P., Dowell-Mesfin N., Turner J.N., Shain W. Directed cell growth on protein-functionalized hydrogel surfaces. JNeurosci Methods 2007, 162:255-263.
25. Tse J.R., Engler A.J. Preparation of hydrogel substrates with tunable mechanical properties. Curr Protoc Cell Biol 2010, 47:10.16.1-10.16.16.
26. Damljanović V., Lagerholm B.C., Jacobson K. Bulk and micropatterned conjugation of extracellular matrix proteins to characterized polyacrylamide substrates for cell mechanotransduction assays. Biotechniques 2005, 39:847-851.
27. Suri S., Schmidt C.E. Cell-laden hydrogel constructs of hyaluronic acid, collagen, and laminin for neural tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A 2010, 16:1703-1716.
28. Winer J.P., Janmey P.A., McCormick M.E., Funaki M. Bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells become quiescent on soft substrates but remain responsive to chemical or mechanical stimuli. Tissue Eng Part A 2009, 15:147-154.
29. Banerjee A., Arha M., Choudhary S., Ashton R.S., Bhatia S.R., Schaffer D.V., et al. The influence of hydrogel modulus on the proliferation and differentiation of encapsulated neural stem cells. Biomaterials 2009, 30:4695-4699.
30. Reilly G.C., Engler A.J. Intrinsic extracellular matrix properties regulate stem cell differentiation. JBiomech 2010, 43:55-62.
31. Park J.S., Chu J.S., Tsou A.D., Diop R., Tang Z., Wang A., et al. The effect of matrix stiffness on the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in response to TGF-β. Biomaterials 2011, 32:3921-3930.
32. Mariman E.C., Wang P. Adipocyte extracellular matrix composition, dynamics and role in obesity. Cell Mol Life Sci 2010, 67:1277-1292.