β 1 - And α v -class integrins cooperate to regulate myosin II during rigidity sensing of fibronectin-based microenvironments

Nature Cell Biology

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 625-636

  Schiller, Herbert B ^a   Hermann, Michaela Rosemarie ^a   Polleux, Julien ^a   Vignaud, Timothée ^b   Zanivan, Sara ^a   Friedel, Caroline C ^c   Sun, Zhiqi ^a   Raducanu, Aurelia ^a   Gottschalk, Kay E ^d   Théry, Manuel ^b   Mann, Matthias ^a   Fässler, Reinhard ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF BIOCHEMISTRY   (Germany)

^b CEA GRENOBLE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BETA1 INTEGRIN; CD51 ANTIGEN; FIBRONECTIN; FOCAL ADHESION KINASE; VITRONECTIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CELL ADHESION; CELL MIGRATION; CELL SIZE; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOWN REGULATION; FIBROBLAST; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEOMICS; STOICHIOMETRY;

ANIMALS; ANTIGENS, CD29; CARRIER PROTEINS; CELL ADHESION; CELL LINE; CELL MOVEMENT; CELLULAR MICROENVIRONMENT; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX PROTEINS; FIBROBLASTS; FIBRONECTINS; FOCAL ADHESIONS; GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE EXCHANGE FACTORS; INTEGRIN ALPHA5BETA1; INTEGRIN ALPHAV; MALE; MICE; MICE, TRANSGENIC; MYOSIN TYPE II; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; PROTO-ONCOGENE PROTEINS; RHO-ASSOCIATED KINASES; RHOA GTP-BINDING PROTEIN; RNA INTERFERENCE; RNA, SMALL INTERFERING;

EID: 84878598076     PISSN: 14657392     EISSN: 14764679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncb2747     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Hynes, R. O. Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell 110, 673-687 (2002).
2. Desgrosellier, J. S. Cheresh, D. A. Integrins in cancer: biological implications and therapeutic opportunities. Nat. Rev. Cancer 10, 9-22 (2010).
3. Avraamides, C. J., Garmy-Susini, B. Varner, J. A. Integrins in angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 8, 604-617 (2008).
4. Liu, H. et al. MYC suppresses cancer metastasis by direct transcriptional silencing of-(v) and-(3) integrin subunits. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 567-574 (2012).
5. Humphries, J. D., Byron, A. Humphries, M. J. Integrin ligands at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 119, 3901-3903 (2006).
6. Leiss, M., Beckmann, K., Giros, A., Costell, M. Fassler, R. The role of integrin binding sites in-bronectin matrix assembly in vivo. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 20, 502-507 (2008).
7. Yang, J. T., Rayburn, H. Hynes, R. O. Embryonic mesodermal defects in-5 integrin-de-cient mice. Development 119, 1093-1105 (1993).
8. Bader, B. L., Rayburn, H., Crowley, D. Hynes, R. O. Extensive vasculogenesis, angiogenesis, and organogenesis precede lethality in mice lacking all-v integrins. Cell 95, 507-519 (1998).
9. Yang, J. T. et al. Overlapping and independent functions of-bronectin receptor integrins in early mesodermal development. Dev. Biol. 215, 264-277 (1999).
10. Zamir, E. et al. Dynamics and segregation of cell-matrix adhesions in cultured-broblasts. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 191-196 (2000).
11. Ballestrem, C., Hinz, B., Imhof, B. A. Wehrle-Haller, B. Marching at the front and dragging behind: differential-v-3-integrin turnover regulates focal adhesion behavior. J. Cell Biol. 155, 1319-1332 (2001).
12. Danen, E. H., Sonneveld, P., Brakebusch, C., Fassler, R. Sonnenberg, A. The-bronectin-binding integrins-5-1 and-v-3 differentially modulate RhoA-GTP loading, organization of cell matrix adhesions, and-bronectin-brillogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 159, 1071-1086 (2002).
13. White, D. P., Caswell, P. T. Norman, J. C.-v-3 and-5-1 integrin recycling pathways dictate downstream Rho kinase signaling to regulate persistent cell migration. J. Cell Biol. 177, 515-525 (2007).
14. Morgan, M. R., Byron, A., Humphries, M. J. Bass, M. D. Giving off mixed signals-distinct functions of-(5)-(1) and-(v)-(3) integrins in regulating cell behaviour. IUBMB Life 61, 731-738 (2009).
15. Van der Flier, A. et al. Endothelial-5 and-v integrins cooperate in remodeling of the vasculature during development. Development 137, 2439-2449 (2010).
16. Choi, C. K. et al. Actin and-actinin orchestrate the assembly and maturation of nascent adhesions in a myosin II motor-independent manner. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 1039-1050 (2008).
17. Geiger, B., Spatz, J. P. Bershadsky, A. D. Environmental sensing through focal adhesions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 21-33 (2009).
18. Bershadsky, A., Kozlov, M. Geiger, B. Adhesion-mediated mechanosensitivity: a time to experiment, and a time to theorize. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 18, 472-481 (2006).
19. Schiller, H. B., Friedel, C. C., Boulegue, C. Fassler, R. Quantitative proteomics of the integrin adhesome show a myosin II-dependent recruitment of LIM domain proteins. EMBO Rep. 12, 259-266 (2011).
20. Kuo, J. C., Han, X., Hsiao, C. T., Yates Iii, J. R. Waterman, C. M. Analysis of the myosin II-responsive focal adhesion proteome reveals a role for-Pix in negative regulation of focal adhesion maturation. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 383-393 (2011).
21. Lammermann, T. et al. Rapid leukocyte migration by integrin-independent- owing and squeezing. Nature 453, 51-55 (2008).
22. Bhadriraju, K. et al. Activation of ROCK by RhoA is regulated by cell adhesion, shape, and cytoskeletal tension. Exp. Cell Res. 313, 3616-3623 (2007).
23. Danen, E. H. et al. Integrins control motile strategy through a Rho-co-lin pathway. J. Cell Biol. 169, 515-526 (2005).
24. Worth, D. C. et al.-v-3 integrin spatially regulates VASP and RIAM to control adhesion dynamics and migration. J. Cell Biol. 189, 369-383 (2010).
25. Huttenlocher, A. Horwitz, A. R. Integrins in cell migration. Cold Spr. Harbor Perspec. Biol. 3, a005074 (2011).
26. Thery, M. et al. Anisotropy of cell adhesive microenvironment governs cell internal organization and orientation of polarity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 19771-19776 (2006).
27. Thery, M. Micropatterning as a tool to decipher cell morphogenesis and functions. J. Cell Sci. 123, 4201-4213 (2010).
28. Tseng, Q. et al. A new micropatterning method of soft substrates reveals that different tumorigenic signals can promote or reduce cell contraction levels. Lab on a Chip 11, 2231-2240 (2011).
29. Rossier, O. et al. Integrins-1 and-3 exhibit distinct dynamic nanoscale organizations inside focal adhesions. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 1057-1067 (2012).
30. Zaidel-Bar, R., Itzkovitz, S., Ma'ayan, A., Iyengar, R. Geiger, B. Functional atlas of the integrin adhesome. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 858-867 (2007).
31. Cox, J. Mann, M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identi-cation rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quanti-cation. Nat. Biotech. 26, 1367-1372 (2008).
32. Zaidel-Bar, R. Geiger, B. The switchable integrin adhesome. J. Cell Sci. 123, 1385-1388 (2010).
33. Meves, A. et al. f-g1 integrin cytoplasmic tyrosines promote skin tumorigenesis independent of their phosphorylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 15213-15218 (2011).
34. Sakai, T. et al. Integrin-linked kinase (ILK) is required for polarizing the epiblast, cell adhesion, and controlling actin accumulation. Genes Dev. 17, 926-940 (2003).
35. Guilluy, C. et al. The Rho GEFs LARG and GEF-H1 regulate the mechanical response to force on integrins. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 722-727 (2011).
36. Montanez, E., Wickstrom, S. A., Altstatter, J., Chu, H. Fassler, R.-parvin controls vascular mural cell recruitment to vessel wall by regulating RhoA/ROCK signalling. EMBO J. 28, 3132-3144 (2009).
37. Montanez, E. et al. Kindlin-2 controls bidirectional signaling of integrins. Genes Dev. 22, 1325-1330 (2008).
38. Holzapfel, G., Wehland, J. Weber, K. Calcium control of actin-myosin based contraction in triton models of mouse 3T3-broblasts is mediated by the myosin light chain kinase (MLCK)-calmodulin complex. Exp. Cell Res. 148, 117-126 (1983).
39. Fincham, V. J., James, M., Frame, M. C. Winder, S. J. Active ERK/MAP kinase is targeted to newly forming cell-matrix adhesions by integrin engagement and v-Src. EMBO J. 19, 2911-2923 (2000).
40. Butcher, D. T., Alliston, T. Weaver, V. M. A tense situation: forcing tumour progression. Nat. Rev. Cancer 9, 108-122 (2009).
41. Oakes, P. W., Beckham, Y., Stricker, J. Gardel, M. L. Tension is required but not suf-cient for focal adhesion maturation without a stress-bre template. J. Cell Biol. 196, 363-374 (2012).
42. Stricker, J., Aratyn-Schaus, Y., Oakes, P. W. Gardel, M. L. Spatiotemporal constraints on the force-dependent growth of focal adhesions. Biophys. J. 100, 2883-2893 (2011).
43. Roca-Cusachs, P., Gauthier, N. C., Del Rio, A. Sheetz, M. P. Clustering of-(5)-(1) integrins determines adhesion strength whereas-(v)-(3) and talin enable mechanotransduction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 16245-16250 (2009).
44. Kong, F., Garcia, A. J., Mould, A. P., Humphries, M. J. Zhu, C. Demonstration of catch bonds between an integrin and its ligand. J. Cell Biol. 185, 1275-1284 (2009).
45. Schiller, H. B., Szekeres, A., Binder, B. R., Stockinger, H. Leksa, V. Mannose 6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor 2 receptor limits cell invasion by controlling-v-3 integrin expression and proteolytic processing of urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor. Mol. Biol. Cell 20, 745-756 (2009).
46. Azioune, A., Carpi, N., Tseng, Q., Thery, M. Piel, M. Protein micropatterns: a direct printing protocol using deep UVs. Meth. Cell Biol. 97, 133-146 (2010).
47. Rape, A. D., Guo, W. H. Wang, Y. L. The regulation of traction force in relation to cell shape and focal adhesions. Biomaterials 32, 2043-2051 (2011).
48. Wisniewski, J. R., Zougman, A., Nagaraj, N. Mann, M. Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat. Methods 6, 359-362 (2009).
49. Wisniewski, J. R., Zougman, A. Mann, M. Combination of FASP and StageTipbased fractionation allows in-depth analysis of the hippocampal membrane proteome. J. Proteome Res. 8, 5674-5678 (2009).
50. Olsen, J. V. et al. Global, in vivo, and site-speci-c phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell 127, 635-648 (2006).
51. Cox, J. et al. Andromeda: a peptide search engine integrated into the MaxQuant environment. J. Proteome Res. 10, 1794-1805 (2011).
52. Luber, C. A. et al. Quantitative proteomics reveals subset-speci-c viral recognition in dendritic cells. Immunity 32, 279-289 (2010).
53. Olsen, J. V. et al. Parts per million mass accuracy on an Orbitrap mass spectrometer via lock mass injection into a C-trap. Mol. Cell Proteomics 4, 2010-2021 (2005).
54. Cox, J. et al. A practical guide to the MaxQuant computational platform for SILAC-based quantitative proteomics. Nat. Protocols 4, 698-705 (2009).
55. Huang da, W., Sherman, B. T. Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protocols 4, 44-57 (2009).
56. Xenarios, I. et al. DIP, the database of interacting proteins: a research tool for studying cellular networks of protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 303-305 (2002).
57. Aranda, B. et al. The IntAct molecular interaction database in 2010. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, D525-D531 (2010).
58. Ceol, A. et al. MINT, the molecular interaction database: 2009 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, D532-D539 (2010).
59. Breitkreutz, B. J. et al. The BioGRID Interaction Database: 2008 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, D637-D640 (2008).
60. Prasad, T. S., Kandasamy, K. Pandey, A. Human protein reference database and human proteinpedia as discovery tools for systems biology. Methods Mol. Biol. 577, 67-79 (2009).
61. Kanehisa, M., Goto, S., Sato, Y., Furumichi, M. Tanabe, M. KEGG for integration and interpretation of large-scale molecular data sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D109-D114 (2012).