Making Open Access work: The "state-of-the-art" in providing Open Access to scholarly literature

Online Information Review

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 604-636

  Pinfield, Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Open Access; Open Access repositories; Research publishing; Scholarly communication; Scholarly journals

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; GOLD DEPOSITS;

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH; DISCUSSION LISTS; FUTURE CHALLENGES; JOURNAL PUBLICATION; POLICY DEVELOPMENT; SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION; SCHOLARLY JOURNALS; STATE OF THE ART;

OPEN ACCESS;

EID: 84941963125     PISSN: 14684527     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/OIR-05-2015-0167     Document Type: Review

References (218)

1. Abrizah, A., Noorhidawati, A. and Kiran, K. (2010), "Global visibility of Asian universities' open access institutional repositories", Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 53-73.
2. Afshari, F. and Jones, R. (2013), "Developing an integrated institutional repository at imperial college London", Program, Vol. 41 No. 3, pp. 338-352.
3. Agrawal, A.A. (2014), "Four more reasons to be skeptical of open-access publishing", Trends in Plant Science, Vol. 19 No. 3, p. 133.
4. Anderson, K. (2012), "Predictable problems-the UK's move to open access", Scholarly Kitchen blog, available at: http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/07/16/predictable-problems-the-uks-move-to-open-access/(accessed 12 May 2015).
5. Anderson, K (2013), "In praise of 'double-dipping'-fairness, affordability, vitality, and sustainability", Scholarly Kitchen blog, available at: http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2013/01/29/in-praise-of-double-dipping-fairness-affordability-vitality-and-sustainability/(accessed 20 June 2014).
6. Anderson, R. (2014), "Housecleaning at the directory of open access journals", Scholarly Kitchen blog, available at: http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2014/08/14/housecleaning-at-the-directory-of-open-access-journals/(accessed 12 May 2015).
7. Andersson, S. and Svensson, A. (2013), "Repositories recreated: the finch report versus DiVA in Sweden", Information Services and Use, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 183-189.
8. Antell, K, Foote, J.B., Turner, J. and Shults, B. (2014), "Dealing with data: science librarians' participation in data management at association of research libraries institutions", College & Research Libraries, Vol. 75 No. 4, pp. 557-574.
9. Archambault, É., Caruso, J. and Nicol, A. (2014), "State-of-art analysis of OA strategies to peer-review publications", Science-Metrix Produced for the European Commission DG Research & Innovation, Montreal, available at: http://science-metrix.com/files/science-metrix/publications/d-2.1-sm-ec-dg-rtd-oa-policies-in-the-era-update-v05p.pdf (accessed 14 May 2015).
10. Archambault, E., Amyot, D., Deschamps, P., Nicol, A, Rebout, L. and Roberge, G. (2013), "Proportion of open access peer-reviewed papers at the European and world levels-2004-2011", Science-Metrix, Montreal, available at: www.science-metrix.com/pdf/SM-EC-OA-Availability-2004-2011.pdf (accessed 14 June 2015).
11. ARL (n.d.), "Campus engagement", Association of Resarch Libraries, available at: www.arl.org/focus-areas/scholarly-communication/campus-engagement#.VXlerk3bLxV (accessed 11 June 2015).
12. Ashworth, S., Mackie, M. and Nixon, W.J. (2004), "The DAEDALUS project, developing institutional repositories at Glasgow university: the story so far", Library Review, Vol. 53 No. 5, pp. 259-264.
13. Atchison, A. and Bull, J. (2014), "Will open access get me cited? An analysis of the efficacy of open access publishing in political science", PS: Political Science & Politics, Vol. 48 No. 1, pp. 129-137.
14. Ayris, P., McLaren, E., Moyle, M., Sharp, C. and Speicher, L. (2014), "Open access in UCL: a new paradigm for London's global university in research support", Australian Academic & Research Libraries, Vol. 45 No. 4, pp. 282-295.
15. Babones, S. (2012), "High-maintenance model", Times Higher Education, 26 July, available at: www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/high-maintenance-model/420674.article (accessed 12 May 2015).
16. Balaji Babu, P., Santosh Kumar, K, Shewale, N.A and Singh, AK. (2012), "Rationale of institutional repository categories and IR development challenges in India", Library Review, Vol. 61 No. 6, pp. 394-417.
17. Baruch, Y., Ghobadian, A. and Özbilgin, M. (2013), "Open access-the wrong response to a complex question: the case of the finch report", British Journal of Management, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 147-155.
18. Bate, J. (2014), "Open and closed", Times Litearary Supplement, 10 January, available at: www. the-tls.co.uk/tls/public/article1360491.ece (accessed 14 June 2015).
19. Bates, J. (2013), "The domestication of open government data advocacy in the United Kingdom: a neo-Gramscian analysis", Policy & Internet, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 118-137.
20. Beall, J. (2012), "Predatory publishers are corrupting open access", Nature, Vol. 489 No. 7415, p. 179.
21. Beall, J. (2013a), "Predatory publishing is just one of the consequences of gold open access", Learned Publishing, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 79-83.
22. Beall, J. (2013b), "The open-access movement is not really about open access", TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 589-597.
23. Becher, T. and Trowler, P. (2001), Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Discipines, 2nd ed., Open University Press, Buckingham.
24. Bell, S. and Sarr, N. (2010), "Re-engineering an institutional repository to engage users", New Review of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 77-89.
25. Binfield, P. (2014), "Novel scholarly journal concepts", in Bartling, S. and Friesike, S. (Eds), Opening Science, Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 155-163.
26. Bivens-Tatum, W. (2014), "Reactionary rhetoric against open access publishing", TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 441-446.
27. Björk, B.-C. (2012), "A comparison of subscription and open access journals in construction management and related fields", Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 27-42.
28. Björk, B.-C. (2013), "Open access-are the barriers to change receding?", Publications, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 5-15.
29. Björk, B.-C. and Solomon, D. (2014a), Developing an Effective Market for Open Access Article Processing Charges, JISC, Research Libraries UK, Research Councils UK, the Wellcome Trust, the Austrian Science Fund, the Luxembourg National Research Fund and the Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics, London, available at: www.wellcome.ac.uk/stellent/groups/corporatesite/@policy-communications/documents/web-document/wtp055910.pdf (accessed 14 June 2015).
30. Björk, B.-C. and Solomon, D. (2014b), "How research funders can finance APCs in full OA and hybrid journals", Learned Publishing, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 93-103.
31. Björk, B.-C. and Solomon, D. (2015), "Article processing charges in OA journals: relationship between price and quality", Scientometrics, Vol. 103 No. 2, pp. 373-385.
32. Björk, B.-C, Laakso, M., Welling, P. and Paetau, P. (2014), "Anatomy of green open access", Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 65 No. 2, pp. 237-250.
33. Björk, B.-C, Welling, P., Laakso, M., Majlender, P., Hedlund, T. and Gudnason, G. (2010), "Open access to the scientific journal literature: situation 2009", PLoS ONE, Vol. 5 No. 6, p. e11273.
34. Bluh, P. and Hepfer, C. (Eds) (2013), The Institutional Repository: Benefits and Challenges, American Library Association, Chicago, IL.
35. Bohannon, J. (2013), "Who's afraid of peer review?", Science, Vol. 342 No. 6154, pp. 60-65.
36. Bonilla-Calero, A. (2014), "Institutional repositories as complementary tools to evaluate the quantity and quality of research outputs", Library Review, Vol. 63 No. 1, pp. 46-59.
37. Bowman, J.D. (2014), "Predatory publishing, questionable peer review, and fraudulent conferences", American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Vol. 78 No. 10, pp. 1-6.
38. Budapest Open Access Initiative (2001), "Budapest open access initiative", available at: www. budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read (accessed 14 June 2015).
39. Buehler, M. (2013), Demystifying the Institutional Repository for Success, Chandos, Oxford.
40. Burgess, R. (2015), "Review of the implementation of the RCUK open access policy", Research Councils UK, Swindon, available at: www.rcuk.ac.uk/RCUK-prod/assets/documents/documents/Openaccessreportpdf (accessed 14 June 2015).
41. Carroll, M.W. (2013), "Creative commons and the openness of open access", The New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 368 No. 9, pp. 789-791.
42. Carter, A.J., Horrocks, N.P.C., Huchard, E., Logan, C.J., Lukas, D., MacLeod, K.J., Marshall, H.H., Peck, H, Sanderson, J. and Sorensen, M. (2014), "Junior scientists are sceptical of sceptics of open access: a reply to agrawal", Trends in Plant Science, Vol. 19 No. 6, pp. 339-340.
43. Cassella, M. and Morando, M. (2012), "Fostering new roles for librarians: skills set for repository managers-results of a survey in Italy", LIBER Quarterly, Vol. 21 Nos 3/4, pp. 407-428.
44. Chen, X. (2014), "Open access in 2013: reaching the 50% milestone", Serials Review, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 21-27.
45. Cheng, W.H., Ren, S.L. and Rousseau, R. (2012), "Digital publishing and China's core scientific journals: a position paper", Scientometrics, Vol. 98 No. 1, pp. 11-22.
46. Collins, E. and Milloy, C. (2012), "A snapshot of attitudes towards open access monograph publishing in the humanities and social sciences-part of the OAPEN-UK project", Insights: The UKSG Journal, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 192-197.
47. Colomb, J. and Brembs, B. (2015), "Sub-strains of Drosophila Canton-S differ markedly in their locomotor behavior", F1000Research, Vol. 3, doi:10.12688/f1000research.4263.2.
48. Connell, T. (2011), "The use of institutional repositories: the Ohio state university experience", College & Research Libraries, Vol. 72 No. 3, pp. 253-25.
49. Cornell University Library (n.d.), "arXiv business support and governance model", available at: http://arxiv.org/help/support (accessed 15 May 2015).
50. Corrall, S. and Pinfield, S. (2014), "Coherence of 'open' initiatives in higher education and research: framing a policy agenda", Proceedings of the iConference 2014, iSchools, Berlin, 4-7March, available at: www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/47316 (accessed 16 June 2015).
51. Cox, A.M. and Corrall, S. (2013), "Evolving academic library specialties", Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 64 No. 8, pp. 1526-1542.
52. Crotty, D. (2014), "The UK government looks to double dip to pay for its open access policy", Scholarly Kitchen Blog, available at: http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2014/02/06/the-uk-government-looks-to-double-dip-to-pay-for-its-open-access-policy/(accessed 20 June 2014).
53. Crow, R. (2002), "The case for institutional repositories: a SPARC position paper", ARL Bimonthly Report No. 223, ARL, Washington, DC, available at: http://works.bepress.com/cgi/view content.cgi?article=1006&context=ir-research (accessed 23 July 2013).
54. Curry, S. (2014), "Open access-reasons to be cheerful: a reply to Agrawal", Trends in Plant Science, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 196-197.
55. Davies, M.C.R., Ayris, P., Stone, G., Cheshire, J., Jackson, R., Hacker, A, Bunz, M., Ferwerda, E., Newton, H., Dacos, M., Mounier, P. and Neuman, Y. (2014), "How should we fund open access monographs and what do you think is the most likely way that funding will happen?", Insights: The UKSG Journal, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 45-50.
56. Davis, P. (2014), "Peak PLOS: planning for a future of declining revenue", Scholarly Kitchen Blog, available at: http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2014/12/02/peak-plos-planning-for-a-future-of-declining-revenue/(accessed 15 May 2015).
57. Donovan, J.M. and Watson, CA. (2011), "Citation advantage of open access legal scholarship", Law Library Journal, Vol. 103 No. 4, pp. 553-573.
58. e-InfraNet (2013), "e-InfraNet: 'open' as the default modus operandi for research and higher education", available at: http://e-infranet.eu/output/e-infranet-open-as-the-default-modus-operandi-for-research-and-higher-education/(accessed 14 June 2015).
59. Elsevier (2013), Performance of the UK Research Base: International Comparison, Department of Business, Innovation and Skills, London, available at: www.gov.uk/government/publications/performance-of-the-uk-research-base-international-comparison-2013 (accessed 17 December 2014).
60. EUA (2015), EUA 's Open Access Checklist For Universities: A Practical Guide On Implementation, European Universities Association, Brussels, available at: www.eua.be/Libraries/Publications-homepage-list/Open-access-report-v3.sflb.ashx (accessed 14 June 2015).
61. Eve, M. (2014), Open Access and the Humanities: Contexts, Controversies and the Future, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316161012 (accessed 14 June 2015).
62. Farida, I., Tjakraatmadja, J.H., Firman, A. and Basuki, S. (2015), "A conceptual model of open access institutional repository in Indonesia academic libraries", Library Management, Vol. 36 Nos 1/2, pp. 168-181.
63. Ferwerda, E. (2010a), "Open access monographic publishing in the humanities", Information Services and Use, Vol. 30 Nos 3/4, pp. 135-141.
64. Ferwerda, E. (2010b), "New models for monographs-open books", Serials: The Journal for the Serials Community, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 91-96.
65. Ferwerda, E. (2014), "Open access monograph business models", Insights: The UKSG Journal, Vol. 27 No. s1, pp. 35-38.
66. Finch, D.J. (2013), "Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: the UK approach to open access", Information Services and Use, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 11-18.
67. Finch, J., Bell, S., Bellingan, L., Campbell, R., Donnelly, P., Gardner, R., Hall, M., Hall, S., Kiley, R., van der Stelt, W., Sweeney, D., Sykes, P., Tickell, A., Wissenburg, A., Egginton, R. and Jubb, M. (2012), Accessibility, Sustainability, Excellence: How to Expand Access to Research Publications, Research Information Network, London, available at: www.researchinfonet. org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Final-version.pdf (accessed 14 June 2015).
68. Ford, E. (2013), "Defining and characterizing open peer review: a review of the literature", Journal of Scholarly Publishing, Vol. 44 No. 4, pp. 311-326.
69. Fry, J. and Talja, S. (2007), "The intellectual and social organization of academic fields and the shaping of digital resources"', Journal ofInformation Science, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 115-133.
70. Fuller, RA., Lee, J.R. and Watson, J.E.M. (2014), "Achieving open access to conservation science", Conservation Biology : The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, Vol. 28 No. 6, pp. 1550-1557.
71. Gargouri, Y., Hajjem, C, Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., Brody, T. and Harnad, S. (2010), "Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research", PLoS ONE, Vol. 5 No. 10, p. e13636.
72. Gargouri, Y., Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L. and Harnad, S. (2012), "Green and gold open access percentages and growth, by discipline", In 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (STI), Science-Metrix and OST, Montreal, pp. 285-292.
73. GOAL (2012), "GOAL June 2012 archive by date", Global Open Access List, available at: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/goal/2012-June/date.html (accessed 12 May 2015).
74. Guédon, J.-C. (2008), "Mixing and matching the Green and Gold roads to open access-take 2", Serials Review, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 41-51.
75. Gulley, N. (2013), "Creative commons: challenges and solutions for researchers; a publisher's perspective of copyright in an open access environment", Insights: The UKSG Journal, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 168-173.
76. Gutam, S., Mishra, A.K., Pandey, P.S., Chandrasekharan, H. and Aneeja, G. (2010), "Need of open access repositories for NARS in India", Current Science, Vol. 98 No. 12, pp. 1564-1566.
77. Hall, M. (2012a), "Green or gold? Open access after Finch", Insights: The UKSG Journal, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 235-240.
78. Hall, S. (2012b), "What does Finch mean for researchers, librarians and publishers?", Insights: The UKSG Journal, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 241-245.
79. Harnad, S. (2009), "Waking OA's 'slumbering giant': the university's mandate to mandate open access", New Review of Information Networking, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 51-68.
80. Harnad, S. (2010), "The immediate practical implication of the Houghton report: provide green open access now", Prometheus, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 55-59.
81. Harnad, S. (2011), "Open access to research: changing researcher behavior through university and funder mandates", JEDEMJournal of Democracy and Open Government, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 33-41.
82. Harnad, S. (2012a), "Finch fiasco in figures", Open Access Archivangelism Blog, available at: http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/905-Finch-Fiasco-in-Figures.html (accessed 12 May 2015).
83. Harnad, S. (2012b), "Why the UK should not heed the Finch report", LSE Impact Blog, available at: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2012/07/04/why-the-uk-should-not-heed-the-finch-report/(accessed 14 June 2015).
84. Harnad, S. (2012c), "Against raising green OA goalpost from gratis to CC-BY", Open Access Archivangelism Blog, available at: http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/946-Against-Raising-Green-OA-Goalpost-From-Gratis-To-CC-BY.html (accessed 12 May 2015).
85. Harnad, S. (2013a), "Finch II: 'our mind's made up: don't confuse us with facts'", Open Access Archivangelism Blog, available at: http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1074-Finch-II-Our-Minds-Made-Up-Dont-Confuse-Us-With-Facts.html (accessed 12 May 2015).
86. Harnad, S. (2013b), "Worldwide open access: UK leadership?", Insights: The UKSG Journal, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 14-21.
87. Haug, C. (2013), "The downside of open-access publishing", The New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 368 No. 9, pp. 791-793.
88. Hawkins, AR., Kimball, MA. and Ives, M. (2013), "Mandatory open access publishing for electronic theses and dissertations: ethics and enthusiasm", Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 32-60.
89. HEFCE (2014), Open Access in the Post-2014 Research Excellence Framework, Higher Education Funding Council for England, London, available at: www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/pubs/2014/cl072014/Print-friendlyversion.pdf (accessed 14 June 2015).
90. Hitchcock, S. (2013), "The effect of open access and downloads ('hits') on citation impact: a bibliography of studies", available at: http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html (accessed 22 November 2014).
91. Hossam Haider Chowdhury, M., Uddin, M.N., Afroz, H. and Sameni, M.A.H. (2011), "Building institutional repositories in Bangladesh using DSpace: a new paradigm of scholarly communication", Library Philosophy and Practice, available at: http://digitalcommons.unl. edu/libphilprac/553/(accessed 16 June 2015).
92. Houghton, J. (2009a), "Costs and benefits of alternative publishing models: Denmark", available at: http://hprints.org/hprints-00429478/(accessed 4 May 2015).
93. Houghton, J. (2009b), Open Access: What are the Economic Benefits? A Comparison of the United Kingdom, Netherlands and Denmark, Knowledge Exchange, London, available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract-id=1492578 (accessed 4 May 2015).
94. Houghton, J. and Sheehan, P. (2006), "The economic impact of enhanced access to research findings", available at: http://vuir.vu.edu.au/472/(accessed 4 May 2015).
95. Houghton, J. and Sheehan, P. (2009), "Estimating the potential impacts of open access to research findings", Economic Analysis and Policy, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 127-142, available at: www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592609500483 (accessed 4 May 2015).
96. Houghton, J. and Swan, A. (2013), "Planting the green seeds for a golden harvest: comments and clarifications on 'going for gold'", D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 19 Nos 1/2, doi:10.1045/january2013-houghton, available at: www.dlib.org/dlib/january13/houghton/01houghton. html (accessed 14 June 2015).
97. Houghton, J., Steele, C. and Sheehan, P. (2006), Research Communication Costs in Australia: Emerging Opportunities and Benefits, Centre for Strategic Economic Studies, Victoria University, Melbourne, Melbourne, available at: https://digitalcollections.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/44485 (accessed 4 May 2015).
98. Houghton, J., Rasmussen, B., Sheehan, P., Oppenheim, C, Morris, A., Creaser, C, Greenwood, H., Summers, M. and Gourlay, A. (2009), Economic Implications of Alternative Scholarly Publishing Models: Exploring Costs and Benefits, JISC, London, available at: www.jisc.ac. uk/publications/reports/2009/economicpublishingmodelsfinalreport.aspx (accessed 14 June 2015).
99. Houghton, J.W. (2010), "Economic implications of alternative publishing models: self-archiving and repositories", LIBER Quarterly, Vol. 19 Nos 3/4, pp. 275-292.
100. Houghton, J.W. (2011), "The costs and potential benefits of alternative scholarly publishing models", Information Research, Vol. 16 No. 1, available at: www.informationr.net/ir/16-1/paper469.html (accessed 14 June 2015).
101. Houghton, J.W. and Oppenheim, C. (2010), "The economic implications of alternative publishing models", Prometheus, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 41-54.
102. Howard, J. (2012), "Push for open access goes global", Chronicle of Higher Education, 13 August, available at: http://chronicle.com/article/Push-for-Open-Access-Goes/133561/(accessed 12 May 2015).
103. Hrynaszkiewicz, I. and Cockerill, M.J. (2012), "Open by default: a proposed copyright license and waiver agreement for open access research and data in peer-reviewed journals", BMC Research Notes, Vol. 5, p. 494, available at: www.biomedcentral.com/1756-0500/5/494 (accessed 18 June 2015).
104. Hrynaszkiewicz, I., Busch, S. and Cockerill, M.J. (2013), "Licensing the future: report on BioMed central's public consultation on open data in peer-reviewed journals", BMC Research Notes, Vol. 6 No. 1, p. 318.
105. Hu, D., Luo, A. and Liu, H. (2013), "Open access in China and its effect on academic libraries", Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 110-112.
106. Igwe, K.N. (2014), "Open access repositories in academic and research institutions for the realization of Nigeria's vision 20: 2020", International Journal of Information Science and Management, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 33-46.
107. Islam, M.A. and Akter, R. (2013), "Institutional repositories and open access initiatives in Bangladesh: a new paradigm of scholarly communication", LIBER Quarterly, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 3-24.
108. Jain, P. (2011), "New trends and future applications/directions of institutional repositories in academic institutions", Library Review, Vol. 60 No. 2, pp. 125-141.
109. Jeffery, K. and Asserson, A. (2009), "Institutional repositories and current research information systems", New Review ofInformation Networking, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 71-83.
110. JISC Collections (n.d.), "SAGE open access statement on 'double dipping'", JISC Collections, available at: www.jisc-collections.ac.uk/News/SAGE-OA-statement/#further-info (accessed 24 June 2014).
111. Johnson, R. (2015), Making Open Access Work for Authors, Institutions and Publishers: A Report on an Open Access Roundtable Hosted by the Copyright Clearance Center Inc, Copyright Clearance Center, Danvers, MA.
112. Johnson, R., Pinfield, S. and Fosci, M. (2015), "Business process costs of implementing 'Gold' and 'Green' open access in institutional and national contexts", Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, doi:10.1002/asi.23545, available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.23545/full (accessed 1 August 2015).
113. Jubb, M. (2014), "The 'Finch report' and the transition to open access: long term monitoring of progress in the United Kingdom", Information Services and Use, Vol. 34 Nos 3/4, pp. 189-193.
114. Jump, P. (2012a), "Open access may require funds to be rationed", Times Higher Education, 21 June, available at: www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/open-access-may-require-funds-to-be-rationed/420326.article (accessed 12 May 2015).
115. Jump, P. (2012b), "Finch's open-access cure may be 'worse than the disease'", Times Higher Education, 28 June, available at: www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/finchs-open-access-cure-may-be-worse-than-the-disease/420392.article (accessed 12 May 2015).
116. Kennan, M.A. (2011), "Learning to share: mandates and open access", Library Management, Vol. 32 Nos 4/5, pp. 302-318.
117. Kingsley, D.A. (2014), "Paying for publication: issues and challenges for research support services", Australian Academic & Research Libraries, Vol. 45 No. 4, pp. 262-281.
118. Koler-Povh, T., Mikoš, M. and Turk, G. (2014), "Institutional repository as an important part of scholarly communication", Library Hi Tech, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 423-434.
119. Kousha, K. and Abdoli, M. (2010), "The citation impact of open access agricultural research", Online Information Review, Vol. 34 No. 5, pp. 772-785.
120. Kurata, K., Morioka, T., Yokoi, K. and Matsubayashi, M. (2013), "Remarkable growth of open access in the biomedical field: analysis of PubMed articles from 2006 to 2010", PLoS ONE, Vol. 8 No. 5, p. e60925.
121. Laakso, M. (2014), "Green open access policies of scholarly journal publishers: a study of what, when, and where self-archiving is allowed", Scientometrics, Vol. 99 No. 2, pp. 475-494.
122. Laakso, M. and Björk, B.-C. (2012), "Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure", BMC Medicine, Vol. 10 No. 1, p. 124.
123. Lagoze, C. and Van de Sompel, H. (2003), "The making of the open archives initiative protocol for metadata harvesting", Library Hi Tech, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 118-128.
124. Lanfear, R. and Pennell, M.W. (2014), "Open access is worth considering: a reply to Agrawal", Trends in Plant Science, Vol. 19 No. 6, pp. 340-341.
125. Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., Brody, T. and Harnad, S. (2012), "Testing the Finch hypothesis on Green OA mandate ineffectiveness", arXiv, available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.8174 (accessed 12 July 2013).
126. Lawrence, J.C. (2010), "Libraries as journal publishers", Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 235-240.
127. Läzäroiu, G. (2014), "Challenges facing scholarly publishing", Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 158-163.
128. Lippincott, S.K. (Ed.) (2015), Library Publishing Directory, 2nd ed., Scholarly Publishing Coalition, Atlanta, GA, available at: www.librarypublishing.org/resources/directory (accessed 15 May 2015).
129. Lyon, L. (2012), "The informatics transform: re-engineering libraries for the data decade", International Journal of Digital Curation, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 126-138.
130. Lyons, C. and Booth, H.A. (2011), "An overview of open access in the fields of business and management", Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 108-124.
131. McCabe, M.J. and Snyder, CM. (2014), "Identifying the effect of open access on citations using a panel of science journals", Economic Inquiry, Vol. 52 No. 4, pp. 1284-1300.
132. MacCallum, C.J. (2011), "Why ONE is more than 5", PLoS Biology, Vol. 9 No. 12, p. e1001235.
133. Mabe, M. and Price, D. (2012), "Gold or Green: which is the best shade of open access?", Times Higher Education, 5 July, available at: www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/Gold-or-Green-which-is-the-best-shade-of-open-access/420454.article (accessed 12 May 2015).
134. Meadows, A. (2013), "The historians are revolting-leading history journal editors take on the research councils UK", Scholarly Kitchen Blog, available at: http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet. org/2013/01/09/the-historians-are-revolting-leading-history-journal-editors-take-on-the-research-councils-uk/(accessed 12 May 2015).
135. Milloy, C, Stone, G. and Collins, E. (2011), "OAPEN-UK: an open access business model for scholarly monographs in the humanities and social sciences", Information Services and Use, Vol. 31 Nos 3/4, pp. 249-258.
136. Mischo, W.H and Schlembach, M.C. (2011), "Open access issues and engineering faculty attitudes and practices", Journal of Library Administration, Vol. 51 Nos 5/6, pp. 432-454.
137. Morrison, H. (n.d.), "Dramatic growth of open access series", The Imaginary Journal of Poetic Economics Blog, available at: http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.ca/2006/08/dramatic-growth-of-open-access-series.html (accessed 12 May 2015).
138. Morrison, H., Salhab, J., Calvé-Genest, A. and Horava, T. (2015), "Open access article processing charges: DOAJ survey May 2014", Publications, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 1-16.
139. Mukherjee, B. (2014), "Green and Gold open access in India", Learned Publishing, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 21-32.
140. Mukhlesur Rahman, M. and Mezbah-ul-Islam, M. (2014), "Issues and strategy of institutional repositories (IR) in Bangladesh: a paradigm shift", The Electronic Library, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 47-61.
141. Mullins, J.L., Murray-Rust, C, Ogburn, J.L., Crow, R., Ivins, O., Mower, A., Nesdill, D., Newton, M., Speer, J. and Watkinson, C. (2012), Library Publishing Services: Strategies for Success: Final Research Report, SPARC, Washington DC, available at: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/charleston/2011/Communication/1/(accessed 24 October 2013).
142. Nault, AJ. (2011), "Open access of publications by veterinary faculty in the United States and Canada", Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 33-41.
143. Nazim, M. and Mukherjee, B. (2011), "Status of institutional repositories in Asian countries: a quantitative study", Library Philosphy & Practice, available at: http://digitalcommons. unl.edu/libphilprac/652 (accessed 11 July 2013).
144. Neylon, C. (2012), "More than just access: delivering on a network-enabled literature", PLoS Biology, Vol. 10 No. 10, p. e1001417.
145. Nicholas, D., Rowlands, I., Watkinson, A., Brown, D. and Jamali, H.R. (2012), "Digital repositories ten years on: what do scientific researchers think of them and how do they use them?", Learned Publishing, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 195-206.
146. Nicholas, D., Watkinson, A., Volentine, R., Allard, S., Levine, K, Tenopir, C. and Herman, E. (2014), "Trust and authority in scholarly communications in the light of the digital transition: setting the scene for a major study", Learned Publishing, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 121-134.
147. Nunn, E. and Pinfield, S. (2014), "Lay summaries of open access journal articles: engaging with the general public on medical research", Learned Publishing, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 173-184.
148. Nyambi, E. and Maynard, S. (2012), "An investigation of institutional repositories in state universities in Zimbabwe", Information Development, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 55-67.
149. Nykanen, M. (2011), "Institutional repositories at small institutions in America: some current trends", Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 1-19.
150. OpenAIRE (2015), "FP7 Gold OA pilot policy guidelines", available at: www.openaire.eu/fp7-Gold-oa-pilot-policy-guidelines/document-details (accessed 14 June 2015).
151. Pathways Project (2015), "Pathways to open access: advocacy toolkit", available at: http://blogs. ucl.ac.uk/open-access/(accessed 11 June 2015).
152. Peters, D. and Lossau, N. (2011), "DRIVER: building a sustainable infrastructure for global repositories", The Electronic Library, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 249-260.
153. Peters, M. (2010), "Three forms of the knowledge economy: learning, creativity and openness", British Journal of Educational Studies, Vol. 58 No. 1, pp. 67-88.
154. Peters, M. and Roberts, P. (2012), The Virtues of Openness: Education, Science, and Scholarship in the Digital Age, Paradigm Publishers, Boulder, CO.
155. Pickler, R., Noyes, J., Perry, L., Roe, B., Watson, R. and Hayter, M. (2014), "Authors and readers beware the dark side of open access", Journal of Advanced Nursing, doi:10.1111/jan.12589, available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jan.12589/abstract (accessed 16 June 2015).
156. Pinfield, S. (2009), "Journals and repositories: an evolving relationship?", Learned Publishing, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 165-175.
157. Pinfield, S. (2013), "Is scholarly publishing going from crisis to crisis?", Learned Publishing, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 85-88.
158. Pinfield, S., Gardner, M. and MacColl, J. (2002), "Setting up an institutional e-print archive", Ariadne, Vol. 31, available at: www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue31/eprint-archives (accessed 5 August 2013).
159. Pinfield, S., Salter, J. and Bath, P.A. (2015), "The 'total cost of publication' in a hybrid open-access environment: institutional approaches to funding journal article-processing charges in combination with subscriptions", Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, doi:10.1002/asi.23446.
160. Pinfield, S., Salter, J., Bath, P.A., Hubbard, B., Millington, P., Anders, J.H.S. and Hussain, A. (2014), "Open-access repositories worldwide, 2005-2012: past growth, current characteristics, and future possibilities", Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 65 No. 12, pp. 2404-2421.
161. PLOS ONE (n.d.), "PLOS ONE: journal information", available at: www.plosone.org/static/information.action (accessed 15 February 2014).
162. Poynder, R. (2012), "The Finch report: UCL's David Price responds", Open and Shut? Blog, available at: http://poynder.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/finch-report-ucls-david-price-responds. html (accessed 12 May 2015).
163. Priem, J. (2013), "Scholarship: beyond the paper", Nature, Vol. 495 No. 7442, pp. 437-440.
164. Prosser, D.C. (2015), "The costs of double dipping", Research Libraries UK Blog, available at: www.rluk.ac.uk/about-us/blog/the-costs-of-double-dipping (accessed 14 June 2015).
165. RCUK (2013), RCUK Policy on Open Access and Supporting Guidance, Research Councils UK, Swindon, available at: www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/documents/RCUKOpenAccessPolicy. pdf (accessed 14 June 2015).
166. Research Exchange (2012), "Open access success stories", available at: www.oastories.org/(accessed 24 May 2015).
167. RIN (2014), Monitoring Progress Towards Open Access in the UK, Research Information Network, London, available at: www.researchinfonet.org/monitoring-progress-towards-open-access-in-the-uk/(accessed 10 April 2015).
168. Rodríguez-Armentia, N. and Amat, C.B. (2010), "Is it worth establishing institutional repositories? The strategies for open access to Spanish peer-reviewed articles", Learned Publishing, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 193-203.
169. Royal Society Publishing (2013), "Our transparent pricing mechanism", available at: http://royalsocietypublishing.org/librarians/transparent-pricing (accessed 12 June 2015).
170. Russell, R. and Day, M. (2010), "Institutional repository interaction with research users: a review of current practice", New Review of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 116-131.
171. Sabaratnam, M. and Kirby, P. (2012), "Open access: HEFCE, REF2020 and the threat to academic freedom", The Disorder of Things Blog, available at: http://thedisorderofthings.com/2012/12/04/open-access-hefce-ref2020-and-the-threat-to-academic-freedom/(accessed 14 February 2014).
172. Sahu, S.K. and Arya, S.K. (2013), "Open access practices in India", Library Hi Tech News, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 6-12.
173. Sajjad Ahmed, S. and Al-Baridi, S. (2012), "An overview of institutional repository developments in the Arabian Gulf region", OCLC Systems & Services: International Digital Library Perspectives, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 79-89.
174. Sawant, S. (2011), "Institutional repositories in India: a preliminary study", Library Hi Tech News, Vol. 28 No. 10, pp. 6-10.
175. Sawant, S. (2012), "Indian institutional repositories: a study of user's perspective", Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, Vol. 46 No. 1, pp. 92-122.
176. Sawant, S. (2013), "Past and present scenario of open access movement in India", Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 108-109.
177. Shafi, S.M. (2013), "Web 2.0 interactivity in open access repositories", Electronic Library, Vol. 31 No. 6, pp. 703-712.
178. Shao, J., Shen, H., Zhang, S., He, X. and Zheng, X. (2013), "The current state of open access in journals sponsored by the China Association for Science and Technology", Journal of Scholarly Publishing, Vol. 44 No. 4, pp. 373-383.
179. SHERPA (n.d.), "SHERPA/JULIET: research funders' open access policies", available at: www. sherpa.ac.uk/juliet/index.php (accessed 14 June 2015).
180. Shieber, S. and Suber, P. (2015), Good Practices for University Open-Access Policies, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, available at: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/hoap/Good-practices-for-university-open-access-policies (accessed 14 June 2015).
181. Shin, E. (2010), "The challenges of open access for Korea's national repositories", Interlending & Document Supply, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 231-236.
182. Shotton, D. (2012), "The five stars of online journal articles-a framework for article evaluation", D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 18 Nos 1/2, doi:10.1045/january2012-shotton, available at: www.dlib. org/dlib/january12/shotton/01shotton.html (accessed 14 June 2015).
183. Smith, A. (2014), "The empire strikes back", Research Fortnight, 12 November, available at: https://adamesmith.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/nov-2014-the-empire-strikes-back-alicia-wise-elsevier-profile.pdf (accessed 14 June 2015).
184. Smith, M., Barton, M., Bass, M., Branschofsky, M., McClellan, G., Stuve, D., Tansley, R. and Walker, J. (2003), "DSpace: an open source dynamic digital repository", D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 9 No. 1, doi:10.1045/january2003-smith, available at: www.dlib.org/dlib/january03/smith/01smith.html (accessed 14 June 2015).
185. Solomon, D.J. and Björk, B.-C. (2012), "A study of open access journals using article processing charges", Journal ofthe American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 63 No. 8, pp. 1485-1495.
186. SPARC (2015), "Directory of open access journals introduces new standards to help community address quality concerns", available at: http://sparc.arl.org/blog/doaj-introduces-new-standards (accessed 12 May 2015).
187. SPARC (n.d.), "How open is it?", available at: www.sparc.arl.org/resource/howopenisit (accessed 12 June 2015).
188. Spezi, V., Fry, J., Creaser, C, Probets, S. and White, S. (2013), "Researchers' Green open access practice: a cross-disciplinary analysis", Journal of Documentation, Vol. 69 No. 3, pp. 334-359.
189. Stanton, K.V. and Liew, C.L. (2012), "Open access theses in institutional repositories: an exploratory study of the perceptions of doctoral students", Information Research, Vol. 17 No. 1, available at: www.informationr.net/ir/17-1/paper507.html (accessed 14 June 2015).
190. Suber, P. (2008), "Gratis and libre open access", SPARC Open Access Newsletter, August, available at: www.sparc.arl.org/publications/articles/gratisandlibre.shtml (accessed 14 June 2015).
191. Suber, P. (2012), Open Access, MIT Press, Boston, MA, available at: http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/open-access (accessed 14 June 2015).
192. Sud, P. and Thelwall, M. (2014), "Evaluating altmetrics", Scientometrics, Vol. 98 No. 2, pp. 1131-1143.
193. Sutton, S.C. (2013), "Open access, publisher embargoes, and the voluntary nature of scholarship", College & Research Libraries News, Vol. 74 No. 9, pp. 468-472.
194. Swan, A. (2012), Policy Guidelines for the Development and Promotion of Open Access, UNESCO, Paris, available at: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002158/215863e.pdf (accessed 14 June 2015).
195. Swan, A. and Houghton, J. (2012), Going for Gold: the Costs and Benefits of Gold Open Access for UK Research Institutions: Further Economic Modelling, JISC, London, available at: http://wiki.lib.sun.ac.za/images/d/d3/Report-to-the-uk-open-access-implementation-group-final. pdf (accessed 20 June 2014).
196. Swan, A., Gargouri, Y., Hunt, M. and Harnad, S. (2015), "Report on policy recording exercise, including policy typology and effectiveness and list of further policymaker targets", PASTEUR4OA Project, available at: http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1504/1504.02261.pdf (accessed 14 June 2015).
197. Swartz, M.K. (2015), "Open access publishing: scholarly or predatory?", Journal of Pediatric Health Care, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 121-122.
198. Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivière, V. and Sugimoto, C. (2013), "Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services", PLoS ONE, Vol. 8 No. 5, p. e64841, available at: http://dx. plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064841 (accessed 10 September 2013).
199. Thomas, W.J. (2013), "The structure of scholarly communications within academic libraries", Serials Review, Vol. 39 No. 3, pp. 167-171.
200. Van de Sompel, H. and Lagoze, C. (2000), "The Santa Fe convention of the open archives initiative", D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 6 No. 2, doi:10.1045/february2000-vandesompel-oai, available at: www.dlib.org/dlib/february00/vandesompel-oai/02vandesompel-oai.html (accessed 14 June 2015).
201. Van Eck, N.J. and Waltman, L. (2010), "Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping", Scientometrics, Vol. 84 No. 2, pp. 523-538.
202. Van Eck, N.J. and Waltman, L. (2011), "Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer", ISSI Newsletter, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 50-54.
203. Van Eck, N.J. and Waltman, L. (2014), "Visualizing bibliometric networks", in Ding, Y., Rousseau, R. and Wolfram, D. (Eds), Measuring Scholarly Impact: Methods and Practice, Springer, Munich, pp. 285-320.
204. Vaughn, J. (2013), "The future of scholarly communication: US efforts to bring warring factions to common purpose in support of scholarship", Information Services and Use, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 27-36.
205. Velterop, J. (2012), "Why should publishers agree to Green OA?", Global Open Access List, Discussion list, available at: www.mail-archive.com/goal%40eprints.org/msg00639.html (accessed 12 May 2015).
206. Wagner, B. (2010), "Open access citation advantage: an annotated bibliography", Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, Vol. 60 No. 1, doi:10.5062/F4Q81B0W, available at: www. istl.org/10-winter/article2.html (accessed 14 June 2015).
207. Way, D. (2010), "The open access availability of library and information science literature", College and Research Libraries, Vol. 71 No. 4, pp. 302-309.
208. Wellcome Trust (2012), "Wellcome Trust strengthens its open access policy", available at: www. wellcome.ac.uk/News/Media-office/Press-releases/2012/WTVM055745.htm# (accessed 12 June 2015).
209. Wellcome Trust (2014), "Charity open access fund", available at: www.wellcome.ac.uk/About-us/Policy/Spotlight-issues/Open-access/Charity-open-access-fund/index.htm# (accessed 14 June 2015).
210. Wellen, R. (2013), "Open access, megajournals, and MOOCs: on the political economy of academic unbundling", SAGE Open, Vol. 3 No. 4, doi:10.1177/2158244013507271, available at: http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/3/4/2158244013507271.short (accessed 14 June 2015).
211. Whitley, R. (2000), The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
212. Wipawin, N. and Wanna, A. (2014), "Institutional repositories in Thai universities", Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8839, Springer, Berlin, pp. 385-392.
213. Xia, J. (2012), "Diffusionism and open access", Journal of Documentation, Vol. 68 No. 1, pp. 72-99.
214. Xia, J., Gilchrist, S., Smith, N, Kingery, J., Radecki, J., Wilhelm, M., Harrison, K., Ashby, M. and Mahn, A. (2012), "A review of open access self-archiving mandate policies", Portal: Libraries and the Academy, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 85-102.
215. Zahedi, Z., Costas, R. and Wouters, P. (2014), "How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of 'alternative metrics' in scientific publications", Scientometrics, Vol. 101 No. 2, pp. 1491-1513.
216. Zhao, R. and Wu, S. (2014), "Study on themes and authors' influence of open access in China", Scientometrics, Vol. 101 No. 2, pp. 1165-1177.
217. Zuccala, A.A. (2009), "The lay person and open access", Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 43 No. 1, pp. 1-62.
218. Zuccala, A.A. (2010), "Open access and civic scientific information literacy", Information Research, Vol. 15 No. 1, available at: http://nile.lub.lu.se/ojs/index.php/infores/article/view/1483 (accessed 23 May 2014).