Open access theses in institutional repositories: An exploratory study of the perceptions of doctoral students

Information Research

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Stanton, Kate Valentine ^a   Liew, Chern Li ^b  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^b VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861977086     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13681613     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Abrizah, A. (2009). The cautious faculty: their awareness and attitudes towards institutional repositories. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 14(2), 17-37.
2. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/63XW5wTz0)
3. Bevan, S.J. (2007). Developing an institutional repository: Cranfield QUEprints: a case study. OCLC Systems & Services, 23(2), 170-182.
4. Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods. (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Charmaz, K. (2001). Grounded theory: methodology and theory construction. In N.J. Smelser & P.B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 6396-6399). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
6. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage Publications.
7. Cheverie, J.F., Boettcher, J. & Buschman, J. (2009). Digital scholarship in the university tenure and promotion process: a report on the sixth scholarly communication symposium at Georgetown University Library. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 30(3), 219-230
8. Cresswell, J.W., Clark, V.L.P., Gutmann, M.L. & Hanson, W.E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashkkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed-methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209-240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
9. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/63XWHcScW)
10. Cullen, R. & Chawner, B. (2009a). Institutional repositories and the role of academic libraries in scholarly communication. Paper presented at the Asia-Pacific Conference on Library Education and Practice, University of Tsukuba, Japan, 6-8 March 2009. Retrieved 5 August, 2009 from http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10063/866/conferece%20paper.pdf?sequence=2 (Archived by WebCite®at http://www.webcitation.org/63YVoAZgv)
11. Cullen, R. & Chawner, B. (2009b). National survey: perceptions of New Zealand academic staff towards institutional repositories, September 2009: executive summary. Retrieved 29 November, 2011 from http://www.oarinz.ac.nz/oarinzwiki/index.php? n=OARiNZ.NationalSurveyPerceptionsOfNewZealandAcademicStaffTowardsInstitutionalRepositoriesSeptember2009
12. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/63XYZbyIb)
13. Duranceau, E.F. (2008). The 'Wealth of Networks' and institutional repositories: MIT, DSpace and the future of the scholarly commons. Library Trends, 57(2), 244-261.
14. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/63XYdhlnz)
15. Gadd, E., Loddington, S. & Oppenheim, C. (2007). A comparison of academics' attitudes towards the rights protection of their research and teaching materials. Journal of Information Science, 33(6), 686-701.
16. Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. The American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597-606.
17. Jones, R. & Andrew, T. (2005). Open access, open source and e-theses: the development of the Edinburgh Research Archive. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 39(3), 198-212.
18. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/63XYiRKFv)
19. Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B.C.Y. & Wei, K.-K. (2005). Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: an empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 113-143.
20. Kingsley, D. (2008). Those who don't look don't find: disciplinary considerations in repository advocacy. OCLC Systems & Services, 24(4), 204-218.
21. Lynch, C.A. (2003). Institutional repositories: essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age. ARL: A Bimonthly Report, (226). Retrieved 16 August, 2009 from http://www.arl.org/resources/pubs/br/br226/br226 institutional repository.shtml
22. MacCallum, C. J. (2007). When is open access not open access? PLoS Biology, 5(10), 2095-2097.
23. McLure-Wasko, M. & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57.
24. Palmer, C.L., Teffeau, L.C. & Newton, M.P. (2008). Strategies for institutional repository development: a case study of three evolving initiatives. Library Trends, 57(2), 142-167.
25. Performance-Based Research Fund. Sector Reference Group (n.d.). Performance-Based Research Fund Sector Reference Group review: managing nominated research outputs. Wellington, New Zealand: Tertiary Education Commission.
26. Pickton, M. & McKnight, C. (2006). Research students and the Loughborough institutional repository. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 38(4), 203-219.
27. Pickton, M. & McKnight, C. (2007). Is there a role for research students in an institutional repository? Some repository managers' views. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 39(3), 153-161.
28. Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press.
29. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/63XZ3rZvX)
30. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/63XZB3Pq4)
31. Swan, A. & Brown, S. (2004). Authors and open access publishing. Learned Publishing, 17, 219-224.
32. Thibaut, J.W. & Kelley, H.H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
33. Troman, A., Jacobs, N. & Copeland, S. (2007). A new electronic service for UK theses: access transformed by EThOS. Interlending & Document Supply, 35(3), 157-163.
34. Watson, S. (2007). Authors' attitudes to, and awareness of, a university institutional repository. Serials, 20(3), 225-230.
35. ® at http://www.webcitation.org/63XZKjbNZ)
36. Xia, J. & Sun, L. (2007). Factors to assess self-archiving in institutional repositories. Serials Review, 33(2), 73-80.