Economic implications of alternative publishing models: Self-archiving and repositories

LIBER Quarterly

Volumn 19, Issue 3-4, 2010, Pages 275-292

  Houghton, John W ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Economics of publishing; OAI6; Open access; Scientific and scholarly communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951165624     PISSN: 14355205     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.18352/lq.7966     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Arundel, A. and A. Geuna (2004): 'Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European frms,' Economics of Innovation and New Technology 3(6), pp. 559-580.
2. Bailey, C.W. (2006): 'What is Open Access?'
3. Jacobs, N., ed. (2006): Open Access: Key strategic, technical and economic aspects, Chandos Publishing, Oxford.
4. Bailey, C.W. et al. (2006): Institutional Repositories, SPEC Kit 292, ARL, Washington DC.
5. Björk, B-C. (2007): 'A model of scientifc communication as a global distributed information system,' Information Research 12(2), paper 307.
6. Björk, B-C., A. Roos and M. Lauri (2008): 'Global annual volume of peer reviewed scholarly articles and the share available via different Open Access options,' Proceedings of ELPUB 2008, Toronto, June.
7. CEPA (2008): Activities, costs and funding fows in the scholarly communications system in the UK, Report commissioned by the Research Information Network (RIN), May.
8. Department of Trade and Industry (1998): Building the Knowledge Driven Economy: Competitiveness White Paper, London: Department of Trade and Industry.
9. EPS, et al. (2006): UK scholarly journals: 2006 baseline report\An evidence-based analysis of data concerning scholarly journal publishing, Research Information Network, Research Councils UK and Department of Trade and Industry.
10. European Commission (2006): Study on the economic and technical evolution of the scientifc publication markets in Europe, European Commission, Brussels.
11. Friedlander, A. and R.S. Bessette (2003): The Implications of Information Technology for Scientifc Journal Publishing: A Literature Review, National Science Foundation Special Report, NSF, Washington DC.
12. Halliday, L. and C. Oppenheim (1999): Economic Models of the Digital Library, eLib, United Kingdom Offce of Library and Information Networking.
13. Houghton, J.W. (2005): 'Economics of Publishing and the Future of Scholarly Communication' in Gorman, G.E. and F. Rowland, (eds.) (2005): International Year Book of Library and Information Management 2004-2005: Scholarly Publishing in an Electronic Era, Facet Publishing, London; etc.
14. Houghton, J.W. and P.J. Sheehan (2006): The Economic Impact of Enhanced Access to Research Findings, CSES Working Paper No. 23, Melbourne: Victoria University, http://www.cfses.com/documents/wp23.pdf
15. Houghton, J.W. and P.J. Sheehan (2009): 'Estimating the Potential Impacts of Open Access to Research Findings,' Economic Analysis and Policy 39(1), March, http://www. eap-journal.com/.
16. Houghton, J.W., C. Steele and P.J. Sheehan (2006): Research Communication Costs in Australia, Emerging Opportunities and Benefts, Department of Education, Science and Training, Canberra.
17. Houghton, J.W., B. Rasmussen, P.J. Sheehan, C. Oppenheim, A. Morris, C. Creaser, H. Greenwood, M. Summers and A. Gourlay (2009): Economic Implications of Alternative Scholarly Publishing Models: Exploring the Costs and Benefts, London & Bristol: The Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC), http://www.cfses.com/EI-ASPM/.
18. Kaufman-Wills (2005): The facts about Open Access: A study of the fnancial and non-fnancial effect of alternative business models for scholarly journals, ALPSP Special Report.
19. King, D.W. (2007): 'The cost of journal publishing: a literature review and commentary,' Learned Publishing 20(2), April, pp. 85-106.
20. King, D.W., S. Aerni, F. Brody, M. Herbison and P. Kohberger (2004): Comparative cost of the University of Pittsburgh electronic and print library collections, University of Pittsburgh, May.
21. King, D.W., C. Tenopir and M. Clarke (2006): 'Measuring total reading of journal articles,' D-Lib Magazine 12(10), October 2006.
22. Mansfeld, E. (1991): 'Academic research and industrial innovation,' Research Policy 20(1), 1991, pp. 1-12.
23. Mansfeld, E. (1998): 'Academic research and industrial innovation: an update of empirical fndings,' Research Policy 26, 1998, pp. 773-776.
24. OECD (2005): Digital Broadband Content: Scientifc Publishing, OECD, Paris.
25. Prosser, D.C. (2005): The Next Information Revolution\How Open Access will Transform Scholarly Communications, in Gorman, G.E. and F. Rowland, eds. (2005): International Yearbook of Library and Information Management 2004-2005: Scholarly Publishing in an Electronic Era, Facet Publishing, London, pp. 99-117.
26. Rowlands, I. and D. Nicholas (2005): New Journal Publishing Models: An international survey of senior researchers, CIBER report.
27. Schonfeld, R.C., D.W. King, A. Okerson and G.E. Fenton (2004): The non-subscription side of periodicals: changes in library operations and costs between print and electronic journals, Council on Library and Information Resources, Washington DC.
28. Smith, J.W.T. (1999): 'The Deconstructed Journal, a new model for Academic Publishing,' Learned Publishing 12(2), pp. 79-91.
29. Smith, J.W.T. (2005): Open Access Publishing Models: Reinventing Journal Publishing, Research Information, May-June.
30. Swan, A. (2008): 'The business of digital repositories,' in Weenink, K., L. Waaijers and K. van Godtsenhoven (eds.): A DRIVER's Guide to European Repositories, Amsterdam University Press.
31. Tenopir, C. and D.W. King (2000): Towards electronic journals: realities for scientists, librarians and publishers, SLA Publishing, Washington DC, and elsewhere.
32. Tenopir, C. and D.W. King (2002): 'Reading behavior and electronic journals,' Learned Publishing 15(4), pp. 259-265.
33. Tenopir, C. and D.W. King (2007): 'Perceptions of value and value beyond perceptions: measuring the quality and value of journal article readings,' Serials 20(3), pp. 199-207.
34. Tenopir, C., D.W. King, S. Edwards and L. Wu (2009): 'Use of Scholarly Journals and Articles by University Faculty: Changes in Information Seeking and Reading Patterns over Nearly Three Decades' Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 2009, http://cissl.scils.rutgers.edu/~tefko/Courses/e553/Readings/ Tenopir%20ele ctr%20journals%20Aslib%20Proc%202009.pdf
35. Universities UK (2007): Publishing research results: the challenges of open access, Policy Briefng, Universities UK, London, April.
36. Van de Sompel, H. et al. (2004): 'Rethinking Scholarly Communication: Building the system that scholars deserve,' D-Lib Magazine 10(9) September.
37. Waltham, M. (2005): JISC: Learned Society Open Access Business Models, JISC, June.
38. Waltham, M. (2006): 'Learned society business models and open access: overview of a recent JISC funded study', Learned Publishing 19(1), January, pp. 15-30.
39. Weenink, K., L. Waaijers and K. van Godtsenhoven (2008): A DRIVER's Guide to European Repositories, Amsterdam University Press.