New trends and future applications/directions of institutional repositories in academic institutions

Library Review

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 125-141

  Jain, Priti ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA   (Botswana)

Author keywords

Developing countries; Digital storage; Knowledge management; Librarians; Universities

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952339627     PISSN: 00242535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/00242531111113078     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Allard, S., Mack, T.R. and Feltner-Reicher, M. (2005), The librarian's role in institutional repositories: a content analysis of the literature in Reference Services Review, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 325-36.
2. Armbruster, C. and Romary, L. (2010), Comparing repository types - challenges and barriers for subject-based repositories, research repositories, national repository systems and institutional repositories in serving scholarly communication, available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.0839 (accessed 7 June 2010).
3. Ashworth, S. (2006), Role of librarians in the development of institutional repositories, available at: www.pfsl.poznan.pl/oa/ppt/2.ppt (accessed 30 January 2010).
4. Bankier, J.-G. and Perciali, I. (2008), The institutional repository rediscovered: what can a university do for open access publishing? in Serials Review, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 21-6.
5. Bankier, J.-G., Foster, C. and Wiley, G. (2009), Institutional repositories strategies for the present and future in The Serials Librarian, Vol. 56, pp. 109-15.
6. Basefsky, S. (2009), The end of institutional repositories and the beginning of social academic research service: an enhanced role for libraries, available at: www.llrx.com/node/2177/print (accessed 31 January 2010).
7. Berlin Declaration on OpenAccess (2003), Berlin declaration on open access to knowledge in the sciences and humanities, available at: www.oa.mpg.de/openaccess-berlin/signatories.html (accessed 6 January 2010).
8. BioMed Central (2010), BioMed Central partners with Massachusetts Institute of Technology Libraries to deposit open access articles automatically using SWORD protocol, available at: www.biomedcentral.com/info/presscenter/pressreleases?pr=20100429 (accessed 5 June 2010).
9. Carpenter, L. (2003), History and development of OAI-PMH, available at: www.oaforum.org/tutorial/english/page2.htm (accessed 5 June 2010).
10. Chan, D.L.H. (2009), An integrative view of the institutional repositories in Hong Kong: strategies and challenges in Serial Review, Vol. 35, pp. 119-24.
11. Chan, D.L.H., Kwok, C.S.Y. and Yip, S.K.F. (2005), Changing roles of reference librarians: the case of the HKUST institutional repository in Reference Services Review, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 268-82.
12. Crow, R. (2002), The case for institutional repositories: a SPARC position paper, available at: http://works.bepress.com/ir_research/7/ (accessed 6 February 2010).
13. Daly, R. and Organ, M. (2009), Research online: digital commons as a publishing platform at the University of Wollongong, Australia in Serials Review, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 149-53.
14. Davis, P.M. and Connolly, M.J.L. (2007), Institutional repositories: evaluating the reasons for non-use of Cornell University's installation of DSpace, D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 13, Nos 3/4, available at: www.dlib.org/dlib/march07/davis/03davis.html (accessed 6 February 2010).
15. Doctor, G. and Ramachandran, S. (2007), Enabling knowledge sharing with an institutional repository in pp. 432-3, Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Niigata.
16. DSpace Project (2000), MIT Faculty Newsletter, Vol. XII, No. 4, available at: http://dspace.org/news/articles/dspace-project.html.
17. English, R. (2003), Scholarly communication and the academy: the importance of the ACRL initiative in Portal: Libraries and the Academy, Vol. 3, pp. 337-40.
18. eScholarship: University of California (2010), eScholarship provides open access, scholarly publishing services to the University of California and delivers a dynamic research platform to scholars worldwide, available at: http://escholarship.org/ (accessed 30 January 2010).
19. Gardner, J. (2008), Open access and institutional repositories: issues in today's digital libraries, available at: www.archive.org/details/OpenAccessAndInstitutionalRepositoriesIssuesInTodaysDigitalLibraries (accessed 31 January 2010).
20. Harnad, S. (2009), Integrating universities' thesis and research deposit mandates, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, paper presented at 12th International Symposium on Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 10-13 June.
21. Harvard University Library (2009), Harvard's DASH for open access, available at: http://hul.harvard.edu/news/2009_0901.html (accessed 31 January 2010).
22. Jain, P. and Bentley, G. (2008), Institutional repositories as a benchmark for digital scholarship in pp. 116-30, Botswana Library Association 1st National Conference, 26-28 June, University of Botswana Library Auditorium, Gaborone.
23. Jain, P., Bentley, G. and Oladiran, M.T. (2009), The role of institutional repository in digital scholarly communications, paper presented at African Digital Scholarship and Curation Conference, 12-14 May, CSIR Conference Centre, Pretoria.
24. Johnson, R.K. (2002), Institutional repositories: partnering with faculty to enhance scholarly communication, D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 8, No. 11, available at: www.dlib.org/dlib/november02/johnson/11johnson.html (accessed 18 January 2010).
25. Lynch, C.A. (2003), Institutional repositories: essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age, ARL: A Bimonthly Report, 226.
26. Lyte, V., Jones, S., Ananiadou, S. and Kerr, L. (2009), UK institutional repository search: innovation and discovery, available at: www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue61/lyte-et-al/ (accessed 12 June 2010).
27. MIRE (2009), The institutional repository in 2010... and beyond, available at: http://atmire.com/presentations/OnlineInformation2009/Repositories-in-2010.pdf (accessed 5 June 2010).
28. Morris, C.M. (2010), Using SWORD and SWAP to implement the MIT OA Mandate: DuraSpace Blog.
29. Morris, D. (2009), EdSpace: an educationally focussed repository for the University of Southampton, available at: www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/.../edspacefinalreport.doc (accessed 17 January 2010).
30. New Zealand Repositories (2009), available at: www.oarinz.ac.nz/oarinzwiki/index.php?n=OARiNZ.NewZealandRepositories (accessed 6 January 2010).
31. OpenDOAR (2010), The directory of open access repositories, available at: www.opendoar.org/ (accessed 14 June 2010).
32. Pickton, M. and Barwick, J. (2006), A librarian's guide to institutional repositories, Loughborough University, Loughborough, available at: http://magpie.lboro.ac.uk/dspace/handle/2134/1122 (accessed 16 January 2010).
33. Poynder, R. (2010), Interview with Stevan Harnad: a prophet whose time has come, Information Today, Vol. 27, No. 2, available at: www.infotoday.com/it/feb10/Poynder.shtml (accessed 30 May 2010).
34. Prosser, D. (2007), The role of the library 2020: LIBER (Association of European Research Libraries) Development Plan 2007-2010.
35. Proulx, E. (2009), New look enhanced services for eScholarship, available at: www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/article/22047 (accessed 6 January 2010).
36. Read, M. (2008), Libraries and repositories in New Review of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 14, Nos 1/2, pp. 71-8.
37. Robinson, M. (2009), Promoting the visibility of educational research through an institutional repository in Serials Review, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 133-7.
38. Romary, L. and Armbruster, C. (2010), Beyond institutional repositories in International Journal of Digital Library Systems, Vol. 1, pp. 44-61.
39. Royster, P. (2008), Publishing original content in an institutional repository in Serials Review, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 27-30.
40. Salo In Albanese, A.R. (2009), Institutional repositories: thinking beyond the box, available at: www.libraryjournal.com/index.asp?layout=articlePrint&articleID=CA6639327 (accessed 30 January 2010).
41. Swan, A. (2008), The business of digital repositories, available at: www.keyperspectives.co.uk/openaccessarchive/reports/The_business_of_digital_repositories.pdf (accessed 30 May 2010).
42. Walters, T.O. (2007), Reinventing the library-how repositories are causing librarians to rethink their professional roles in Portal: Libraries and the Academy, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 213-25, available at: http://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/14421.
43. Warren, B. (2003), Current challenges and choices in scientific publication in Baylor University Medical Centre Proceedings, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 401-4, available at: www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1214560&blobtype=pdf (accessed 17 January 2010).
44. Westell, M. (2006), Institutional repositories: proposed indicators of success in Library Hi Tech, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 211-26.
45. White, W. (2009), Institutional repositories: contributing to institutional knowledge management and the global research commons, paper presented at 4th International Open Repositories Conference, 18-21 May, Atlanta, GA.
46. Xia, J. (2009), Library publishing as a new model of scholarly communication in Journal of Scholarly Publishing, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 370-83.
47. Bailey, C.W. Jr (2008), Institutional repositories, tout de suite, available at: www.digital-scholarship.org/ts/irtoutsuite.pdf (accessed 31 January 2010).
48. Bailey, R. and Bailey, E. (2006), Providence College's digital institutional repository the digital common, available at: http://digitalcommons.providence.edu (accessed 30 January 2010).
49. California Digital Library (2009), available at: www.cdlib.org/glance/overview.html (accessed 6 January 2010).
50. Carr, L. and Brody, T. (2007), Size isn't everything: sustainable repositories evidenced by sustainable deposit profiles, D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 13, Nos 7/8, available at: http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/13872/ (accessed 5 June 2010).
51. Center for Research Libraries (2008), Trustworthy repositories audit and certification (TRAC): criteria and checklist, Center for Research Libraries, Chicago, IL, available at: www.crl.edu/PDF/trac.pdf (accessed 30 January 2010).
52. Directory of Open Access Journals (2009), available at: www.doaj.org/ (accessed 4 April 2010).
53. ePrints (2010), Open access and institutional repositories with ePrints, available at: www.eprints.org/ (accessed 6 June 2010).
54. Harnad, S. and McGovern, N. (2009), Institutional repository success is dependent upon mandates in Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 27-31.
55. Jones, R., Andrew, T. and MacColl, J. (2006), The institutional repository, Chandos, Oxford, available at: www.digital-scholarship.org/ts/irtoutsuite.pdf (accessed 5 June 2010).
56. Library Spring (2009), Institutional repositories: contributing to institutional knowledge management and the global research commons", Wendy White, University of Southampton, available at: http://libraryspring.blogspot.com/2009/05/or-09-institutional-repositories.html (accessed 16 January 2010).
57. Morris, C.M. (2010), Fedora-based University of Wisconsin Library Prototype for all UW digital collections: DuraSpace Blog.
58. Poynder, R. (2010), Institutional repositories and small institutions, available at: http://undergraduatesciencelibrarian.wordpress.com/2010/01/16/institutional-repositories-and-small-institutions/ (accessed 30 May 2010).
59. SPARC EUROPE (2009), The DOAJ received SPARC Europe Award for outstanding achievements in scholarly communications, available at: www.lub.lu.se/index.php?id=267&L=1&nId=154 (accessed 17 January 2010).
60. SPARCE Europe (2010), Advocating change in scholarly communications for the benefit of researchers and society, available at: www.sparceurope.org/ (accessed 5 June 2010).
61. Stuart, B. (2009), The end of institutional repositories and the beginning of social academic research service: an enhanced role for libraries, available at: www.llrx.com/node/2177/print (accessed 17 January 2010).
62. UC Berkeley (2010), Faculty conference on scholarly publications, available at: www.lib.berkeley.edu/scholarlypublishing/repositories.html (accessed 5 June 2010).