Institutional repository interaction with research users: A review of current practice

New Review of Academic Librarianship

Volumn 16, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2010, Pages 116-131

  Russell, Rosemary ^a   Day, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BATH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Institutional repositories; Researchers; Scholarly communication; User requirements; Workflows

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959812552     PISSN: 13614533     EISSN: 17407834     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2010.509996     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Aschenbrenner, Andreas, et al "The Future of Repositories? Patterns for (Cross-) Repository Architectures." D-Lib Magazine 14.11/12 (2008): n. pag. Web. 18 Mar. 2010.
2. BRII. U of Oxford, 2008. Web. 18 Mar. 2010.
3. Beagrie, Neil, Julia Chruszcz, and Brian Lavoie. Keeping Research Data Safe. Joint Information Systems Committee, 2008. Web. 18 Mar. 2010.
4. Bjork, Bo-Christer, Annikki Roos, and Mari Lauri. Global Annual Volume of Peer Reviewed Scholarly Articles and the Share Available via Different Open Access Options. ELPUB2008 Conference on Electronic Publishing, Toronto. June 2008. Web. 18 Mar. 2010.
5. Blake, Michelle. "Economists Online: user requirements for a subject repository." Serials 22.3 (2009): 206-213. Print.
6. Carter, Lemura, and France B́elanger. "The Utilization of E-government Services: Citizen Trust, Innovation and Accepting Factors." Information Systems Journal 15.1 (2005): 5-25. Print.
7. Crow, Raym. The Case for Institutional Repositories: A SPARC Position Paper. Washington, D.C.: Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resources Coalition, 2002. Web. 18 Mar. 2010.
8. Daoutis, Christine. Case Study: A Brief History of Surrey Scholarship OnLine (SSOL). Repositories Support Project, n.d. Web. 18 Mar. 2010.
9. Davis, Philip M., and Matthew J. L. Connolly. "Institutional Repositories: Evaluating the Reasons for Non-use of Cornell University's Installation of DSpace." D-Lib Magazine 13.3/4 (2007): n. pag. Web. 18 Mar. 2010.
10. De Roure, David. Edinburgh Repository Fringe 2008. Playfair Library, U of Edinburgh. 1 Aug. 2008. Closing Plenary. Web. 18 Mar. 2010. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3946866546394622361&hl=en
11. Digital Repository infoKit. JISC infoNet, 2009. Web. 18 Mar. 2010.
12. DRIVER. Web. 18 Mar. 2010. http://search.driver.research-infrastructures.eu/
13. Foster, Nancy Fried, and Susan Gibbons. "Understanding faculty to improve content recruitment for institutional repositories." D-Lib Magazine 11.1 (2005): n. pag. Web. 18 Mar. 2010.
14. Fry, Jenny, et al. PEER Behavioural Research: Authors and Users vis-à-vis, Journals and Repositories. PEER Project, 2009. Web. 18 Mar. 2010.
15. Gandel, Paul B., Richard N. Katz, and Susan E. Metros. The 'Weariness of the Flesh': Reflections on the Life of the Mind in an Era of Abundance. Educause Review 39.2 (2004): 40-51. Web. 18 Mar. 2010.
16. Gargouri, Yassine, et al. Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research. Ar Xiv Computer Science, 9 Jan. 2010. Web. 18 Mar. 2010.
17. Heery, Rachel. Digital Repositories Roadmap Review: Towards a Vision for Research and Learning in 2013. Joint Information Systems Committee, 2009. Web. 18 Mar.2010.
18. Hey, Jessie M. N. "Targeting Academic Research with Southampton's Institutional Repository." Ariadne 40 (2004): n. pag. Web. 18 Mar. 2010.
19. I-WIRE Requirements. Cardiff U, 2010. Web. 18 Mar. 2010. http://blogs.cf.ac.uk/iwire/category/RequirementsReport
20. JISC Grant Funding Call 2/10: Deposit of Research Outputs and Exposing Digital Content for Education and Research. Joint Information Systems Committee, 2010. Web. 18 Mar. 2010.
21. Loureiro-Koechlin, Cecilia. Institutional Repositories: Acceptance and Adoption. BRII Blog, 2 Oct. 2009. Web. 18 Mar. 2010.
22. Loureiro-Koechlin, Cecilia. "Uncovering User Perceptions of Research Activity Data." Ariadne 62 (2010): n. pag. Web. 18 Mar. 2010.
23. Maness, Jack M., Tomasz Miaskiewicz and Tamara Sumner. "Using Personas to Understand the Needs and Goals of Future Institutional Repository Users." D-Lib Magazine 14.9/10 (2008): n. pag. Web. 18 Mar. 2010.
24. Murray-Rust, Peter. Repositories for Scientific Data (at OR08). Unilever Cambridge Centre for Molecular Informatics, 2008. Web. 18 Mar. 2010. http://wwmm.ch.cam.ac.uk/blogs/murrayrust/?p=992
25. Paterson, Lorraine, and Boon Low. Usability Inspection of Digital Libraries. U of Edinburgh, 18 Feb. 2010. Web. 18 Mar. 2010.
26. Pickton, Margaret J. "Research Students and the Loughborough Institutional Repository." Diss. Loughborough U, 2005. Web. 18 Mar. 2010.
27. Puplett, Dave. Subject Repositories: European Collaboration in the International Context. Conference held at the British Library, London on 28-29 January 2010. Ariadne 62 (2010): n. pag. Web. 18 Mar. 2010.
28. Randall, Ryan, et al. The Next Generation of Academics. U of Rochester, 2008. Web. 18 Mar. 2010.
29. Rowland, Fytton, et al. "Delivery, Management and Access Model for E-prints and Open Access Journals." Journal of Academic Librarianship 30.4 (2004): 298-303. Web. 18 Mar. 2010.
30. Rumsey, Sally. Case Study: Oxford University Research Archive (ORA). Repositories Support Project, Feb. 2008. Web. 18 Mar. 2010.
31. Simple Web-service Offering Repository Deposit (SWORD). Web. 18 Mar 2010. http://www.swordapp.org/
32. VIVO. Cornell U Library, 2009. Web. 18 Mar. 2010. http://vivo.cornell.edu/about
33. Watson, Sarah. "Authors' Attitudes to, and Awareness and Use of, a University Institutional Repository." Serials 20.3 (2007): 225-230. Print.
34. Zuccala, Alesia, et al Digital Repository Management Practices, User Needs and Potential Users: An Integrated Analysis. U of Wolverhampton, 31 Aug. 2006. Web. 18 Mar. 2010.