메뉴 건너뛰기
Trends in Plant Science
Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 340-341
Open access is worth considering: A reply to Agrawal
Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]
Indexed keywords

PUBLISHING; STANDARDS;
EID: 84901587194     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.04.006     Document Type: Letter
Times cited : (2)
References (3)
  • 1
    • 84894483352 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Four more reasons to be skeptical of open-access publishing
    • Agrawal A.A. Four more reasons to be skeptical of open-access publishing. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19:133.
    • (2014) Trends Plant Sci. , vol.19 , pp. 133
    • Agrawal, A.A.1
  • 2
    • 84901642608 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Publication policies of 31 open access publishers in biology
    • Lanfear R., Pennell M.W. Publication policies of 31 open access publishers in biology. Figshare 2014, 10.6084/m9.figshare.956240.
    • (2014) Figshare
    • Lanfear, R.1    Pennell, M.W.2
  • 3
    • 84886624151 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The assessment of science: the relative merits of post-publication review, the impact factor, and the number of citations
    • Eyre-Walker A., Stoletzki N. The assessment of science: the relative merits of post-publication review, the impact factor, and the number of citations. PLoS Biol. 2013, 11:e1001675.
    • (2013) PLoS Biol. , vol.11
    • Eyre-Walker, A.1    Stoletzki, N.2

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.