Green open access policies of scholarly journal publishers: A study of what, when, and where self-archiving is allowed

Scientometrics

Volumn 99, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 475-494

  Laakso, Mikael ^a  

^a HANKEN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Finland)

Author keywords

Open access; Science policy; Scientific publishing; Self archiving

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898008123     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-1205-3     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Antelman, K. (2006). Self-archiving practice and the influence of publisher policies in the social sciences. Learned Publishing, 19(2), 85-95.
2. Björk, B. C., Laakso, M., Welling, P., & Paetau, P. (2014). Anatomy of green open access. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. In Press. doi: 10. 1002/asi. 22963.
3. Covey, D. T. (2009). Self-archiving journal articles: A case study of faculty practice and missed opportunity. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 9(2), 223-251.
4. Creaser, C., Fry, J., Greenwood, H., Oppenheim, C., Probets, S., Spezi, V., et al. (2010). Authors' awareness and attitudes toward open access repositories. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 16(Sup1), 145-161. doi: 10. 1080/13614533. 2010. 518851.
5. DOAJ. (2013). Directory of open access journals. http://www. doaj. org.
6. Elsevier. (2013a). What does it cover? Content coverage guide for SciVerse/Scopus. Retrieved from http://www. info. sciverse. com/scopus/scopus-in-detail/facts.
7. Elsevier. (2013b). Article posting policy. http://www. elsevier. com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy#accepted-author-manuscript.
8. Finch, J. (2012). Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: How to expand access to research publications, p. 140. http://www. researchinfonet. org/publish/finch/.
9. Finch, J. (2013). Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: How to expand access to research publications-A review of progress in implementing the recommendations of the Finch report, p. 74. http://www. researchinfonet. org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Final-version. pdf.
10. Gadd, E., Oppenheim, C., & Probets, S. (2003). RoMEO studies 4: An analysis of journal publishers' copyright agreements. Learned Publishing, 16(4), 293-308.
11. Hansen, D. (2012). Understanding and making use of academic authors' open access rights. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 1(2), eP1050. doi: 10. 7710/2162-3309. 1050.
12. Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallieres, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y., et al. (2004). The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access. Serials Review, 30(4), 310-314.
13. Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2012). Anatomy of open access publishing: A study of longitudinal development and internal structure. BMC Medicine, 10, 124. doi: 10. 1186/1741-7015-10-124.
14. Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high-impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 64(7), 1323-1329. doi: 10. 1002/asi. 22856.
15. Larsen, P. O., & Ins, M. (2010). The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by science citation index. Scientometrics, 84(3), 575-603. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-010-0202-z.
16. Miguel, S., Chinchilla-Rodriguez, Z., & de Moya-Anegón, F. (2011). Open access and scopus: A new approach to scientific visibility from the standpoint of access. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(6), 1130-1145. doi: 10. 1002/asi. 21532.
17. Morris, S. (2009). Journal authors' rights: Perception and reality (PRC Summary Paper 5). http://www. publishingresearch. net/documents/JournalAuthorsRights. pdf.
18. Publishers. org. (2013). Understanding CHORUS. http://www. publishers. org/press/107/.
19. Rowlands, I., & Nicholas, D. (2005). Scholarly communication in the digital environment: The 2005 survey of journal author behaviour and attitudes. Aslib Proceedings, 57(6), 481-497. doi: 10. 1108/00012530510634226.
20. SCIMago. (2007). SJR-SCImago journal & country rank. Retrieved from http://www. scimagojr. com.
21. Scopus. (2013). The Scopus bibliographic database. http://www. scopus. com/.
22. SHERPA/RoMEO. (2013). SHERPA/RoMEO: Publisher copyright policies & self-archiving. http://www. sherpa. ac. uk/.
23. SHERPA/RoMEO Statistics. (2013). SHERPA/RoMEO statistics. http://www. sherpa. ac. uk/romeo/statistics. php?la=en&fIDnum={pipe}&mode=simple.
24. Solomon, D. J., Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). A longitudinal comparison of citation rates and growth among open access journals. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 642-650. doi: 10. 1016/j. joi. 2013. 03. 008.
25. Spezi, V., Fry, J., Creaser, C., Probets, S., & White, S. (2013). Researchers' green open access practice: A cross-disciplinary analysis. Journal of Documentation, 69(3), 334-359.
26. Swan, A., & Brown, S. (2005). Open access self-archiving: An author study. Key Perspectives Report, p. 97. http://www. jisc. ac. uk/uploaded_documents/Open%20Access%20Self%20Archiving-an%20author%20study. pdf.
27. Tenopir, C., Volentine, R., & King, D. W. (2013). Social media and scholarly reading. Online Information Review, 37(2), 193-216. doi: 10. 1108/OIR-04-2012-0062.
28. UlrichsWeb. (2013). UlrichsWeb serials solutions. http://ulrichsweb. serialssolutions. com.
29. Web of Knowledge. (2013). Thomson reuters web of knowledge. http://apps. webofknowledge. com.
30. Whitehouse. gov. (2013). Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies. http://www. whitehouse. gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ostp_public_access_memo_2013. pdf.