Green and gold open access in India

Learned Publishing

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 21-32

  Mukherjee, Bhaskar ^a  

^a GURU GHASIDAS UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890369192     PISSN: 09531513     EISSN: 17414857     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1087/20140104     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Census of India, 2011. http://censusindia.gov.in/ (accessed 13 February 2013).
2. Khatri, N.K. E-journal publishing in India: a case study of Indian Statistical Institute publication: Sankhya-The Indian Journal of Statistics. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Academic Libraries (ICAL-2009). Delhi, University of Delhi, 2009, pp. 386-88.
3. Sahu, D.K. and Parmar, R. The position around the world: open access in India. In N. Jacobs (ed.), Open Access: Key Strategic, Technical and Economic Aspects. Oxford, Chandos Publishing, 2006, pp. 26-32.
4. Fernandez, L. 2006. Open access initiatives in India - an evaluation. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 1(1) https://journal.lib.uoguelph.ca/index.php/perj/article/view/110/171 (accessed 11 January 2013).
5. Guédon, J.-C. 2004. The green and gold roads to open access: the case for mixing and matching, Serials Review, 30(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2004.09.005 (accessed 24 January 2013).
6. Harnad, S. 2005. Fast-forward on the green road to open access: the case against mixing up green and gold. http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/260675/3/mixcritcont.html (accessed 5 March 2013).
7. Pakir, A. 2005. Applied linguistics proper? Relocation, reorientation, and realignment. TESOL Quarterly, 39(4): 720-723.
8. Duszak, A. 2006. Looking globally, seeing locally: exploring some myths of globalization in academia. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 53: 35-45.
9. Pabón Escobar, S.C. and da Costa, M.C. 2006. Visibility of Latin American scientifi c publications: the example of Bolivia. Journal of Science Communication, 5(2): 1-8.
10. Shashok, K. 2008. Content and communication: how can peer review provide helpful feedback about the writing? BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(8): 3, http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcmedresmethodol/archive/ (accessed 30 March 2013).
11. Sykes, J. 2006. The culture of science editing. Report of meetings. European Science Editing, 32(3): 71.
12. Katic, T. and Penava, Z. 2005. Inclusion of nationally oriented journals into the journal elite of international signifi cance or what can scientifi c outskirts offer to the metropolis? Paper presented at the World Library and Information Congress: 71st IFLA General Conference and Council, August 2005, Oslo, Norway.
13. Morcos, A. 1999. Publishing in developing countries: problems and solutions. CBE News, 22(6): 198.
14. Arunachalam, S. 2002. The global research village: a view from the periphery. Digital Library of Information Science and Technology. http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/843/01/Article%5F11.pdf (accessed 9 December 2012).
15. Bioline International. 2007 http://blogs.openaccesscentral.com/blogs/bmcblog/entry/berlin_5_and_developing_countries (accessed 11 January 2013).
16. Lenzer, J. 2008. US Congress and European Research Council insist on open access to research results. British Medical Journal, 336: 176-177.
17. Stegemann, H. 2007. Raising the visibility of 'small journals': the Venezuelan Association of Biomedical Journal Editors (ASEREME). The Write Stuff, 16(4): 161-165.
18. Collins, C.S. and Walters, W.H. 2010. Open access journals in college library collections. Serials Librarian, 59(2): 194-214.
19. Niu, X., Hemminger, B.M., Lown, C., Adams, S., Brown, C., Level, A., McLure, M., Powers, A., Tennant, M.R., and Cataldo, T. 2010. National study of information seeking behavior of academic researchers in the United States. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(5): 869-890.
20. Neuhaus, C., Neuhaus, E, Asher, A and Wrede, C. 2006. The depth and breadth of Google Scholar: an empirical study. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 6(2): 127-141.
21. The Open Citation Project. 2012. The effect of open access and downloads ('hits') on citation impact: a bibliography of studies. http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitationbiblio.html (accessed 17 December 2012).
22. Davis, P.M. and Walters, W.H. 2011. The impact of free access to the scientifi c literature: a review of recent research. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 99: 208-217.
23. Craig, I.D., Plume, A.M., McVeigh, M.E., Pringle, J., and Amin, M. 2007. Do open access articles have greater citation impact? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 1: 239-248.
24. Harnad, S. and Brody, T. 2004. Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs. Non-OA articles in the same journals. D-Lib Magazine, 10(6). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june04/harnad/06harnad.html (accessed 6 February, 2013)
25. Lawrence, S. 2001. Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact. Nature, 411 (6837): 521.
26. Cole, S. 1992. Making Science: Between Nature and Society. Harvard University Press.
27. Papin-Ramcharan, J. and Dawe, R.A. 2006. The other side of the coin for open access publishing - a developing country view. Libri, 56(1): 16-27. doi:10.1515/LIBR.2006.16
28. Indian Citation Index. http://www.indiancitationindex.com/ici.aspx?target=aboutus (accessed 10 March 2013).
29. Solomon, D.J. and Björk, B.C. 2012. Publication fees in open access publishing: sources of funding and factors infl uencing choice of journal. Journal of the American Society for Information Science And Technology, 63(1): 98-107.
30. Meadows, J. 1997. Can we really see where electronic journals are going? Library Management, 18(3): 151-154.
31. Kaufman-Wills Group, The Facts About Open Access. Worthing, West Sussex, Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers, 2005, http://www.alpsp.org/ForceDownload.asp?id=70 (accessed 10 April 2013).
32. EBSCO Information Services. 2007. EBSCO simplifi es management of open access titles. http://www2.ebsco.com/EN-US/ (accessed 16 January 2013).
33. Testa, J. 2011. The Thomson Reuters journal selection process. http://thomsonreuters.com/productsservices/science/free/essays/journal_selection_process (accessed 19 March 2013)
34. Nowick, E.A., Jenda, C.A., and Azzam, J. 2004. Indexing of open access journals in agriculture. Quarterly Bulletin of the International Association of Agricultural Information Specialists, 49(1-2): 20-23.
35. Björk, B.C and Solomon, D. 2012. Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientifi c impact. BMC Medicine, 10. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/10/73 (accessed 16 July 2012).
36. Springer. 2005. Springer strengthens its commitment to freely accessible research literature. http://www.springer.com/about+springer/media/pressreleases?SGWID=0-11002-2-803740-0 (accessed 17 February 2013).
37. Research Information Network. 2008. Activities, costs and funding flows in the scholarly communications system in the UK. http://www.rin.ac.uk/our-work/communicating-and-disseminatingresearch/activities-costsand-funding-flows-scholarly-commu (accessed 8 March 2013).
38. Houghton, J., Rasmussen, B., Sheehan P., Oppenheim C., Morris A., Creaser, C., and Gourlay, A. 2010. Eeconomic implications of alternative scholarly publishing models: Exploring the costs and benefits. http://ierepository.jisc.ac.uk/278/ (accessed 24 January 2013).
39. BOAI, 2007. Budapest Open Access Initiative FAQ http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm #openaccess Accessed 05/06/2007 (accessed 10 December 2012).
40. Dawson, M. and Rascoff, M 2006. Scholarly Communication in the Economics Discipline: A Report Commissioned by JSTOR. New York, Ithaka. http://www.ithaka.org/publications/pdfs/JSTOR%20Econ%20Study%20Report%20Public%20final1031.pdf (accessed 16 December 2012).
41. Griffiths, R. 2006. Scholarly Communication in the History Discipline: A Report Commissioned by JSTOR. New York, Ithaka. http://www.ithaka.org/publications/pdfs/JSTOR%20History%20Study%20Report%20Public%20final1031pdf (accessed 16 December 2012)
42. Quinn, M. and Kim, J. 2007. Scholarly Communication in the Biosciences Discipline: A Report Commissioned by JSTOR. New York, Ithaka. http://www.ithaka.org/publications/pdfs/JSTOR%20BioSci%20Study%20Report%20Public%20final1031.pdf (accessed 10 March 2013).
43. Moed, H. 2005. Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Dordrecht, Springer.
44. Sulkunen, P. 1982. Society made visible - on the cultural sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Acta Sociologica, 25(2): 103-115.
45. Björk, B.C., Welling, P., Laakso, M., Majlender, P., Hedlund, T., and Guônason, G. 2010. Open access to the scientific journal literature: situation 2009. PLoS ONE, 5(6). www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2890572 (accessed 12 January 2013)
46. Miguel, S., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., and Moya-Anegón, F. de. 2011. Open access and Scopus: a new approach to scientifi c visibility from the standpoint of access. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(6): 1130-1145.
47. Frantsvåg, J.E. 2010. The size distribution of open access publishers: a problem for open access. First Monday, 2010; 15(12), http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/rt/printerFriendly/3208/2726 (accessed 28 February 2013).
48. Walters, W.H and Linvill, A.C. 2011. Characteristics of open access journals in six subject areas. College & Research Libraries, 72(3), http://crl.acrl.org/content/early/2010/09/14/crl-132.full.pdf+html
49. King, D.W., Tenopir, C., Choemprayong, S., and Wu, L. 2009. Scholarly journal information-seeking and reading patterns of faculty at fi ve US universities. Learned Publishing, 22(2): 126-144.
50. Butler, D. 2013. Investigating journals: the dark side of publishing. Nature, 495: 433-435. doi:10.1038/495433a
51. Eysenbach, G. 2006. Citation advantage of open access articles. PLoS Biology, 4: 692-698.