An Overview of Open Access in the Fields of Business and Management

Journal of Business and Finance Librarianship

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 108-124

  Charles, Lyons ^a   Booth, H Austin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic publishing; Business faculty; Institutional repositories; Open access; Self archiving; Subject repositories

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953319030     PISSN: 08963568     EISSN: 15470644     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08963568.2011.554786     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Adler, N., & Harzing, A. (2009). When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8, 72-95.
2. Antelman, K. (2004). Do open-access articles have a greater research impact? College & Research Libraries, 65, 372-382.
3. Antelman, K. (2006). Self-archiving practice and the influence of publisher policies in the social sciences. Learned Publishing, 19, 85-95.
4. Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. (2008). Final report of the impact of research task force. Retrieved from http://www.aacsb.edu/resourcecenters/research/Final/ImpactofResearchReport-FINAL.PDF.
5. Ball, K. (2009). The indexing of scholarly open access business journals. Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship, 10(3). Retrieved from http://www.southernlibrarianship.icaap.org/content/v10n03/ballk01.html.
6. Bartunek, J. M. (2001). Academic-practitioner collaboration need not require joint or relevant research: Toward a relational scholarship of integration. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1323-1333.
7. Bergstrom, T. C., & Lavaty, R. (2007). How often do economists self-archive? Retrieved from http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/69f4b8vz.
8. Bjork, B., Roos, A., & Lauri, M. (2008). Global annual volume of peer reviewed scholarly articles and the share available via different OA options. Proceedings ELPUB2008 Conference on Electronic Publishing. Retrieved from oacs.shh.fi/publications/elpub-2008.pdf.
9. Chapman, K., & Pike, L. (2002). Working papers and scholarly research in finance. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 21(1), 27-35.
10. Corbyn, Z., & Reisz, M. (2009, November 12). Learning to share. Times Higher Education Supplement. Retrieved from http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=409049.
11. Covey, D. (2009). Self-archiving journal articles: A case study of faculty practice and missed opportunity. portal: Libraries & the Academy, 9, 223-251.
12. Craig, I. D., Plume, A. M., McVeigh, M. E., Pringle, J., & Amin, M. (2007). Do OA articles have greater citation impact?: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 1, 239-248.
13. Davis, P. (2009). Studies on access: A review. Retrieved from http://www.arxiv.org/abs/0912.3953.
14. Fry, J., Oppenheim, C., & Probets, S. (2009). PEER behavioural research: Authors and users vis-à-vis journals and repositories. Retrieved from http://www.peerproject. eu/fileadmin/media/reports/Final revision-behavioural baseline report-200110.pdf.
15. Hajjem, C., Harnad, S., & Gingras, Y. (2005). Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of OA and how it increases research citation impact. Bulletin of the IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Data Engineering. Retrieved from http//www.sites.computer.org/debull/A05dec/hajjem.pdf.
16. Hansen, L. (2009). Greater access to scholarly publications from Copenhagen Business School: The CBS open access policy 2009. ScieCom Info, 5(4). Retrieved from http://www.sciecom.org/ojs/index.php/sciecominfo/article/view/1812.
17. Harnad, S. (2008). Waking OA's "slumbering giant": The university's mandate to mandate OA. New Review of Information Networking, 14(1), 51-68.
18. Harnad, S., & Brody T. (2004). Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same journals. D-Lib Magazine, 10(6). Retrieved from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june04/harnad/06harnad.html#Brody.
19. Judge, T., Cable, D., Colbert, A., & Rynes, S. (2007). What causes a management article to be cited-Article, author, or journal?. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 491-506.
20. Kim, J. (2007). Motivating and impeding factors affecting faculty contribution to institutional repositories. Journal of Digital Information, 8(2). Retrieved January 16, 2010 from http://www.journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/193/177.
21. Matsubayashi, M., Kurata, K., Sakai, Y., Morioka, T., Kato, S., Mine, S., & Ueda, S. (2009). Status of OA in the biomedical field in 2005. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 97, 3-10.
22. Norris, M., Oppenheim, C., & Rowland, F. (2008). The citation advantage of open-access articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 59, 1963-1972.
23. Poynder, R. (2010). A prophet whose time has come. InformationToday, 27(2), 1, 39-40.
24. Schulze, J. (2009). Google dubbed internet parasite by WSJ editor. The Australian, 31. Retrieved from Newspaper Source Plus database: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/google-dubbed-internet-parasite/story-e6frg996-1225696931547.
25. Swan, A., & Brown, S. (2005). Open access self-archiving: An author study. Retrieved from http://www.keyperspectives.co.uk/openaccessarchive/reports/Open%20Access%20II%20(author%20survey%20on%20self%20archiving)%202005.pdf.
26. Turk, N. (2008). Citation impact of OA journals. New Library World, 109, 65-74.
27. Willinsky, J. (2009). The stratified economics of OA. Economic Analysis & Policy, 39(1), 53-70.
28. Xia, J. (2008). A comparison of subject and institutional repositories in self-archiving practices. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34, 489-495.