The downside of open-access publishing

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 368, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 791-793

  Haug, Charlotte ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERNET; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; ONLINE SYSTEM; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUALITY CONTROL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SHORT SURVEY; STANDARDIZATION; WEB BROWSER;

EID: 84874367153     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: 15334406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1214750     Document Type: Article

References (2)

1. Beall J. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature 2012;489:179.
2. Idem. Criteria for determining predatory open-access publishers (2nd edition). Scholarly Access Publishers (http://scholarlyoa.com/2012/11/30/ criteria-for-determining-predatory-open-access-publishers-2nd-edition).