Is scholarly publishing going from crisis to crisis?

Learned Publishing

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 85-88

  Pinfield, Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875358120     PISSN: 09531513     EISSN: 17414857     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1087/20130204     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Houghton, J., Rasmussen, B., Sheehan, P., Oppenheim, C., Morris, A., Creaser, C., Greenwood, H., Summers, M., and Gourlay, A. 2009. Economic implications of alternative scholarly publishing models: exploring the costs and benefits. London: JISC. Available at http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/ documents/publications/rpteconomicoapublishing. pdf (accessed 14 January 2013).
2. Houghton, J. and Sheehan, P. 2009. Estimating the potential impacts of open access to research fi ndings. Economic Analysis and Policy, 39(1): 127-142. E-print available at http://vuir.vu.edu.au/15221/ (accessed 14 January 2013).
3. Swan, A. 2010. The Open Access Citation Advantage: Studies and Results to Date. Technical Report. School of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton. http://eprints.soton.ac. uk/268516/ (accessed 14 January 2013).
4. Jubb, M., Cook, J., Hulls, D., Jones, D., and Ware, M. 2011. Costs, risks and benefits in improving access to journal articles. Learned Publishing, 24(4): 247-259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20110402.
5. Houghton, J. and Swan, A. 2013. Planting the green seeds for a golden harvest: comments and clarifi cations on 'going for gold'. D-Lib Magazine 19(1/2). h t t p: / / d x. d o i. o r g / 1 0. 1 0 4 5 / january2013-houghton.
6. Swan, A. 2007. Open access and the progress of science. American Scientist, 95(3): 197. E-print available at http://www.americanscientist. org/libraries/documents/ 2007327142636_307.pdf (accessed 14 January 2013).
7. Look, H. and Marsh, K. 2012. Benefits of open access to scholarly research to the public sector. London: JISC. Available at http:// repository.jisc.ac.uk/575/1/publicsector_oa_ report_fi nal_20120312.pdf (accessed 14 January 2013).
8. Beddoes, D., Brodie, E., Clarke, R., and Hoong Sin, C. 2012. Benefits of open access to scholarly research for voluntary and charitable sector organisations. London, JISC. Available at http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/576/1/ JISC_open_access_and_VCS_report-FINAL. pdf (accessed 14 January 2013).
9. Open access success stories. http://www.oastories. org/ (accessed 14 January 2013).
10. Neylon C. 2012. More than just access: delivering on a network-enabled literature. PLoS Biology, 10(10). http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001417.
11. Finch, J. 2012. Accessibility, Sustainability, Excellence: How to Expand Access to Research Publications. Report of the Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings. London, Research Information Network. Available at http://www.researchinfonet.org/wp-content/ uploads/2012/06/Finch-Group-report-FINAL-VERSION.pdf (accessed 14 January 2013).
12. BIS. 2012. Government response to the Finch Group report: 'Accessibility, Sustainability, Excellence: How to Expand Access to Research Publications'. London, Department of Business, Innovation and Skills. Available at http://www.bis.gov.uk/ assets/biscore/science/docs/l/12-975-lettergovernment-response-to-finch-reportresearch-publications.pdf (accessed 14 January 2013).
13. RCUK. 2012. Research Councils UK Policy on Access to Research outputs. Available at http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/documents/ RCUK%20_Policy_on_Access_to_ Research_Outputs.pdf (accessed 14 January 2013).
14. Comparison of BioMed Central's articleprocessing charges with those of other publishers. http://www.biomedcentral.com/ about/apccomparison/ (accessed 14 January 2013).
15. Peer J. https://peerj.com/ (accessed 11 February 2013).
16. SCOAP3. http://scoap3.org/ (accessed 11 February 2014). Mele, S., Morrison, H., D'Agostino, D., and Dyas-Correia, S. 2009. SCOAP3 and open access. Serials Review, 35(4): 264-271.
17. Suber, P. 2012. Ensuring open access for publicly funded research. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5184.
18. Pinfield, S. 2009. Journals and repositories: an evolving relationship? Learned Publishing, 22(3): 165-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/2009302.