Learning to share: Mandates and open access

Library Management

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 302-318

  Kennan, Mary Anne ^a  

^a CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Australia; Open access; Research work; University libraries

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053974204     PISSN: 01435124     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/01435121111132301     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Akrich, M. and Latour, B. (1992), "A summary of a convenient vocabulary for the semiotics of human and nonhuman assemblies" in Shaping Technology/Building Society, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 259-64.
2. Australian Department of Education, Science and Training (n.d.), Accessibility Framework, Australian Department of Education, Science and Training, Canberra, available at: www.dest.gov.au/sectors/research_sector/policies_issues_reviews/key_issues/accessibility_framework/ (accessed 4 December, 2006).
3. Australian Department of Education, Science and Training. Development Advisory Group of The RQF (2006), "The recommended RQF", Research Quality Framework: Assessing the Quality and Impact of Research in Australia, Australian Department of Education, Science and Training, Canberra.
4. Australian Department of Innovation Industry Science and Research (2008), Review of the National Innovation System, Australian Government, Canberra, available at: www.innovation.gov.au/innovationreview/Pages/home.aspx (accessed 14 September 2008).
5. Australian Government Australian Research Council (2008), The Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) Initiative, Australian Government Australian Research Council, Sydney.
6. Björk, B.-C., Roosr, A. and Lauri, M. (2008), "Global annual volume of peer reviewed scholarly articles and the share available via different open access options" Chan, L. and Mornatti, S. (Eds.), ELPUB2008. Openness in Digital Publishing: Awareness, Discovery and Access - Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Toronto, Canada.
7. BOAI (2002), Budapest Open Access Initiative, Open Society Institute, Budapest, available at: www.soros.org/openaccess/ (accessed 7 April 2006).
8. Borgman, C.L. (2007), Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
9. Brody, T., Harnad, S. and Carr, L. (2006), "Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact: research articles" in Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 57, pp. 1060-72.
10. Callan, P.A. (2007), "But wait! There's more! Using your eprint repository to advance multiple institutional objectives while protecting (and advancing) your open access objectives", Proceedings of 5th Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI5), CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.
11. Carr, K. (2008), Review of the National Innovation System Report - Venurous Australia (Speech), Australian Government, Canberra, available at: http://minister.industry.gov.au/Carr/Pages/REVIEWOFTHENATIONALINNOVATIONSYSTEMREPORT-VENTUROUSAUSTRALIA.aspx (accessed 16 September 2008).
12. Carr, L. (2010), "EPrints open access week mandates challenge (email to discussion list)", paper presented at the American Scientist Open Access Forum.
13. Cochrane, T. and Callan, P. (2007), "Making a difference: implementing the eprints mandate at QUT" in OCLC Systems & Services, Vol. 23, pp. 262-8.
14. Crow, R. (2002), "The case for institutional repositories: a SPARC position paper", The Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resources Coalition, Washington, DC, discussion paper.
15. Drott, M.C. (2006), "Open access" in Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST), Vol. 40, pp. 79-109.
16. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989), "Building theories from case study research" in The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, pp. 532-50.
17. Ezzy, D. (2002), Qualitative Analysis: Practice and Innovation, Routledge, London.
18. Foster, N.F. and Gibbons, S. (2005), "Understanding faculty to improve content recruitment for institutional repositories", D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 11, available at: http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/edoc/aw/d-lib/dlib/january05/foster/01foster.html.
19. Giles, J. (2007), "PR's 'pit bull' takes on open access" in Nature, Vol. 445, No. 7126, p. 347.
20. Goodman, D. (2004), "The criteria for open access", Serials Review, Vol. 30, (preprint).
21. Harnad, S. (2003), "Eprints: electronic preprints and postprints", Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY.
22. Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallieres, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y., Oppenheim, C., Stamerjohanns, H. and Hilf, E. (2004), "The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access" in Serials Review, Vol. 30, pp. 310-14.
23. Hess, T., Wigand, R.T., Mann, F. and Von Walter, B. (2007), "Open access & science publishing-results of a study on researchers' acceptance and use of open access publishing", Management Reports of the Institute of Information Systems and New Media, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Insitutute for Information Systems and New Media and University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Munich.
24. Horwood, L., Sullivan, S., Young, E. and Garner, J. (2003), "OAI compliant institutional repositories and the role of library staff" in Library Management, Vol. 25, pp. 170-6.
25. Houghton, J.W., Henty, M. and Steel, C. (2003), Changing Research Practices in the Digital Information and Communication Environment, Australian Department of Education, Science and Training, Canberra.
26. Houghton, J.W., Steele, C. and Henty, M. (2004), "Research practices and scholarly communication in the digital environment" in Learned Publishing, Vol. 17, pp. 231-49.
27. Jamali, H.R. and Nicholas, D. (2009), "E-print depositing behavior of physicists and astronomers: an intradisciplinary study" in The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 35, pp. 117-25.
28. Jantz, R.C. and Wilson, M.C. (2008), "Institutional repositories: faculty deposits, marketing, and the reform of scholarly communication" in The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 34, pp. 186-95.
29. Kennan, M.A. (2007), "Academic authors, scholarly publishing, and open access in Australia" in Learned Publishing, Vol. 20, pp. 138-46.
30. Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1986), Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
31. Look, H. (2004), "Open access: look both ways before crossing" in Serials, Vol. 17, pp. 217-23.
32. Lynch, C.A. (2003), "Institutional repositories: essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age" in Portal: Libraries and the Academy, Vol. 3, pp. 327-36.
33. Lynch, C.A. and Lippincott, J.K. (2005), "Institutional repository deployment in the United States as of early 2005", D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 11, available at: http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/edoc/aw/d-lib/dlib/september05/lynch/09lynch.html.
34. Mann, F., von Walter, B., Hess, T. and Wigand, R.T. (2008), "Open access publishing in science: why it is highly appreciated but rarely used", Communications of the ACM, Vol. 51, (preprint version).
35. Markey, K., Rieh, S.Y., Jean, B.S., Kim, J. and Yakel, E. (2007), Census of Institutional Repositories in the United States, CLIR, Washington DC.
36. Mol, A. and Law, J. (2002), "Complexities: an introduction" Law, J. and Mol, A. (Eds.), Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
37. Morris, S. (2007), "Will the parasite kill the host? Are institutional repositories a fact of life-and does it matter?" in Serials: The Journal for the Serials Community, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 172-9.
38. Nicholas, D., Jamali, H.R. and Rowlands, I. (2006), "On the tips of their tongues: authors and their views on scholarly publishing" in Learned Publishing, Vol. 19, pp. 193-202.
39. Oxford University Press (1989), Oxford English Dictionary Online, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
40. Pinfield, S. (2005), "Self archiving publications" Gorman, G.E. and Rowland, F. (Eds.), Scholarly Publishing in an Electronic Era, Facet, London.
41. Poynder, R. (2004), "No gain without pain" in Information Today, Vol. 21, pp. 1-5.
42. Poynder, R. (2005), "Institutional repositories" Harnad, S. (Ed.), American Scientist Open Access Forum, available at: http://listserver.sigmaxi.org/sc/wa.exe?A1=ind05&L=american-scientist-open-access-forum&F=l&O=T&H=0&D=1&T=1#137 (accessed 23 December 2006).
43. Sale, A.H.J. (2006a), "The acquisition of open access research articles", First Monday, Vol. 11.
44. Sale, A. (2006b), "The impact of mandatory policies on ETD acquisition", D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 12, available at: http://dlib.org/dlib/april06/sale/04sale.html.
45. Suber, P. (2003), "Removing the barriers to research: an introduction to open access for librarians" in College & Research Libraries News, Vol. 64, pp. 92-4.
46. Swan, A. (2010), "The open access citation advantage: studies and results to date", School of Electronics & Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, Technical Report.
47. Swan, A. and Brown, S. (1999), What Authors Want: The ALPSP Research Study on the Motivation and Concerns of Contributors to Learned Journals, Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers, Bristol.
48. Swan, A. and Brown, S. (2005), Open Access Self Archiving: An Author Study, Key Perspectives: Consultants to the Scholarly Information Industry, Truro.
49. Swan, A., Needham, P., Probets, S., Muir, A., Oppenheim, C., O'Brien, A., Hardy, R., Rowland, F. and Brown, S. (2005), "Developing a model for e-prints and open access journal content in UK further and higher education" in Learned Publishing, Vol. 18, pp. 25-40.
50. Thomas, C. and Mcdonald, R.H. (2007), "Measuring and comparing participation patterns in digital repositories", D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 13, available at: http://dlib.org/dlib/september07/mcdonald/09mcdonald.html.
51. University of Southampton (n.d.), Open Access and Institutional Repositories with EPrints, University of Southampton, Southampton, available at: www.eprints.org/ (accessed 24 June 2008).
52. van Orsdel, L.C. and Born, K. (2008), "Periodicals price survey 2008: embracing openness", Library Journal, April 14, available at: www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6547086.html.
53. Willinsky, J. (2006), "The access principle: the case for open access to research and scholarship", MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
54. Xia, J. (2007), "Assessment of self-archiving in institutional repositories: across disciplines" in The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 33, pp. 647-54.
55. Xia, J. and Sun, L. (2007), "Factors to assess self-archiving in institutional repositories" in Serials Review, Vol. 33, pp. 73-80.
56. Yin, R.K. (2003), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
57. Kennan, M.A. (2008), "Reassembling scholarly publishing: open access, institutional repositories and the process of change", University of New South Wales, Sydney, PhD thesis.