Junior scientists are sceptical of sceptics of open access: A reply to Agrawal

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 339-340

  Carter, Alecia J ^a   Horrocks, Nicholas P C ^a   Huchard, Elise ^b   Logan, Corina J ^c   Lukas, Dieter ^a   MacLeod, Kirsty J ^a   Marshall, Harry H ^d   Peck, Hannah L ^e   Sanderson, Jennifer L ^d   Sorensen, Marjorie C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b CENTRE D ECOLOGIE FONCTIONNELLE ET EVOLUTIVE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^e IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PUBLISHING; STANDARDS;

PUBLISHING;

EID: 84901620728     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.04.005     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. Agrawal A.A. Four more reasons to be skeptical of open-access publishing. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19:133.
2. Swan A. The Open Access Citation Advantage: Studies and Results to Date 2010, ePrints Soton.
3. Davis P.M. Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing. FASEB J. 2011, 25:2129-2134.