Institutional repository as an important part of scholarly communication

Library Hi Tech

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 423-434

  Koler Povh, Teja ^a   Mikoš, Matjaž ^a   Turk, Goran ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Archives management; Automated storage Retrieval systems; Digital documents; Digital storage; Electronic information resources

Indexed keywords

EID: 84907233562     PISSN: 07378831     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/LHT-10-2013-0146     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Antelman, K. (2004), “Do open access articles have a greater research impact?,” College and Research Libraries, Vol. 65 No. 5, pp. 372-382, available at: eprints. rclis. org/archive/00002309/(accessed 15 August 2012).
2. Arlitsch, K. and O'Brien, P. S. (2012), “Invisible institutional repositories-addressing the low indexing ratios of IRs in Google Scholar,” Library Hi Tech, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 60-81.
3. Asunka, S., Chae, H. S. and Natriello, G. (2011), “Towards an understanding of the use of an institutional repository with integrated social networking tools: a case study of pocket knowledge,” Library Information Science Research, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 80-88.
4. Björk, B. C., Roos, A. and Lauri, M. (2008), “Global annual volume of peer reviewed scholarly articles and the share available via different open access options,” in Chan, L. and Mornati, S. (Eds), Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Open Scholarship: Authority, Community and Sustainability in the Age of Web 2. 0, Scarborough, Toronto, available at: oacs. shh. fi/publications/elpub-2008. pdf (accessed 10 September 2012).
5. Björk, B. C., Welling, P., Laakso, M., Majlender, P., Hedlund, T. and Guônason, G. (2010), “Open access to the scientific journal literature: situation 2009,” PLoS ONE, Vol. 5 No. 6, p. e11273, available at: www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/pmc/articles/PMC2890572 (accessed 10 September 2012).
6. Brezovnik, J. and Ojstersek, M. (2011), “Advanced features of digital library of university of Maribor,” International Journal of Education and Information Technologies, NAUN, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 34-41.
7. Craig, I. D., Plume, A. M., McVeigh, M. E., Pringle, J. and Amin, M. (2007), “Do open access articles have greater citation impact? A critical review of the literature,” Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 239-248, available at: www. publishingresearch. net/Citations-SummaryPaper3_000. pdf (accessed 10 September 2011).
8. Eysenbach, G. (2006), “The open access advantage,” J Med Internet Res, Vol. 8 No. 2, p. e8, available at: www. jmir. org/2006/ (accessed 10 August 2012).
9. Graham, T. (2000), “Scholarly communication,” Serials, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 3-11.
10. Halliday, L. L. (2001), “Scholarly communication, scholarly publication and the status of emerging formats,” Information Research, Vol. 6 No. 4, available at: www. informationr. net/ir/6-4/paper111. html.
11. Harnad, S. and Brody, T. (2004), “Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs non-OA articles in the same journals,” D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 10 No. 6, pp. 1-6, available at: www. dlib. org/dlib/june04/harnad/06harnad. html (accessed 10 August 2012).
12. Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallieres, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, S., Oppenheim, Y., Hajjem, C. and Hilf, E. (2004), “The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access,” Serials Review, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 310-314.
13. Harnad, S., Carr, L., Swan, A., Sale, A. and Bosc, H. (2009), “Maximizing and measuring research impact-open-access self-archiving mandates,” Wissenschaftsmanagement, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 6-41.
14. Jantz, R. C. and Wilson, M. C. (2008), “Institutional repositories: faculty deposits, marketing, and the reform of scholarly communication,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 34 No. 3, pp. 186-195.
15. Koler-Povh, T., Južnič, P., Turk, Ž. and Turk, G. (2011), “Analysis of scientific publications in civil and geodetic engineering in Slovenia, in the case of the Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering in University of Ljubljana,” Geodetski vestnik, Vol. 53 No. 4, pp. 749-763, (in Slovenian), available at: www. geodetski-vestnik. com/55/4/gv55-4_764-780. pdf (accessed 23 December 2012).
16. Koler-Povh, T., Vitek, A., Lorber, M. and Turk, G. (2012), “DRUGG-digital repository of UL FGG,” Geodetski vestnik, Vol. 56 No. 1, pp. 208-211, (in Slovenian), available at: www. geodetski-vestnik. com/56/1/gv56-1_208-211. pdf (accessed 23 December 2012).
17. Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C., Demleitner, M. and Henneken, E. et al. (2005), “The effect of use and access on citations,” Information Processing & Management, Vol. 41, pp. 395-1402.
18. Lawrence, S. (2001), “Online or invisible?,” Nature, Vol. 411 No. 6837, p. 521, available at: tildalawrence/papers/online-nature01/_may, 1, 2006 (accessed 28 August 2012).
19. Linde, P., Erikson, J., Kullman, L., Fathli, M., Karlsson, K., Sikström, M., Sköld, Y. and Tång, I. (2011), “Accessibility and self-archiving of conference articles: a study on a selection of Swedish institutional repositories,” Information Services & Use, Vol. 31 Nos 3/4, pp. 259-269.
20. McVeigh, M. E. (2004), “Open access journals in the ISI citation databases: analysis of impact factors and citation patterns: a citation study from Thomson Scientific,” available at: science. thomsonreuters. com/m/pdfs/openaccesscitations2. pdf (accessed 28 September 2012).
21. Miguel, S., Chinchilla-Rodriguez, Z. and De Moya-Anegón, F. (2011), “Open Access and Scopus: a new approach to scientific visibility from the standpoint of access,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 62 No. 6, pp. 1130-1145.
22. Norris, M., Oppenheim, C. and Rowland, F. (2008), “The citation advantage of open-access articles,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 59 No. 12, pp. 1963-1972.
23. Okoye, M. O. and Ejikeme, A. N. (2011), “Open access, institutional repositories, and scholarly publishing: the role of librarians in South Eastern Nigeria,” Paper No. 612, Library Philosophy and Practice, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, available at: http://digitalcommons. unl. edu/libphilprac/612 (accessed 1 May 2014).
24. Seadle, M. (2010), “Archiving in the networked world: interoperability,” Library Hi Tech, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 189-194.
25. Seadle, M. (2011), “Archiving in the networked world: metrics for testing,” Library Hi Tech, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 557-564.
26. Suber, P. (2007), “Open access overview. Focusing on open access to peer-reviewed research articles and their preprints,” available at: www. earlham. edu/Bpeters/fos/overview. htm (accessed 16 September 2012).
27. Turk, N. (2011), “Do open access biomedical journals benefit smaller countries? The Slovenian experience,” Health Information and Libraries Journal, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 143-147.
28. Varela-Prado, C. and Baiget, T. (2012), “The future of academic libraries: uncertainties, opportunities and challenges,” Investigacion Bibliotecologica, Vol. 26 No. 56, pp. 115-135.
29. Way, D. (2010), “The open access availability of library and information science literature,” College & Research Libraries, Vol. 71 No. 4, pp. 302-309.
30. Koler-Povh, T. (2005), “Instructions for layout and referencing in scholarly publications on UL FGG,” Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, 48pp. (in Slovenian), available at: www. fgg. uni-lj. si/KMTe/documents/academic/navodila-fgg. pdf (accessed 23 December 2012).
31. Kotar, M. (2009), “Free-access repository of research and scholarly publications,” Knjižničarske novice, Vol. 19 Nos 6/7, pp. 8-12 (in Slovenian).
32. Webometrics (2013), “Ranking web of world universities,” available at: www. webometrics. info (accessed 5 February 2013).