Open-access repositories worldwide, 2005-2012: Past growth, current characteristics, and future possibilities

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 65, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 2404-2421

  Pinfield, Stephen ^a   Salter, Jennifer ^a   Bath, Peter A ^a   Hubbard, Bill ^b   Millington, Peter ^b   Anders, Jane H S ^b   Hussain, Azhar ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

diffusion of innovation; open access publications; scholarly communication

Indexed keywords

OPEN SYSTEMS;

CURRENT CHARACTERISTIC; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATIONS; INITIAL DEVELOPMENT; INNOVATION DIFFUSION THEORY; IT INFRASTRUCTURES; OPEN ACCESS; POLICY INITIATIVES; SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION;

OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE;

EID: 84919393025     PISSN: 23301635     EISSN: 23301643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.23131     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. Bhat, M., (2010). Interoperability of open access repositories in computer science and IT-An evaluation. Library Hi Tech, 28 (1), 107-118. doi: 10.1108/07378831011026724
2. Björk, B., Laakso, M., Welling, P., &, Paetau, P., (2013). Anatomy of green open access. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, (Pre-print). Retrieved from http://www.openaccesspublishing.org/apc8/Personal%20VersionGreenOa.pdf
3. Brown, M., (2012). Open access at the University of Southampton-Pushing the boundaries and the art of the impossible. Jisc. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/topics/opentechnologies/openaccess/case-studies/southampton-university.aspx
4. Buehler, M., (2013). Demystifying the Institutional Repository for Success. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing.
5. Connell, T., (2011). The use of institutional repositories: The Ohio State University experience. College & Research Libraries, 72 (3), 253-275. Retrieved from http://crl.acrl.org/content/72/3/253.short
6. Crow, R., (2002). The case for institutional repositories: A SPARC position paper. ARL Bimonthly Report 223. Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&context=ir-research
7. Darby, N., &, Dyer, K., (2011). ADT-Original Australian research in the spotlight. Libraries Australia. Retrieved from http://www.nla.gov.au/librariesaustralia/files/2011/07/issue-11.pdf
8. Davis, P., &, Connolly, M., (2007). Institutional repositories: Evaluating the reasons for non-use of Cornell University's installation of DSpace. D-Lib Magazine, 13 (3/4). doi: 10.1045/march2007-davis
9. Dulle, F.W., &, Minishi-Majanja, M.K., (2011). The suitability of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model in open access adoption studies. Information Development, 27 (1), 32-45. doi: 10.1177/0266666910385375
10. Foster, N., &, Gibbons, S., (2005). Understanding faculty to improve content recruitment for institutional repositories. D-Lib Magazine, 11 (1). doi: 10.1045/january2005-foster
11. Garfield, E., (1977). English-An international language for science. Information Scientist, 19-20.
12. Ginsparg, P., (1997). Winners and losers in the global research village. The Serials Librarian, 30 (3-4), 83-95. doi: 10.1300/J123v30n03-13
13. Gutteridge, C., (2002). GNU EPrints 2 overview. In Proceedings of the 11th Panhellenic Academic Libraries Conference. Retrieved from http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/256840/
14. Halpern, J., &, Lagoze, C., (1999). The Computing Research Repository: Promoting the rapid dissemination and archiving of computer science research. Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Digital Libraries, 3-11. doi: 10.1145/313238.313240
15. Hanlon, A., &, Ramirez, M., (2011). Asking for permission: A survey of copyright workflows for institutional repositories. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11 (2), 683-702. Retrieved from http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/portal-libraries-and-the-academy/v011/11.2.hanlon.html
16. Harnad, S., (n.d.). Open Access Archivangelism: Blog. Retrieved from http://openaccess.eprints.org/
17. HEFCE. (2013). Call for advice on open access. Retrieved from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/news/newsarchive/2013/name,78750,en.html
18. ISO. (n.d.). Country Codes-ISO 3166. Retrieved from http://www.iso.org/iso/country-codes
19. Jones, R., Andrew, T., &, MacColl, J., (2006). The Institutional Repository. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
20. Kaiser, J., (2013, February 22). White House unveils long-awaited public access policy. Science Magazine Online. Retrieved from http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2013/02/white-house-unveils-long-awaited.html
21. Kennan, M.A., (2011). Learning to share: Mandates and open access. Library Management, 32 (4/5), 302-318. doi: 10.1108/01435121111132301
22. Kiley, R., (2013). Europe PMC: A gold and green OA repository. In 5th Couperin's Open Access meeting. Retrieved from http://couperin.sciencesconf.org/conference/couperin/pages/RobertKiley.pdf
23. Kim, J., (2010). Faculty self-archiving: Motivations and barriers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61 (9), 11909-11922. doi: 10.1002/asi.21336
24. Kim, J., (2011). Motivations of faculty self-archiving in institutional repositories. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37 (3), 2246-2254. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2011.02.017
25. Kling, R., &, McKim, G., (2000). Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 51 (14), 1306-1320. doi: 10.1002/1097-4571
26. Lagoze, C., &, Sompel, H., Van de,. (2003). The making of the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting. Library Hi Tech, 21 (2), 118-128. doi: 10.1108/07378830310479776
27. Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., Brody, T., &, Harnad, S., (2012). Testing the Finch Hypothesis on Green OA Mandate Ineffectiveness. arXiv. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.8174
28. Lawal, I., (2002). Scholarly communication: The use and non-use of e-print archives for the dissemination of scientific information. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 36. Retrieved from http://www.istl.org/02-fall/article3.html
29. Lynch, C., (2003). Institutional repositories: essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3 (2), 327-336. doi: 10.1353/pla.2003.0039
30. Mann, F., von Walter, B., Hess, T., &, Wigand, R.T., (2009). Open access publishing in science. Communications of the ACM, 52 (3), 135. doi: 10.1145/1467247.1467279
31. Max Planck Society. (2003). Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities. 2003. Retrieved from http://oa.mpg.de/lang/en-uk/berlin-prozess/berliner-erklarung/
32. McKiernan, G., (2000). arXiv.org: The Los Alamos National Laboratory e-print server. International Journal on Grey Literature, 1 (3), 127-133. doi: 10.1108/14666180010345564
33. Millington, P., (2013). Counting on OpenDOAR. In Open Repositories, 8-11 July 2013. Retrieved from http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/documents/Counting-on-OpenDOAR-2013-07-10.pptx
34. Morrison, H., (2012). December 31, 2012 Dramatic Growth of Open Access. Retrieved from http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/december-31-2012-dramatic-growth-of.html
35. Nabe, J.A., (2009). Starting, strengthening and managing institutional repositories: A how-to-do-it manual. New York: Neal-Schuman.
36. Nazim, M., &, Mukherjee, B., (2011). Status of institutional repositories in Asian countries: A quantitative study. Library Philosphy & Practice. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/652
37. Nicholas, D., Rowlands, I., Watkinson, A., Brown, D., &, Jamali, H.R., (2012). Digital repositories ten years on: What do scientific researchers think of them and how do they use them? Learned Publishing, 25 (3), 195-206. doi: 10.1087/20120306
38. NII. (n.d.). NII Institutional Repositories DataBase Contents Analysis. Retrieved from http://irdb.nii.ac.jp/analysis/browse-e.php
39. Norris, M., Oppenheim, C., &, Rowland, F., (2008). Open access citation rates and Developing Countries. In ELPUB 2008 Conference on Electronic Publishing (pp. 335-342). Retrieved from http://elpub.scix.net/data/works/att/335-elpub2008.content.pdf
40. Nyambi, E., &, Maynard, S., (2012). An investigation of institutional repositories in state universities in Zimbabwe. Information Development, 28 (1), 55-67. doi: 10.1177/0266666911425264
41. O'Keeffe, J., Willinsky, J., &, Maggio, L., (2011). Public access and use of health research: an exploratory study of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Public Access Policy using interviews and surveys of health personnel. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13 (4), e97. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1827
42. Ochoa, X., &, Duval, E., (2009). Quantitative analysis of learning object repositories. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2 (3), 226-238. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2009.28
43. OpenDOAR. (n.d.-a). About OpenDOAR-Directory of Open Access Repositories. Retrieved from http://www.opendoar.org/about.html
44. OpenDOAR. (n.d.-b). The fate of suggestions 2008 to date. Retrieved from http://www.opendoar.org/suggestionschart.html
45. Palmer, C., Teffeau, L., &, Newton, M., (2008). Strategies for institutional repository development: A case study of three evolving initiatives. Library Trends, 57 (2), 142-167. doi: 10.1353/lib.0.0033
46. Pinfield, S., (2001). How do physicists use an e-print archive? Implications for institutional e-print services. D-Lib Magazine, 7 (12). doi: 10.1045/december2001-pinfield
47. Pinfield, S., (2005). A mandate to self archive? The role of open access institutional repositories. Serials: The Journal for the Serials Community, 18 (1), 30-34. doi: 10.1629/1830
48. Pinfield, S., (2009). Journals and repositories: An evolving relationship? Learned Publishing, 22 (3), 165-175. doi: 10.1087/2009302
49. RCUK. (2013). RCUK Policy on Open Access and Supporting Guidance. Retrieved from http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/documents/RCUKOpenAccessPolicy.pdf
50. Rogers, E.M., (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Simon & Schuster International.
51. Sale, A., (2006). Comparison of content policies for institutional repositories in Australia. First Monday, 11 (4). Retrieved from http://www.firstmonday.dk/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1324
52. Sawant, S., (2011). Institutional repositories in India: A preliminary study. Library Hi Tech News, 28 (10), 6-10. doi: 10.1108/07419051111202646
53. Shearer, K., (2006). The CARL institutional repositories project: A collaborative approach to addressing the challenges of IRs in Canada. Library Hi Tech, 24 (2), 165-172. doi: 10.1108/07378830610669547
54. Singeh, F., Abrizah, A., &, Karim, N.H.A., (2013). Malaysian authors' acceptance to self-archiving institutional repositories: Towards a unified view. Electronic Library, 31 (2), 188-207. doi: 10.1108/02640471311312375
55. Smith, M., Barton, M., Bass, M., Branschofsky, M., McClellan, G., Stuve, D.,..., Walker, J.H., (2003). DSpace: An open source dynamic digital repository. D-Lib Magazine, 9 (1). doi: 10.1045/january2003-smith
56. Sompel, H., Van de, &, Lagoze, C., (2000). The Santa Fe Convention of the Open Archives Initiative. D-Lib Magazine, 6 (2). doi: 10.1045/february2000-vandesompel-oai
57. Spezi, V., Fry, J., Creaser, C., Probets, S., &, White, S., (2013). Researchers' green open access practice: A cross-disciplinary analysis. Journal of Documentation, 69 (3), 3334-3359. doi: 10.1108/JD-01-2012-0008
58. Suber, P., (2008, August). Gratis and libre Open Access. SPARC Open Access Newsleter. Retrieved from http://www.sparc.arl.org/publications/articles/gratisandlibre.shtml
59. Suber, P., (2012). Open access. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
60. Tardy, C., (2004). The role of English in scientific communication: Lingua franca or Tyrannosaurus rex? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3 (3), 247-269. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2003.10.001
61. Tripathi, M., &, Jeevan, V., (2011). An evaluation of digital libraries and institutional repositories in India. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37 (6), 543-545. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2011.08.012
62. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., &, Davis, F., (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 27 (3), 425-478. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/30036540
63. Walport, M., &, Kiley, R., (2006). Open access, UK PubMed Central and the Wellcome Trust. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99 (9), 438-439. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.99.9.438
64. Walters, T., (2007). Reinventing the library: How repositories are causing librarians to rethink their professional roles. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 7 (2), 213-225. doi: 10.1353/pla.2007.0023
65. Warr, W.A., (2003). Evaluation of an experimental chemistry pre-print server. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 43, 362-373.
66. Wellcome Trust. (2012). Wellcome Trust strengthens its open access policy. Retrieved from http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/News/Media-office/Press-releases/2012/WTVM055745.htm#
67. Xia, J., (2007). Assessment of self-archiving in institutional repositories: Across disciplines. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33 (6), 647-654. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2007.09.020
68. Xia, J., (2008). A Comparison of Subject and Institutional Repositories in Self-archiving Practices. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34 (6), 489-495. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2008.09.016
69. Xia, J., (2012). Diffusionism and open access. Journal of Documentation, 68 (1), 72-99. doi: 10.1108/00220411211200338
70. Xia, J., Gilchrist, S., Smith, N., Kingery, J., Radecki, J., Wilhelm, M.,..., Mahn, A., (2012). A review of open access self-archiving mandate policies. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 12 (1), 85-102. doi: 10.1353/pla.2012.0000
71. Yiotis, K., (2008). Electronic theses and dissertation (ETD) repositories: What are they? Where do they come from? How do they work? OCLC Systems & Services, 24 (2), 101-115. doi: 10.1108/10650750810875458