The domestication of open government data advocacy in the United Kingdom: A neo-Gramscian analysis

Policy and Internet

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 118-137

  Bates, Jo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Gramsci; Hegemony; Information policy; Open government data; Trasformismo; United Kingdom

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876720764     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19442866     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/poi3.25     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bates, Jo. 2012. "'This is What Modern Deregulation Looks Like': Co-optation and Contestation in the Shaping of the UK's Open Government Data Initiative.," The Journal of Community Informatics 8 (2) [Online]. http://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/845/916. Accessed May 29, 2012.
2. Bieler, Andreas, and Adam David Morton. 2001. "The Gordian Knot of Agency - Structure in International Relations: A neo-Gramscian Perspective.," European Journal of International Relations 7 (1): 5-35. (Pubitemid 33403125)
3. Bomberg, Elizabeth. 2007. "Policy Learning in an Enlarged European Union: Environmental NGOs and New Policy Instruments.," Journal of European Public Policy 14 (2): 248-68.
4. Coleman, Emer. 2011. From New Public Management to Open Governance - A New Future or the More Things Change the More They Stay the Same? Master's thesis, University of Warwick.
5. Cox, Robert W. 1996. Approaches to World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. -. 1981. "Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory.," Millennium: Journal of International Studies 10 (2): 126-55.
7. -. 1983. "Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method.," Millennium: Journal of International Studies 12 (2): 162-75.
8. Dalton, Russell J. 2004. Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Davies, Tim. 2010. Open Data, Democracy and Public Sector Reform: A Look at Open Government Data Use from data.gov.uk. Master's thesis, University of Oxford.
10. -. 2012. Focussing on Open Data Where It Matters: Accountability and Action [Online]. http://www.timdavies.org.uk/2012/03/08/focussing-on-open-data- where-it-matters-accountability-and-action/. Accessed May 29, 2012.
11. Femia, Joseph. 1981. Gramsci's Political Thought: Hegemony, Consciousness, and the Revolutionary Process. New York: Clarendon Press.
12. Gill, Stephen. 1992. "The Emerging World Order and European Change: the Political Economy of European Union.," in The Socialist Register: New World Order? eds. Ralph Miliband and Leo Panitch. London: Merlin Press, 157-96.
13. Gramsci, Antonio. 1992a. Prison Notebooks, Vol. 2. New York: Columbia University Press.
14. -. 1992b. Prison Notebooks, Vol. 3. New York: Columbia University Press.
15. Hogge, Becky. 2010. Open Data Study [Online]. http://www.soros.org/sites/ default/files/open-data-study-20110519.pdf. Accessed August 9, 2010.
16. Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 2001. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, 2nd ed. London: Verso.
17. Longo, Justin. 2011. "#Open Data: Digital-Era Governance Thoroughbred or New Public Management Trojan Horse?," Public Policy and Governance Review 2 (2): 38-51.
18. Mayo, Ed, and Tom Steinberg. 2007. The Power of Information: An Independent Review [Online]. www.opsi.gov.uk/advice/poi/power-of-information- review.pdf. Accessed July 7, 2010.
19. Melucci, Alberto. 1992. "Liberation or Meaning? Social Movements, Culture and Democracy.," Development and Change 23 (3): 43-77.
20. Miliband, Ed. 2012. Ed Miliband Speech to the Sheffield Political Economy Research Institute [Online]. http://www.labour.org.uk/ed-miliband-speech- economy. Accessed July 18, 2012.
21. Moore, Phoebe. 2007. Globalisation and Labour Struggle in Asia: A Neo-Gramscian Critique of South Korea's Political Economy. London: Tauris Academic Series.
22. Morton, Adam David. 2007. Unravelling Gramsci: Hegemony and Passive Revolution in the Global Economy. London: Pluto Press.
23. Murphy, Craig N. 2000. "Global Governance: Poorly Done and Poorly Understood.," International Affairs 76 (4): 789-803.
24. Newbery, David, Lionel Bently, and Rufus Pollock. 2008. Models of Public Sector Information provision via Trading Funds [Online]. http://www.berr.gov.uk/ files/file45136.pdf. Accessed July 7, 2010.
25. OKFN & Access-Info. 2010. Beyond Access: Open Government Data and the "Right to Reuse," [Online]. http://www.access-info.org/documents/ Access-Docs/Advancing/Beyond-Access-7-January-2011-web.pdf. Accessed September 14, 2010.
26. Paterson, Bill. 2009. "Trasformismo at the World Trade Organization.," in Gramsci and Global Politics: Hegemony and Resistance, eds. Mark McNally and John Schwarzmantel. Oxford: Routledge, 42-57.
27. Ruggie, John Gerard. 2002. "The Theory and Practice of Learning Networks.," Journal of Corporate Citizenship 5: 27-36.
28. Schiller, Herbert I. 1991. "Public Information Goes Corporate.," Library Journal 1: 42-5.
29. Screene, Lorraine. 2005. "How Prepared are Public Bodies for the Implementation of the UK Freedom of Information Act, in January 2005?," Records Management Journal 15 (1): 34-42. (Pubitemid 40757499)
30. Shepherd, Elizabeth, Alice Stevenson, and Andrew Flinn. 2010. "Information Governance, Records Management, and Freedom of Information: A Study of Local Government Authorities in England.," Government Information Quarterly 27 (4): 337-45.
31. Tinati, Ramine, Susan Halford, Leslie Carr, and Catherine Pope. 2011. Exploring the UK Open-PSI Community. In Share PSI: Removing the Roadblocks to a Pan European Market for Public Sector Information Re-use, May 9-10, 2011. Brussels [Online]. http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/22293/. Accessed June 8, 2011.
32. Worthy, Benjamin. 2010. "More Open but Not More Trusted? The Effect of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on the United Kingdom Central Government.," Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 23 (4): 561-82.