The layperson and open access

Annual Review of Information Science and Technology

Volumn 43, Issue , 2009, Pages 1-62

  Zuccala, Alesia ^a  

^a Rathenau Institute KNAW   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57849103935     PISSN: 00664200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1002/aris.2009.1440430115     Document Type: Review

References (156)

1. Agosto, D. E., & Hughes-Hassell, S. (2006). Toward a model of the everyday life information needs of urban teenagers, part 1: Theoretical model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 1394-1403.
2. Alliance for Taxpayers Access. (2006, May 2). Taxpayer Alliance supports Senate bill broadening access to federal research. Retrieved July 5, 2007, from www.taxpayeraccess.org/ media/Release06-0502.htm
3. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans: Project 2061. Retrieved November 28, 2007, from www.project2061.org/tools/sfaaol/sfaatoc.htm
4. Andrews, J. E., Pearce, K. A., Ireson, C., & Love, M. M. (2005). Information-seeking behaviors of practitioners in a primary care practice-based research network (PBRN). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 93, 206-213.
5. Association of College and Research Libraries. (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Retrieved November 26, 2007, from www.ala.org/ala/acrl/ acrlstandards/informationliteracycompetency.cfm
6. Baker, L. M., & Gollop, C. J. (2004). Medical textbooks: Can laypeople read and understand them? Library Trends, 53, 336-347.
7. Barjak, F., Li., X., & Thelwall, M. (2007). Which factors explain the Web impact of scientists' personal homepages? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 200-211.
8. Bates, B. R., Romina, S., Ahmed, R., & Hopson, D. (2006). The effect of source credibility on consumers' perceptions of the quality of health information on the Internet. Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine, 31(1), 45-52.
9. Bauer, M. W., Durant, J., & Evans, G. (1994). European public perceptions of science. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 6(2), 163-186.
10. Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories (2nd ed.). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
11. Bensaude-Vincent, B. (2001). A genealogy of the increasing gap between science and the public. Public Understanding of Science, 10(1), 99-113.
12. Bostrom, A., Granger Morgan, M., Fischoff, B., & Read, D. (1994). What do people know about global climate change? 1. Mental models. Risk Analysis, 14(6), 959-970.
13. Brossard, D., & Shanahan, J. (2006). Do they know what they read? Building a scientific literacy measurement instrument based on science media coverage. Science Communication, 28(1), 47-63.
14. Brown, C. M. (1999). Information seeking behavior of scientists in the electronic information age: Astronomers, chemists, mathematicians, and physicists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 929-944.
15. Brown, C. M., & Krumholz, L. R. (2002). Integrating information literacy into the science curriculum. College & Research Libraries, 63(2), 111-123.
16. Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002, February 14). Budapest Open Access Initiative. Retrieved November, 14, 2007 from www.soros.org/ openaccess/read.shtml
17. Callon, M. (1999). The role of laypeople in the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge. Science, Technology, & Society, 4(1), 81-94.
18. Case, D. O. (2006). Information behavior. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 40, 293-327.
19. Case, D. O., Andrews, J. E., Johns, J. D., & Allard, S. L. (2005). Avoiding versus seeking: The relationship of information seeking to avoidance, blunting, coping, dissonance, and related concepts. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 93(3), 353-362.
20. Chatman, E. A. (1991). Life in a small world: Applicability of gratification theory to informationseeking behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42, 438-449.
21. Choo, C. W., Detlor, B., & Turnbull, D. (2000). Information seeking on the Web: An integrated model of browsing and searching. First Monday, 5(2). Retrieved November 5, 2007, from www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue5-2/ choo
22. Cline, R. J. W., & Haynes, K. M. (2001). Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: The state of the art. Health Education Research, 16(6), 671-692.
23. Cole, C. (1997). Information as process: The difference between corroborating evidence and "information" in humanistic research domains. Information Processing & Management, 33(1), 55-67.
24. Crawford, S. (1978). Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 13, 61-81.
25. Davis, R. C. (1958). The public impact of science in the mass media: A report on a nationwide survey for the National Association of Science Writers. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
26. Dervin, B. (1992). From the mind's eye of the user: The sense-making qualitative-quantitative methodology. In J. Glazier & R. L. Powell (Eds.), Qualitative research in information management (pp. 61-83). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
27. Dervin, B. (1998). Sense-making theory and practice: An overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(2), 36-46.
28. Dervin, B. (1999). On studying information seeking methodologically: The implications of connecting metatheory to method. Information Processing & Management, 35, 727-750.
29. Dervin, B. (2003). Sense-making's journey from metatheory to methodology to method: An example using information seeking and use as research focus. In B. Dervin & L. Foreman-Wernet (Eds.), Sense-making methodology reader: Selected writings of Brenda Dervin (pp. 133-164). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
30. Dervin, B., & Nilan, M. (1986). Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 18, 277-304.
31. Dervin, B., & Voigt, M. (Eds.). (2006). Sense-making methodology reader: Selected writings of Brenda Dervin. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
32. Dijkstra, M., Buijtels, H. E. J. J. M., & van Raaij, W. F. (2005). Separate and joint effects of medium type on consumer responses: A comparison of television, print, and the Internet. Journal of Business Research, 58(3), 377-386.
33. Drott, M. C. (2006). Open access. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 40, 79-109.
34. Dutta-Bergman, M. (2003). Trusted sources of health information: Differences in demographics, health beliefs, and health-information orientation. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 5(3). Retrieved December 10, 2007, from www.jmir.org/2003/3/e21
35. Eastin, M. (2001). Credibility assessments of online health information: The effects of source expertise and knowledge of content. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(4), 1-14.
36. Ellis, D. (1989). A behavioural approach to information retrieval design. Journal of Documentation, 45(3), 171-212.
37. Ellis, D., Cox, D., & Hall, K. (1993). A comparison of the information seeking patterns of researchers in the physical and social sciences. Journal of Documentation, 49(4), 356-369.
38. Esposito, J. (2004, August). The devil you don't know: The unexpected future of open access. First Monday, 9(8). Retrieved February 19, 2007, from www.firstmonday.org/issues/ issue9-8/esposito
39. Evans, G., & Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), 57-74.
40. Eveland, W. P., & Dunwoody, S. (2001). User control and structural isomorphism or disorientation and cognitive load? Learning from the Web versus print. Communication Research, 28(1), 48-78.
41. Eysenback, G., & Kohler, C. (2002). How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the World Wide Web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. British Medical Journal, 324, 573-577.
42. Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2000). Perceptions of Internet information credibility, Journal of Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3), 515-540.
43. Fleck, L. (1979). Genesis and development of scientific fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44. Flynn, K. E., Smith, M. A., & Freese, J. (2006). When do older adults turn to the Internet for health information? Findings from the Wisconsin longitudinal study. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21(12), 1295-1301.
45. Fogg, B. J., & Tseng, H. (1999, May). The elements of computer credibility. Paper presented at the Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems, Pittsburgh, PA.
46. Ford, N., Miller, D., & Moss, N. (2005a). Web search strategies and human individual differences: Cognitive and demographic factors, Internet attitudes, and approaches. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(7), 741-756.
47. Ford, N., Miller, D., & Moss, N. (2005b). Web search strategies and human individual differences: A combined analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(7), 757-764.
48. Forker-Dunn, J. (2003). Internet-based patient self-care: The next generation of health care delivery. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 5(2). Retrieved December 10, 2007, from www.jmir.org/2003/2/e8
49. Fox, S., & Fallows, D. (2003). Internet health resources. Health searches and email have become more commonplace, but there is room for improvement in searches and overall Internet access. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved April 5, 2007, from www.pewinternet.org/ pdfs/PIP-Health-Report-July-2003.pdf
50. Fox, S., & Rainie, L. (2000). The online health care revolution: How the Web helps Americans take better care of themselves. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved July 11, 2007, from www.pewinternet.org/ pdfs/PIP-Health-Report.pdf
51. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. London: Hamish Hamilton.
52. Gambetta, D. (1990). Trust: Making and breaking co-operative relations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
53. Geist, M. (2007, February 26). Open Access: Reshaping the rules of research. Toronto Star. Retreived on November 9, 2007, from www.thestar.com /article/185609
54. Gerber, B. S., & Eiser, A. R. (2001). The patient physician relationship in the Internet age: Future prospects and the research agenda. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 3(2). Retrieved December 10, 2007, from www.jmir.org/2001/2/e15
55. Ginsparg, P. (2007). Next-generation implications of Open Access. CTWatch Quarterly, 3(3). Retrieved October 29, 2007, from www.ctwatch.org/quarterly/articles/2007/08/nextgeneration-implications-of-open- access
56. Given, L. M. (2000). The social construction of the "mature student" identity: Effects and implications for academic information behaviours. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
57. Given, L. M. (2002). The academic and the everyday: Investigating the overlap in mature undergraduates' information-seeking behaviors. Library & Information Science Research, 24(1), 17-29.
58. Goldner, M. (2006). Using the Internet and email for health purposes: The impact of health status. Social Science Quarterly, 83(3), 690-710.
59. Gray, N., Klein, J. D., Noyce, P. R., Sesselberg, T. S., & Cantriw, J. A. (2005). Health information-seeking behaviour in adolescence: The place of the Internet. Social Science & Medicine, 60(7), 1467-1478.
60. Hamad, S. (2003). Open access to peer-reviewed research through author/institution selfarchiving: Maximizing research impact by maximizing online access. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, 49(4), 337-342.
61. Hamad, S. (2006, January). Publish or perish? Self-archive to flourish: The green route to Open Access. ERCIM News, 64. Retrieved February 19, 2007, from www.ercim.org/ publication/Ercim-News/enw64/harnad.html
62. Harnad, S. (2007, April 29). Open Access is not just a public health matter [Msg 397]. Message posted to listserver.sigmaxi.org/sc/wa.exe?A2= ind07&L=american-scientist-open-access-forum&F=1&P=53589
63. Haythornthwaite, C., & Wellman, B. (2002). The Internet in everyday life: An introduction. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 3-41). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
64. Hewins, E. T. (1990). Information needs and use studies. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 25, 145-174.
65. Hilgartner, S. (1990). The dominant view of popularization: Conceptual problems, political uses. Social Studies of Science, 20(3), 519-539.
66. Hogan, T. P., & Palmer, C. L. (2005). Information preferences and practices among people living with HrV/AIDS: Results from a nationwide survey. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 93(4), 431-439.
67. 2. Science, 318(5853), 1045.
68. House of Lords Select Committee. (2000, February 23). Science and technology: Third report of the session 1999-2000. Retrieved February 19, 2007, from www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ldl99900/ldselect/ ldsctech/38/3801.htm
69. Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy. (2002). 21st century information fluency project. What is DIF? - The core competencies. Retrieved November 23, 2007, from 21cif.imsa.edu/resources/materials/difcore
70. Jacobs, N. (Ed.). (2006). Open Access: Key strategic, technical and economic aspects. Oxford, UK: Chandos.
71. Jasanoff, S. (2000). The "science wars" and American politics. In M. Dierkes & C. von Grote (Eds.), Between understanding and trust: The public, science and technology (pp. 39-60). Amsterdam: Harwood.
72. Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (1998). Cruising is believing?: Comparing Internet and traditional sources on media credibility measures. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 75, 325-340.
73. Jurdant, B. (1969). Vulgarisation scientifique et idéologie. Communications, 14, 150-161.
74. Kim, H.-S. (2007). PEP/IS: A new model for communicative effectiveness of science. Science Communication, 28(3), 287-313.
75. King, D. W., & Tenopir, C. (1999). Using and reading scholarly literature. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34, 423-477.
76. Koehler, A. E. C. (2006). Some thoughts on the meaning of Open Access for university library technical services. Serials Review, 32(1), 17-21.
77. Koolstra, C. M., Boss, M. J. W., & Vermeulen, I. E. (2006). Through which medium should science information professionals communicate with the public: Television or the Internet? Journal of Science Communication, 5(3), 1-8.
78. Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2006). Motivations for URL citations to open access library and information science articles. Scientomctrics, 68(3), 501-517.
79. Krauss, L., & Mooney, C. (2007, December 12). Make science part of the debate: Which candidate can best analyze issues like global warming and stem cells? Los Angeles Times. Retrieved December 12, 2007, from www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-mooney12dec12,0,2945719.story?coll= 1a-opinion-rightrail
80. Krikelas, J. (1983). Information-seeking behavior: Patterns and concepts. Drexel Library Quarterly, 19(2), 5-20.
81. Kuhlthau, C. C. (1991). Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user's perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 361-367.
82. Kuhlthau, C. C. (1997). The influence of uncertainty on the information seeking behaviour of a securities analyst. Proceedings of an International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, 268-275.
83. Kurtz, M., & Brody, T. (2006). The impact loss to authors and research. In N. Jacobs (Ed.), Open Access: Key strategic, technical and economic aspects (pp. 45-54). Oxford, UK: Chandos.
84. Kyvik, S. (2005). Popular science publishing and contributions to public discourse among university faculty. Science Communication, 26(3), 288-311.
85. Lacayo, R. (2001, August 12). Stem cell decision: How Bush got there. Time. Retrieved November 9, 2007, from www.time.com/time/magazine/ article/0,9171,1101010820-170839,00.html
86. Large, A. (2004). Children, teenagers, and the Web. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 39, 347-392.
87. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
88. Leydesdorff, L., & van den Besselaar, P. (1987). What have we learned from the Amsterdam science shop. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, 11, 135-160.
89. Leydesdorff, L., & Ward, J. (2005). Science shops: A kaleidoscope of science-society collaborations in Europe. Public Understanding of Science, 14(4), 353-372.
90. Lin, M. (1972). Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 7, 5-37.
91. Liu, Z. (2004). Perceptions of credibility of scholarly information on the Web. Information Processing & Management, 40, 1027-1038.
92. Lorenzo's oil: The full story. (2004, July 21). BBC News-Health. Retrieved February 19, 2007, from news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/health/3907559. stm
93. Lujan, J. L., & Todt, O. (2007). Precaution in public: The social perception of the role of science and values in policy making. Public Understanding of Science, 16(1), 97-109.
94. Marsh, S., & Dibben, M. R. (2003). The role of trust in information science and technology. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 465-498.
95. Martyn, J. (1974). Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 9, 3-23.
96. McKenzie, P. J. (2003). A model of the information practices in accounts of everyday-life information seeking. Journal of Documentation, 59(1), 19-40.
97. Meho, L. I., & Tibbo, H. R. (2003). Modeling the information-seeking behavior of social scientists: Ellis's study revisited. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(6), 570-587.
98. Merriam-Webster, Inc. (2007). Merriam-Webster online. Retrieved November 15, 2007, from www.merriam-webster.com
99. Metzger, M. J. (2007). Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2078-2091.
100. Meyers, E. M., Fisher, K. E., & Marcoux, E. M. (2007). Studying the everyday information behavior of tweens: Notes from the field. Library & Information Science Research, 29, 310-331.
101. Miller, J. D. (1998). The measurement of scientific literacy. Public Understanding of Science, 7, 203-223.
102. Miller, J. D. (2004). Public understanding of, and attitudes toward, scientific research: What we know and what we need to know. Public Understanding of Science, 13, 273-294.
103. Miller, J. D., Pardo, R., & Niwa, F. (1997). Public perceptions of science and technology: A comparative study of the European Union, the United States, Japan, and Canada. Madrid, Spain: BBV Foundation.
104. Moore, J. (2006). Perspective: Does peer review mean the same to the public as it does to scientists? Nature. Retrieved February 19, 2007, from www.nature.com/nature/peer review/debate/op5.html
105. Moynihan, R., Bero, L., Ross-Degnan, D., & Henry, D. (2000). Coverage by the news media of the benefits and risks of medications. New England Journal of Medicine, 342(22), 1645-1648.
106. National Academy of Sciences. (1996). National science education standards: Scientific literacy. Retrieved November 20, 2007, from www.literacynetorg/science/scientificliteracy. html
107. National electronic Library for Health. (2006, March 15). The drug that could reverse heart disease. Retrieved February 22, 2007, from www.nelh.nhs.uk/painkiller-heart-attack. asp
108. Nissen, S. E., Nicholls, S. J., Sipahi, I., Libby, P., Raichlen, J. S., Ballantyn, C. M., et al. (2006). Effect of very high-intensity statin therapy on regression of coronary atherosclerosis: The ASTEROID trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 295(13), 1556-1565.
109. Noble, R. L., & Coughlin, C. (1997, January 1). Information-seeking practices of Canadian academic chemists: A study of information needs and use of resources in chemistry [Electronic Version]. Canadian Journal of Communication, 22(3). Retrieved February 19, 2007, from www.cjc-online.ca/ viewarticle.php?id=425&layout=html
110. North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. (2004). 21st century skills: Scientific literacy. Retrieved November 28, 2007, from www.ncrel.org/engauge/skills/scilit.htm
111. Nwosu, C. R. (2000). The impact of the Internet on the doctor-patient relationship. Health Informatics Journal, 6(3), 156-161.
112. Paisley, W. J. (1968). Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 3, 1-30.
113. Pardo, R., & Calvo, F. (2004). The cognitive dimension of public perceptions of science: Methodological issues. Public Understanding of Science, 13(3), 203-227.
114. Pettigrew, K. E. (2001). Conceptual frameworks in information behavior. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 35, 43-78.
115. Pinfield, S. (2005). A mandate to self archive? The role of Open Access institutional repositories. Journal for the Serials Community, 18(1), 30-34.
116. Regazzi, J. (2004). The shifting sands of Open Access publishing, a publisher's view. Serials Review, 30(4), 275-280.
117. Rieh, S. Y. (2002). Judgement of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 145-161.
118. Rieh, S. Y. (2004). On the Web at home: Information seeking and Web searching in the home environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55, 743-754.
119. Rimer, S. (2007, December 20). He blinded me with science: With a flare for YouTube theatrics, online academic stars are winning over students of all ages. Toronto Globe and Mail, p. L3.
120. Rowlands, I. (2007). Electronic journals and user behavior: A review of recent research. Library & Information Science Research, 29, 369-396.
121. Sale, A. (2006). Researchers and institutional repositories. In N. Jacobs (Ed.), Open Access: Key strategic, technical and economic aspects (pp. 87-98). Oxford, UK: Chandos.
122. Savolainen, R. (1995). Everyday life information seeking: Approaching information seeking in the context of "way of life." Library & Information Science Research, 17(3), 259-294.
123. Savolainen, R. (1999). The role of the Internet in information seeking: Putting the networked services in context. Information Processing & Management, 35(6), 765-782.
124. Savolainen, R. (2005). Everyday life information seeking. In K. Fisher, S. Erdelez, & L. McKechnie (Eds.), Theories of information (pp. 143-148). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
125. Savolainen, R. (2007a). Information behavior and information practice: Reviewing the umbrella concepts of information-seeking studies. Library Quarterly, 77(2), 109-132.
126. Savolainen, R. (2007b). Media credibility and cognitive authority: The case of seeking orienting information. Information Research, 12(3). Retrieved October 29, 2007, from informationr.net/ir/12-3/paper319.html
127. Savolainen, R., & Jarkko, K. (2006). Facing and bridging gaps in Web searching. Information Processing & Management, 42(2), 519-537.
128. Schweiger, W. (2000). Media credibility: Experience or image? A survey on the credibility of the World Wide Web in Germany in comparison to other media. European Journal of Communication, 15(1), 37-59.
129. Self, C. S. (1996). Crediblity. In M. Salwen & D. Stacks (Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 421-444). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
130. Spink, A., & Cole, C. (2001). Information and poverty: Information-seeking channels used by African American low-income households. Library & Information Science Research, 23(1), 45-65.
131. Stem Cell Research Blog. (2007, October 4). Stem cell therapy: A new hope for Huntington's Disease. Retrieved November 9, 2007, from stemcell.taragana.net/archive/stem-celltherapy-a-new-hope-for-huntingtons- disease/#more-1058
132. Sturgis, P., & Allum, N. (2004). Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science, 13, 55-74.
133. Swan, A. (2005, May). Open access self-archiving: An introduction (Technical Report, JISC, HEFCE). Retrieved February 19, 2007, from eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/11006
134. Swan, A. (2006). The culture of open access: Researchers' views and responses. In N. Jacobs (Ed.), Open access: Key strategic, technical and economic aspects (pp. 65-72). Oxford, UK: Chandos.
135. Taylor, R. S. (1991). Information use environments. In B. Dervin & M. J. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (Vol. 10, pp. 217-255). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
136. Thelwall, M. (2004). Link analysis: An information science approach. San Diego: Academic Press.
137. Thelwall, M., & Prabowo, R. (2006). Identifying and characterizing public science-related fears from RSS feeds. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 379-390.
138. Thelwall, M., Vaughan, L., & Björneborn, L. (2005). Webometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 39, 81-135.
139. Tombros, A., Ruthven, I., & Joemon, M. J. (2005). How users assess Web pages for information seeking. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56, 327-344.
140. Toms, E. G., & Latter, C. (2007). How consumers search for health information. Health Informatics Journal, 13(3), 223-235.
141. Treise, D., Walsh-Childers, K., Weigold, M. F., & Friedman, M. (2003). Cultivating the science Internet audience: Impact of brand and domain on source credibility for science information. Science Communication, 24(3), 309-332.
142. Tseng, S., & Fogg, B. J. (1999). Credibility and computing technology. Communications of the ACM, 42(5), 39-44.
143. Warner, D., & Procaccino, J. D. (2004). Toward wellness: Women seeking health information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55, 709-730.
144. Wathen, C. N., & Burkell, J. (2002). Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 134-144.
145. Wessel, C. B., Tannery, N. H., & Epstein, B. A. (2006). Information-seeking behavior and use of information resources by clinical research coordinators. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 94(1), 48-55.
146. Wildemuth, B. M. (2002). Effective methods for studying information seeking and use. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 1218-1222.
147. Willinsky, J. (2003). The nine flavours of Open Access scholarly publishing. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, 49, 263-267.
148. Willinsky, J. (2006). The access principle: The case for Open Access to research and scholarship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
149. Wilsdon, J., Wynne, B., & Stilgoe, J. (2005). We need to infuse the culture and practice of science with a new set of social possibilities: The public value of science, or how to ensure that science really matters. London: Demos.
150. Wilson, P. (1977). Public knowledge, private ignorance: Toward a library and information science policy. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
151. Wilson, P. (1983). Second-hand knowledge: An inquiry into cognitive authority. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
152. Wilson, T. D. (1981). On user studies and information needs. Journal of Documentation, 37(1), 3-15.
153. Wilson, T. D. (1994). Information needs and uses: Fifty years of progress? In B. C. Vickery (Ed.), Fifty years of information progress: A Journal of Documentation review (pp. 15-51). London: Aslib.
154. Wilson, T. D. (1997). Information behaviour: An inter-disciplinary perspective. Proceedings of an International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, 39-50.
155. Wilson, T. D. (1999). Models in information behaviour research. Journal of Documentation, 55(3), 249-270.
156. Wynne, B. (1992). Public understanding of science research: New horizons or hall of mirrors? Public Understanding of Science, 1(1), 37.