Journals and repositories: An evolving relationship?

Learned Publishing

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 165-175

  Pinfield, Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 68749092160     PISSN: 09531513     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1087/2009302     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Budapest Open Access Initiative, February 2002. http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml
2. Journal Article Versions (JAV): Recommendations of the NISO/ALPSP JAV Technical Working Group, April 2008, NISO-RP-8-2008. http://www.niso.org/publications/rp/RP-8-2008.pdf
3. Morgan, C. 2008. Journal article version nomenclature: the NISO/ALPSP recommendations. Learned Publishing, 21: 272-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/095315108X356699.
4. Lynch, C. Open computation: beyond human reader-centric views of scholarly literatures. In Jacobs, N. (ed), Open Access: Key Strategic, Technical and Economic Aspects. Oxford, Chandos Publishing, 2006.
5. Pinfield, S. Self-archiving publications. In Gorman, G.E. and Rowland, F. (eds), Scholarly Publishing in an Electronic Era, International Yearbook of Library and Information Management, 2004-2005. London, Facet Publishing, 2005. Eprint available at http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/archive/00000142/
6. Wates, E. and Campbell, R. 2007. Author's version vs. publisher's version: an analysis of the copy-editing function. Learned Publishing, 20: 121-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/174148507X185090
7. Goodman, D., Dowson, S. and Yaremchuk, J. 2007. Open access and accuracy: author-archived manuscripts vs. published articles. Learned Publishing, 20: 203-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/095315107X204012
8. Henneken, E.A. et al. 2007. E-prints and journal articles in astronomy: a productive co-existence. Learned Publishing, 20: 16-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/095315107779490661
9. Pinfield, S. 2007. Can open access repositories and peer-reviewed journals coexist? Serials, 20: 163-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1629/20163
10. Terry, R. 2005. Funding the way to open access. PLoS Biology, 3: e97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030097
11. Pinfield, S. 2006. A Wel(l)come development: research funders and open access. Learned Publishing, 19: 219-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/095315106777877548
12. My thanks are due to David Prosser for suggesting this model.
13. Smith, J.W.T. 1999. The deconstructed journal: a new model for academic publishing. Learned Publishing, 12: 79-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/09531519950145896
14. Smith, A.P. 2000. The journal as an overlay on preprint databases. Learned Publishing, 13: 43-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/09531510050145542
15. RIOJA (Repository Interface for Overlaid Journal Archives). http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ls/rioja/
16. Roosendaal, H.E. and Geurts, P.A.T.M. 1998. Forces and functions in scientific communication: an analysis of their interplay. Proceedings of the Cooperative Research Information Systems in Physics conference, 1997. http://www.physik.uni-oldenburg.de/confer-ences/crisp97/roosendaal.html
17. Prosser, D. Fulfilling the promise of scholarly communication - a comparison between old and new access models. In Nielsen, E.K., Saur, K.G. and Ceynowa, K. (eds), Die innovative Bibliothek: Elmar Mittler zum 65.Geburtstag, pp. 95-106. Munich, K.G. Saur, 2005. Eprint available at: http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00003918/
18. Ware, M. Pathfinder Research on Web-Based Repositories: Final Report. London, Publisher and Library/Learning Solutions (PALS), 2004. http://mrkwr.files.wordpress.com/2006/11/pals-report-on-institutional-repositories.pdf
19. http://www.opendoar.org/
20. There has been a discussion of this idea in the professional literature for some time. See Frankel, M.S. 2000. Defining and certifying electronic publication in science. Learned Publishing, 13: 251-8. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1087/09531510050162093
21. Guédon, J.C. 2002. Open access archives: from scientific plutocracy to the republic of science. Proceedings of the 68th IFLA Council and General Conference, August 18-24, 2002. http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla68/papers/guedon.pdf
22. See Peer review and the acceptance of new scientific ideas: discussion paper from a working party on equipping the public with an understanding of peer review. London, Sense about Science, 2004. http://www.senseabout science.org.uk/pdf/peerreview.pdf
23. Harnad, S. 2008. Validating research performance metrics against peer rankings. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8: 103-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/esep00088
24. Harnad, S. et al. 2003. Mandated online RAE CVs linked to university eprint archives: enhancing UK research impact and assessment. Ariadne, 35. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue35/harnad/
25. Swan, A. The business of digital repositories. In Weenink, K., Waaijers, L. and van Godtsenhoven, K. (eds), A DRIVER's Guide to European Repositories. Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, 2007. http://www.keyperspectives.co.uk/openaccessarchive/reports/The_business_of_digital_repositories.pdf
26. http://www.rin.ac.uk/openaccess-payment-fees
27. Research Excellence Framework: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/research/ref/
28. http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/scientific/ISI_Web_of_Knowledge
29. http://info.scopus.com/