Indoctrinating T cells to attack pathogens through homeschooling

Trends in Immunology

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 337-343

  Parello, Caitlin S ^a   Huseby, Eric S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Autoimmunity; CD5; Dynamic tuning; T cell development; T cell homeostasis; TCR specificity

Indexed keywords

LIGAND; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGEN; T LYMPHOCYTE RECEPTOR; LYMPHOCYTE ANTIGEN RECEPTOR; PEPTIDE;

ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY; ANTIGEN SPECIFICITY; AUTOIMMUNITY; CROSS REACTION; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PATHOGENESIS; PROTEIN INTERACTION; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; T LYMPHOCYTE; T LYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION; ANIMAL; ANTIGEN PRESENTING CELL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; IMMUNOLOGY; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX;

ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY; ANIMALS; ANTIGEN-PRESENTING CELLS; AUTOIMMUNITY; HUMANS; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX; MODELS, IMMUNOLOGICAL; PEPTIDES; RECEPTORS, ANTIGEN, T-CELL; T-LYMPHOCYTES;

EID: 84930821320     PISSN: 14714906     EISSN: 14714981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2015.04.004     Document Type: Review

References (99)

1. Corse E., et al. Strength of TCR-peptide/MHC interactions and in vivo T cell responses. J. Immunol. 2011, 186:5039-5045.
2. Arstila T.P., et al. A direct estimate of the human alphabeta T cell receptor diversity. Science 1999, 286:958-961.
3. Robins H.S., et al. Overlap and effective size of the human CD8+ T cell receptor repertoire. Sci. Transl. Med. 2010, 2:47ra64.
4. Jenkins M.K., et al. On the composition of the preimmune repertoire of T cells specific for peptide-major histocompatibility complex ligands. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2010, 28:275-294.
5. Davis M.M., Bjorkman P.J. T-cell antigen receptor genes and T-cell recognition. Nature 1988, 334:395-402.
6. Huseby E.S., et al. How the T cell repertoire becomes peptide and MHC specific. Cell 2005, 122:247-260.
7. Huseby E.S., et al. Interface-disrupting amino acids establish specificity between T cell receptors and complexes of major histocompatibility complex and peptide. Nat. Immunol. 2006, 7:1191-1199.
8. Stadinski B.D., et al. A role for differential variable gene pairing in creating T cell receptors specific for unique major histocompatibility ligands. Immunity 2011, 35:694-704.
9. Stadinski B.D., et al. Effect of CDR3 sequences and distal V gene residues in regulating TCR-MHC contacts and ligand specificity. J. Immunol. 2014, 192:6071-6082.
10. Borg N.A., et al. The CDR3 regions of an immunodominant T cell receptor dictate the 'energetic landscape' of peptide-MHC recognition. Nat. Immunol. 2005, 6:171-180.
11. Birnbaum M.E., et al. Deconstructing the peptide-MHC specificity of T cell recognition. Cell 2014, 157:1073-1087.
12. Vrisekoop N., et al. Revisiting thymic positive selection and the mature T cell repertoire for antigen. Immunity 2014, 41:181-190.
13. Nelson R.W., et al. T cell receptor cross-reactivity between similar foreign and self peptides influences naive cell population size and autoimmunity. Immunity 2015, 42:95-107.
14. Grossman Z., Paul W.E. Dynamic tuning of lymphocytes: physiological basis, mechanisms, and function. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2015, 33:677-713.
15. McKeithan T.W. Kinetic proofreading in T-cell receptor signal transduction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92:5042-5046.
16. Lever M., et al. Phenotypic models of T cell activation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2014, 14:619-629.
17. Chakraborty A.K., Weiss A. Insights into the initiation of TCR signaling. Nat. Immunol. 2014, 15:798-807.
18. Kuhns M.S., Davis M.M. TCR signaling emerges from the sum of many parts. Front. Immunol. 2012, 3:159.
19. Stepanek O., et al. Coreceptor scanning by the T cell receptor provides a mechanism for T cell tolerance. Cell 2014, 159:333-345.
20. Saito T. Mechanisms of T-lymphocyte signaling and activation. Fundamental Immunology 2013, 306-324. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 7th edn. W.H. Paul Series (Ed.).
21. Rhee I., Veillette A. Protein tyrosine phosphatases in lymphocyte activation and autoimmunity. Nat. Immunol. 2012, 13:439-447.
22. Altan-Bonnet G., Germain R.N. Modeling T cell antigen discrimination based on feedback control of digital ERK responses. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3:e356.
23. Stefanova I., et al. TCR ligand discrimination is enforced by competing ERK positive and SHP-1 negative feedback pathways. Nat. Immunol. 2003, 4:248-254.
24. Paster W., et al. A THEMIS:SHP1 complex promotes T-cell survival. EMBO J. 2015, 34:393-409.
25. Sykulev Y., et al. Evidence that a single peptide-MHC complex on a target cell can elicit a cytolytic T cell response. Immunity 1996, 4:565-571.
26. Irvine D.J., et al. Direct observation of ligand recognition by T cells. Nature 2002, 419:845-849.
27. Yagi J., Janeway C.A. Ligand thresholds at different stages of T cell development. Int. Immunol. 1990, 2:83-89.
28. Pircher H., et al. Lower receptor avidity required for thymic clonal deletion than for effector T-cell function. Nature 1991, 351:482-485.
29. Davey G.M., et al. Preselection thymocytes are more sensitive to T cell receptor stimulation than mature T cells. J. Exp. Med. 1998, 188:1867-1874.
30. Lucas B., et al. Divergent changes in the sensitivity of maturing T cells to structurally related ligands underlies formation of a useful T cell repertoire. Immunity 1999, 10:367-376.
31. Hogquist K.A., Jameson S.C. The self-obsession of T cells: how TCR signaling thresholds affect fate 'decisions' and effector function. Nat. Immunol. 2014, 15:815-823.
32. Alam S.M., et al. T-cell-receptor affinity and thymocyte positive selection. Nature 1996, 381:616-620.
33. Koehli S., et al. Optimal T-cell receptor affinity for inducing autoimmunity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014, 111:17248-17253.
34. Huseby E.S., et al. Age-dependent T cell tolerance and autoimmunity to myelin basic protein. Immunity 2001, 14:471-481.
35. Li Q.J., et al. miR-181a is an intrinsic modulator of T cell sensitivity and selection. Cell 2007, 129:147-161.
36. Ebert P.J., et al. An endogenous positively selecting peptide enhances mature T cell responses and becomes an autoantigen in the absence of microRNA miR-181a. Nat. Immunol. 2009, 10:1162-1169.
37. Henao-Mejia J., et al. The microRNA miR-181 is a critical cellular metabolic rheostat essential for NKT cell ontogenesis and lymphocyte development and homeostasis. Immunity 2013, 38:984-997.
38. Sun Z., et al. PKC-theta is required for TCR-induced NF-kappaB activation in mature but not immature T lymphocytes. Nature 2000, 404:402-407.
39. Egawa T., et al. Requirement for CARMA1 in antigen receptor-induced NF-kappa B activation and lymphocyte proliferation. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13:1252-1258.
40. Ruland J., et al. Bcl10 is a positive regulator of antigen receptor-induced activation of NF-kappaB and neural tube closure. Cell 2001, 104:33-42.
41. Ruland J., et al. Differential requirement for Malt1 in T and B cell antigen receptor signaling. Immunity 2003, 19:749-758.
42. Fu G., et al. Themis sets the signal threshold for positive and negative selection in T-cell development. Nature 2013, 504:441-445.
43. Fu G., et al. Themis controls thymocyte selection through regulation of T cell antigen receptor-mediated signaling. Nat. Immunol. 2009, 10:848-856.
44. Lesourne R., et al. Themis, a T cell-specific protein important for late thymocyte development. Nat. Immunol. 2009, 10:840-847.
45. Johnson A.L., et al. Themis is a member of a new metazoan gene family and is required for the completion of thymocyte positive selection. Nat. Immunol. 2009, 10:831-839.
46. Wang D., et al. Tespa1 is involved in late thymocyte development through the regulation of TCR-mediated signaling. Nat. Immunol. 2012, 13:560-568.
47. Lo W.L., et al. A voltage-gated sodium channel is essential for the positive selection of CD4(+) T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2012, 13:880-887.
48. Matsuzaki H., et al. Tespa1 is a novel inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor binding protein in T and B lymphocytes. FEBS Open Bio 2012, 2:255-259.
49. Morris G.P., Allen P.M. How the TCR balances sensitivity and specificity for the recognition of self and pathogens. Nat. Immunol. 2012, 13:121-128.
50. Tarakhovsky A., et al. A role for CD5 in TCR-mediated signal transduction and thymocyte selection. Science 1995, 269:535-537.
51. Azzam H.S., et al. CD5 expression is developmentally regulated by T cell receptor (TCR) signals and TCR avidity. J. Exp. Med. 1998, 188:2301-2311.
52. Bhandoola A., et al. Peripheral expression of self-MHC-II influences the reactivity and self-tolerance of mature CD4(+) T cells: evidence from a lymphopenic T cell model. Immunity 2002, 17:425-436.
53. Takada K., Jameson S.C. Naive T cell homeostasis: from awareness of space to a sense of place. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2009, 9:823-832.
54. Han S., et al. Role of antigen persistence and dose for CD4+ T-cell exhaustion and recovery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:20453-20458.
55. Surh C.D., Sprent J. Homeostasis of naive and memory T cells. Immunity 2008, 29:848-862.
56. Stefanova I., et al. Self-recognition promotes the foreign antigen sensitivity of naive T lymphocytes. Nature 2002, 420:429-434.
57. Cho J.H., et al. T cell receptor-dependent regulation of lipid rafts controls naive CD8+ T cell homeostasis. Immunity 2010, 32:214-226.
58. Palmer M.J., et al. Signaling thresholds govern heterogeneity in IL-7-receptor-mediated responses of naive CD8(+) T cells. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2011, 89:581-594.
59. Vahl J.C., et al. Continuous T cell receptor signals maintain a functional regulatory T cell pool. Immunity 2014, 41:722-736.
60. Levine A.G., et al. Continuous requirement for the TCR in regulatory T cell function. Nat. Immunol. 2014, 15:1070-1078.
61. Ernst B., et al. The peptide ligands mediating positive selection in the thymus control T cell survival and homeostatic proliferation in the periphery. Immunity 1999, 11:173-181.
62. Goldrath A.W., Bevan M.J. Low-affinity ligands for the TCR drive proliferation of mature CD8+ T cells in lymphopenic hosts. Immunity 1999, 11:183-190.
63. Hataye J., et al. Naive and memory CD4+ T cell survival controlled by clonal abundance. Science 2006, 312:114-116.
64. Lo W.L., et al. An endogenous peptide positively selects and augments the activation and survival of peripheral CD4+ T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2009, 10:1155-1161.
65. Lo W.L., et al. T cell immunodominance is dictated by the positively selecting self-peptide. Elife 2014, 3:e01457.
66. Wong P., et al. Dynamic tuning of T cell reactivity by self-peptide-major histocompatibility complex ligands. J. Exp. Med. 2001, 193:1179-1187.
67. Mandl J.N., et al. T cell-positive selection uses self-ligand binding strength to optimize repertoire recognition of foreign antigens. Immunity 2013, 38:263-274.
68. Persaud S.P., et al. Intrinsic CD4+ T cell sensitivity and response to a pathogen are set and sustained by avidity for thymic and peripheral complexes of self peptide and MHC. Nat. Immunol. 2014, 15:266-274.
69. Fulton R.B., et al. The TCR's sensitivity to self peptide-MHC dictates the ability of naive CD8(+) T cells to respond to foreign antigens. Nat. Immunol. 2015, 16:107-117.
70. Weber K.S., et al. Distinct CD4+ helper T cells involved in primary and secondary responses to infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:9511-9516.
71. Detours V., et al. Deriving quantitative constraints on T cell selection from data on the mature T cell repertoire. J. Immunol. 2000, 164:121-128.
72. Engelhard V.H. Structure of peptides associated with class I and class II MHC molecules. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1994, 12:181-207.
73. Mason D. A very high level of crossreactivity is an essential feature of the T-cell receptor. Immunol. Today 1998, 19:395-404.
74. Nikolich-Zugich J., et al. The many important facets of T-cell repertoire diversity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2004, 4:123-132.
75. Stone J.D., et al. T-cell receptor binding affinities and kinetics: impact on T-cell activity and specificity. Immunology 2009, 126:165-176.
76. Zehn D., et al. Complete but curtailed T-cell response to very low-affinity antigen. Nature 2009, 458:211-214.
77. Ashton-Rickardt P.G., et al. Evidence for a differential avidity model of T cell selection in the thymus. Cell 1994, 76:651-663.
78. Vanguri V., et al. Viral antigen density and confinement time regulate the reactivity pattern of CD4 T-cell responses to vaccinia virus infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:288-293.
79. Depoil D., Dustin M.L. Force and affinity in ligand discrimination by the TCR. Trends Immunol. 2014, 35:597-603.
80. Liu B., et al. Accumulation of dynamic catch bonds between TCR and agonist peptide-MHC triggers T cell signaling. Cell 2014, 157:357-368.
81. Das D.K., et al. Force-dependent transition in the T-cell receptor beta-subunit allosterically regulates peptide discrimination and pMHC bond lifetime. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2015, 112:1517-1522.
82. Judokusumo E., et al. Mechanosensing in T lymphocyte activation. Biophys. J. 2012, 102:L5-L7.
83. Kim S.T., et al. The alphabeta T cell receptor is an anisotropic mechanosensor. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284:31028-31037.
84. Beddoe T., et al. Antigen ligation triggers a conformational change within the constant domain of the alphabeta T cell receptor. Immunity 2009, 30:777-788.
85. Robert P., et al. Kinetics and mechanics of two-dimensional interactions between T cell receptors and different activating ligands. Biophys. J. 2012, 102:248-257.
86. Aivazian D., Stern L.J. Phosphorylation of T cell receptor zeta is regulated by a lipid dependent folding transition. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2000, 7:1023-1026.
87. Xu C., et al. Regulation of T cell receptor activation by dynamic membrane binding of the CD3epsilon cytoplasmic tyrosine-based motif. Cell 2008, 135:702-713.
88. Zhang H., et al. Basic residues in the T-cell receptor zeta cytoplasmic domain mediate membrane association and modulate signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:19323-19328.
89. Gagnon E., et al. Local changes in lipid environment of TCR microclusters regulate membrane binding by the CD3epsilon cytoplasmic domain. J. Exp. Med. 2012, 209:2423-2439.
90. Shi X., et al. Ca2+ regulates T-cell receptor activation by modulating the charge property of lipids. Nature 2013, 493:111-115.
91. Pircher H., et al. Viral escape by selection of cytotoxic T cell-resistant virus variants in vivo. Nature 1990, 346:629-633.
92. Ciurea A., et al. CD4+ T-cell-epitope escape mutant virus selected in vivo. Nat. Med. 2001, 7:795-800.
93. Barouch D.H., et al. Eventual AIDS vaccine failure in a rhesus monkey by viral escape from cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Nature 2002, 415:335-339.
94. Gaiha G.D., et al. Dysfunctional HIV-specific CD8+ T cell proliferation is associated with increased caspase-8 activity and mediated by necroptosis. Immunity 2014, 41:1001-1012.
95. Schietinger A., Greenberg P.D. Tolerance and exhaustion: defining mechanisms of T cell dysfunction. Trends Immunol. 2014, 35:51-60.
96. Kedl R.M., et al. Epitope dominance, competition and T cell affinity maturation. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2003, 15:120-127.
97. Corse E., et al. Attenuated T cell responses to a high-potency ligand in vivo. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8:e1000481.
98. Willis R.A., et al. CD8 T cell competition for dendritic cells in vivo is an early event in activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:12063-12068.
99. Chang J.T., et al. Molecular regulation of effector and memory T cell differentiation. Nat. Immunol. 2014, 15:1104-1115.