Force and affinity in ligand discrimination by the TCR

Trends in Immunology

Volumn 35, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 597-603

  Depoil, David ^a,b   Dustin, Michael L ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIGAND; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGEN; T LYMPHOCYTE RECEPTOR;

ANTIGEN RECOGNITION; BINDING AFFINITY; CELL JUNCTION; CHEMICAL BOND; FORCE; HUMAN; IMMUNE RESPONSE; IMMUNOLOGICAL SYNAPSE; LIPID BILAYER; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NONHUMAN; REVIEW; T LYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION;

EID: 84915752670     PISSN: 14714906     EISSN: 14714981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2014.10.007     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Xie J., et al. Photocrosslinkable pMHC monomers stain T cells specifically and cause ligand-bound TCRs to be 'preferentially' transported to the cSMAC. Nat. Immunol. 2012, 13:674-680.
2. Bashour K.T., et al. CD28 and CD3 have complementary roles in T-cell traction forces. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014, 111:2241-2246.
3. Liu B., et al. Accumulation of dynamic catch bonds between TCR and agonist peptide-MHC triggers T cell signaling. Cell 2014, 157:357-368.
4. Dembo M., et al. The reaction-limited kinetics of membrane-to-surface adhesion and detachment. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 1988, 234:55-83.
5. Thomas W., et al. Catch-bond model derived from allostery explains force-activated bacterial adhesion. Biophys. J. 2006, 90:753-764.
6. Matsui K., et al. Kinetics of T-cell receptor binding to peptide/I-Ek complexes: correlation of the dissociation rate with T-cell responsiveness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1994, 91:12862-12866.
7. Kersh G.J., et al. High- and low-potency ligands with similar affinities for the TCR: the importance of kinetics in TCR signaling. Immunity 1998, 9:817-826.
8. Daniels M.A., et al. Thymic selection threshold defined by compartmentalization of Ras/MAPK signalling. Nature 2006, 444:724-729.
9. Alam S.M., et al. Qualitative and quantitative differences in T cell receptor binding of agonist and antagonist ligands. Immunity 1999, 10:227-237.
10. Garcia K.C., et al. Alphabeta T cell receptor interactions with syngeneic and allogeneic ligands: affinity measurements and crystallization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94:13838-13843.
11. Govern C.C., et al. Fast on-rates allow short dwell time ligands to activate T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:8724-8729.
12. Qi S., et al. Molecular flexibility can influence the stimulatory ability of receptor-ligand interactions at cell-cell junctions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:4416-4421.
13. Aleksic M., et al. Dependence of T cell antigen recognition on T cell receptor-peptide MHC confinement time. Immunity 2010, 32:163-174.
14. Bell G.I. Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. Science 1978, 200:618-627.
15. Dustin M.L., et al. Identification of self through two-dimensional chemistry and synapses. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2001, 17:133-157.
16. Shaw A.S., Dustin M.L. Making the T cell receptor go the distance: a topological view of T cell activation. Immunity 1997, 6:361-369.
17. Mescher M.F. Surface contact requirements for activation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 1992, 149:2402-2405.
18. Galbraith C.G., et al. The relationship between force and focal complex development. J. Cell Biol. 2002, 159:695-705.
19. Ilani T., et al. T cell antigen receptor signaling and immunological synapse stability require myosin IIA. Nat. Immunol. 2009, 10:531-539.
20. Negulescu P.A., et al. Polarity of T cell shape, motility, and sensitivity to antigen. Immunity 1996, 4:421-430.
21. Kim S.T., et al. The alphabeta T cell receptor is an anisotropic mechanosensor. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284:31028-31037.
22. Li Y.C., et al. Cutting edge: mechanical forces acting on T cells immobilized via the TCR complex can trigger TCR signaling. J. Immunol. 2010, 184:5959-5963.
23. Judokusumo E., et al. Mechanosensing in T lymphocyte activation. Biophys. J. 2012, 102:L5-L7.
24. O'Connor R.S., et al. Substrate rigidity regulates human T cell activation and proliferation. J. Immunol. 2012, 189:1330-1339.
25. Grakoui A., et al. The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. Science 1999, 285:221-227.
26. Jonsson P., et al. Hydrodynamic trapping of molecules in lipid bilayers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:10328-10333.
27. Dustin M.L., et al. Visualization of CD2 interaction with LFA-3 and determination of the two-dimensional dissociation constant for adhesion receptors in a contact area. J. Cell Biol. 1996, 132:465-474.
28. Dustin M.L., et al. Quantification and modeling of tripartite CD2-, CD58FC chimera (Alefacept)-, and CD16-mediated cell adhesion. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:34748-34757.
29. Tolentino T.P., et al. Measuring diffusion and binding kinetics by contact area FRAP. Biophys. J. 2008, 95:920-930.
30. van der Merwe P.A., et al. Human cell-adhesion molecule CD2 binds CD58 (LFA-3) with a very low affinity and an extremely fast dissociation rate but does not bind CD48 or CD59. Biochemistry 1994, 33:10149-10160.
31. Wu Y., et al. Theory and simulations of adhesion receptor dimerization on membrane surfaces. Biophys. J. 2013, 104:1221-1229.
32. Wu Y., et al. Transforming binding affinities from three dimensions to two with application to cadherin clustering. Nature 2011, 475:510-513.
33. Choudhuri K., et al. Polarized release of T-cell-receptor-enriched microvesicles at the immunological synapse. Nature 2014, 507:118-123.
34. Huppa J.B., et al. TCR-peptide-MHC interactions in situ show accelerated kinetics and increased affinity. Nature 2010, 463:963-967.
35. O'Donoghue G.P., et al. Direct single molecule measurement of TCR triggering by agonist pMHC in living primary T cells. Elife 2013, 2:e00778.
36. Chesla S.E., et al. Measuring two-dimensional receptor-ligand binding kinetics by micropipette. Biophys. J. 1998, 75:1553-1572.
37. Zarnitsyna V.I., et al. Memory in receptor-ligand-mediated cell adhesion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:18037-18042.
38. Huang J., et al. The kinetics of two-dimensional TCR and pMHC interactions determine T-cell responsiveness. Nature 2010, 464:932-936.
39. Selvaraj P., et al. The T lymphocyte glycoprotein CD2 (LFA-2/T11/E-Rosette receptor) binds the cell surface ligand LFA-3. Nature 1987, 326:400-403.
40. Hermand P., et al. Binding sites of leukocyte beta 2 integrins (LFA-1, Mac-1) on the human ICAM-4/LW blood group protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275:26002-26010.
41. Spring F.A., et al. Intercellular adhesion molecule-4 binds alpha(4)beta(1) and alpha(V)-family integrins through novel integrin-binding mechanisms. Blood 2001, 98:458-466.
42. Evans E., Kinoshita K. Using force to probe single-molecule receptor-cytoskeletal anchoring beneath the surface of a living cell. Methods Cell Biol. 2007, 83:373-396.
43. Stepanek O., et al. Coreceptor scanning by the T cell receptor provides a mechanism for T cell tolerance. Cell 2014, 159:333-345.
44. Robert P., et al. Kinetics and mechanics of two-dimensional interactions between T cell receptors and different activating ligands. Biophys. J. 2012, 102:248-257.
45. 2+ indicators with greatly improved fluorescence properties. J. Biol. Chem. 1985, 260:3440-3450.
46. Huse M., et al. Spatial and temporal dynamics of T cell receptor signaling with a photoactivatable agonist. Immunity 2007, 27:76-88.
47. Weiss A., et al. Role of T3 surface molecules in human T-cell activation: T3-dependent activation results in an increase in cytoplasmic free calcium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1984, 81:4169-4173.
48. Valitutti S., et al. Sustained signaling leading to T cell activation results from prolonged T cell receptor occupancy. Role of T cell actin cytoskeleton. J. Exp. Med. 1995, 181:577-584.
49. Varma R., et al. T cell receptor-proximal signals are sustained in peripheral microclusters and terminated in the central supramolecular activation cluster. Immunity 2006, 25:117-127.
50. Irvine D.J., et al. Direct observation of ligand recognition by T cells. Nature 2002, 419:845-849.
51. Feske S., et al. A mutation in Orai1 causes immune deficiency by abrogating CRAC channel function. Nature 2006, 441:179-185.
52. Mege J.L., et al. Quantification of cell surface roughness; a method for studying cell mechanical and adhesive properties. J. Theor. Biol. 1986, 119:147-160.
53. Chauveau A., et al. Membrane nanotubes facilitate long-distance interactions between natural killer cells and target cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:5545-5550.
54. Pryshchep S., et al. Accumulation of serial forces on TCR and CD8 frequently applied by agonist antigenic peptides embedded in MHC molecules triggers calcium in T cells. J. Immunol. 2014, 193:68-76.
55. McKeithan T.W. Kinetic proofreading in T-cell receptor signal transduction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92:5042-5046.
56. Bunnell S.C., et al. T cell receptor ligation induces the formation of dynamically regulated signaling assemblies. J. Cell Biol. 2002, 158:1263-1275.
57. Campi G., et al. Actin and agonist MHC-peptide complex-dependent T cell receptor microclusters as scaffolds for signaling. J. Exp. Med. 2005, 202:1031-1036.
58. Springer T.A. Adhesion receptors of the immune system. Nature 1990, 346:425-434.
59. van der Merwe P.A., et al. Topology of the CD2-CD48 cell-adhesion molecule complex: implications for antigen recognition by T cells. Curr. Biol. 1995, 5:74-84.
60. Ma Z., et al. The receptor deformation model of TCR triggering. FASEB J. 2008, 22:1002-1008.
61. Lillemeier B.F., et al. TCR and Lat are expressed on separate protein islands on T cell membranes and concatenate during activation. Nat. Immunol. 2010, 11:90-96.