The effects of psychological distance on abstraction: Two meta-analyses

Psychological Bulletin

Volumn 141, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 525-548

  Soderberg, Courtney K ^a   Callahan, Shannon P ^b   Kochersberger, Annie O ^b   Amit, Elinor ^c   Ledgerwood, Alison ^b  

^a Center for Open Science   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Construal level; Mental representation; Meta analysis; Psychological distance; Temporal distance

Indexed keywords

CONCEPT FORMATION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SOCIAL DISTANCE; TIME PERCEPTION;

CONCEPT FORMATION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; HUMANS; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SOCIAL DISTANCE; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 84928986181     PISSN: 00332909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/bul0000005     Document Type: Article

References (166)

1. Agerström, J., & Björklund, F. (2009a). Moral concerns are greater for temporally distant events and are moderated by value strength. Social Cognition, 27, 261-282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.2.261
2. Agerström, J., & Björklund, F. (2009b). Temporal distance and moral concerns: Future morally questionable behavior is perceived as more wrong and evokes stronger prosocial intentions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 31, 49-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01973530802659885
3. Agerström, J., Björklund, F., & Allwood, C. M. (2010). The influence of temporal distance on justice and care morality. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 51, 46-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00724.x
4. Agerström, J., Bjorklund, F., & Carlsson, R. (2012). Emotions in time:Moral emotions appear more intense with temporal distance. Social Cognition, 30, 181-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/soco.2012.30.2.181
5. Amit, E., Algom, D., & Trope, Y. (2009). Distance-dependent processing of pictures and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 400-415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015835
6. Amit, E., Mehoudar, E., Trope, Y., & Yovel, G. (2012). Do object-category selective regions in the ventral visual stream represent perceived distance information? Brain and Cognition, 80, 201-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2012.06.006
7. Amit, E., Wakslak, C., & Trope, Y. (2013). The use of visual and verbal means of communication across psychological distance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 43-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167212460282
8. Badre, D., & D'Esposito, M. (2007). Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for a hierarchical organization of the prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 2082-2099. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.12.2082
9. Bakker, M., van Dijk, A., & Wicherts, J. M. (2012). The rules of the game called psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 543-554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459060
10. Bar-Anan. (2009). The effect of temporal distance on the behavior identification form: A replication. Unpublished data.
11. Bobko, P., Roth, P., & Bobko, C. (2001). Correcting the effect size of d for range and unreliability. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 46-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109442810141003
12. Borenstein, M. (2009). Effect sizes for continuous data. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 317-333). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
13. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2005). Comprehensive meta-analysis (Version 2) [Computer Software]. Englewood, NJ: Biostat.
14. Borovoi, L., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2010). The effects of attractive but unattainable alternatives on the attractiveness of near and distant future menus. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 102-109.
15. Burgoon, E. M., Henderson, M. D., & Markman, A. B. (2013). There are many ways to see the forest for the trees: A tour guide for abstraction. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 501-520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691613497964
16. Burgoon, E. M., Henderson, M. D., & Wakslak, C. J. (2013). How do we want others to decide?: Geographical distance influences evaluations of decision makers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 826-838. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167213481247
17. Burrus, J., & Roese, N. J. (2006). Long ago it was meant to be: The interplay between time, construal, and fate beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1050-1058. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167206288282
18. Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafò, M. R. (2013). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14, 365-376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn3475
19. Card, N. A. (2012). Applied meta-analysis for social science research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
20. Carter, S. E., & Sanna, L. J. (2008). It's not just what you say but when you say it: Self-presentation and temporal construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1339-1345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.017
21. Chan, M. E., & Arvey, R. D. (2012). Meta-analysis and the development of knowledge. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 79-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691611429355
22. Chiu, F. (2012). Fit between future thinking and future orientation on creative imagination. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7, 234-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.05.002
23. Choi, S. Y., Park, H. S., & Oh, J. Y. (2012). Temporal distance and blood donation intention. Journal of Health Psychology, 17, 590-599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1359105311421048
24. Chou, H., & Lien, N. (2012). The effect of incentive types and appeal regulatory framing in travel advertising. Service Industries Journal, 32, 883-897. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2010.545878
25. Christian, B. M., Miles, L. K., Fung, F. H. K., Best, S., & Macrae, C. N. (2013). The shape of things to come: Exploring goal-directed prospection. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 471-478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.02.002
26. Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10096-006
27. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
28. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Cojuharenco, I., Patient, D., & Bashshur, M. R. (2011). Seeing the "forest" or the "trees" of organizational justice: Effects of temporal perspective on employee concerns about unfair treatment at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 17-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.05.008
30. Conway, P., & Peetz, J. (2012). When does feeling moral actually make you a better person? Conceptual abstraction moderates whether past moral deeds motivate consistency or compensatory behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 907-919. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167212442394
31. Cooper, H. (2009). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348858.n11
32. Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (Eds.). (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY:Russell Sage Foundation.
33. Danziger, S., Montal, R., & Barkan, R. (2012). Idealistic advice and pragmatic choice: A psychological distance account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1105-1117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0027013
34. Darwent, K. M. (2012). Individual differences in travel across psychological distances (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
35. Day, S. B., & Bartels, D. M. (2008). Representation over time: The effects of temporal distance on similarity. Cognition, 106, 1504-1513. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.013
36. De Dreu, C. K. W., Giacomantonio, M., Shalvi, S., & Sligte, D. (2009). Getting stuck or stepping back: Effect of obstacles and construal level in the negotiation of creative solutions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 542-548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.01.001
37. Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455-463.
38. Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H. H., & Dermen, D. (1976). Kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services.
39. Eyal, T., Hoover, G. M., Fujita, K., & Nussbaum, S. (2011). The effect of distance-dependent construals on schema-driven impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 278-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.10.007
40. Eyal, T., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2008). Judging near and distant virtue and vice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1204-1209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.012
41. Eyal, T., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Walther, E. (2004). The pros and cons of temporally near and distant action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 781-795. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.781
42. Eyal, T., Sagristano, M. D., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Chaiken, S. (2009). When values matter: Expressing values in behavioral intentions for the near vs. distant future. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 35-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.023
43. Ferguson, C. J., & Brannick, M. T. (2012). Publication bias in psychological science: Prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses. Psychological Methods, 17, 120-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024445
44. Förster, J. (2009). Relations between perceptual and conceptual scope:How global versus local processing fits a focus on similarity versus dissimilarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 88-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0014484
45. Förster, J., & Becker, D. (2012). When curiosity kills no cat-But mediates the relation between distant future thoughts and global processing across sensory modalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 334-341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1856
46. Förster, J., & Dannenberg, L. (2010). GLOMO sys: A systems account of global versus local processing. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 175-197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2010.487849
47. Förster, J., Friedman, R. S., & Liberman, N. (2004). Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: Consequences for insight and creative cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 177-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.177
48. Freitas, A. L., Langsam, K. L., Clark, S., & Moeller, S. J. (2008). Seeing oneself in one's choices: Construal level and self-pertinence of electoral and consumer decisions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1174-1179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.02.011
49. Freitas, A. L., Salovey, P., & Liberman, N. (2001). Abstract and concrete self-evaluative goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 410-424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.410
50. Fujita, K., Eyal, T., Chaiken, S., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2008). Influencing attitudes toward near and distant objects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 227, 9044-9062.
51. Fujita, K., Henderson, M., Eng, J., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2004). Testing the effect of spatial distance on action identification. Unpublished data.
52. Fujita, K., Henderson, M. D., Eng, J., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2006). Spatial distance and mental construal of social events. Psychological Science, 17, 278-282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01698.x
53. Fukukura, J., Ferguson, M. J., & Fujita, K. (2013). Psychological distance can improve decision making under information overload via gist memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 658-665. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030730
54. Garcia, D. (2011). Happy today, happy tomorrow: The (non-) effect of temporal distance on judgments of life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 1048-1051. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.031
55. Garcia, D., Rosenberg, P., & Siddiqui, A. (2011). Tomorrow I could be in trouble... but the sun will come out next year: The effect of temporal distance on adolescents' judgments of life satisfaction. Journal of Adolescence, 34, 751-757. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.08.006
56. Giacomantonio, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Mannetti, L. (2010). Now you see it, now you don't: Interests, issues, and psychological distance in integrative negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 761-774. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017879
57. Giacomantonio, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., Shalvi, S., Sligte, D., & Leder, S. (2010). Psychological distance boosts value-behavior correspondence in ultimatum bargaining and integrative negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 824-829. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.001
58. Gilead, M., Liberman, N., & Maril, A. (2012). Construing counterfactual worlds: The role of abstraction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 391-397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1862
59. Gong, H., & Medin, D. L. (2012). Construal level and moral judgment:Some complications. Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 628-638.
60. Goodman, J. K., & Malkoc, S. A. (2012). Choosing here and now versus there and later: The moderating role of psychological distance on assortment size preference. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 751-768. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/665047
61. Halamish, V., Nussinson, R., & Ben-Ari, L. (2013). In a year, memory will benefit from learning, tomorrow it won't: Distance and construal level effects on the basis of metamemory judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1621-1627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0032381
62. Hedges, L. V., Tipton, E., & Johnson, M. C. (2010). Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. Research Synthesis Methods, 1, 39-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.5
63. Heller, D., Stephan, E., Kifer, Y., & Sedikides, C. (2011). What will I be? The role of temporal perspective in predictions of affect, traits, and self-narratives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 610-615. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.01.010
64. Henderson, M. D. (2009). Psychological distance and group judgments:The effect of physical distance on beliefs about common goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1330-1341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167209340905
65. Henderson, M. (2011). Mere physical distance and integrative agreement:When more space improves negotiation outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 7-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.07.011
66. Henderson, M. D., Fujita, K., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2006). Transcending the "here": The effect of spatial distance on social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 845-856. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.845
67. Henderson, M. D., Trope, Y., & Carnevale, P. J. (2006). Negotiation from a near and distant time perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 712-729. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.712
68. Henderson, M. D., & Wakslak, C. J. (2010). Psychological distance and priming: When do semantic primes impact social evaluations? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 975-985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167210367490
69. Herzog, S. M., Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (2007). Temporal distance and ease of retrieval. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 483-488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.008
70. Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1539-1558. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186
71. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations:Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
72. Huedo-Medina, T. B., Sánchz-Meca, J., Martìn-Martìnez, F., & Botella, J. (2006). Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index? Psychological Methods, 11, 193-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.193
73. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
74. Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
75. Janakiraman, N., & Ordonez, L. (2012). The effect of effort and deadlines on consumer product returns. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 260-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.05.002
76. Jia, L., Hirt, E. R., & Karpen, S. C. (2009). Lessons from a faraway land:The effect of spatial distance on creative cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1127-1131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.05.015
77. Jia, L., & Smith, E. R. (2013). Distance makes the metaphor grow stronger: A psychological distance model of metaphor use. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 492-497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.01.009
78. Jiga-Boy, G. M., Clark, A. E., & Semin, G. R. (2013). Situating construal level: The function of abstractness and concreteness in social contexts. Social Cognition, 31, 201-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/soco.2013.31.2.201
79. Jin, L., & He, Y. (2013). Designing service guarantees with construal fit:Effects of temporal distance on consumer responses to service guarantees. Journal of Service Research, 16, 202-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094670512468330
80. Kane, J., van Boven, L., & McGraw, P. (2012). Prototypical prospective:Future events are more prototypically represented and simulated than past events. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 354-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1866
81. Kim, Y., Park, J., & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (2009). Effects of temporal distance on memory and consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 634-645. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/599765
82. Kivetz, Y., & Tyler, T. R. (2007). Tomorrow I'll be me: The effect of time perspective on the activation of idealistic versus pragmatic selves. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 193-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.07.002
83. Kühnen, U., & Oyserman, D. (2002). Thinking about the self influences thinking in general: Cognitive consequences of salient self-concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 492-499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00011-2
84. Leach, F. R., & Plaks, J. E. (2009). Regret for errors of commission and omission in the distant term versus near term: The role of level of abstraction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 221-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167208327001
85. Ledgerwood, A., & Callahan, S. P. (2010). Distance modulates susceptibility to local versus global social influences. Unpublished manuscript. University of California, Davis.
86. Ledgerwood, A., & Callahan, S. P. (2012). The social side of abstraction:Psychological distance enhances conformity to group norms. Psychological Science, 23, 907-913.
87. Ledgerwood, A., Trope, Y., & Chaiken, S. (2010). Flexibility now, consistency later: Psychological distance and construal shape evaluative responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 32-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019843
88. Ledgerwood, A., & Wakslak, C. J. (2007). Differential information use for near and distant decisions: Additional experiment. Unpublished manuscript. New York University, New York, NY.
89. Ledgerwood, A., Wakslak, C. J., & Wang, M. A. (2010). Differential information use for near and distant decisions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 638-642. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.001
90. Lehrer, J. (2010, December 13). The truth wears off. The New Yorker. p. 52. Retrieved from http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/12/13/the-truth-wears-off
91. Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of "theory of mind." Psychological Review, 94, 412-426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.4.412
92. Liberman, N., & Förster, J. (2009). The effect of psychological distance on perceptual level of construal. Cognitive Science, 33, 1330-1341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01061.x
93. Liberman, N., Sagristano, M., & Trope, Y. (2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 523-534. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00535-8
94. Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 5-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.5
95. Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322, 1201-1205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1161958
96. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
97. Liviatan, I., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2008). Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: Implications for perception of others'actions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1256-1269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.007
98. Liviatan, I., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2014). A construal level analysis of the similarity-attraction relation. Unpublished manuscript. New York University, New York, NY.
99. Lu, J., Xie, X., & Xu, J. (2013). Desirability or feasibility: Self-other decision-making differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 144-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167212470146
100. Lutchyn, Y., & Yzer, M. (2011). Construal level theory and theory of planned behavior: Time frame effects on salient belief generation. Journal of Health Communication, 16, 595-606. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2011.551991
101. Maglio, S. J., & Trope, Y. (2011). Scale and construal: How larger measurement units shrink length estimates and expand mental horizons. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 165-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-010-0025-1
102. Maglio, S. J., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2013a). Distance from a distance: Psychological distance reduces sensitivity to any further psychological distance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 644-657. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030258
103. Maglio, S. J., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2013b). The common currency of psychological distance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 278-282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963721413480172
104. Malkoc, S. A., Zauberman, G., & Ulu, C. (2005). Consuming now or later? The interactive effect of timing and attribute alignability. Psychological Science, 16, 411-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01549.x
105. McCarthy, R. J., & Skowronski, J. J. (2011). You're getting warmer:Level of construal affects the impact of central traits on impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1304-1307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.017
106. McGraw, A. P., Warren, C., Williams, L. E., & Leonard, B. (2012). Too close for comfort, or too far to care? Finding humor in distant tragedies and close mishaps. Psychological Science, 23, 1215-1223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797612443831
107. Medin, D. L. (1989). Concepts and conceptual structure. American Psychologist, 44, 1469-1481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.12.1469
108. Menegatti, M., & Rubini, M. (2013). Convincing similar and dissimilar others: The power of language abstraction in political communication. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 596-607. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167213479404
109. Milkman, K. L., Akinola, M., & Chugh, D. (2012). Temporal distance and discrimination: An audit study in academia. Psychological Science, 23, 710-717. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797611434539
110. Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. I. (1989). Delay of gratification in children. Science, 244, 933-938. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.2658056
111. Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291
112. Nussbaum, S., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2006). Predicting the near and distant future. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 152-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.152
113. Nussbaum, S., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Creeping dispositionism:The temporal dynamics of behavior prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 485-497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.485
114. Park, K. (2010). The role of elaboration moderating the effects of temporal construal on evaluation. Seoul Journal of Business, 16, 65-92.
115. Park, L. E., Young, A. F., & Eastwick, P. W. (under review). Psychological distance makes the heart grow fonder: Effects of psychological distance and relative intelligence on men's attraction to women.
116. Peetz, J., & Buehler, R. (2012). When distance pays off: The role of construal level in spending predictions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 395-398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.07.016
117. Peetz, J., Buehler, R., & Wilson, A. (2010). Planning for the near and distance future: How does temporal distance affect task completion predictions? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 709-720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.008
118. Peetz, J., & Wilson, A. E. (2013). The post-birthday world: Consequences of temporal landmarks for temporal self-appraisal and motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 249-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030477
119. Perugini, M., Gallucci, M., & Constantini, G. (2014). Safeguard power as a protection against imprecise power estimates. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 319-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528519
120. Peters, J. L., Sutton, A. J., Jones, D. R., Abrams, K. R., & Rushton, L. (2008). Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61, 991-996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.010
121. Plaks, J. E., McNichols, N. K., & Fortune, J. L. (2009). Thoughts versus deeds: Distal and proximal intent in lay judgments of moral responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1687-1701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167209345529
122. Polman, E., & Emich, K. J. (2011). Decisions for others are more creative than decisions for the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 492-501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167211398362
123. Raudenbush, S. W. (2009). Analyzing effect sizes: Random-effects models. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 317-333). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
124. Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F., Jr., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7, 331-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331
125. Rim, S., Hansen, J., & Trope, Y. (2013). What happens why? Psychological distance and focusing on causes versus consequences of events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 457-472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031024
126. Rim, S., Uleman, J. S., & Trope, Y. (2009). Spontaneous trait inference and construal level theory: Psychological distance increases nonconscious trait thinking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1088-1097. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.015
127. Roehm, M. L., & Roehm, H. A., Jr. (2011). The influence of redemption time frame on responses to incentives. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39, 363-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0201-x
128. Rogers, Y., & Bazerman, M. H. (2008). Future lock-in: Future implementation increases selection of 'should' choices. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106, 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.08.001
129. Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-X
130. Rosenthal, R. (1979). The "file drawer problem" and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638-641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638
131. Sanchez, A. M., & Ledgerwood, A. (2012a). The shape of the relationship between temporal distance and construal level. Unpublished data.
132. Sanchez, A. M., & Ledgerwood, A. (2012b). The effect of intervening temporal markers on the relationship between distance and abstraction. Unpublished data.
133. Sanchez, A. M., & Rutchick, A. M. (2013, January). Distance, prevention, and resilience in decisions about national security risks. Poster presented at the 14th annual Society for Personality and Social Psychology in New Orleans, LA.
134. Sargis, E. G., Skitka, L. J., & McKeever, W. (2013). The Internet as psychological laboratory revisited: Best practices, challenges, and solutions. In Y. Amichai-Hamburger (Ed.). The social net: Understanding our on-line behavior (2nd Ed., pp. 253-270). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
135. Schacter, D. L. (2012). Adaptive constructive processes and the future of memory. American Psychologist, 67, 603-613. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029869
136. Schimmel, K., & Forster, J. (2008). How temporal distance changes novices' attitudes towards unconventional art. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 53-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.2.1.53
137. Schmidt, F. L., Le, H., & Oh, I. S. (2009). Correcting for the distorting effects of study artifacts in meta-analysis. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 317-333). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
138. Schooler, J. W. (2011). Unpublished results hide the decline effect. Nature, 470, 437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/470437a
139. Semin, G. R., & Fiedler, K. (1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 131, 364-376.
140. Steinhart, Y., Carmon, Z., & Trope, Y. (2013). Warnings of adverse side effects can backfire over time. Psychological Science, 24, 1842-1847. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797613478948
141. Steinhart, Y., Mazursky, D., & Kamins, S. (2013). The "temporalprocessing-fit effect": The interplay between regulatory state, temporal distance, and construal level. Social Cognition, 31, 315-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/soco.2013.31.3.315
142. Stephan, E., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2010). Politeness and psychological distance: A construal level perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 268-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0016960
143. Sterne, J. A. C., & Egger, M. (2005). Regression methods to detect publication and other bias in meta-analysis. In H. R. Rothstein, A. J. Simon, & M. Borenstein (Eds.), Publication bias in meta-analysis. Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 99-110). Hoboken, NJ:Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch6
144. Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M. C. (2007). The evolution of foresight:What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 299-313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07001975
145. Tam, L., Glassman, M., & Vandenwauver, M. (2010). The psychology of password management: A tradeoff between security and convenience. Behaviour & Information Technology, 29, 233-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01449290903121386
146. Tanner-Smith, E., & Tipton, E. (2014). Robust variance estimation with dependent effect sizes: Practical considerations and a software tutorial in Stata and SPSS. Research Synthesis Methods, 5, 13-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1091
147. Terrin, N., Schmid, C. H., Lau, J., & Olkin, I. (2003). Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity. Statistics in Medicine, 22, 2113-2126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.1461
148. Thomas, M., Chandran, S., & Trope, Y. (2006). The effects of information type and temporal distance on purchase intentions. Unpublished data.
149. Tipton, E. (2014). Small sample adjustments for robust variance estimation with meta-regression. Psychological Methods. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/met0000011
150. Todorov, A., Goren, A., & Trope, Y. (2007). Probability as a psychological distance: Construal and preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 473-482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.04.002
151. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2000). Temporal construal and timedependent changes in preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 876-889. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.876
152. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403-421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403
153. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440-463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
154. Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 3-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.1.3
155. Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 660-671. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.660
156. Volk, S., & Korner, A. Temporal distance increases utilitarian decisions in the crying baby dilemma. Unpublished manuscript.
157. Von Wagner, C., Semmler, C., Power, E., & Good, A. (2010). What matters when deciding whether to participate in colorectal cancer screening? The moderating role of time perspective. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 15, 20-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9861.2010.00050.x
158. Wakslak, C. J., Nussbaum, S., Liberman, N.,&Trope, Y. (2008). Representations of the self in the near and distant future. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 757-773. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012939
159. Wakslak, C. J., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Alony, R. (2006). Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely: Probability and the mental representation of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 641-653. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.641
160. Warner, R. H., Vandeursen, M. J., & Pope, A. R. D. (2012). Temporal distance as a determinant of just world strategy. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 276-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1855
161. Wyer, N. A. (2014). Unpublished raw data.
162. Wyer, N. A., Perfect, T. J., & Pahl, S. (2010). Temporal distance and person memory: Thinking about the future changes memory for the past. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 805-816. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167210370965
163. Yan, D., & Sengupta, J. (2011). Effects of construal level on the pricequality relationship. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 376-389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/659755
164. Yan, D., & Sengupta, J. (2013). The influence of base rate and case information on health-risk perceptions:Aunified model of self-positivity and self-negativity. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 931-946. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/666596
165. Yong, E. (2012). Replication studies: Bad copy. Nature, 485, 298-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/485298a
166. Zauberman, G., Kim, B. K., Malkoc, S. A., & Bettman, J. R. (2009). Discounting time and time discounting: Subjective time perception and intertemporal preference. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 543-556. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.46.4.543