Erratum: Safeguard power as a protection against imprecise power estimates [Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, (2014) 319-332, DOI 10.1177/1745691614528519];Safeguard Power as a Protection Against Imprecise Power Estimates

Perspectives on Psychological Science

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 319-332

  Perugini, Marco ^a   Gallucci, Marcello ^a   Costantini, Giulio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

Author keywords

power analysis; replicability; safeguard

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899791409     PISSN: 17456916     EISSN: 17456924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1745691614542786     Document Type: Erratum

References (44)

1. Asendorpf J. B.,Conner M.,De Fruyt F.,De Houwer J.,Denissen J. J. A.,Fiedler K., Wicherts J. M.Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology.European Journal of Personality. 2013;27:108-119.
2. Bakker M.,van Dijk A.,Wicherts J. M.The rules of the game called psychological science.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012;7:543-554.
3. Brandt M. J.,Ijzerman H.,Dijksterhuis A.,Farach F. J.,Geller J.,Giner-Sorolla R., van 't Veer A.The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication?.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2014;50:217-224.
4. Braver S. L.,Thoemmes F. J.,Rosenthal R.Continuously cumulating meta-analysis and replicability.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2014;9:333-342.
5. Button K. S.,Ioannidis J. P. A.,Mokrysz C.,Nosek B. A.,Flint J.,Robinson E. S. J.,Munafò M. R.Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2013;14:365-376.
6. Cohen J.The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1962;65:145-153.
7. Cohen J.Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988:.
8. Cohen J.A power primer.Psychological Bulletin. 1992;112:155-159.
9. Cumming G.Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Routledge; 2012:.
10. Cumming G.,Fidler F.The reviewer's guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences. Hancock G. R.Mueller R. O., ed. London, England: Routledge; 2010:79-91.
11. DoyenS.KleinO.PichonC. L.CleeremansA. (2012). Behavioral priming: It's all in the mind, but whose mind?PLoS ONE, 7(1), e29081. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0029081.
12. FanelliD. (2010). "Positive" results increase down the hierarchy of the sciences. PLoS ONE, 5(4), e10068. http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0010068.
13. Fanelli D.,Ioannidis J. P. A.US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 2013;110:15031-15036.
14. Ferguson C. J.,Brannick M. T.Publication bias in psychological science: Prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses.Psychological Methods. 2012;17:120-128.
15. Frick R. W.The appropriate use of null hypothesis testing.Psychological Methods. 1996;1:379-390.
16. Galak J.,LeBoeuf R. A.,Nelson L. D.,Simmons J. P.Correcting the past: Failures to replicate psi.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2012;103:933-948.
17. Gigerenzer G.,Krauss S.,Vitouch O.The SAGE handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences. Kaplan D., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2004:391-408.
18. Howell D. C.Statistical methods for psychology. 2002). Statistical methods for psychology (5th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury; 2002:.
19. John L. K.,Loewenstein G.,Prelec D.Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling.Psychological Science. 2012;23:524-532.
20. Kelley K.,Maxwell S. E.Sample size for multiple regression: Obtaining regression coefficients that are accurate, not simply significant.Psychological Methods. 2003;8:305-321.
21. Kelley K.,Rausch J. R.Sample size planning for the standardized mean difference: Accuracy in parameter estimation via narrow confidence intervals.Psychological Methods. 2006;11:363-385.
22. Kievit R. A.Bayesians caught smuggling priors into Rotterdam harbor.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2011;6:313.
23. Kruschke J. K.What to believe: Bayesian methods for data analysis.Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2010;14:293-300.
24. Kruschke J. K.Bayesian assessment of null values via parameter estimation and model comparison.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2011;6:299-312.
25. Lakens D.Sailing from the seas of chaos into the corridor of stability: Practical recommendations to increase the informational value of studies.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2014;9:278-292.
26. LeBel E. P.,Campbell L.Heightened sensitivity to temperature cues in individuals with high anxious attachment: Real or elusive phenomenon?.Psychological Science. 2013;24:2128-2130.
27. Ledgerwood A.,Shrout P. E.The trade-off between accuracy and precision in latent variable models of mediation processes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2011;101:1174-1188.
28. Masicampo E. J.,Lalande D. R.A peculiar prevalence of p values just below .05.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2012;65:2271-2279.
29. Maxwell S. E.,Kelley K.,Rausch J. R.Sample size planning for statistical power and accuracy in parameter estimation.Annual Review of Psychology. 2008;59:537-563.
30. Nickerson R. S.Null hypothesis significance testing: A review of an old and continuing controversy.Psychological Methods. 2000;5:241-301.
31. Nosek B. A.,Spies J. R.,Motyl M.Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012;7:615-631.
32. An open, large-scale, collaborative effort to estimate the reproducibility of psychological science.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012;7:657-660.
33. Pashler H.,Wagenmakers E. J.Editors' introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological Science: A crisis of confidence?.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012;7:528-530.
34. Rosnow R. L.,Rosenthal R.Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science.American Psychologist. 1989;44:1276-1284.
35. Schönbrodt F. D.,Perugini M.At what sample size do correlations stabilize?.Journal of Research in Personality. 2013;47:609-612.
36. ShanksD. R.NewellB. R.LeeE. H.BalakrishnanD.EkelundL.CenacZ. MooreC. (2013). Priming intelligent behavior: An elusive phenomenon. PLoS ONE, 8(4), e56515. http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0056515.
37. Simmons J. P.,Nelson L. D.,Simonsohn U.False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.Psychological Science. 2011;22:1359-1366.
38. SimonsohnU. (2013). Small telescopes: Detectability and the evaluation of replication results. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2259879.
39. Sterling T. D.,Rosenbaum W. L.,Weinkam J. J.Publication decisions revisited: The effect of the outcome of statistical tests on the decision to publish and vice versa.The American Statistician. 1995;49:108-112.
40. Wagenmakers E. J.,Wetzels R.,Borsboom D.,van der Maas H. L. J.Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of psi: Comment on Bem (2011).Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2011;100:426-432.
41. Wagenmakers E. J.,Wetzels R.,Borsboom D.,van der Maas H. L. J.,Kievit R. A.An agenda for purely confirmatory research.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012;7:632-638.
42. WichertsJ. M.BakkerM.MolenaarD. (2011). Willingness to share research data is related to the strength of the evidence and the quality of reporting of statistical results. PLoS ONE, 6(11), e26828. http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0026828.
43. Wilkinson L.Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations.American Psychologist. 1999;54:594-604.
44. YoungN. S.IoannidisJ. P. A.Al-UbaydliO. (2008). Why current publication practices may distort science. PLoS Medicine, 5(10), e201. Retrieved from http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.0050201.