Getting stuck or stepping back: Effects of obstacles and construal level in the negotiation of creative solutions

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 542-548

  De Dreu, Carsten K W ^a   Giacomantonio, Mauro ^b   Shalvi, Shaul ^a   Sligte, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Construal level; Left to right bias; Negotiation; Obstacles; Processing style

Indexed keywords

EID: 64049100548     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: 10960465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Achtziger A., Gollwitzer P.M., and Sheeran P. Implementation intentions and shielding goal striving from unwanted thoughts and feelings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34 (2008) 381-393
2. Balakrishnan P.V., Patton C., and Lewis P.A. Toward a theory of agenda setting in negotiations. Journal of Consumer Research 19 (1993) 637-654
3. Bilewicz M. History as an obstacle: Impact of temporal-based social categorizations on Polish-Jewish intergroup contact. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 10 (2007) 551-563
4. Bolger N., and Zuckerman A. A framework for studying personality in the stress process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69 (1995) 890-902
5. Busch L.A., and Horstmann I.J. The game of negotiations: Ordering issues and implementing agreements. Games and Economic Behavior 41 (2002) 169-191
6. Cohen H. You can negotiate anything (1980), Bantam, New York
7. De Dreu C.K.W., Baas M., and Nijstad B.A. Hedonic tone and activation in the mood - creativity link: Towards a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94 (2008) 739-756
8. De Dreu C.K.W., Beersma B., Stroebe K., and Euwema M.C. Motivated information processing, strategic choice, and the quality of negotiated agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90 (2006) 927-943
9. De Dreu C.K.W., Carnevale P.J.D., Emans B.J.M., and Van de Vliert E. Effects of gain loss frames in negotiation: Loss aversion, mismatching, and frame adoption. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 60 (1994) 90-107
10. Dobel C., Diesendruck G., and Bolte J. How writing system and age influences spatial representations of actions. Psychological Science 18 (2007) 487-491
11. Druckman D. Social psychological approaches to the study of negotiation. In: Druckman D. (Ed). Negotiation: Social psychological perspectives (1977), Sage, Thousand Oakes
12. Druckman D. Determinants of compromising behavior in negotiation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution 38 (1994) 507-556
13. Flamini F. First things first? The agenda formation problem for multi-issue committees. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 63 (2007) 138-157
14. Förster J., Friedman R., and Liberman N. Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: Consequences for insight and creative cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87 (2004) 177-189
15. Harinck F., and De Dreu C.K.W. Negotiating values or resources: The moderating impact of time pressure. European Journal of Social Psychology 35 (2004) 595-612
16. Henderson M.D., Trope Y., and Carnevale P.J. Negotiation from a near and distant time perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91 (2006) 721-729
17. Higgins E.T. Value from hedonic experience and engagement. Psychological Review 113 (2006) 439-460
18. Hirt E.R., Devers E.E., and McCrae S.M. I want to be creative: Exploring the role of hedonic experiences in the positive mood-cognitive flexibility link. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94 (2008) 214-230
19. Joireman J., Kamdar D., Daniels D., and Duell B. Good citizens to the end? It depends: Empathy and concern with future consequences moderate the impact of a short-term time horizon on OCBs. Journal of Applied Psychology 91 (2006) 1307-1320
20. Kelly J.R., and McGrath J.E. Effects of time limits and task types on task performance and interaction in four-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49 (1985) 395-407
21. Ledgerwood A., Liviatan I., and Carnevale P.J. Group-identity completion and the symbolic value of property. Psychological Science 18 (2007) 873-878
22. Lewin K. A dynamic theory of personality: Selected papers (1935), McGraw Hill, New York
23. Maass A., and Russo A. Directional bias in the mental representation of spatial events: Nature or culture?. Psychological Science 14 (2003) 296-301
24. Nieremberg G.I. The art of negotiation (1968), Hawthorn, New York
25. Nijstad B.A., and Kaps S.C. Taking the easy way out: Preference diversity, decision strategies, and decision refusal in groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94 (2008) 860-870
26. Okhuysen G.A., Galinsky A.D., and Uptigrove T.A. Saving the worst for last: The effect of time horizon on the efficiency of negotiating benefits and burdens. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 91 2 (2003) 269-279
27. Pruitt D.G., Bercovitch J., and Zartman I.W. A brief history of the Oslo Talks. International Negotiation 2 (1997) 177-182
28. Pruitt D.G., and Carnevale P.J. Negotiation in social conflict (1993), Open University Press, Buckingham, UK
29. Rapoport A. Fight, games, and debates (1960), University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI
30. Schelling T. The strategy of conflict (1960), Harvard University Press, Cambridge
31. Shah J.Y., Friedman R., and Kruglanski A.W. Forgetting all else: In the antecedents and consequences of goal shielding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83 (2002) 1261-1280
32. Spalec T.M., and Hammad S. The left-to-right bias in inhibition of return is due to the direction of reading. Psychological Science 16 (2005) 15-18
33. Veling H., and Van Knippenberg A. Shielding intentions from distraction: Forming an intention reduces inhibition of distracting stimuli. Social Cognition 24 (2006) 409-425
34. Walton R.E., and McKersie R. A behavioral theory of labor negotiations: An analysis of a social interaction system (1965), McGraw-Hill, New York