One Hundred Years of Social Psychology Quantitatively Described

Review of General Psychology

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 331-363

  Richard, F D ^a   Bond, Charles F ^b   Stokes Zoota, Juli J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347604000     PISSN: 10892680     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abelson, R. P. (1995). Statistics as principled argument. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Anderson, C. A., Lindsay, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (1999). Research in the psychology laboratory: Truth or triviality? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 3-9.
3. Bass, B. M. (1954). The leaderless group discussion. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 465-492.
4. Bausell, R. B., Li, Y., Gau, M., & Soeken, K. L. (1995). The growth of the meta-analytic literature from 1980 to 1993. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 18, 238-251.
5. Bowers, K. S. (1973). Situationism in psychology: An analysis and a critique. American Psychologist, 80, 307-336.
6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
7. Cooper, H., & Findley, M. (1982). Expected effect sizes: Estimates for statistical power analysis in social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 168-173.
8. Cronbach, L. J. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 30, 116-127.
9. Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429-456.
10. Gergen, K. (1973). Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 309-320.
11. Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (1998). The handbook of social psychology (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3-8.
13. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14. Greenwald, A. G. (1975). Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis. Psychological Review, 82, 1-20.
15. Hall, J. A. (1998). How big are nonverbal sex differences? In D. J. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication (pp. 155-177). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Hedges, L. V. (1987). How hard is hard science, how soft is soft science: The empirical cumulativeness of research. American Psychologist, 42, 443-455.
17. Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998). Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3, 486-504.
18. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19. Law, K. S. (1995). The use of Fisher's Z in Hunter-Schmidt-type meta-analyses. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 20, 287-306.
20. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48, 1181-1209.
21. Lord, C. G. (1997). Social psychology. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
22. Manstead, A. S. R., & Hewstone, M. (1995). The Blackwell encyclopedia of social psychology. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
23. Miller, N., & Cooper, H. M. (1991). Introduction to special issue on meta-analysis in personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 243-244.
24. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.
25. Rosenthal, R. (1984). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26. Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231-244). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
27. Sahakian, W. S. (1974). Systematic social psychology. New York: Chandler.
28. Sarason, I. G., Smith, R. E., & Diener, E. (1975). Personality research: Components of variance attributable to the person and the situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 199-204.
29. Schmidt, F. L. (1992). What do data really mean? Research findings, meta-analysis, and cumulative knowledge in psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 1173-1181.
30. Shadish, W. R., & Haddock, C. K. (1994). Combining estimates of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 261-281). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
31. Stogdill, R. M. (1948). Personal factors associated with leadership: A survey of the literature. Journal of Psychology, 25, 35-71.
32. Tett, R. P., Meyer, J. P., & Roese, N. J. (1994). Applications of meta-analysis: 1987-1992. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9, 71-112.
33. Triplett, N. (1898). The dynamogenic factors in pace-making and competition. American Journal of Psychology, 9, 507-533.
34. Zanna, M. P., & Fazio, R. H. (1982). The attitude-behavior relation: Moving toward a third generation of research. In M. P. Zanna, E. T. Higgins, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Consistency in social behavior: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 2, pp. 283-301). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.