Exploring evolutions in reciprocal peer tutoring groups' socially shared metacognitive regulation and identifying its metacognitive correlates

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 38, Issue , 2015, Pages 63-78

  De Backer, Liesje ^a   Van Keer, Hilde ^a   Valcke, Martin ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Correlations; Higher education; Peer tutoring; Socially shared metacognitive regulation; Time bound evolutions

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928256864     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Brown A.L. Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation and other more mysterious mechanisms. Metacognition, motivation and understanding 1987, 65-116. Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey. F.E. Weinert, R.H. Kluwe (Eds.).
2. Barron B. When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 2003, 12:307-359.
3. Butler D.L. Qualitative approaches to investigating self-regulated learning: contributions and challenges. Educational Psychologist 2002, 37:59-63.
4. Chan C.K. Co-regulation of learning in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a discussion. Metacognition and Learning 2012, 7:63-73.
5. Chin C., Brown D. Learning in science: a comparison of deep and surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2000, 37:109-138.
6. Chi M., Siler S., Jeong H., Yamauchi T., Hausmann R. Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science 2001, 25:471-533.
7. De Backer L., Van Keer H., Valcke M. Exploring the potential impact of reciprocal peer tutoring on higher education students' metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive regulation. Instructional Science 2012, 40:559-588.
8. De Backer L., Van Keer H., Valcke M. Learning to regulate from peers? An analysis on peer tutoring groups' metacognitive regulation. Paper presented at the 15th Biennial conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Munich, Germany, August 27-31, 2013 2013.
9. De Backer L., Van Keer H., Valcke M. Socially shared metacognitive regulation during reciprocal peer tutoring: identifying its relationship with students' content processing and transactive discussions. Instructional Science 2015, 43:323-344.
10. De Backer, L., Van Keer, H., & Valcke, M. Promoting university students' metacognitive regulation through peer learning: the potential of reciprocal peer tutoring. Higher Education. (in press). DOI: 10.1007/s10734-014-9849-3.
11. De Smet M., Van Keer H., Valcke M. Cross-age peer tutors in asynchronous discussion groups: a study of the evolution in tutor support. Instructional Science 2009, 37:87-105.
12. DiDonato N.C. Effective self- and co-regulation in collaborative learning groups: an analysis of how students regulate problem solving of authentic interdisciplinary tasks. Instructional Science 2013, 41:25-47.
13. Dillenbourg P. What do you mean by 'collaborative learning'?. Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches 1999, 1-15. Pergamon, Amsterdam. P. Dillenbourg (Ed.).
14. Duran D., Monereo C. Styles and sequences of collaborative learning in fixed and reciprocal peer tutoring. Learning and Instruction 2005, 15:179-199.
15. Falchikov N. Learning together. Peer tutoring in higher education 2001, Routledge Falmer, London.
16. Grau V., Whitebread D. Self and social regulation of learning during collaborative activities in the classroom: the interplay of individual and group cognition. Learning and Instruction 2012, 22:401-412.
17. Hadwin A.F., Järvelä S., Miller M. Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance 2011, 65-84. Routledge, New York. B.J. Zimmerman, D.H. Schunk (Eds.).
18. Hadwin A.F., Wozney L., Pontin O. Scaffolding the appropriation of self-regulatory activity: a socio-cultural analysis of changes in teacher-student discourse about a graduate research portfolio. Instructional Science 2005, 33:413-450.
19. Hurme T.L., Palonen T., Järvelä S. Metacognition in joint discussions: an analysis of the patterns of interaction and the metacognitive content of the networked discussions in mathematics. Metacognition and Learning 2006, 1:181-200.
20. Iiskala T., Vauras M., Lehtinen E., Salonen P.K. Socially shared metacognition in dyads of pupils in collaborative mathematical problem-solving processes. Learning and Instruction 2011, 21:379-393.
21. Järvelä S., Järvenojä H., Malmberg J., Hadwin A. Exploring socially shared regulation in the context of collaboration. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology 2013, 12:267-286.
22. Järvenojä H., Volet S., Järvalä S. Regulation of emotions in socially challenging learning situations: an instrument to measure the adaptive and social nature of the regulation process. Educational Psychology 2013, 33:31-58.
23. Johnson D., Johnson R. Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning 1999, Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
24. Khosa D.K., Volet S.E. Productive group engagement in cognitive activity and metacognitive regulation during collaborative learning: can it explain differences in students' conceptual understanding?. Metacognition and Learning 2014, 9:287-307.
25. King A. Transactive peer tutoring: distributing cognition and metacognition. Educational Psychology Review 1998, 10:57-74.
26. Kirschner F., Paas F., Kirschner P.A. Acognitive load approach to collaborative learning: united brains for complex tasks. Educational Psychology Review 2009, 21:31-42.
27. Kline R.B. Beyond significance testing: Reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research 2004, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
28. Lajoie S.P., Lu J. Supporting collaboration with technology: does shared cognition lead to co-regulation in medicine?. Metacognition and Learning 2012, 7:45-62.
29. McLuckie J., Topping K.J. Transferable skills for online peer learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 2004, 29:563-584.
30. Meijer J., Veenman M.V.J., van Hout-Wolters B.H.A.M. Metacognitive activities in text-studying and problem-solving: development of a taxonomy. Educational Research and Evaluation 2006, 12:209-237.
31. Michinov N., Michinov E. Investigating the relationship between transactive memory and performance in collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction 2009, 19:43-54.
32. Molenaar I., Järvelä S. Sequential and temporal characteristics of self and socially regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning 2014, 9:75-85.
33. Molenaar I., Sleegers P., van Boxtel C. Metacognitive scaffolding during collaborative learning: a promising combination. Metacognition and Learning 2014, 9:309-332.
34. Pastor R., Guallar E. Use of two-segmented logistic regression to estimate change-points in epidemiologic studies. American Journal of Psychology 1998, 148:631-642.
35. Pata K., Sarapuu T., Lehtinen E. Tutor scaffolding styles of dilemma solving in network-based role-play. Learning and Instruction 2005, 15:571-587.
36. Perry N.E., Winne P.H. Tracing students' regulation of learning in complex collaborative tasks. Interpersonal regulation of learning and motivation: Methodological advances 2013, 45-66. Routledge, London. S. Volet, M. Vauras (Eds.).
37. Pifarré M., Cobos R. Promoting metacognitive skills through peer scaffolding in a CSCL environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2010, 5:237-253.
38. Rasku-Puttonen H., Eteläpelto A., Arvaja M., Häkkinen P. Is successful scaffolding an illusion? Shifting patterns of responsibility and control in teacher-student interaction in a long-term learning project. Instructional Science 2003, 31:377-393.
39. Robinson D., Schofield J., Steers-Wentzell K. Peer and cross-age tutoring in math: outcomes and their design implications. Educational Psychology Review 2005, 17:327-362.
40. Rogat T.K., Adams-Wiggins K.R. Other-regulation in collaborative groups: Implications for regulation quality. Instructional Science 2014, 42:879-904.
41. Rogat T.K., Linnenbrink-Garcia L. Socially shared regulation in collaborative groups: an analysis of the interplay between quality of socialregulation and group processes. Cognition and Instruction 2011, 29:375-415.
42. Roscoe R.D. Self-monitoring and knowledge building in learning by teaching. Instructional Science 2014, 42:327-351.
43. Roscoe R.D., Chi M. Tutor learning: the role of explaining and responding to questions. Instructional Science 2008, 36:321-350.
44. Saab N., van Joolingen W., van Hout-Wolters B.A.M. Support of the collaborative inquiry process: Influence of support on task and team regulation. Metacognition and Learning 2012, 7:7-23.
45. Schraw G., Crippen K.J., Hartley K. Promoting self-regulation in science education: metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education 2006, 36:111-139.
46. Schunk D.H., Zimmerman B.J. Influencing children's self-efficacy and self-regulation of reading and writing through modeling. Reading and Writing Quarterly 2007, 23:7-25.
47. Topping K.J. Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology 2005, 25:631-645.
48. Vauras M., Volet S. The study of interpersonal regulation in learning and its challenge to the research methodology. Interpersonal regulation of learning and motivation: Methodological advances 2013, 1-13. Routledge, London. S. Volet, M. Vauras (Eds.).
49. Veenman M.V.J., Elshout J.J., Meijer J. The generality vs. domain-specificity of metacognitive skills in novice learning across domains. Learning and Instruction 1997, 7:187-209.
50. Volet S., Summers M., Thurman J. High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: how does it emerge and how is it sustained?. Learning and Instruction 2009, 19:128-143.
51. Volet S., Vauras M., Khosa D., Iiskala T. Metacognitive regulation in collaborative learning: conceptual developments and methodological contextualizations. Interpersonal regulation of learning and motivation: Methodological advances 2013, 67-101. Routledge, London. S. Volet, M. Vauras (Eds.).
52. Volet S., Vauras M., Salonen P. Self- and social regulation in learning contexts: an integrative perspective. Educational Psychologist 2009, 44:215-226.
53. Webb N.M. The teacher's role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. British Journal of Educational Psychology 2009, 79:1-28.
54. Webb N.M., Ing M., Kersting N., Nemer K.M. Help seeking in cooperative learning groups. Help seeking in academic settings. Goals, groups, and context 2006, 45-88. Laurence Erlbaum Associates Inc, New Jersey. S.A. Karabenick, R.S. Newman (Eds.).
55. Weinberger A., Fischer F. Aframework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education 2006, 46:71-95.