Self-monitoring and knowledge-building in learning by teaching

Instructional Science

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 327-351

  Roscoe, Rod D ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Expertise; Explaining; Learning by teaching; Metacognition; Peer tutoring; Personal epistemology; Question answering

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897023022     PISSN: 00204277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11251-013-9283-4     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Alexander, P. (2003). The development of expertise: The journey from acclimation to proficiency. Educational Research, 32, 10-14.
2. Annis, L. (1983). The processes and effects of peer tutoring. Human Learning, 2, 39-47.
3. Atkinson, R., Renkl, A., & Merrill, M. (2003). Transitioning from studying examples to solving problems: Effects of self-explanation prompts and fading worked-out steps. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 774-783.
4. Buehl, M., & Alexander, P. (2006). Examining the dual nature of epistemological beliefs. International Journal of Educational Research, 45, 28-42.
5. Chi, M. (2000). Self-explaining expository texts: The dual processes of generating inferences and repairing mental models. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology: Educational design and cognitive science (Vol. 5, pp. 161-238). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Chi, M. (2006). Two approaches to the study of experts' characteristics. In K. Ericsson, N. Charness, R. Hoffman, & P. Feltovich (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 21-30). New York: Cambridge.
7. Chi, M. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 73-105.
8. Chi, M., & Roscoe, R. (2002). The processes and challenges of conceptual change. In M. Limon & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change (pp. 3-27). London: Kluwer.
9. Chi, M., Feltovich, P., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
10. Chi, M., deLeeuw, N., Chiu, M., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
11. Cohen, J. (1986). Theoretical considerations of peer tutoring. Psychology in the Schools, 23, 175-186.
12. Cohen, P., Kulik, J., & Kulik, C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 237-248.
13. Coleman, E., Brown, A., & Rivkin, I. (1997). The effect of instructional explanations on formal learning from scientific texts. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 347-365.
14. De Backer, L., van Keer, H., & Valcke, M. (2012). Exploring the potential impact of reciprocal peer tutoring on higher education students' metacognitive knowledge and regulation. Instructional Science, 40, 559-588.
15. Dufrene, B., Noell, G., Gilbertson, D., & Duhan, G. (2005). Monitoring implementation of reciprocal peer tutoring: Identifying and intervening with students who do not maintain accurate implementation. School Psychology Review, 34, 74-86.
16. Duit, R., Roth, W., Komorek, M., & Wilbers, J. (2001). Fostering conceptual change by analogies-between Scylla and Charybdis. Learning and Instruction, 11, 283-303.
17. Ericsson, K. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In K. Ericsson, N. Charness, R. Hoffman, & P. Feltovich (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 39-68). New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Ericsson, K., Krampe, R., & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363-406.
19. Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.
20. Foot, H., Shute, R., Morgan, M., & Barron, A. (1990). Theoretical issues in peer tutoring. In H. Foot, M. Morgan, & R. Shute (Eds.), Children helping children (pp. 65-92). New York: Wiley.
21. Fox, S. (1996). Human physiology (5th ed.). Chicago: WCB Publishers.
22. Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C., Phillips, N., Karns, K., & Dutka, S. (1997). Enhancing students' helping behavior during peer-mediated instruction with conceptual mathematical explanations. The Elementary School Journal, 97, 223-249.
23. Glenburg, A., Wilkinson, A., & Epstein, W. (1982). The illusion of knowing: Failure in the self-assessment of comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 10, 597-602.
24. Goldstein, E. B. (1999). Sensation and perception. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
25. Graesser, A., & Person, N. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 104-137.
26. Graesser, A., McNamara, D., Louwerse, M., & Cai, Z. (2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 193-202.
27. Greene, J., & Azevedo, R. (2007). A theoretical review of Winne and Hadwin's model of self-regulated learning: New perspectives and directions. Review of Educational Research, 77, 334-372.
28. Hacker, D. (1998). Self-regulated comprehension during normal reading. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 165-191). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Hill, H., Ball, D., & Schilling, S. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers' topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 372-400.
30. Hofer, B., & Pintrich, P. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88-140.
31. Ismail, H., & Alexander, J. (2005). Learning within scripted and non-scripted peer-tutoring session: The Malaysian context. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 67-77.
32. King, A. (1992). Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, and notetaking-review as strategies for learning from lectures. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 303-323.
33. King, A. (1997). ASK to THINK-TEL WHY: a model of transactive peer tutoring for scaffolding higher level complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 32, 221-235.
34. King, A. (1998). Transactive peer tutoring: Distributing cognition and metacognition. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 57-74.
35. King, A., Staffieri, A., & Adelgais, A. (1998). Mutual peer tutoring: Effects of structuring tutorial interaction to scaffold peer learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 134-152.
36. Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121-1134.
37. Leinhardt, G. (2001). Instructional explanations: A commonplace for teaching and location for contrast. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 333-357). Washington, DC: AERA.
38. Lepper, M., Drake, M., & Donnell-Johnson, O. (1997). Scaffolding techniques of expert human tutors. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley (Eds.), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues (pp. 108-144). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
39. Maki, R., Shields, M., Wheeler, A., & Zacchilli, T. (2005). Individual differences in absolute and relative metacomprehension accuracy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 723-731.
40. McDaniel, M., Roediger, H., & McDermott, K. (2007). Generalizing test-enhanced learning from the laboratory to the classroom. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 200-206.
41. McDaniel, M., Howard, D., & Einstein, G. (2009). The Read-Recite-Review study strategy: Effective and portable. Psychological Science, 20, 516-522.
42. McMaster, K., Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. (2006). Research on peer-assisted learning strategies: The promise and limitation of peer-mediated instruction. Reading and Research Quarterly, 22, 5-25.
43. Pressley, M., Ghatala, E. S., Woloshyn, V., & Pirie, J. (1990). Sometimes adults miss the main ideas and do not realize it: Confidence in responses to short-answer and multiple-choice comprehension questions. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 232-249.
44. Rekrut, M. (1994). Peer and cross-age tutoring: The lessons of research. Journal of Reading, 37, 356-362.
45. Robinson, D., Schofield, J., & Steers-Wentzell, K. (2005). Peer and cross-age tutoring in math: Outcomes and their design implications. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 327-362.
46. Roediger, H., & Karpicke, J. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249-255.
47. Rohrbeck, C., Ginsburg-Block, M., Fantuzzo, J., & Miller, T. (2003). Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 240-257.
48. Roscoe, R., & Chi, M. (2007). Understanding tutor learning: Knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors' explanations and questions. Review of Educational Research, 77, 534-574.
49. Roscoe, R., & Chi, M. (2008). Tutor learning: The role of instructional explaining and responding to questions. Instructional Science, 36, 321-350.
50. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1987). Knowledge telling and knowledge transforming in written composition. Advances in Applied Psycholinguistics, 2, 142-175.
51. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 265-283.
52. Schommer-Aikins, M., & Easter, M. (2006). Ways of knowing and epistemological beliefs: Combined effect on academic performance. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 26, 411-423.
53. Schraw, G., Crippen, K., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111-139.
54. Schunn, C., & Anderson, J. (1999). The generality/specificity of expertise in scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 23, 337-370.
55. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.
56. Topping, K., & Ehly, S. (2001). Peer assisted learning: A framework for consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12, 113-132.
57. VanLehn, K., Graesser, A., Jackson, G. T., Jordan, P., Olney, A., & Rosé, C. (2007). When are tutorial dialogues more effective than reading? Cognitive Science, 31, 3-62.
58. VanLehn, K., Siler, S., Murray, C., Yamauchi, T., & Baggett, W. (2003). Why do only some events cause learning during human tutoring? Cognition and Instruction, 21, 209-249.
59. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60. Webb, N. (2009). The teacher's role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 1-28.
61. Webb, N., Nemer, K., & Ing, M. (2006). Small-group reflections: Parallels between teacher discourse and student behavior in peer-directed groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 63-119.