Is early ability grouping good for high-achieving students' psychosocial development? Effects of the transition into academically selective schools

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 106, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 555-568

  Becker, Michael ^a,b   Neumann, Marko ^a,b   Tetzner, Julia ^a,b   Böse, Susanne ^a,b   Knoppick, Henrike ^a,b   Maaz, Kai ^a,b   Baumert, Jürgen ^c   Lehmann, Rainer ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^b GERMAN INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH   (Germany)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (Germany)

^d HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ability grouping; Longitudinal design; Propensity score matching; Psychosocial development; Transition

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925685997     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: 19392176     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0035425     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Adams-Byers, J., Whitsell, S. S., & Moon, S. M. (2004). Gifted students' perceptions of the academic and social/emotional effects of homogeneous and heterogeneous grouping. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 7-20. doi:10.1177/001698620404800102
2. Adelson, J. L., & Carpenter, B. D. (2011). Grouping for achievement gains: For whom does achievement grouping increase kindergarten reading growth? Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 265-278. doi:10.1177/0016986211417306
3. Aust, K., Watermann, R., & Grube, D. (2009). Konsequenzen von Leistungsgruppierungen für die Entwicklungsverläufe des allgemeinen und fachspezifischen Fähigkeitsselbstkonzepts nach dem Übergang in die Sekundarstufe [Consequences of ability grouping for the development of general and domain-specific self-concept after the transition into secondary schools]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 12, 328-351. doi:10.1007/978-3-531-92216-4_14
4. Austin, P. C., Grootendorst, P., & Anderson, G. M. (2007). A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: A Monte Carlo study. Statistics in Medicine, 26, 734-753. doi:10.1002/sim.2580
5. Ball, J., Lohaus, A., & Miebach, C. (2006). Psychological adjustment and school achievement during transition from elementary to secondary school. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 38, 101-109. doi:10.1026/0049-8637.38.3.101
6. Baumert, J., Becker, M., Neumann, M., & Nikolova, R. (2009). Frühübergang in ein grundständiges Gymnasium: Übergang in ein privilegiertes Entwicklungsmilieu? Ein Vergleich von Regressionsanalyse und Propensity Score Matching [Early transition to the academic track of secondary schooling: Transition in a privileged developmental milieu? A comparison of regression analysis and propensity score matching]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 12, 189 -215. doi:10.1007/s11618-009-0072-4
7. Baumert, J., Becker, M., Neumann, M., & Nikolova, R. (2010). Besondere Förderung von Kernkompetenzen an Spezialgymnasien? Der Frühübergang in grundständige Gymnasien in Berlin [Accelerated development of key competencies in Gymnasia with special profiles? The early transition into the academic track of secondary schooling in Berlin]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie/German Journal of Educational Psychology, 24, 5-22. doi:10.1024/1010-0652.a000001
8. Baumert, J., Gruehn, S., Heyn, S., Köller, O., & Schnabel, K.-U. (1997). Bildungsverläufe und psychosoziale Entwicklung im Jugendalter (BIJU): Dokumentation Band 1. Skalen Längsschnitt I, Wellen 1-4 [Educational careers and psychosocial development during adolescence (BIJU): Documentation Vol. 1. Longitudinal scales, Waves 1-4]. Berlin, Germany: Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung.
9. Becker, M. (2009). Kognitive Leistungsentwicklung in differenziellen Lernumwelten: Effekte des gegliederten Sekundarschulsystems in Deutschland [Cognitive performance development in differential learning environments: Effects of school tracks in the secondary school system in Germany]. Berlin, Germany: Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung.
10. Borland, J. H., Horton, D., Subotnik, R. F., Shiang-Jiun, C., Miran, C., Freeman, C., & Yu, J. (2002). Ability grouping and acceleration of gifted students: Articles from the Roeper Review. Roeper Review, 24, 100-102. doi:10.1080/02783190209554138
11. Bos, W., Bonsen, M., Gröhlich, C., Guill, K., & Scharenberg, K. (2009). KESS 7: Skalenhandbuch zur Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente [KESS 7: Scales manual for the documentation of instruments]. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
12. Bos, W., & Pietsch, M. (Eds.). (2006). KESS 4-Kompetenzen und Einstellungen von Schülerinnen und Schülern am Ende der Jahrgangsstufe 4 in Hamburger Grundschulen [KESS 4: Students' competencies and attitudes at the end of fourth grade in elementary schools in Hamburg]. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
13. Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22, 31-72. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x.
14. Campbell, D. T., & Kenny, D. A. (1999). A primer on regression artifacts. New York, NY: Guilford Press
15. Cantin, S., & Boivin, M. (2004). Change and stability in children's social network and self-perceptions during transition from elementary to junior high school. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 561-570. doi:10.1080/01650250444000289
16. Chmielewsky, A. K., Dumont, H., & Trautwein, U. (2013). Tracking effects depend on tracking type: An international comparison of students' mathematics self-concept. American Educational Research Journal. Advance online publication. doi:10.3102/0002831213489843
17. Chorzempa, B. F., & Graham, S. (2006). Primary-grade teachers' use of within-class ability grouping in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 529-541. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.529
18. Cialdini, R. B., Borden, R. J., Thorne, A., Walker, M. R., Freeman, S., & Sloan, L. R. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 366-375. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.34.3.366
19. Condron, D. J. (2008). An early start: Skill grouping and unequal reading gains in the elementary years. Sociological Quarterly, 49, 363-394. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2008.00119.x
20. Cook, T. D., Steiner, P. M., & Pohl, S. (2009). Assessing how bias reduction is influenced by covariate choice, unreliability, and data analytic mode: An analysis of different kinds of within-study comparisons in different substantive domains. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44, 828-847. doi:10.1080/00273170903333673
21. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1984). Being adolescent. New York, NY: Basic Books.
22. Dai, Y. D., & Rinn, A. N. (2008). The big-fish-little-pond effect: What do we know and where do we go from here? Educational Psychology Review, 20, 283-317. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9071-x
23. Fend, H. (1998). Eltern und Freunde: Soziale Entwicklung im Jugendalter [Parents and friends: Social development in adolescence]. Bern, Switzerland: Hans Huber.
24. Fenzel, M., & Blyth, D. A. (1986). Individual adjustment to school transitions: An exploration of the role of supportive peer relations. Journal of Early Adolescence, 6, 315-329. doi:10.1177/0272431686064003
25. Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2007). Perceived learning environment and students' emotional experiences: A multilevel analysis of mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 17, 478-493. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.001
26. Ganzeboom, H. B. G., & Treiman, D. J. (2003). Three internationally standardized measures for comparative research on occupational status. In J. H. P. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik & C. Wolf (Eds.), Advances in crossnational comparison: A European working book for demographic and socio-economic variables (pp. 159-193). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9186-7_9
27. Glass, G. V. (2002). Grouping students for instruction. In A. Molnar (Ed.), School reform proposals: The research evidence (pp. 95-112). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
28. Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., Zirngibl, A., Jullien, S., Kleine, M., Vom Hofe, R., & Blum, W. (2004). Leistung und emotionales Erleben im Fach Mathematik: Längsschnittliche Mehrebenenanalysen [Achievement and emotional experience of mathematics: Longitudinal multilevel models]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie/German Journal of Educational Psychology, 18, 201-212. doi:10.1024/1010-0652.18.34.201
29. Goldring, E. B. (1990). Assessing the status of information on classroom organizational frameworks for gifted students. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 313-326.
30. Goldsmith, P. R. (2011). Coleman revisited: School segregation, peers, and frog ponds. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 508-535. doi:10.3102/0002831210392019
31. Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549-576. doi:10.1146/annurev .psych.58.110405.085530
32. Graham, J. W., Cumsille, P. E., & Elek-Fisk, E. (2003). Methods for handling missing data. In J. A. Schinka & W. F. Velicer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 2. Research methods in psychology (pp. 87-114). New York, NY: Wiley. doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei0204
33. Gross, M. U. M. (2003). Exceptionally gifted children (2nd ed.). London, England: Routledge.
34. Gross, M. U. M., & van Vliet, H. E. (2005). Radical acceleration and early entrance to college: A review of the research. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 154-171. doi:10.1177/001698620504900205
35. Guo, S., & Fraser, M. W. (2010). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Hallam, S., Ireson, J., Lister, V., Chaudhury, I. A., & Davies, J. (2003). Ability grouping practices in the primary school: A survey. Educational Studies, 29, 69-83. doi:10.1080/03055690303268
37. Hattie, J. C. (2002). Classroom composition and peer effects. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 449-481. doi:10.1016/S0883- 0355(03)00015-6
38. Heller, K. A., & Perleth, C. (2000). Kognitiver Fähigkeitstest für 4.-12. Klassen, Revision (KFT 4 12+R) [Cognitive abilities test for fourth to 12th grade, revision (KFT 4-12+R)]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
39. Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E. A. (2007). Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis, 15, 199-236. doi:10.1093/pan/mpl013
40. Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E. A. (2011). MatchIt: Nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. Journal of Statistical Software, 42, 1-28.
41. Ireson, J., & Hallam, S. (2001). Ability grouping in education. London, England: Sage.
42. Isaacs, M. L., & Duffus, L. R. (1995). Scholars' club: A culture of achievement among minority students. School Counselor, 42, 204-210.
43. Kelly, D. L. (2003). Developing the PIRLS background questionnaires. In M. O. Martin, I. V. S. Mullis, & A. M. Kennedy (Eds.), PIRLS 2001 technical report (pp. 29-40). Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
44. Köller, O. (2004). Konsequenzen von Leistungsgruppierungen [Consequences of ability grouping]. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
45. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. C. (1984). Effects of accelerated instruction on students. Review of Educational Research, 54, 409-425. doi:10.3102/00346543054003409
46. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. (1997). Ability grouping. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 230-242). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
47. Lehmann, R., & Lenkeit, J. (2008). ELEMENT. Erhebung zum Lese-und Mathematikverständnis. Entwicklung in den Jahrgangsstufen 4 bis 6 in Berlin: Abschlussbericht über die Untersuchungen 2003, 2004 und 2005 an Berliner Grundschulen und grundständigen Gymnasien [ELEMENT: Assessment of reading and mathematics achievement-Development from fourth to sixth grade in Berlin: Final report about data waves in 2003, 2004, and 2005 in Berlin elementary schools and academic track schools]. Berlin, Germany: Humboldt Universität zu Berlin.
48. LeTendre, G., Hofer, B., & Shimizu, H. (2003). What is tracking? Cultural expectations in the United States, Germany, and Japan. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 43- 89. doi:10.3102/00028312040001043
49. Lucas, S. R. (1999). Tracking inequality: Stratification and mobility in American high schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
50. Maaz, K., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., & Baumert, J. (2008). Educational transitions and differential learning environments: How explicit between-school tracking contributes to social inequality in educational outcomes. Child Development Perspectives, 2, 99-106. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00048.x
51. Marsh, H. W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic selfconcept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 280-295. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.79.3.280
52. Marsh, H. W. (1990). A multidimensional hierarchical self-concept: Theoretical and empirical justification. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 77-172. doi:10.1007/BF01322177
53. Marsh, H. W. (1991). The failure of high-ability high schools to deliver academic benefits: The importance of academic self-concept and educational aspirations. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 445-480. doi:10.3102/00028312028002445
54. Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. T. (2003). Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: A cross-cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58, 364-376. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.5.364
55. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Craven, R. (2004). The big-fish-little-pond effect stands up to scrutiny. American Psychologist, 59, 269-271. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.4.269
56. Marsh, H. W., Kong, C. K., & Hau, K. T. (2000). Longitudinal multilevel models of the big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: Counterbalancing contrast and reflected-glory effects in Hong Kong schools. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 337-349. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.337
57. Marsh, H. W., Seaton, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Hau, K. T., O'Mara, A. J., & Craven, R. G. (2008). The big-fish-little-pond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 319-350. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9075-6
58. McCoach, D. B., O'Connell, A. A., & Levitt, H. (2006). Ability grouping across kindergarten using an early childhood longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 339-346. doi:10.3200/JOER.99.6.339-346
59. Morgan, S. L., & Winship, C. (2007). Counterfactuals and causal inference: Methods and principles in social research. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511804564 Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (1998 -2011). Mplus (Version 6.11) [Computer software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
60. Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (1998 -2011). Mplus (Version 6.11) [Computer software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
61. Neihart, M. (2007). The socioaffective impact of acceleration and ability grouping: Recommendations for best practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 330-341. doi:10.1177/0016986207306319
62. Nicholls, J. G., Cobb, P., Yackel, E., Wood, T., & Wheatly, G. (1990). Students' theories about mathematics and their mathematical knowledge: Multiple dimensions of assessment. In G. Kulm (Ed.), Assessing higher order thinking in mathematics (pp. 137-154). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
63. Plucker, J. A., Robinson, N. M., Greenspon, T. S., Feldhusen, J. F., McCoach, D. B., & Subotnik, R. F. (2004). It's not how the pond makes you feel, but rather how high you can jump. American Psychologist, 59, 268-269. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.4.268
64. Preckel, F., & Brüll, M. (2008). Grouping the gifted and talented: Are gifted girls most likely to suffer the consequences? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32, 54-85.
65. Preckel, F., & Brüll, M. (2010). The benefit of being a big fish in a big pond: Contrast and assimilation effects on academic self-concept. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 522-531. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.12.007
66. Preckel, F. Goetz, T., & Frenzel, A. (2010). Ability grouping of gifted students: Effects on academic self-concept and boredom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 451- 472. doi:10.1348/000709909X480716
67. Rindermann, H., & Heller, K. A. (2005). The benefit of gifted classes and talent schools for developing students' competences and enhancing academic self-concept. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie/ German Journal of Educational Psychology, 19, 133-136. doi:10.1024/1010-0652.19.3.133
68. Rogers, K. (1993). Grouping the gifted and talented: Questions and answers. Roeper Review, 16, 8-12. doi:10.1080/02783199309553526
69. Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational studies. New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3692-2
70. Rosenbaum, P. R. (2010). Design of observational studies. New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1213-8
71. Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. American Statistician, 39, 33-38. doi:10.1080/00031305.1985.10479383
72. Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, NY: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9780470316696
73. Rubin, D. B. (2001). Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: Application to the tobacco litigation. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2, 169-188. doi:10.1023/A:1020363010465
74. Sayler, M. F., & Brookshire, W. K. (1993). Social, emotional, and behavioral adjustment of accelerated students, students in gifted classes, and regular students in eighth grade. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 150-154. doi:10.1177/001698629303700403
75. Schnabel, K. U. (1998). Prüfungsangst und Lernen: Empirische Analysen zum Einfluβ fachspezifischer Leistungsängstlichkeit auf schulischen Lernfortschritt [Test anxiety and learning: Empirical analyses on the impact of domain-specific test anxiety on educational learning development]. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
76. Schofield, J. W. (2010). International evidence on ability grouping with curriculum differentiation and the achievement gap in secondary schools. Teachers College Record, 112, 1492-1528.
77. Schwarzer, R., Lange, B., & Jerusalem, M. (1982). Selbstkonzeptentwicklung nach einem Bezugsgruppenwechsel [Self-concept development after a change of reference group]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 14, 125-140.
78. Seaton, M., Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2009). Earning its place as a pan-human theory: Universality of the big-fish-little-pond effect across 41 culturally and economically diverse countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 403-419. doi:10.1037/a0013838
79. Shields, C. M. (1995). A comparison study of student attitudes and perceptions in homogeneous and heterogeneous classrooms. Roeper Review, 17, 234-238. doi:10.1080/02783199509553670
80. Steiner, P. M., Cook, T. D., Shadish, W. R., & Clark, M. H. (2010). The importance of covariate selection in controlling for selection bias in observational studies. Psychological Methods, 15, 250 -267. doi: 10.1037/a0018719
81. Sternberg, R. (1999). The theory of successful intelligence. Review of General Psychology, 3, 292-316. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.3.4.292
82. Steyer, R., Partchev, I., & Shanahan, M. J. (2000). Modeling true intraindividual change in structural equation models: The case of poverty and children's psychosocial adjustment. In T. D. Little, J. Baumert, & K. U. Schnabel (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data (pp. 109-126). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00676.x
83. Stuart, E. A. (2010). Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statistical Science, 25, 1-21. doi:10.1214/09-STS313
84. Tach, L. M., & Farkas, G. (2006). Learning-related behaviors, cognitive skills, and ability grouping when schooling begins. Social Science Research, 35, 1048-1079. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.08.001
85. Thijs, J., Verkuyten, M., & Helmond, P. (2010). A further examination of the big-fish-little-pond effect. Sociology of Education, 83, 333-345. doi:10.1177/0038040710383521
86. Thoemmes, F., & Kim, E. S. (2011). A systematic review of propensity score methods in the social sciences. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 90-118. doi:10.1080/00273171.2011.540475
87. Trautwein, U., Köller, O., & Kämmerer, E. (2002). Effekte innerer und äuβerer Leistungsdifferenzierung auf selbstbezogene Fähigkeitskognitionen, die wahrgenommene Unterrichtspartizipation und die wahrgenommene soziale Akzeptanz [Effects of within- and between-group ability grouping on academic self-concept, perceived class participation, and social acceptance]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 49, 273-286.
88. Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H. W., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2006). Tracking, grading, and student motivation: Using group composition and status to predict self-concept and interest in ninth-grade mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 788-806. doi:10.1037/0022- 0663.98.4.788
89. Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H. W., & Nagy, G. (2009). Withinschool social comparison: How students perceive the standing of their class predicts academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 853-866. doi:10.1037/a0016306
90. Valtin, R., & Wagner, C. (2004). Der Übergang in die Sekundarstufe I: Psychische Kosten der externen Leistungsdifferenzierung [The transition into lower secondary schools: Psychological costs of explicit tracking]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 51, 52-68.
91. Van Ophuysen, S. (2008). Zur Veränderung der Schulfreude von Klasse 4 bis 7: Eine Längsschnittanalyse schulformspezifischer Effekte von Ferien und Grundschulübergang [On the change of school satisfaction from Grade 4 to 7: A longitudinal analysis about school track-specific effects of school vacations and the transition from primary schools into secondary schools]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie/German Journal of Educational Psychology, 22, 293-306. doi:10.1024/1010-0652.22.34.293
92. Watermann, R., Klingebiel, F., & Kurz, T. (2010). Die motivationale Bewältigung des Grundschulübergangs aus Schüler-und Elternsicht [The motivational processing of the transition from primary to secondary school from students' and parents' perspective]. In K. Maaz, J. Baumert, C. Gresch, & N. McElvany (Eds.), Der Übergang von der Grundschule in die weiterführende Schule: Leistungsgerechtigkeit und regionale, soziale und ethnisch-kulturelle Disparitäten (pp. 355-383). Bonn, Germany: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Referat Bildungsforschung.
93. Zeidner, M., & Schleyer, E. J. (1999). The big-fish-little-pond effect for academic self-concept, test anxiety, and school grades in gifted children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 305-329. doi:10.1006/ceps.1998.0985