Educational transitions and differential learning environments: How explicit between-school tracking contributes to social inequality in educational outcomes

Child Development Perspectives

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 99-106

  Maaz, Kai ^a   Trautwein, Ulrich ^a   Lüdtke, Oliver ^a   Baumert, Jürgen ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (Germany)

Author keywords

Educational outcomes; Educational transitions; German school system; School achievement; School tracking; Social inequality

Indexed keywords

EID: 64549132563     PISSN: 17508592     EISSN: 17508606     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00048.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
2. Baumert, J., & Schümer, G. (2001). Familiäre Lebensverhältnisse. Bildungsbeteiligung und Kompetenzerwerb [Family background. Educational participation and the acquisition of competencies]. In J. Baumert, E. Klieme, M. Neubrand, M. Prenzel, U. Schiefele, W. Schneider, et al. (Eds.), PISA 2000. Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich (pp. 323-407). Opladen, Germany: Leske + Budrich.
3. Baumert, J., Stanat, P., & Watermann, R. (2006). Schulstruktur und die Entstehung differenzieller Lern- und Entwicklungsmilieus [School structure and the development of differential environments for learning and development]. In J. Baumert, P. Stanat, & R. Watermann (Eds.), Herkunftsbedingte Disparitäten im Bildungswesen: Differenzielle Bildungsprozesse und Probleme der Verteilungsgerechtigkeit (pp. 95-188). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS für Sozialwissenschaften.
4. Baumert, J., Trautwein, U., & Artelt, C. (2003). Schulumwelten - institutionelle Bedingungen des Lehrens und Lernens [School environments - Institutional conditions of learning and instruction]. In J. Baumert, C. Artelt, E. Klieme, M. Neubrand, M. Prenzel, U. Schiefele, et al. (Eds.), PISA 2000. Ein differenzierter Blick auf die Länder der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (pp. 261-331). Opladen, Germany: Leske + Budrich.
5. Becker, M., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Baumert, J. (2006). Leistungszuwachs in Mathematik: Evidenz für einen Schereneffekt im mehrgliedrigen Schulsystem? [Achievement gains in mathematics: Evidence for differential achievement trajectories in a tracked school system?]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 20, 233-242.
6. Becker, R. (2003). Educational expansion and persistent inequalities of education. Utilizing subjective expected utility theory to explain increasing participation rates in upper secondary school in the Federal Republic of Germany. European Sociological Review, 19, 1-24.
7. Becker, R. (2004). Soziale Ungleichheit von Bildungschancen und Chancengleichheit [Social inequality of education and equal opportunity]. In R. Becker & W. Lauterbach (Eds.), Bildung als Privileg? Erklärungen und Befunde zu den Ursachen der Bildungsungleichheit (pp. 161-193). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
8. Bos, W., Voss, A., Lankes, E.-M., Schwippert, K., Thiel, O., & Valtin, R. (2004). Schullaufbahnempfehlungen von Lehrkräften für Kinder am Ende der vierten Jahrgangsstufe [Teachers' recommendations for student tracking at the end of fourth grade]. In W. Bos, E.-M. Lankes, M. Prenzel, K. Schwippert, R. Valtin, & G. Walther (Eds.), IGLU. Einige Länder der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im nationalen und internationalen Vergleich (pp. 191-220). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
9. Boudon, R. (1974). Education, opportunity, and social inequality: Changing prospects in Western society. New York: Wiley.
10. Breen, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (1997). Explaining educational differentials: Towards a formal rational action theory. Rationality and Society, 9, 275-305.
11. Bryk, A. S., Lee, V. E., & Holland, P. B. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Ditton, H. (2005). Der Beitrag von Familie und Schule zur Reproduktion von Bildungsungleichheit [The contribution of family and school to the reproduction of educational inequality]. In H. G. Holtappels & K. Höhmann (Eds.), Schulentwicklung und Schulwirksamkeit. Systemsteuerung, Bildungschancen und Entwicklung der Schule. 30 Jahre Institut für Schulentwicklungsforschung (pp. 121-130). Weinheim, Germany: Juventa.
13. Ditton, H., Krüsken, J., & Schauenberg, M. (2005). Bildungsungleichheit - der Beitrag von Familie und Schule [Educational equality - The contribution of family and school]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 8, 285-303.
14. Duru-Bellat, M., & Mingat, A. (1998). Importance of ability grouping in French "Collèges" and its impact upon pupils' academic achievement. Educational Research and Evaluation, 4, 348-368.
15. Eccles (Parsons), J., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., et al. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviours. In J. T. Spence (Eds.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75-146). San Francisco: Freeman.
16. Erikson, R., & Jonsson, J. O. (1996). Explaining class inequality in education: The Swedish test case. In R. Erikson & J. O. Jonsson (Eds.), Can education be equalized? The Swedish case in comparative perspective (pp. 1-63). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
17. Gambetta, D. (1987). Were they pushed or did they jump? Individual decision mechanisms in education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Gamoran, A., Nystrand, M., Berends, M., & LePore, L. (1995). An organizational analysis of the effects of ability grouping. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 687-715.
19. Hahn, H. J. (1998). Education and society in Germany. Oxford, UK: Berg.
20. Hanushek, E. A., & Wößmann, L. (2006). Does educational tracking affect performance and inequality? Differences-in-differences evidence across countries. Economic Journal, 116, C63-C76.
21. Hattie, J. A. C. (2002). Classroom composition and peer effects. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 449-481.
22. Hoffer, T. B. (1992). Middle school ability grouping and student achievement in science and mathematics. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14, 205-227.
23. Köller, O. (in press). Gesamtschule [Comprehensive school]. In K. S. Cortina, J. Baumert, A. Leschinsky, K. U. Mayer, & L. Trommer (Eds.), Das Bildungswesen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Strukturen und Entwicklungen im Überblick. Reinbek bei Hamburg, Germany: Rowohlt.
24. Lehmann, R. H., Peek, R., & Gänsfuß, R. (1997). Aspekte der Lernausgangslage von Schülerinnen und Schülern der fünften Klassen an Hamburger Schulen [Initial achievement and learning development - Grade 5 students in Hamburg schools]. Hamburg, Germany: Behörde für Schule, Jugend und Berufsbildung, Amt für Schule.
25. LeTendre, G. (1996). Constructed aspirations: Decision-making processes in Japanese Educational Selection. Sociology of Education, 69, 193-216.
26. LeTendre, G., Hofer, B., & Shimizu, H. (2003). What is tracking? Cultural expectations in the U.S., Germany, and Japan. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 43-89.
27. Lucas, S. R. (1999). Tracking inequality. Stratification and mobility in American high schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
28. Maaz, K., Hausen, C., McElvany, N., & Baumert, J. (2006). Stichwort: Übergänge im Bildungssystem. Theoretische Konzepte und ihre Anwendung in der empirischen Forschung beim Übergang in die Sekundarstufe [Keyword: Transitions in the educational system. Theoretical concepts and their application to research at the transition to secondary level]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 9, 299-327.
29. Mare, R. D. (1981). Change and stability in educational stratification. American Sociological Review, 46, 72-87.
30. Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. (2002). The pivotal role of frames of reference in academic self-concept formation: The big-fish-littlepond effect. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Adolescence and education (Vol. II, pp. 83-123). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
31. Mintrop, H. (1997). Retracking on a grand scale: Policy and pedagogy in the reform of eastern German secondary schools after the fall of socialism. Journal of Education Policy, 12, 333-354.
32. Müller, W., & Pollak, R. (2004). Weshalb gibt es so wenige Arbeiterkinder in Deutschlands Universitäten? [Why are there so few children from working-class backgrounds in German universities?] In R. Becker & W. Lauterbach (Eds.), Bildung als Privileg? Erklärungen und Befunde zu den Ursachen der Bildungsungleichheit (pp. 311-325). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
33. Neumann, M., Schnyder, I., Trautwein, U., Niggli, A., Lüdtke, O., & Cathomas, R. (2007). Schulformen als differenzielle Lernmilieus: Institutionelle und kompositionelle Effekte auf die Leistungsentwicklung im Fach Französisch [School types as differential learning environments: Institutional and compositional effects on learning gains in French]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 10, 399-420.
34. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
35. Oakes, J., Gamoran, A., & Page, R. (1992). Curriculum differentiation: Opportunities, outcomes, and meanings. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 570-608). New York: Macmillan.
36. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2001). Knowledge and skills for life: First results from PISA 2000. Paris: Author.
37. Okano, K. (1995). Rational decision making and school-based job referrals for high school students in Japan. Sociology of Education, 68, 31-47.
38. Opdenakker, M.-C., & Van Damme, J. (2000). Effects of schools, teaching staff and classes on achievement and well-being in secondary education: Similarities and differences between school outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, 165-196.
39. Opdenakker, M.-C., & Van Damme, J. (2001). Relationship between school composition and characteristics of school process and their effect on mathematics achievement. British Educational Research Journal, 27, 407-432.
40. Opdenakker, M.-C., & Van Damme, J. (2006). Differences between secondary schools: A study about school context, group composition, school practice, and school effects with special attention to public and Catholic schools and types of schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17, 87-117.
41. Robertson, D., & Symons, J. (1996). Do peer groups matter? Peer group versus schooling effects on academic attainment. London: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science.
42. Schnabel, K. U., Alfeld, C., Eccles, J. S., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2002). Parental influence on students' educational choices in the United States and Germany: Different ramifications - Same effect? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60, 178-198.
43. Shavit, Y., & Blossfeld, H.-P. (Eds.). (1993). Persistent inequality. Changing educational attainment in thirteen countries. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
44. Thrupp, M. (1999). Schools making a difference: Let's be realistic! School mix, school effectiveness and the social limits of reform. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
45. Thrupp, M., Lauder, H., & Robinson, T. (2002). School composition and peer effects. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 483-504.
46. Trautwein, U., & Baeriswyl, F. (2007). Wenn leistungsstarke Klassenkameraden ein Nachteil sind: Referenzgruppeneffekte bei Übergangsentscheidungen [When high-achieving classmates put students at a disadvantage: Reference group effects at the transition to secondary schooling]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 21, 119-133.
47. Trautwein, U., Köller, O., Lehmann, R., & Lüdtke, O. (Eds.). (2007). Schulleistungen von Abiturienten: Regionale, schulformbezogene und soziale Disparitäten [School achievement in Gymnasium schools: Regional, school-based and social disparities]. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
48. Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H. W., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2006). Tracking, grading, and student motivation: Using group composition and status to predict self-concept and interest in ninth grade mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 788-806.
49. Van Houtte, M. (2004). Tracking effects on school achievement: A quantitative explanation in terms of the academic culture of school staff. American Journal of Education, 110, 354-388.