The benefit of being a big fish in a big pond: Contrast and assimilation effects on academic self-concept

Learning and Individual Differences

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 522-531

  Preckel, Franzis ^a   Brüll, Matthias ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIER   (Germany)

^b GERMAN YOUTH INSTITUTE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Academic self concept; Assimilation effect; Big fish little pond effect; Contrast effect; Gifted education

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956263973     PISSN: 10416080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.12.007     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Aiken L.S., West S.G. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions 1991, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
2. Baron R.M., Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 51:1173-1182.
3. Bong M. Between- and within-domain relations of academic motivation among middle and high school students: Self-efficacy, task-value, and achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology 2001, 93:23-34.
4. Byrne B.M. Academic self-concept: Its structure, measurement, and relation to academic achievement. Handbook of self-concept 1996, 1-37. Wiley, New York. B.A. Bracken (Ed.).
5. Byrne B.M. Validating the measurement and structure of self-concept: Snapshots of past, present, and future research. American Psychologist 2002, 57:896-909.
6. Catsambis S., Mulkey L.M., Crain R.L. To track or not to track? The social effects of gender and middle school tracking. Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization 1999, 12:135-163.
7. Catsambis S., Mulkey L.M., Crain R.L. For better or for worse? A nationwide study of the social psychological effects of gender and ability grouping in mathematics. Social Psychology of Education 2001, 5:83-115.
8. Cialdini R.B., Borden R.J., Thorne A., Walker M.R., Freeman S., Sloan L.R. Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1976, 34:366-375.
9. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. 2nd ed.
10. Craven R.G., Marsh H.W., Print M. Gifted, streamed, and mixed-ability programs for gifted students: Impact on self-concept, motivation, and achievement. Australian Journal of Education 2000, 44:51-75.
11. Dai Y.D., Rinn A.N. The big-fish-little-pond effect: What do we know and where do we go from here?. Educational Psychology Review 2008, 20:283-317.
12. Deary I.J., Strand S., Smith P., Fernandes C. Intelligence and educational achievement. Intelligence 2007, 35:13-21.
13. Dickhäuser O., Plenter I. "Letztes Halbjahr stand ich zwei". Zur Akkuratheit selbst berichteter Noten ["Last term I had a B". On the accuracy of self-reported school grades]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie 2005, 19:219-224.
14. Gerlach E., Trautwein U., Lüdtke O. Referenzgruppeneffekte im Sportunterricht: Kurz- und langfristig negative Effekte sportlicher Klassenkameraden auf das sportbezogene Selbstkonzept [Reference group effects in sport class: Short- and long-term effects of athletic classmates on physical self-concept]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 2007, 38:73-83.
15. Goetz T., Frenzel C.A., Hall N.C., Pekrun R. Antecedents of academic emotions: Testing the internal/external frame of reference model for academic enjoyment. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2008, 33:9-33.
16. Goetz T., Preckel F., Zeidner M., Schleyer E.J. Anxiety of big fish swimming in big ponds: A multilevel analysis of test anxiety and achievement in special gifted classes. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping 2008, 21:185-198.
17. Goldring E.B. Assessing the status of information on classroom organisational frameworks for gifted students. Journal of Educational Research 1990, 83:313-326.
18. Graham J.W., Cumsille P.E., Elek-Fisk E. Methods for handling missing data. Handbook of Psychology: Research methods in psychology 2003, Vol. 2:87-114. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
19. Guay F., Marsh H.W., Boivin M. Academic self-concept and academic achievement: A developmental perspective on their causal ordering. Journal of Educational Psychology 2003, 95:124-136.
20. Hattie J.C. Classroom composition and peer effects. International Journal of Educational Research 2002, 37:449-481.
21. Heller K.A., Perleth C. Kognitiver Fähigkeitstest für 4. bis 12. Klassen, Revision [Cognitive ability test for class level 4 to 12, revised version] 2000, Hogrefe, Goettingen; Germany.
22. Hox J.J. Applied multilevel analysis 1995, TT-Publikaties, Amsterdam.
23. Huguet P., Dumas F., Marsh H.W., Regner I., Wheeler L., Suls J., et al. Clarifying the role of social comparison in the big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE): An integrative study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009, 97:156-170.
24. Ingenkamp K., Lissmann U. Lehrbuch der Pädagogischen Diagnostik (5., völlig überarbeite Auflage) [Psychological and educational assessment. Textbook] 2005, Beltz, Weinheim.
25. Ireson J., Hallam S. Academic self-concepts in adolescence: Relations with achievement and ability grouping in schools. Learning and Instruction 2009, 19:201-213.
26. Jensen A.R. The g factor: The science of mental ability 1998, Praeger Publishers, Westport.
27. Kammermeyer G., Martschinke S. Schulleistung und Fähigkeitsselbstbild im Anfangsunterricht: Ergebnisse aus dem KILIA-Projekt [School achievement and self-concept of ability in elementary school: Results from project KILIA]. Empirische Pädagogik 2003, 17:486-503.
28. Kelly K.R., Jordan L.K. Effects of academic achievement and gender on academic and social self-concept: A replication study. Journal of Counseling and Development 1990, 69:173-177.
29. Köller O. Konsequenzen von Leistungsgruppierungen [Effects of ability grouping] 2004, Waxmann, Münster, Germany.
30. Köller O., Schnabel K., Baumert J. Der Einfluß der Leistungsstärke von Schulen auf das fachspezifische Selbstkonzept der Begabung und das Interesse [The impact of the school's average performance on students' domain-specific self-concept and interest]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie 2000, 32:70-80.
31. Köller O., Trautwein U., Lüdtke O., Baumert J. Zum Zusammenspiel von schulischer Leistung, Selbstkonzept und Interesse in der gymnasialen Oberstufe [On the interplay of academic achievement, self-concept, and interest in upper secondary schools]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie 2006, 20:27-39.
32. Krull J.L., MacKinnon D.P. Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research 2001, 36:249-277.
33. Kulik J.A., Kulik C.-L. Ability grouping. Handbook of gifted education 1997, 230-242. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA. N. Colangelo, G.A. Davis (Eds.).
34. Kunter M., Schümer G., Artelt C., Baumert J., Klieme E., Neubrand M., et al. PISA 2000: Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente. Materialien aus der Bildungsforschung (Band 72) [PISA 2000: Documentation of assessment tools. Instruments from educational research (Vol. 72)] 2002, Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung, Berlin.
35. Little R.J.A., Rubin D.B. Statistical analysis with missing data 1987, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
36. Lohman D.F. The role of non-verbal ability tests in identifying academically gifted children: An aptitude perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly 2005, 49:111-138.
37. Lohman D.F., Korb K. Gifted today but not tomorrow? Longitudinal changes in ITBS and CogAT scores during elementary school. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 2006, 29:451-484.
38. Lüdtke O., Köller O., Artelt C., Stanat P., Baumert J. Eine Überprüfung von Modellen zur Genese akademischer Selbstkonzepte: Ergebnisse aus der PISA-Studie [Testing models on the development of academic self-concept: Results from the PISA-study]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie 2002, 16:151-164.
39. MacKinnon D.P. Introduction to statistical mediation analysis 2008, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York.
40. Marsh H.W. The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology 1987, 79:280-295.
41. Marsh H.W. Self-Description Questionnaire-II 1990, Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX.
42. Marsh H.W. The failure of high ability high schools to deliver academic benefits: The importance of academic self-concept and educational aspirations. American Educational Research Journal 1991, 28:445-480.
43. Marsh H.W. Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. German Journal of Educational Psychology 2005, 19:119-127.
44. Marsh H.W. Self-concept theory, measurement and research into practice. The role of self-concept in educational psychology 2007, British Psychological Society, Leicester, UK.
45. Marsh H.W., Chessor D., Craven R., Roche L. The effect of gifted and talented programs on academic self-concept: The big fish strikes again. American Educational Research Journal 1995, 32:285-319.
46. Marsh H.W., Craven R. The pivotal role of frames of reference in academic self-concept formation: The big-fish-little-pond effect. Adolescence and education 2002, Vol. 2:83-123. Information Age, Greenwich, CT.
47. Marsh H.W., Hau K.T. Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: A Cross-cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist 2003, 58:364-376.
48. Marsh H.W., Kong C.K., Hau K.T. Longitudinal multilevel models of the big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: Counterbalancing contrast and reflected-glory effects in Hong Kong. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2000, 78:337-349.
49. Marsh H.W., Parker J.W. Determinants of self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don't learn to swim as well. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1984, 47:213-231.
50. Marsh H.W., Seaton M., Trautwein U., Lüdtke O., Hau K.T., O'Mara A.J., et al. The Big-Fish-Little-Pond-Effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review 2008, 20:319-350.
51. Marsh H.W., Trautwein U., Lüdtke O., Baumert J., Köller O. The big fish little pond effect: Persistent negative effects of selective high schools on self-concept after graduation. American Educational Research Journal 2007, 44:631-669.
52. Marsh H.W., Trautwein U., Lüdtke O., Köller O., Baumert J. Academic self-concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: Reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. Child Development 2005, 76:397-416.
53. Marsh H.W., Trautwein U., Lüdtke O., Köller O., Baumert J. Integration of multidimensional self-concept and core personality constructs: Construct validation and relations to well-being and achievement. Journal of Personality 2006, 74:403-456.
54. Matthews D., Kitchen J. School-within-a-school gifted programs: Perceptions of students and teachers in public secondary schools. Gifted Child Quarterly 2007, 51:256-271.
55. McCoach D.B., Siegle D. The structure and function of academic self-concept in gifted and general education students. Roeper Review 2003, 25:61-65.
56. McFarland C., Buehler R. Collective self-esteem as a moderator of the frog-pond effect in reactions to performance feedback. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1995, 68:1055-1070.
57. Neihart M. The socioaffective impact of acceleration and ability grouping: Recommendations for best practice. Gifted Child Quarterly 2007, 51:330-341.
58. Oakes J. Keeping track: How schools structure inequality 1985, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
59. Preckel F., Brüll M. Grouping the gifted and talented: Are gifted girls most likely to suffer the consequences?. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 2008, 32:54-85.
60. Preckel F., Zeidner M., Goetz T., Schleyer E. Female 'big fish' swimming against the tide: The 'big-fish-little-pond effect' and gender-ratio in special gifted classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2008, 33:78-96.
61. Raudenbush S.W., Bryk A.S. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods 2002, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
62. Raudenbush S.W., Bryk A.S., Cheong Y.F., Congdon R., du Toit M. HLM 6: Linear and Nonlinear Modeling 2004, Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood, IL.
63. Rogers K.B. Grouping the gifted and talented: Questions and answers. Roeper Review 1993, 16:8-12.
64. Rogers K.B. Lessons learned about educating the gifted and talented: A synthesis of the research on educational practice. Gifted Child Quarterly 2007, 51:382-396.
65. Schafer J.L. Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. Monographs on statistics and applied probability 1997, Vol. 72. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton.
66. Schafer, J. L. (1999). NORM: Multiple imputation of incomplete multivariate data under a normal model, version 2. Software for Windows 95/98/NT. Retrieved January 11, 2009, from http://www.stat.psu.edu/~jls/misoftwa.html.
67. Schafer J.L., Graham J.W. Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods 2002, 7:147-177.
68. Schafer J.L., Olsen M.K. Multiple imputation for multivariate missing-data problems: A data analyst's perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1998, 33:545-572.
69. Seaton, M. (2007). The big-fish-little-pond effect under the grill: Tests of its universality, a search for moderators, and the role of social comparison. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Western Sydney, Australia.
70. Seaton M., Marsh H.W., Craven R.G. Earning its place as a pan-human theory: Universality of the big-fish-little-pond effect across 41 culturally and economically diverse countrier. Journal of Educational Psychology 2009, 101:404-419.
71. Shavelson R.J., Hubner J.J., Stanton G.C. Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research 1976, 46:407-441.
72. Shields C.M. A comparison study of student attitudes and perceptions in homogeneous and heterogeneous classrooms. Roeper Review 2002, 24:115-119.
73. Skaalvik E.M., Skaalvik S. Internal and external frames of reference for academic self-concept. Educational Psychologist 2002, 37:233-244.
74. Slavin R.E. Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best-evidence synthesis (Rep. 1) 1986, Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research on Elementary and Middle Schools, Baltimore.
75. Snijders T., Bosker R. Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modelling 1999, Sage Publications, Thousand Oakes, CA.
76. Sobel M.E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological methodology 1982 1982, 290-312. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. S. Leinhardt (Ed.).
77. Spinath B., Spinath F.M. Development of self-perceived ability in elementary school: The role of parents' perceptions, teacher evaluations, and intelligence. Cognitive Development 2005, 20:190-204.
78. Thorndike R.L., Hagen E. Cognitive abilities test 1971, Houghton-Mifflin, Boston.
79. Trautwein U., Baeriswyl F. Wenn leistungsstarke Klassenkameraden ein Nachteil sind: Referenzgruppeneffekte bei Übertrittsentscheidungen [When high-achieving classmates put students at a disadvantage: Reference group effects at the transition to secondary schooling]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie 2007, 21:119-133.
80. Trautwein U., Lüdtke O., Köller O., Baumert J. Self-esteem, academic self-concept, and achievement: How the learning environment moderates the dynamics of self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006, 90:334-349.
81. Trautwein U., Lüdtke O., Marsh H.W., Köller O., Baumert J. Tracking, grading, and student motivation: Using group composition and status to predict self-concept and interest in ninth-grade Mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology 2006, 98:788-806.
82. Trautwein U., Köller O., Lüdtke O., Baumert J. Student tracking and the powerful effects of opt-in courses on self-concept. Reflected-glory effects do exist after all. New frontiers for self research 2005, 307-327. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, Connecticut. H.W. Marsh, R.G. Craven, D.M. McInerny (Eds.).
83. Tymms P. Effect sizes in multilevel models. But what does it mean? The use of effect sizes in educational research 2004, 55-66. National Foundation for Educational Research, London. I. Schagen, K. Elliot (Eds.).
84. Valentine J.C., DuBois D.L., Cooper H. The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A systematic review. Educational Psychologist 2004, 39:111-133.
85. Van Boxtel H.W., Mönks F.J. General, social, and academic self-concepts of gifted adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 1992, 21:169-186.
86. Vock M., Preckel F., Holling H. Förderung Hochbegabter in der Schule: Evaluationsbefunde und Wirksamkeit von Maßnahmen [Fostering the gifted in school: Results of evaluations studies and effectiveness of fostering options] 2007, Hogrefe, Göttingen.
87. Weinert F.E., Schneider W. Individual development from 3 to 12. Findings from the Munich Longitudinal Study 1999, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
88. Wheeler L., Suls J. Social comparison and self-evaluations of competence. Handbook of competence and motivation 2005, 566-578. Guilford Press, New York. A.J. Elliot, C.S. Dweck (Eds.).
89. Zeidner M., Schleyer E.J. The big-fish-little-pond effect for academic self concept, test anxiety, and school grades in gifted children. Contemporary Educational Psychology 1998, 24:305-329.