Gifted students' perceptions of the academic and social/emotional effects of homogeneous and heterogeneous grouping

Gifted Child Quarterly

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 7-20

  Adams Byers, Jan ^a   Whitsell, Sara Squiller ^a   Moon, Sidney M ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27144503388     PISSN: 00169862     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/001698620404800102     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
2. Baker, J. A., Bridger, R., & Evans, K. (1998). Models of underachievement among gifted preadolescents: The role of personal, family, and school factors. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 5-15.
3. Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1996). Inequity in equity: How "equity" can lead to inequity for high-potential students. Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law, 2, 249-292.
4. Bland, L. C., Sowa, C. J., & Callahan, C. M. (1994). An overview of resilience in gifted children. Roeper Review, 17, 77-80.
5. Clasen, D. R., & Clasen, R. E., (1995). Underachievement of highly able students and the peer society. Gifted and Talented International, 10, 67-76.
6. Clinkenbeard, P. R. (1991). Unfair expectations: A pilot study of middle school students' comparisons of gifted and regular classes. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15, 56-63.
7. Cross, T. L., Coleman, L. J., & Terhaar-Yonkers, M. (1991). The social cognition of gifted adolescents in schools: Managing the stigma of giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15, 44-55.
8. Delcourt, M. A. B., & Evans, K. (1994, November). Qualitative extension of the learning outcomes study. Charlottesville: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Virginia.
9. Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
10. Feldhusen, J. F. (1989). Synthesis of research on gifted youth. Educational Leadership, 46, 6-11.
11. Feldhusen, J. F., & Moon, S. M. (1992). Grouping gifted students: Issues and concerns. Gifted Child Quarterly, 65, 63-67.
12. Gross, M. U. M. (1989). The pursuit of excellence or the search for intimacy? The forced-choice dilemma of gifted youth. Roeper Review, 11, 189-194.
13. Gross, M. U. M. (1993). Exceptionally gifted children. London: Routledge.
14. Kerr, B. A. (1985). Smart girls, gifted women. Columbus: Ohio Psychology Press.
15. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1987). Effects of ability grouping on student achievement. Equity & Excellence, 23, 22-30.
16. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1997). Ability grouping. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 230-242). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
17. Lawton, M. (1992, February 5). Gifted elementary students languishing in regular classrooms, studies suggest. Education Week, 11(20), 4.
18. Moon, S. M., Kelly, K. R., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1997). Specialized counseling services for gifted youth and their families: A needs assessment. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41, 16-25.
19. Moon, S. M., Nelson, T. S., & Piercy, F. P. (1993). Family therapy with a highly gifted adolescent. Journal of Family Psychology, 4(3), 1-16.
20. Moon, S. M., & Rosselli, H. C. (2000). Developing gifted programs. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International Handbook Giftedness and Talent (2nd ed., pp. 499-521). New York: Pergamon Press.
21. Moon, S. M., Swift, M., & Shallenberger, A. (2002). Perceptions of a self-contained class of fourth- and fifth-grade students with high to extreme levels of intellectual giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 64-79.
22. Neihart, M., Reis, S. M., Robinson, N. M., & Moon, S. M. (Eds.). (2002). The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
23. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track. New Haven: Yale University Press.
24. Oakes, J. (1992, May). Can tracking research inform practice? Technical, normative, and political considerations. Educational Researcher, 12-21.
25. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
27. Robinson, A. (1990). Cooperation or exploitation? The argument against cooperative learning for talented students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 9-27.
28. Robinson, N. M., & Noble, K. D. (1991). Social-emotional development and adjustment of gifted children. In M. C. Wang, M. C. Reynolds, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Handbook of special education: Research and practice. Vol. 4: Emerging programs (pp.57-76). New York: Pergamon Press.
29. Rogers, K. B. (1991). Relationship of grouping practices to the education of the gifted and talented learners. Storrs: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
30. Sayler, M. F., & Brookshire, W. K. (1993). Social, emotional, and behavioral adjustment of accelerated students, students in gifted classes, and regular students in eighth grade. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 150-154.
31. Schunk, D. H. (1987). Peer models and children's behavioral change. Review of Educational Research, 52, 149-174.
32. Silverman, L. K. (1993). Social development, leadership, and gender issues. In L. K. Silverman (Ed.), Counseling the gifted and talented (pp. 291-327). Denver: Love.
33. Slavin, R. E. (1987). Grouping for instruction: Equity and effectiveness. Equity & Excellence, 23, 31-36.
34. Slavin, R. E. (1990). Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 60, 471-499.
35. Steinberg, L. (1996). Beyond the classroom. New York: Simon & Schuster.
36. Tomlinson, C. (1995). How to differentiate instruction in mixed ability classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. [blank_line]