Sgs1 and Exo1 redundantly inhibit break-induced replication and de Novo telomere addition at broken chromosome ends

PLoS Genetics

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 25-

  Lydeard, John R ^a,b   Lipkin Moore, Zachary ^a   Jain, Suvi ^a   Eapen, Vinay V ^a   Haber, James E ^a  

^a BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUNGAL PROTEIN; PROTEIN EXO1; PROTEIN RAD1; PROTEIN SGS1; SINGLE STRANDED DNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; EXODEOXYRIBONUCLEASE; EXODEOXYRIBONUCLEASE I; PRIMER DNA; RECQ HELICASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; SGS1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE;

3' UNTRANSLATED REGION; 5' UNTRANSLATED REGION; ARTICLE; CELL SURVIVAL; CELL VIABILITY; CHROMOSOME TRANSLOCATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA REPAIR; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; DNA SYNTHESIS; DNA TEMPLATE; GENE CONVERSION; GENE INDUCTION; GENE OVEREXPRESSION; GENE REPLICATION; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; NONHUMAN; TELOMERE; CHROMOSOME; DNA REPLICATION; FUNGAL GENE; GENE TRANSLOCATION; GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYSIOLOGY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

SACCHAROMYCETALES;

BASE SEQUENCE; CHROMOSOMES, FUNGAL; DNA PRIMERS; DNA REPLICATION; EXODEOXYRIBONUCLEASES; GENE CONVERSION; GENES, FUNGAL; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RECQ HELICASES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TELOMERE; TRANSLOCATION, GENETIC;

EID: 77953219442     PISSN: 15537390     EISSN: 15537404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000973     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. San Filippo J, Sung P, Klein H (2008) Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination. Annu Rev Biochem 77: 229-257.
2. Agmon N, Pur S, Liefshitz B, Kupiec M (2009) Analysis of repair mechanism choice during homologous recombination. Nucleic Acids Res 37: 5081-5092.
3. Krogh BO, Symington LS (2004) Recombination proteins in yeast. Annu Rev Genet 38: 233-271.
4. Pâques F, Haber JE (1999) Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63: 349-404.
5. Llorente B, Smith CE, Symington LS (2008) Break-induced replication: what is it and what is it for? Cell Cycle 7: 859-864.
6. McEachern MJ, Haber JE (2006) Break-induced replication and recombinational telomere elongation in yeast. Annu Rev Biochem 75: 111-135.
7. Chen C, Kolodner RD (1999) Gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication and recombination defective mutants. Nat Genet 23: 81-85.
8. Lydeard JR, Jain S, Yamaguchi M, Haber JE (2007) Break-induced replication and telomerase-independent telomere maintenance require Pol32. Nature 448: 820-823.
9. Lydeard JR, Lipkin-Moore Z, Sheu YJ, Stillman B, Burgers PM, et al. (in press) Break-induced replication requires all essential DNA replication factors except those specific for Pre-RC assembly. Genes Dev.
10. Saleh-Gohari N, Bryant HE, Schultz N, Parker KM, Cassel TN, et al. (2005) Spontaneous homologous recombination is induced by collapsed replication forks that are caused by endogenous DNA single-strand breaks. Mol Cell Biol 25: 7158-7169.
11. Murray AW, Claus TE, Szostak JW (1988) Characterization of two telomeric DNA processing reactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 8: 4642-4650.
12. Kramer KM, Haber JE (1993) New telomeres in yeast are initiated with a highly selected subset of TG1-3 repeats. Genes Dev 7: 2345-2356.
13. Pennaneach V, Putnam CD, Kolodner RD (2006) Chromosome healing by de novo telomere addition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Microbiol 59: 1357-1368.
14. Schulz VP, Zakian VA (1994) The saccharomyces PIF1 DNA helicase inhibits telomere elongation and de novo telomere formation. Cell 76: 145-155.
15. Davis AP, Symington LS (2004) RAD51-dependent break-induced replication in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 24: 2344-2351.
16. Jain S, Sugawara N, Lydeard J, Vaze M, Tanguy Le Gac N, et al. (2009) A recombination execution checkpoint regulates the choice of homologous recombination pathway during DNA double-strand break repair. Genes Dev 23: 291-303.
17. Malkova A, Naylor ML, Yamaguchi M, Ira G, Haber JE (2005) RAD51-dependent break-induced replication differs in kinetics and checkpoint responses from RAD51-mediated gene conversion. Mol Cell Biol 25: 933-944.
18. Falck J, Coates J, Jackson SP (2005) Conserved modes of recruitment of ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs to sites of DNA damage. Nature 434: 605-611.
19. Nakada D, Matsumoto K, Sugimoto K (2003) ATM-related Tel1 associates with double-strand breaks through an Xrs2-dependent mechanism. Genes Dev 17: 1957-1962.
20. Usui T, Ogawa H, Petrini JH (2001) A DNA damage response pathway controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 complex. Mol Cell 7: 1255-1266.
21. D'Amours D, Jackson SP (2001) The yeast Xrs2 complex functions in S phase checkpoint regulation. Genes Dev 15: 2238-2249.
22. Zhu Z, Chung WH, Shim EY, Lee SE, Ira G (2008) Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell 134: 981-994.
23. Mimitou EP, Symington LS (2008) Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 455: 770-774.
24. Gravel S, Chapman JR, Magill C, Jackson SP (2008) DNA helicases Sgs1 and BLM promote DNA double-strand break resection. Genes Dev 22: 2767-2772.
25. Ira G, Pellicioli A, Balijja A, Wang X, Fiorani S, et al. (2004) DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 431: 1011-1017.
26. Cejka P, Kowalczykowski SC (2010) The full-length Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sgs1 protein is a vigorous DNA helicase that preferentially unwinds holliday junctions. J Biol Chem 285: 8290-8301.
27. Myung K, Datta A, Chen C, Kolodner RD (2001) SGS1, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologue of BLM and WRN, suppresses genome instability and homeologous recombination. Nat Genet 27: 113-116.
28. Spell RM, Jinks-Robertson S (2004) Examination of the roles of Sgs1 and Srs2 helicases in the enforcement of recombination fidelity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 168: 1855-1865.
29. Sugawara N, Goldfarb T, Studamire B, Alani E, Haber JE (2004) Heteroduplex rejection during single-strand annealing requires Sgs1 helicase and mismatch repair proteins Msh2 and Msh6 but not Pms1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 9315-9320.
30. Wu L, Hickson ID (2003) The Bloom's syndrome helicase suppresses crossing over during homologous recombination. Nature 426: 870-874.
31. Ira G, Malkova A, Liberi G, Foiani M, Haber JE (2003) Srs2 and Sgs1-Top3 suppress crossovers during double-strand break repair in yeast. Cell 115: 401-411.
32. Lo YC, Paffett KS, Amit O, Clikeman JA, Sterk R, et al. (2006) Sgs1 regulates gene conversion tract lengths and crossovers independently of its helicase activity. Mol Cell Biol 26: 4086-4094.
33. Malkova A, Ivanov EL, Haber JE (1996) Double-strand break repair in the absence of RAD51 in yeast: a possible role for break-induced replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93: 7131-7136.
34. Mullen JR, Kaliraman V, Brill SJ (2000) Bipartite structure of the SGS1 DNA helicase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 154: 1101-1114.
35. Ira G, Haber JE (2002) Characterization of RAD51-independent break-induced replication that acts preferentially with short homologous sequences. Mol Cell Biol 22: 6384-6392.
36. Stith CM, Sterling J, Resnick MA, Gordenin DA, Burgers PM (2008) Flexibility of eukaryotic Okazaki fragment maturation through regulated strand displacement synthesis. J Biol Chem 283: 34129-34140.
37. Mankouri HW, Ngo HP, Hickson ID (2009) Esc2 and Sgs1 Act in Functionally Distinct Branches of the Homologous Recombination Repair Pathway in S. cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell.
38. Ip SC, Rass U, Blanco MG, Flynn HR, Skehel JM, et al. (2008) Identification of Holliday junction resolvases from humans and yeast. Nature 456: 357-361.
39. Collins SR, Miller KM, Maas NL, Roguev A, Fillingham J, et al. (2007) Functional dissection of protein complexes involved in yeast chromosome biology using a genetic interaction map. Nature 446: 806-810.
40. Ii M, Brill SJ (2005) Roles of SGS1, MUS81, and RAD51 in the repair of lagging-strand replication defects in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 48: 213-225.
41. Tong AH, Evangelista M, Parsons AB, Xu H, Bader GD, et al. (2001) Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294: 2364-2368.
42. Signon L, Malkova A, Naylor ML, Klein H, Haber JE (2001) Genetic requirements for RAD51- and RAD54-independent break-induced replication repair of a chromosomal double-strand break. Mol Cell Biol 21: 2048-2056.
43. Lee K, Zhang Y, Lee SE (2008) Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATM orthologue suppresses break-induced chromosome translocations. Nature 454: 543-546.
44. Mankouri HW, Craig TJ, Morgan A (2002) SGS1 is a multicopy suppressor of srs2: functional overlap between DNA helicases. Nucleic Acids Res 30: 1103-1113.
45. Lee SE, Bressan DA, Petrini JH, Haber JE (2002) Complementation between Nterminal Saccharomyces cerevisiae mre11 alleles in DNA repair and telomere length maintenance. DNA Repair (Amst) 1: 27-40.
46. Fishman-Lobell J, Rudin N, Haber JE (1992) Two alternative pathways of double-strand break repair that are kinetically separable and independently modulated. Mol Cell Biol 12: 1292-1303.
47. Sugawara N, Wang X, Haber JE (2003) In vivo roles of Rad52, Rad54, and Rad55 proteins in Rad51-mediated recombination. Mol Cell 12: 209-219.
48. Johnson R, Borde V, Neale MJ, Bishop-Bailey A, North M, et al. (2007) Excess single-stranded DNA inhibits meiotic double-strand break repair. PLoS Genet 3: e223. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030223.
49. Milne GT, Ho T, Weaver DT (1995) Modulation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA double-strand break repair by SRS2 and RAD51. Genetics 139: 1189-1199.
50. Mantiero D, Clerici M, Lucchini G, Longhese MP (2007) Dual role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae Tel1 in the checkpoint response to double-strand breaks. EMBO Rep 8: 380-387.
51. Schmidt KH, Kolodner RD (2006) Suppression of spontaneous genome rearrangements in yeast DNA helicase mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 18196-18201.
52. Motegi A, Myung K (2007) Measuring the rate of gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A practical approach to study genomic rearrangements observed in cancer. Methods 41: 168-176.
53. Smith S, Hwang JY, Banerjee S, Majeed A, Gupta A, et al. (2004) Mutator genes for suppression of gross chromosomal rearrangements identified by a genomewide screening in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 9039-9044.
54. Bonetti D, Martina M, Clerici M, Lucchini G, Longhese MP (2009) Multiple pathways regulate 39 overhang generation at S. cerevisiae telomeres. Mol Cell 35: 70-81.
55. Dotiwala F, Haase J, Arbel-Eden A, Bloom K, Haber JE (2007) The yeast DNA damage checkpoint proteins control a cytoplasmic response to DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 11358-11363.
56. Bachrati CZ, Borts RH, Hickson ID (2006) Mobile D-loops are a preferred substrate for the Bloom's syndrome helicase. Nucleic Acids Res 34: 2269-2279.
57. Hu Y, Raynard S, Sehorn MG, Lu X, Bussen W, et al. (2007) RECQL5/Recql5 helicase regulates homologous recombination and suppresses tumor formation via disruption of Rad51 presynaptic filaments. Genes Dev 21: 3073-3084.
58. Jessop L, Lichten M (2008) Mus81/Mms4 endonuclease and Sgs1 helicase collaborate to ensure proper recombination intermediate metabolism during meiosis. Mol Cell 31: 313-323.
59. Oh SD, Lao JP, Hwang PY, Taylor AF, Smith GR, et al. (2007) BLM ortholog, Sgs1, prevents aberrant crossing-over by suppressing formation of multichromatid joint molecules. Cell 130: 259-272.
60. Chung WH, Zhu Z, Papusha A, Malkova A, Ira G (2010) Defective resection at DNA double-strand breaks leads to de novo telomere formation and enhances gene targeting. PLoS Genet 6: e948. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000948.
61. Malkova A, Signon L, Schaefer CB, Naylor ML, Theis JF, et al. (2001) RAD51-independent break-induced replication to repair a broken chromosome depends on a distant enhancer site. Genes Dev 15: 1055-1060.
62. Cotta-Ramusino C, Fachinetti D, Lucca C, Doksani Y, Lopes M, et al. (2005) Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells. Mol Cell 17: 153-159.
63. Segurado M, Diffley JF (2008) Separate roles for the DNA damage checkpoint protein kinases in stabilizing DNA replication forks. Genes Dev 22: 1816-1827.
64. Zierhut C, Diffley JF (2008) Break dosage, cell cycle stage and DNA replication influence DNA double strand break response. EMBO J.
65. Aylon Y, Liefshitz B, Kupiec M (2004) The CDK regulates repair of doublestrand breaks by homologous recombination during the cell cycle. EMBO J 23: 4868-4875.
66. Kaye JA, Melo JA, Cheung SK, Vaze MB, Haber JE, et al. (2004) DNA breaks promote genomic instability by impeding proper chromosome segregation. Curr Biol 14: 2096-2106.
67. Galgoczy DJ, Toczyski DP (2001) Checkpoint adaptation precedes spontaneous and damage-induced genomic instability in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 21: 1710-1718.
68. Makovets S, Blackburn EH (2009) DNA damage signalling prevents deleterious telomere addition at DNA breaks. Nat Cell Biol 11: 1383-1386.
69. Myung K, Chen C, Kolodner RD (2001) Multiple pathways cooperate in the suppression of genome instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 411: 1073-1076.
70. Alani E, Cao L, Kleckner N (1987) A method for gene disruption that allows repeated use of URA3 selection in the construction of multiply disrupted yeast strains. Genetics 116: 541-545.
71. Eissenberg JC, Ayyagari R, Gomes XV, Burgers PM (1997) Mutations in yeast proliferating cell nuclear antigen define distinct sites for interaction with DNA polymerase delta and DNA polymerase epsilon. Mol Cell Biol 17: 6367-6378.
72. Voth WP, Jiang YW, Stillman DJ (2003) New 'marker swap' plasmids for converting selectable markers on budding yeast gene disruptions and plasmids. Yeast 20: 985-993.
73. Sikorski RS, Hieter P (1989) A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122: 19-27.