Protein quality control and elimination of protein waste: The role of the ubiquitin-proteasome system

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Molecular Cell Research

Volumn 1843, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 182-196

  Amm, Ingo ^a   Sommer, Thomas ^b   Wolf, Dieter H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

^b MAX DELBRÜCK CENTER FOR MOLECULAR MEDICINE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Chaperones; Misfolded proteins; Protein degradation; Protein quality control; Ubiquitin proteasome system

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONE; CYSTEINE; CYTOPLASM PROTEIN; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 110; HYDROXYMETHYLGLUTARYL COENZYME A REDUCTASE; MESSENGER RNA; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; MITOCHONDRIAL PROTEIN; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; PARKIN; PHOSPHATIDYLETHANOLAMINE; PROTEASOME; PROTEIN KINASE PIM 1; SERINE; SIGNAL PEPTIDE; THREONINE; UBIQUITIN; UBIQUITIN CONJUGATING ENZYME; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE E3;

AUTOPHAGOSOME; AUTOPHAGY; CELL COMPARTMENTALIZATION; CONTROL SYSTEM; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM ASSOCIATED DEGRADATION; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; EUKARYOTIC CELL; GLYCOSYLATION; HYDROPHOBICITY; INTRACELLULAR SPACE; LYSOSOME; MITOCHONDRIAL DYNAMICS; MITOCHONDRIAL MEMBRANE; NONHUMAN; POLYADENYLATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN AGGREGATION; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN HOMEOSTASIS; PROTEIN QUALITY; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SECRETORY PATHWAY; UBIQUITIN PROTEASOME SYSTEM; UBIQUITINATION;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 84890204277     PISSN: 01674889     EISSN: 18792596     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.06.031     Document Type: Review

References (295)

1. Alberts B. Molecular biology of the cell 2008, Garland Science, New York. Fifth ed.
2. Bartlett A.I., Radford S.E. An expanding arsenal of experimental methods yields an explosion of insights into protein folding mechanisms. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16:582-588.
3. Dobson C.M., Sali A., Kaplus M. Protein folding: a perspective from theory and experiment. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1998, 37:868-893.
4. Berg J.M., Tymoczko J.L., Stryer L. Biochemistry 2012, Freeman, New York. seventh ed.
5. Hartl F.U. Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding. Nature 1996, 381:571-579.
6. Hartl F.U., Hayer-Hartl M. Converging concepts of protein folding in vitro and in vivo. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16:574-581.
7. Hartl F.U., Hayer-Hartl M. Molecular chaperones in the cytosol: from nascent chain to folded protein. Science 2002, 295:1852-1858.
8. Jahn T.R., Radford S.E. The Yin and Yang of protein folding. FEBS J. 2005, 272:5962-5970.
9. Tyedmers J., Mogk A., Bukau B. Cellular strategies for controlling protein aggregation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11:777-788.
10. Hartl F.U., Bracher A., Hayer-Hartl M. Molecular chaperones in protein folding and proteostasis. Nature 2011, 475:324-332.
11. Chiti F., Dobson C.M. Protein misfolding, functional amyloid, and human disease. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2006, 75:333-366.
12. Kayed R., Head E., Thompson J.L., McIntire T.M., Milton S.C., Cotman C.W., Glabe C.G. Common structure of soluble amyloid oligomers implies common mechanism of pathogenesis. Science 2003, 300:486-489.
13. Ben-Zvi A., Miller E.A., Morimoto R.I. Collapse of proteostasis represents an early molecular event in Caenorhabditis elegans aging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:14914-14919.
14. Ross C.A., Poirier M.A. Protein aggregation and neurodegenerative disease. Nat. Med. 2004, 10:S10-S17. (Suppl.).
15. Akerfelt M., Morimoto R.I., Sistonen L. Heat shock factors: integrators of cell stress, development and lifespan. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11:545-555.
16. Voisine C., Pedersen J.S., Morimoto R.I. Chaperone networks: tipping the balance in protein folding diseases. Neurobiol. Dis. 2010, 40:12-20.
17. Fredrickson E.K., Gardner R.G. Selective destruction of abnormal proteins by ubiquitin-mediated protein quality control degradation. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2012, 23:530-537.
18. He C., Klionsky D.J. Regulation mechanisms and signaling pathways of autophagy. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2009, 43:67-93.
19. Kirkin V., McEwan D.G., Novak I., Dikic I. A role for ubiquitin in selective autophagy. Mol. Cell. 2009, 34:259-269.
20. Nakatogawa H., Suzuki K., Kamada Y., Ohsumi Y. Dynamics and diversity in autophagy mechanisms: lessons from yeast. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10:458-467.
21. Stolz A., Wolf D.H. Endoplasmic reticulum associated protein degradation: a chaperone assisted journey to hell. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010, 1803:694-705.
22. Esser C., Alberti S., Hohfeld J. Cooperation of molecular chaperones with the ubiquitin/proteasome system. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2004, 1695:171-188.
23. Heinemeyer W., Kleinschmidt J.A., Saidowsky J., Escher C., Wolf D.H. Proteinase yscE, the yeast proteasome/multicatalytic-multifunctional proteinase: mutants unravel its function in stress induced proteolysis and uncover its necessity for cell survival. EMBO J. 1991, 10:555-562.
24. Wolf D.H., Hilt W. The proteasome: a proteolytic nanomachine of cell regulation and waste disposal. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2004, 1695:19-31.
25. Kravtsova-Ivantsiv Y., Sommer T., Ciechanover A. The lysine48-based polyubiquitin chain proteasomal signal: not a single child anymore. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2013, 52:192-198.
26. Dimitrova L.N., Kuroha K., Tatematsu T., Inada T. Nascent peptide-dependent translation arrest leads to Not4p-mediated protein degradation by the proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284:10343-10352.
27. Akimitsu N. Messenger RNA surveillance systems monitoring proper translation termination. J. Biochem. 2008, 143:1-8.
28. Ito-Harashima S., Kuroha K., Tatematsu T., Inada T. Translation of the poly(A) tail plays crucial roles in nonstop mRNA surveillance via translation repression and protein destabilization by proteasome in yeast. Genes Dev. 2007, 21:519-524.
29. Alamgir M., Erukova V., Jessulat M., Azizi A., Golshani A. Chemical-genetic profile analysis of five inhibitory compounds in yeast. BMC Chem. Biol. 2010, 10:6.
30. Brandman O., Stewart-Ornstein J., Wong D., Larson A., Williams C.C., Li G.W., Zhou S., King D., Shen P.S., Weibezahn J., Dunn J.G., Rouskin S., Inada T., Frost A., Weissman J.S. A ribosome-bound quality control complex triggers degradation of nascent peptides and signals translation stress. Cell 2012, 151:1042-1054.
31. Stolz A., Hilt W., Buchberger A., Wolf D.H. Cdc48: a power machine in protein degradation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2011, 36:515-523.
32. Bengtson M.H., Joazeiro C.A. Role of a ribosome-associated E3 ubiquitin ligase in protein quality control. Nature 2010, 467:470-473.
33. Braun M.A., Costa P.J., Crisucci E.M., Arndt K.M. Identification of Rkr1, a nuclear RING domain protein with functional connections to chromatin modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 27:2800-2811.
34. Lu J., Deutsch C. Electrostatics in the ribosomal tunnel modulate chain elongation rates. J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 384:73-86.
35. Duttler S., Pechmann S., Frydman J. Principles of cotranslational ubiquitination and quality control at the ribosome. Mol. Cell. 2013, 50:379-393.
36. Collart M.A., Panasenko O.O. The Ccr4-not complex. Gene 2012, 492:42-53.
37. Rospert S., Dubaquie Y., Gautschi M. Nascent-polypeptide-associated complex. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2002, 59:1632-1639.
38. Wiedmann B., Sakai H., Davis T.A., Wiedmann M. A protein complex required for signal-sequence-specific sorting and translocation. Nature 1994, 370:434-440.
39. Craig E.A., Eisenman H.C., Hundley H.A. Ribosome-tethered molecular chaperones: the first line of defense against protein misfolding?. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2003, 6:157-162.
40. Hundley H.A., Walter W., Bairstow S., Craig E.A. Human Mpp11 J protein: ribosome-tethered molecular chaperones are ubiquitous. Science 2005, 308:1032-1034.
41. Conz C., Otto H., Peisker K., Gautschi M., Wolfle T., Mayer M.P., Rospert S. Functional characterization of the atypical Hsp70 subunit of yeast ribosome-associated complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:33977-33984.
42. Huang P., Gautschi M., Walter W., Rospert S., Craig E.A. The Hsp70 Ssz1 modulates the function of the ribosome-associated J-protein Zuo1. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2005, 12:497-504.
43. Preissler S., Deuerling E. Ribosome-associated chaperones as key players in proteostasis. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2012, 37:274-283.
44. Olzscha H., Schermann S.M., Woerner A.C., Pinkert S., Hecht M.H., Tartaglia G.G., Vendruscolo M., Hayer-Hartl M., Hartl F.U., Vabulas R.M. Amyloid-like aggregates sequester numerous metastable proteins with essential cellular functions. Cell 2011, 144:67-78.
45. Mayer M.P. Gymnastics of molecular chaperones. Mol. Cell. 2010, 39:321-331.
46. Kampinga H.H., Craig E.A. The HSP70 chaperone machinery: J proteins as drivers of functional specificity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11:579-592.
47. McClellan A.J., Scott M.D., Frydman J. Folding and quality control of the VHL tumor suppressor proceed through distinct chaperone pathways. Cell 2005, 121:739-748.
48. Park S.H., Bolender N., Eisele F., Kostova Z., Takeuchi J., Coffino P., Wolf D.H. The cytoplasmic Hsp70 chaperone machinery subjects misfolded and endoplasmic reticulum import-incompetent proteins to degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Mol. Biol. Cell 2007, 18:153-165.
49. Becker J., Walter W., Yan W., Craig E.A. Functional interaction of cytosolic hsp70 and a DnaJ-related protein, Ydj1p, in protein translocation in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1996, 16:4378-4386.
50. Shiber A., Breuer W., Brandeis M., Ravid T. Ubiquitin conjugation triggers misfolded protein sequestration into quality-control foci when Hsp70 chaperone levels are limiting. Mol. Biol. Cell 2013, 24:2076-2087.
51. Parsell D.A., Kowal A.S., Singer M.A., Lindquist S. Protein disaggregation mediated by heat-shock protein Hsp104. Nature 1994, 372:475-478.
52. Glover J.R., Lindquist S. Hsp104, Hsp70, and Hsp40: a novel chaperone system that rescues previously aggregated proteins. Cell 1998, 94:73-82.
53. Goloubinoff P., Mogk A., Zvi A.P., Tomoyasu T., Bukau B. Sequential mechanism of solubilization and refolding of stable protein aggregates by a bichaperone network. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999, 96:13732-13737.
54. Winkler J., Tyedmers J., Bukau B., Mogk A. Hsp70 targets Hsp100 chaperones to substrates for protein disaggregation and prion fragmentation. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 198:387-404.
55. Lindquist S., Kim G. Heat-shock protein 104 expression is sufficient for thermotolerance in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1996, 93:5301-5306.
56. Diamant S., Ben-Zvi A.P., Bukau B., Goloubinoff P. Size-dependent disaggregation of stable protein aggregates by the DnaK chaperone machinery. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275:21107-21113.
57. Doyle S.M., Wickner S. Hsp104 and ClpB: protein disaggregating machines. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2009, 34:40-48.
58. Dragovic Z., Broadley S.A., Shomura Y., Bracher A., Hartl F.U. Molecular chaperones of the Hsp110 family act as nucleotide exchange factors of Hsp70s. EMBO J. 2006, 25:2519-2528.
59. Rampelt H., Kirstein-Miles J., Nillegoda N.B., Chi K., Scholz S.R., Morimoto R.I., Bukau B. Metazoan Hsp70 machines use Hsp110 to power protein disaggregation. EMBO J. 2012, 31:4221-4235.
60. Raviol H., Sadlish H., Rodriguez F., Mayer M.P., Bukau B. Chaperone network in the yeast cytosol: Hsp110 is revealed as an Hsp70 nucleotide exchange factor. EMBO J. 2006, 25:2510-2518.
61. Lai B.T., Chin N.W., Stanek A.E., Keh W., Lanks K.W. Quantitation and intracellular localization of the 85K heat shock protein by using monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1984, 4:2802-2810.
62. Wandinger S.K., Richter K., Buchner J. The Hsp90 chaperone machinery. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:18473-18477.
63. Li J., Soroka J., Buchner J. The Hsp90 chaperone machinery: conformational dynamics and regulation by co-chaperones. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1823:624-635.
64. Whitesell L., Lindquist S.L. HSP90 and the chaperoning of cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2005, 5:761-772.
65. Trepel J., Mollapour M., Giaccone G., Neckers L. Targeting the dynamic HSP90 complex in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2010, 10:537-549.
66. Taipale M., Jarosz D.F., Lindquist S. HSP90 at the hub of protein homeostasis: emerging mechanistic insights. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11:515-528.
67. Jakob U., Lilie H., Meyer I., Buchner J. Transient interaction of Hsp90 with early unfolding intermediates of citrate synthase. Implications for heat shock in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270:7288-7294.
68. Schumacher R.J., Hansen W.J., Freeman B.C., Alnemri E., Litwack G., Toft D.O. Cooperative action of Hsp70, Hsp90, and DnaJ proteins in protein renaturation. Biochemistry 1996, 35:14889-14898.
69. Freeman B.C., Morimoto R.I. The human cytosolic molecular chaperones hsp90, hsp70 (hsc70) and hdj-1 have distinct roles in recognition of a non-native protein and protein refolding. EMBO J. 1996, 15:2969-2979.
70. Haslbeck M., Braun N., Stromer T., Richter B., Model N., Weinkauf S., Buchner J. Hsp42 is the general small heat shock protein in the cytosol of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 2004, 23:638-649.
71. Specht S., Miller S.B., Mogk A., Bukau B. Hsp42 is required for sequestration of protein aggregates into deposition sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 2011, 195:617-629.
72. Haslbeck M., Miess A., Stromer T., Walter S., Buchner J. Disassembling protein aggregates in the yeast cytosol. The cooperation of Hsp26 with Ssa1 and Hsp104. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280:23861-23868.
73. Cashikar A.G., Duennwald M., Lindquist S.L. A chaperone pathway in protein disaggregation. Hsp26 alters the nature of protein aggregates to facilitate reactivation by Hsp104. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280:23869-23875.
74. Ballinger C.A., Connell P., Wu Y., Hu Z., Thompson L.J., Yin L.Y., Patterson C. Identification of CHIP, a novel tetratricopeptide repeat-containing protein that interacts with heat shock proteins and negatively regulates chaperone functions. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999, 19:4535-4545.
75. Jiang J., Ballinger C.A., Wu Y., Dai Q., Cyr D.M., Hohfeld J., Patterson C. CHIP is a U-box-dependent E3 ubiquitin ligase: identification of Hsc70 as a target for ubiquitylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276:42938-42944.
76. Rosser M.F., Washburn E., Muchowski P.J., Patterson C., Cyr D.M. Chaperone functions of the E3 ubiquitin ligase CHIP. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:22267-22277.
77. Luders J., Demand J., Hohfeld J. The ubiquitin-related BAG-1 provides a link between the molecular chaperones Hsc70/Hsp70 and the proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275:4613-4617.
78. Dai Q., Qian S.B., Li H.H., McDonough H., Borchers C., Huang D., Takayama S., Younger J.M., Ren H.Y., Cyr D.M., Patterson C. Regulation of the cytoplasmic quality control protein degradation pathway by BAG2. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280:38673-38681.
79. Kalia L.V., Kalia S.K., Chau H., Lozano A.M., Hyman B.T., McLean P.J. Ubiquitinylation of alpha-synuclein by carboxyl terminus Hsp70-interacting protein (CHIP) is regulated by Bcl-2-associated athanogene 5 (BAG5). PLoS One 2011, 6:e14695.
80. Gamerdinger M., Hajieva P., Kaya A.M., Wolfrum U., Hartl F.U., Behl C. Protein quality control during aging involves recruitment of the macroautophagy pathway by BAG3. EMBO J. 2009, 28:889-901.
81. Alberti S., Bohse K., Arndt V., Schmitz A., Hohfeld J. The cochaperone HspBP1 inhibits the CHIP ubiquitin ligase and stimulates the maturation of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator. Mol. Biol. Cell 2004, 15:4003-4010.
82. Eisele F., Wolf D.H. Degradation of misfolded protein in the cytoplasm is mediated by the ubiquitin ligase Ubr1. FEBS Lett. 2008, 582:4143-4146.
83. Nillegoda N.B., Theodoraki M.A., Mandal A.K., Mayo K.J., Ren H.Y., Sultana R., Wu K., Johnson J., Cyr D.M., Caplan A.J. Ubr1 and Ubr2 function in a quality control pathway for degradation of unfolded cytosolic proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 2010, 21:2102-2116.
84. Heck J.W., Cheung S.K., Hampton R.Y. Cytoplasmic protein quality control degradation mediated by parallel actions of the E3 ubiquitin ligases Ubr1 and San1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107:1106-1111.
85. Bartel B., Wunning I., Varshavsky A. The recognition component of the N-end rule pathway. EMBO J. 1990, 9:3179-3189.
86. Varshavsky A. The N-end rule pathway and regulation by proteolysis. Protein Sci. 2011, 20:1298-1345.
87. Summers D.W., Wolfe K.J., Ren H.Y., Cyr D.M. The Type II Hsp40 Sis1 cooperates with Hsp70 and the E3 ligase Ubr1 to promote degradation of terminally misfolded cytosolic protein. PLoS One 2013, 8:e52099.
88. Gowda N.K., Kandasamy G., Froehlich M.S., Dohmen R.J., Andreasson C. Hsp70 nucleotide exchange factor Fes1 is essential for ubiquitin-dependent degradation of misfolded cytosolic proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013, 110:5975-5980.
89. Byrd C., Turner G.C., Varshavsky A. The N-end rule pathway controls the import of peptides through degradation of a transcriptional repressor. EMBO J. 1998, 17:269-277.
90. Wang L., Mao X., Ju D., Xie Y. Rpn4 is a physiological substrate of the Ubr2 ubiquitin ligase. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:55218-55223.
91. Ju D., Xie Y. Proteasomal degradation of RPN4 via two distinct mechanisms, ubiquitin-dependent and -independent. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:23851-23854.
92. Mannhaupt G., Schnall R., Karpov V., Vetter I., Feldmann H. Rpn4p acts as a transcription factor by binding to PACE, a nonamer box found upstream of 26S proteasomal and other genes in yeast. FEBS Lett. 1999, 450:27-34.
93. London M.K., Keck B.I., Ramos P.C., Dohmen R.J. Regulatory mechanisms controlling biogenesis of ubiquitin and the proteasome. FEBS Lett. 2004, 567:259-264.
94. Gardner R.G., Nelson Z.W., Gottschling D.E. Degradation-mediated protein quality control in the nucleus. Cell 2005, 120:803-815.
95. Prasad R., Kawaguchi S., Ng D.T. A nucleus-based quality control mechanism for cytosolic proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 2010, 21:2117-2127.
96. Khosrow-Khavar F., Fang N.N., Ng A.H., Winget J.M., Comyn S.A., Mayor T. The yeast ubr1 ubiquitin ligase participates in a prominent pathway that targets cytosolic thermosensitive mutants for degradation. G3 (Bethesda) 2012, 2:619-628.
97. Guerriero C.J., Weiberth K.F., Brodsky J.L. Hsp70 targets a cytoplasmic quality control substrate to the San1p ubiquitin ligase. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288:18506-18520.
98. Russell S.J., Steger K.A., Johnston S.A. Subcellular localization, stoichiometry, and protein levels of 26S proteasome subunits in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274:21943-21952.
99. Gilon T., Chomsky O., Kulka R.G. Degradation signals for ubiquitin system proteolysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 1998, 17:2759-2766.
100. Gilon T., Chomsky O., Kulka R.G. Degradation signals recognized by the Ubc6p-Ubc7p ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme pair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000, 20:7214-7219.
101. Metzger M.B., Maurer M.J., Dancy B.M., Michaelis S. Degradation of a cytosolic protein requires endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation machinery. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:32302-32316.
102. Hwang C.S., Shemorry A., Varshavsky A. N-terminal acetylation of cellular proteins creates specific degradation signals. Science 2010, 327:973-977.
103. Aviram S., Kornitzer D. The ubiquitin ligase Hul5 promotes proteasomal processivity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2010, 30:985-994.
104. Crosas B., Hanna J., Kirkpatrick D.S., Zhang D.P., Tone Y., Hathaway N.A., Buecker C., Leggett D.S., Schmidt M., King R.W., Gygi S.P., Finley D. Ubiquitin chains are remodeled at the proteasome by opposing ubiquitin ligase and deubiquitinating activities. Cell 2006, 127:1401-1413.
105. Koegl M., Hoppe T., Schlenker S., Ulrich H.D., Mayer T.U., Jentsch S. A novel ubiquitination factor, E4, is involved in multiubiquitin chain assembly. Cell 1999, 96:635-644.
106. Kohlmann S., Schafer A., Wolf D.H. Ubiquitin ligase Hul5 is required for fragment-specific substrate degradation in endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:16374-16383.
107. Fang N.N., Ng A.H., Measday V., Mayor T. Hul5 HECT ubiquitin ligase plays a major role in the ubiquitylation and turnover of cytosolic misfolded proteins. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:1344-1352.
108. Kaganovich D., Kopito R., Frydman J. Misfolded proteins partition between two distinct quality control compartments. Nature 2008, 454:1088-1095.
109. Yorimitsu T., Klionsky D.J. Autophagy: molecular machinery for self-eating. Cell Death Differ. 2005, 12(Suppl. 2):1542-1552.
110. Kabeya Y., Mizushima N., Ueno T., Yamamoto A., Kirisako T., Noda T., Kominami E., Ohsumi Y., Yoshimori T. LC3, a mammalian homologue of yeast Apg8p, is localized in autophagosome membranes after processing. EMBO J. 2000, 19:5720-5728.
111. Kuma A., Matsui M., Mizushima N. LC3, an autophagosome marker, can be incorporated into protein aggregates independent of autophagy: caution in the interpretation of LC3 localization. Autophagy 2007, 3:323-328.
112. Nakatogawa H., Ichimura Y., Ohsumi Y. Atg8, a ubiquitin-like protein required for autophagosome formation, mediates membrane tethering and hemifusion. Cell 2007, 130:165-178.
113. Rujano M.A., Bosveld F., Salomons F.A., Dijk F., van Waarde M.A., van der Want J.J., de Vos R.A., Brunt E.R., Sibon O.C., Kampinga H.H. Polarised asymmetric inheritance of accumulated protein damage in higher eukaryotes. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:e417.
114. Bjorkoy G., Lamark T., Brech A., Outzen H., Perander M., Overvatn A., Stenmark H., Johansen T. p62/SQSTM1 forms protein aggregates degraded by autophagy and has a protective effect on huntingtin-induced cell death. J. Cell Biol. 2005, 171:603-614.
115. Pankiv S., Clausen T.H., Lamark T., Brech A., Bruun J.A., Outzen H., Overvatn A., Bjorkoy G., Johansen T. p62/SQSTM1 binds directly to Atg8/LC3 to facilitate degradation of ubiquitinated protein aggregates by autophagy. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:24131-24145.
116. Kirkin V., Lamark T., Sou Y.S., Bjorkoy G., Nunn J.L., Bruun J.A., Shvets E., McEwan D.G., Clausen T.H., Wild P., Bilusic I., Theurillat J.P., Overvatn A., Ishii T., Elazar Z., Komatsu M., Dikic I., Johansen T. A role for NBR1 in autophagosomal degradation of ubiquitinated substrates. Mol. Cell 2009, 33:505-516.
117. Noda N.N., Kumeta H., Nakatogawa H., Satoo K., Adachi W., Ishii J., Fujioka Y., Ohsumi Y., Inagaki F. Structural basis of target recognition by Atg8/LC3 during selective autophagy. Genes Cells 2008, 13:1211-1218.
118. Ichimura Y., Kumanomidou T., Sou Y.S., Mizushima T., Ezaki J., Ueno T., Kominami E., Yamane T., Tanaka K., Komatsu M. Structural basis for sorting mechanism of p62 in selective autophagy. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:22847-22857.
119. Johnston J.A., Ward C.L., Kopito R.R. Aggresomes: a cellular response to misfolded proteins. J. Cell Biol. 1998, 143:1883-1898.
120. Pandey U.B., Nie Z., Batlevi Y., McCray B.A., Ritson G.P., Nedelsky N.B., Schwartz S.L., DiProspero N.A., Knight M.A., Schuldiner O., Padmanabhan R., Hild M., Berry D.L., Garza D., Hubbert C.C., Yao T.P., Baehrecke E.H., Taylor J.P. HDAC6 rescues neurodegeneration and provides an essential link between autophagy and the UPS. Nature 2007, 447:859-863.
121. Kopito R.R. Aggresomes, inclusion bodies and protein aggregation. Trends Cell Biol. 2000, 10:524-530.
122. Johnston J.A., Illing M.E., Kopito R.R. Cytoplasmic dynein/dynactin mediates the assembly of aggresomes. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 2002, 53:26-38.
123. Kawaguchi Y., Kovacs J.J., McLaurin A., Vance J.M., Ito A., Yao T.P. The deacetylase HDAC6 regulates aggresome formation and cell viability in response to misfolded protein stress. Cell 2003, 115:727-738.
124. Gamerdinger M., Kaya A.M., Wolfrum U., Clement A.M., Behl C. BAG3 mediates chaperone-based aggresome-targeting and selective autophagy of misfolded proteins. EMBO Rep. 2011, 12:149-156.
125. Olzmann J.A., Li L., Chudaev M.V., Chen J., Perez F.A., Palmiter R.D., Chin L.S. Parkin-mediated K63-linked polyubiquitination targets misfolded DJ-1 to aggresomes via binding to HDAC6. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 178:1025-1038.
126. Zhang M., Windheim M., Roe S.M., Peggie M., Cohen P., Prodromou C., Pearl L.H. Chaperoned ubiquitylation-crystal structures of the CHIP U box E3 ubiquitin ligase and a CHIP-Ubc13-Uev1a complex. Mol. Cell 2005, 20:525-538.
127. Zhang Y., Gao J., Chung K.K., Huang H., Dawson V.L., Dawson T.M. Parkin functions as an E2-dependent ubiquitin-protein ligase and promotes the degradation of the synaptic vesicle-associated protein, CDCrel-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000, 97:13354-13359.
128. Haigh N.G., Johnson A.E. Protein sorting at the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum. Protein Targeting, Transport, and Translocation 2002, 74-106. Academic Press, London. R. Dalbey, G. Von Heijne (Eds.).
129. Rapoport T.A. Protein translocation across the eukaryotic endoplasmic reticulum and bacterial plasma membranes. Nature 2007, 450:663-669.
130. Araki K., Nagata K. Protein folding and quality control in the ER. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2012, 4:a015438.
131. van Anken E., Braakman I. Versatility of the endoplasmic reticulum protein folding factory. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2005, 40:191-228.
132. Pearse B.R., Hebert D.N. Lectin chaperones help direct the maturation of glycoproteins in the endoplasmic reticulum. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010, 1803:684-693.
133. Helenius A., Aebi M. Roles of N-linked glycans in the endoplasmic reticulum. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2004, 73:1019-1049.
134. Aebi M., Bernasconi R., Clerc S., Molinari M. N-glycan structures: recognition and processing in the ER. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2010, 35:74-82.
135. Freedman R.B., Hirst T.R., Tuite M.F. Protein disulphide isomerase: building bridges in protein folding. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1994, 19:331-336.
136. Tu B.P., Weissman J.S. Oxidative protein folding in eukaryotes: mechanisms and consequences. J. Cell Biol. 2004, 164:341-346.
137. Appenzeller-Herzog C., Ellgaard L. The human PDI family: versatility packed into a single fold. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2008, 1783:535-548.
138. Braakman I., Bulleid N.J. Protein folding and modification in the mammalian endoplasmic reticulum. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2011, 80:71-99.
139. Schroder M., Kaufman R.J. The mammalian unfolded protein response. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2005, 74:739-789.
140. Korennykh A., Walter P. Structural basis of the unfolded protein response. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2012, 28:251-277.
141. Walter P., Ron D. The unfolded protein response: from stress pathway to homeostatic regulation. Science 2011, 334:1081-1086.
142. Kimmig P., Diaz M., Zheng J., Williams C.C., Lang A., Aragon T., Li H., Walter P. The unfolded protein response in fission yeast modulates stability of select mRNAs to maintain protein homeostasis. Elife 2012, 1:e00048.
143. Guerriero C.J., Brodsky J.L. The delicate balance between secreted protein folding and endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation in human physiology. Physiol. Rev. 2012, 92:537-576.
144. Hebert D.N., Molinari M. In and out of the ER: protein folding, quality control, degradation, and related human diseases. Physiol. Rev. 2007, 87:1377-1408.
145. Bernasconi R., Molinari M. ERAD and ERAD tuning: disposal of cargo and of ERAD regulators from the mammalian ER. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2011, 23:176-183.
146. Brodsky J.L., McCracken A.A. ER protein quality control and proteasome-mediated protein degradation. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 1999, 10:507-513.
147. Buchberger A., Bukau B., Sommer T. Protein quality control in the cytosol and the endoplasmic reticulum: brothers in arms. Mol. Cell. 2010, 40:238-252.
148. Claessen J.H., Kundrat L., Ploegh H.L. Protein quality control in the ER: balancing the ubiquitin checkbook. Trends Cell Biol. 2012, 22:22-32.
149. Hampton R.Y., Sommer T. Finding the will and the way of ERAD substrate retrotranslocation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2012, 24:460-466.
150. Kostova Z., Wolf D.H. For whom the bell tolls: protein quality control of the endoplasmic reticulum and the ubiquitin-proteasome connection. EMBO J. 2003, 22:2309-2317.
151. Meusser B., Hirsch C., Jarosch E., Sommer T. ERAD: the long road to destruction. Nat. Cell Biol. 2005, 7:766-772.
152. Plemper R.K., Wolf D.H. Retrograde protein translocation: ERADication of secretory proteins in health and disease. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1999, 24:266-270.
153. Sommer T., Wolf D.H. Endoplasmic reticulum degradation: reverse protein flow of no return. FASEB J. 1997, 11:1227-1233.
154. Vembar S.S., Brodsky J.L. One step at a time: endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9:944-957.
155. Hiller M.M., Finger A., Schweiger M., Wolf D.H. ER degradation of a misfolded luminal protein by the cytosolic ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Science 1996, 273:1725-1728.
156. Werner E.D., Brodsky J.L., McCracken A.A. Proteasome-dependent endoplasmic reticulum-associated protein degradation: an unconventional route to a familiar fate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1996, 93:13797-13801.
157. Wiertz E.J., Tortorella D., Bogyo M., Yu J., Mothes W., Jones T.R., Rapoport T.A., Ploegh H.L. Sec61-mediated transfer of a membrane protein from the endoplasmic reticulum to the proteasome for destruction. Nature 1996, 384:432-438.
158. Hampton R.Y., Gardner R.G., Rine J. Role of 26S proteasome and HRD genes in the degradation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase, an integral endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein. Mol. Biol. Cell 1996, 7:2029-2044.
159. Plemper R.K., Bohmler S., Bordallo J., Sommer T., Wolf D.H. Mutant analysis links the translocon and BiP to retrograde protein transport for ER degradation. Nature 1997, 388:891-895.
160. Brodsky J.L., Werner E.D., Dubas M.E., Goeckeler J.L., Kruse K.B., McCracken A.A. The requirement for molecular chaperones during endoplasmic reticulum-associated protein degradation demonstrates that protein export and import are mechanistically distinct. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274:3453-3460.
161. Nishikawa S.I., Fewell S.W., Kato Y., Brodsky J.L., Endo T. Molecular chaperones in the yeast endoplasmic reticulum maintain the solubility of proteins for retrotranslocation and degradation. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 153:1061-1070.
162. Hebert D.N., Molinari M. Flagging and docking: dual roles for N-glycans in protein quality control and cellular proteostasis. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2012, 37:404-410.
163. Caramelo J.J., Parodi A.J. Getting in and out from calnexin/calreticulin cycles. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:10221-10225.
164. Molinari M. N-glycan structure dictates extension of protein folding or onset of disposal. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2007, 3:313-320.
165. Barlowe C.K., Miller E.A. Secretory protein biogenesis and traffic in the early secretory pathway. Genetics 2013, 193:383-410.
166. Knop M., Hauser N., Wolf D.H. N-Glycosylation affects endoplasmic reticulum degradation of a mutated derivative of carboxypeptidase yscY in yeast. Yeast 1996, 12:1229-1238.
167. Jakob C.A., Burda P., Roth J., Aebi M. Degradation of misfolded endoplasmic reticulum glycoproteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is determined by a specific oligosaccharide structure. J. Cell Biol. 1998, 142:1223-1233.
168. Jakob C.A., Bodmer D., Spirig U., Battig P., Marcil A., Dignard D., Bergeron J.J., Thomas D.Y., Aebi M. Htm1p, a mannosidase-like protein, is involved in glycoprotein degradation in yeast. EMBO Rep. 2001, 2:423-430.
169. Hosokawa N., Wada I., Hasegawa K., Yorihuzi T., Tremblay L.O., Herscovics A., Nagata K. A novel ER alpha-mannosidase-like protein accelerates ER-associated degradation. EMBO Rep. 2001, 2:415-422.
170. Vashist S., Ng D.T. Misfolded proteins are sorted by a sequential checkpoint mechanism of ER quality control. J. Cell Biol. 2004, 165:41-52.
171. Carvalho P., Goder V., Rapoport T.A. Distinct ubiquitin-ligase complexes define convergent pathways for the degradation of ER proteins. Cell 2006, 126:361-373.
172. Bays N.W., Gardner R.G., Seelig L.P., Joazeiro C.A., Hampton R.Y. Hrd1p/Der3p is a membrane-anchored ubiquitin ligase required for ER-associated degradation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2001, 3:24-29.
173. Deak P.M., Wolf D.H. Membrane topology and function of Der3/Hrd1p as a ubiquitin-protein ligase (E3) involved in endoplasmic reticulum degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276:10663-10669.
174. Swanson R., Locher M., Hochstrasser M. A conserved ubiquitin ligase of the nuclear envelope/endoplasmic reticulum that functions in both ER-associated and Matalpha2 repressor degradation. Genes Dev. 2001, 15:2660-2674.
175. Kostova Z., Tsai Y.C., Weissman A.M. Ubiquitin ligases, critical mediators of endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2007, 18:770-779.
176. Huyer G., Piluek W.F., Fansler Z., Kreft S.G., Hochstrasser M., Brodsky J.L., Michaelis S. Distinct machinery is required in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for the endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation of a multispanning membrane protein and a soluble luminal protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:38369-38378.
177. Gnann A., Riordan J.R., Wolf D.H. Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator degradation depends on the lectins Htm1p/EDEM and the Cdc48 protein complex in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 2004, 15:4125-4135.
178. Friedlander R., Jarosch E., Urban J., Volkwein C., Sommer T. A regulatory link between ER-associated protein degradation and the unfolded-protein response. Nat. Cell Biol. 2000, 2:379-384.
179. Biederer T., Volkwein C., Sommer T. Role of Cue1p in ubiquitination and degradation at the ER surface. Science 1997, 278:1806-1809.
180. Rubenstein E.M., Kreft S.G., Greenblatt W., Swanson R., Hochstrasser M. Aberrant substrate engagement of the ER translocon triggers degradation by the Hrd1 ubiquitin ligase. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 197:761-773.
181. Metzger M.B., Liang Y., Das R., Mariano J., Li S., Li J., Kostova Z., Byrd R.A., Ji X., Weissman A.M. A Structurally Unique E2-Binding Domain Activates Ubiquitination by the ERAD E2, Ubc7p, Through Multiple Mechanisms 2013.
182. Bagola K., von Delbrück M., Dittmar G., Scheffner M., Ziv I., Glickman M.H., Ciechanover A., Sommer T. Ubiquitin Binding by a CUE Domain Regulates Ubiquitin Chain Formation by ERAD E3 Ligases 2013.
183. Finger A., Knop M., Wolf D.H. Analysis of two mutated vacuolar proteins reveals a degradation pathway in the endoplasmic reticulum or a related compartment of yeast. Eur. J. Biochem. 1993, 218:565-574.
184. Gauss R., Kanehara K., Carvalho P., Ng D.T., Aebi M. A complex of Pdi1p and the mannosidase Htm1p initiates clearance of unfolded glycoproteins from the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol. Cell 2011, 42:782-793.
185. Gillece P., Luz J.M., Lennarz W.J., de La Cruz F.J., Romisch K. Export of a cysteine-free misfolded secretory protein from the endoplasmic reticulum for degradation requires interaction with protein disulfide isomerase. J. Cell Biol. 1999, 147:1443-1456.
186. Clerc S., Hirsch C., Oggier D.M., Deprez P., Jakob C., Sommer T., Aebi M. Htm1 protein generates the N-glycan signal for glycoprotein degradation in the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 184:159-172.
187. Quan E.M., Kamiya Y., Kamiya D., Denic V., Weibezahn J., Kato K., Weissman J.S. Defining the glycan destruction signal for endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation. Mol. Cell 2008, 32:870-877.
188. Bhamidipati A., Denic V., Quan E.M., Weissman J.S. Exploration of the topological requirements of ERAD identifies Yos9p as a lectin sensor of misfolded glycoproteins in the ER lumen. Mol. Cell 2005, 19:741-751.
189. Buschhorn B.A., Kostova Z., Medicherla B., Wolf D.H. A genome-wide screen identifies Yos9p as essential for ER-associated degradation of glycoproteins. FEBS Lett. 2004, 577:422-426.
190. Kim W., Spear E.D., Ng D.T. Yos9p detects and targets misfolded glycoproteins for ER-associated degradation. Mol. Cell 2005, 19:753-764.
191. Szathmary R., Bielmann R., Nita-Lazar M., Burda P., Jakob C.A. Yos9 protein is essential for degradation of misfolded glycoproteins and may function as lectin in ERAD. Mol. Cell 2005, 19:765-775.
192. Gauss R., Jarosch E., Sommer T., Hirsch C. A complex of Yos9p and the HRD ligase integrates endoplasmic reticulum quality control into the degradation machinery. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8:849-854.
193. Sato B.K., Schulz D., Do P.H., Hampton R.Y. Misfolded membrane proteins are specifically recognized by the transmembrane domain of the Hrd1p ubiquitin ligase. Mol. Cell 2009, 34:212-222.
194. Martinez Benitez E., Stolz A., Becher A., Wolf D.H. Mnl2, a novel component of the ER associated protein degradation pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 414:528-532.
195. Benitez E.M., Stolz A., Wolf D.H. Yos9, a control protein for misfolded glycosylated and non-glycosylated proteins in ERAD. FEBS Lett. 2011, 585:3015-3019.
196. Jaenicke L.A., Brendebach H., Selbach M., Hirsch C. Yos9p assists in the degradation of certain nonglycosylated proteins from the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol. Biol. Cell 2011, 22:2937-2945.
197. Kostova Z., Wolf D.H. Importance of carbohydrate positioning in the recognition of mutated CPY for ER-associated degradation. J. Cell Sci. 2005, 118:1485-1492.
198. Xu C., Wang S., Thibault G., Ng D.T. Futile protein folding cycles in the ER are terminated by the unfolded protein O-mannosylation pathway. Science 2013, 340:978-981.
199. Gauss R., Sommer T., Jarosch E. The Hrd1p ligase complex forms a linchpin between ER-lumenal substrate selection and Cdc48p recruitment. EMBO J. 2006, 25:1827-1835.
200. Horn S.C., Hanna J., Hirsch C., Volkwein C., Schutz A., Heinemann U., Sommer T., Jarosch E. Usa1 functions as a scaffold of the HRD-ubiquitin ligase. Mol. Cell 2009, 36:782-793.
201. Neuber O., Jarosch E., Volkwein C., Walter J., Sommer T. Ubx2 links the Cdc48 complex to ER-associated protein degradation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2005, 7:993-998.
202. Schuberth C., Buchberger A. Membrane-bound Ubx2 recruits Cdc48 to ubiquitin ligases and their substrates to ensure efficient ER-associated protein degradation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2005, 7:999-1006.
203. Hitt R., Wolf D.H. Der1p, a protein required for degradation of malfolded soluble proteins of the endoplasmic reticulum: topology and Der1-like proteins. FEMS Yeast Res. 2004, 4:721-729.
204. Knop M., Finger A., Braun T., Hellmuth K., Wolf D.H. Der1, a novel protein specifically required for endoplasmic reticulum degradation in yeast. EMBO J. 1996, 15:753-763.
205. Zattas D., Adle D.J., Rubenstein E.M., Hochstrasser M. N-terminal acetylation of the yeast Derlin Der1 is essential for Hrd1 ubiquitin-ligase activity toward luminal ER substrates. Mol. Biol. Cell 2013, 24:890-900.
206. Greenblatt E.J., Olzmann J.A., Kopito R.R. Derlin-1 is a rhomboid pseudoprotease required for the dislocation of mutant alpha-1 antitrypsin from the endoplasmic reticulum. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011, 18:1147-1152.
207. Lemberg M.K. Sampling the membrane: function of rhomboid-family proteins. Trends Cell Biol. 2013, 23:210-217.
208. Fleig L., Bergbold N., Sahasrabudhe P., Geiger B., Kaltak L., Lemberg M.K. Ubiquitin-dependent intramembrane rhomboid protease promotes ERAD of membrane proteins. Mol. Cell 2012, 47:558-569.
209. Pilon M., Schekman R., Romisch K. Sec61p mediates export of a misfolded secretory protein from the endoplasmic reticulum to the cytosol for degradation. EMBO J. 1997, 16:4540-4548.
210. Schafer A., Wolf D.H. Sec61p is part of the endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation machinery. EMBO J. 2009, 28:2874-2884.
211. Scott D.C., Schekman R. Role of Sec61p in the ER-associated degradation of short-lived transmembrane proteins. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 181:1095-1105.
212. Willer M., Forte G.M., Stirling C.J. Sec61p is required for ERAD-L: genetic dissection of the translocation and ERAD-L functions of Sec61P using novel derivatives of CPY. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:33883-33888.
213. Garza R.M., Tran P.N., Hampton R.Y. Geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate is a potent regulator of HRD-dependent 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase degradation in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284:35368-35380.
214. Wahlman J., DeMartino G.N., Skach W.R., Bulleid N.J., Brodsky J.L., Johnson A.E. Real-time fluorescence detection of ERAD substrate retrotranslocation in a mammalian in vitro system. Cell 2007, 129:943-955.
215. Carvalho P., Stanley A.M., Rapoport T.A. Retrotranslocation of a misfolded luminal ER protein by the ubiquitin-ligase Hrd1p. Cell 2010, 143:579-591.
216. Kreft S.G., Wang L., Hochstrasser M. Membrane topology of the yeast endoplasmic reticulum-localized ubiquitin ligase Doa10 and comparison with its human ortholog TEB4 (MARCH-VI). J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:4646-4653.
217. Lilley B.N., Ploegh H.L. A membrane protein required for dislocation of misfolded proteins from the ER. Nature 2004, 429:834-840.
218. Ye Y., Shibata Y., Yun C., Ron D., Rapoport T.A. A membrane protein complex mediates retro-translocation from the ER lumen into the cytosol. Nature 2004, 429:841-847.
219. Ploegh H.L. A lipid-based model for the creation of an escape hatch from the endoplasmic reticulum. Nature 2007, 448:435-438.
220. Olzmann J.A., Kopito R.R. Lipid droplet formation is dispensable for endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286:27872-27874.
221. Nakatsukasa K., Huyer G., Michaelis S., Brodsky J.L. Dissecting the ER-associated degradation of a misfolded polytopic membrane protein. Cell 2008, 132:101-112.
222. Stolz A., Schweizer R.S., Schafer A., Wolf D.H. Dfm1 forms distinct complexes with Cdc48 and the ER ubiquitin ligases and is required for ERAD. Traffic 2010, 11:1363-1369.
223. Sato B.K., Hampton R.Y. Yeast Derlin Dfm1 interacts with Cdc48 and functions in ER homeostasis. Yeast 2006, 23:1053-1064.
224. Bays N.W., Wilhovsky S.K., Goradia A., Hodgkiss-Harlow K., Hampton R.Y. HRD4/NPL4 is required for the proteasomal processing of ubiquitinated ER proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 2001, 12:4114-4128.
225. Braun S., Matuschewski K., Rape M., Thoms S., Jentsch S. Role of the ubiquitin-selective CDC48(UFD1/NPL4)chaperone (segregase) in ERAD of OLE1 and other substrates. EMBO J. 2002, 21:615-621.
226. Jarosch E., Taxis C., Volkwein C., Bordallo J., Finley D., Wolf D.H., Sommer T. Protein dislocation from the ER requires polyubiquitination and the AAA-ATPase Cdc48. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002, 4:134-139.
227. Rabinovich E., Kerem A., Frohlich K.U., Diamant N., Bar-Nun S. AAA-ATPase p97/Cdc48p, a cytosolic chaperone required for endoplasmic reticulum-associated protein degradation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002, 22:626-634.
228. Ye Y., Meyer H.H., Rapoport T.A. The AAA ATPase Cdc48/p97 and its partners transport proteins from the ER into the cytosol. Nature 2001, 414:652-656.
229. Wolf D.H., Stolz A. The Cdc48 machine in endoplasmic reticulum associated protein degradation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1823:117-124.
230. Wang Q., Liu Y., Soetandyo N., Baek K., Hegde R., Ye Y. A ubiquitin ligase-associated chaperone holdase maintains polypeptides in soluble states for proteasome degradation. Mol. Cell 2011, 42:758-770.
231. Leznicki P., Clancy A., Schwappach B., High S. Bat3 promotes the membrane integration of tail-anchored proteins. J. Cell Sci. 2010, 123:2170-2178.
232. Mariappan M., Li X., Stefanovic S., Sharma A., Mateja A., Keenan R.J., Hegde R.S. A ribosome-associating factor chaperones tail-anchored membrane proteins. Nature 2010, 466:1120-1124.
233. Hessa T., Sharma A., Mariappan M., Eshleman H.D., Gutierrez E., Hegde R.S. Protein targeting and degradation are coupled for elimination of mislocalized proteins. Nature 2011, 475:394-397.
234. Medicherla B., Kostova Z., Schaefer A., Wolf D.H. A genomic screen identifies Dsk2p and Rad23p as essential components of ER-associated degradation. EMBO Rep. 2004, 5:692-697.
235. Raasi S., Wolf D.H. Ubiquitin receptors and ERAD: a network of pathways to the proteasome. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2007, 18:780-791.
236. Richly H., Rape M., Braun S., Rumpf S., Hoege C., Jentsch S. A series of ubiquitin binding factors connects CDC48/p97 to substrate multiubiquitylation and proteasomal targeting. Cell 2005, 120:73-84.
237. Suzuki T., Park H., Hollingsworth N.M., Sternglanz R., Lennarz W.J. PNG1, a yeast gene encoding a highly conserved peptide:N-glycanase. J. Cell Biol. 2000, 149:1039-1052.
238. Olzmann J.A., Kopito R.R., Christianson J.C. The mammalian endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation system. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2012, (a013185).
239. Dasgupta A., Ramsey K.L., Smith J.S., Auble D.T. Sir Antagonist 1 (San1) is a ubiquitin ligase. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:26830-26838.
240. Goebl M.G., Yochem J., Jentsch S., McGrath J.P., Varshavsky A., Byers B. The yeast cell cycle gene CDC34 encodes a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme. Science 1988, 241:1331-1335.
241. Seufert W., McGrath J.P., Jentsch S. UBC1 encodes a novel member of an essential subfamily of yeast ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes involved in protein degradation. EMBO J. 1990, 9:4535-4541.
242. Matsuo Y., Kishimoto H., Tanae K., Kitamura K., Katayama S., Kawamukai M. Nuclear protein quality is regulated by the ubiquitin-proteasome system through the activity of Ubc4 and San1 in fission yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286:13775-13790.
243. Fredrickson E.K., Rosenbaum J.C., Locke M.N., Milac T.I., Gardner R.G. Exposed hydrophobicity is a key determinant of nuclear quality control degradation. Mol. Biol. Cell 2011, 22:2384-2395.
244. Rosenbaum J.C., Fredrickson E.K., Oeser M.L., Garrett-Engele C.M., Locke M.N., Richardson L.A., Nelson Z.W., Hetrick E.D., Milac T.I., Gottschling D.E., Gardner R.G. Disorder targets misorder in nuclear quality control degradation: a disordered ubiquitin ligase directly recognizes its misfolded substrates. Mol. Cell 2011, 41:93-106.
245. Haslbeck M., Ignatiou A., Saibil H., Helmich S., Frenzl E., Stromer T., Buchner J. A domain in the N-terminal part of Hsp26 is essential for chaperone function and oligomerization. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 343:445-455.
246. Jaya N., Garcia V., Vierling E. Substrate binding site flexibility of the small heat shock protein molecular chaperones. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:15604-15609.
247. Stromer T., Fischer E., Richter K., Haslbeck M., Buchner J. Analysis of the regulation of the molecular chaperone Hsp26 by temperature-induced dissociation: the N-terminal domail is important for oligomer assembly and the binding of unfolding proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:11222-11228.
248. Rudiger S., Germeroth L., Schneider-Mergener J., Bukau B. Substrate specificity of the DnaK chaperone determined by screening cellulose-bound peptide libraries. EMBO J. 1997, 16:1501-1507.
249. Fredrickson E.K., Gallagher P.S., Clowes Candadai S.V., Gardner R.G. Substrate recognition in nuclear protein quality control degradation is governed by exposed hydrophobicity that correlates with aggregation and insolubility. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288:6130-6139.
250. Prasad R., Kawaguchi S., Ng D.T. Biosynthetic mode can determine the mechanism of protein quality control. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012, 425:689-695.
251. Mullen J.R., Brill S.J. Activation of the Slx5-Slx8 ubiquitin ligase by poly-small ubiquitin-like modifier conjugates. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:19912-19921.
252. Xie Y., Kerscher O., Kroetz M.B., McConchie H.F., Sung P., Hochstrasser M. The yeast Hex3.Slx8 heterodimer is a ubiquitin ligase stimulated by substrate sumoylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:34176-34184.
253. Mullen J.R., Kaliraman V., Ibrahim S.S., Brill S.J. Requirement for three novel protein complexes in the absence of the Sgs1 DNA helicase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2001, 157:103-118.
254. Wang Z., Prelich G. Quality control of a transcriptional regulator by SUMO-targeted degradation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2009, 29:1694-1706.
255. Maderbock K., Pichler A. Sumo control. Subcell. Biochem. 2010, 54:158-169.
256. Ravid T., Kreft S.G., Hochstrasser M. Membrane and soluble substrates of the Doa10 ubiquitin ligase are degraded by distinct pathways. EMBO J. 2006, 25:533-543.
257. Deng M., Hochstrasser M. Spatially regulated ubiquitin ligation by an ER/nuclear membrane ligase. Nature 2006, 443:827-831.
258. Alfassy O.S., Cohen I., Reiss Y., Tirosh B., Ravid T. Placing a disrupted degradation motif at the C terminus of proteasome substrates attenuates degradation without impairing ubiquitylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288:12645-12653.
259. Furth N., Gertman O., Shiber A., Alfassy O.S., Cohen I., Rosenberg M.M., Doron N.K., Friedler A., Ravid T. Exposure of bipartite hydrophobic signal triggers nuclear quality control of Ndc10 at the endoplasmic reticulum/nuclear envelope. Mol. Biol. Cell 2011, 22:4726-4739.
260. Iwata A., Nagashima Y., Matsumoto L., Suzuki T., Yamanaka T., Date H., Deoka K., Nukina N., Tsuji S. Intranuclear degradation of polyglutamine aggregates by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284:9796-9803.
261. DiFiglia M., Sapp E., Chase K.O., Davies S.W., Bates G.P., Vonsattel J.P., Aronin N. Aggregation of huntingtin in neuronal intranuclear inclusions and dystrophic neurites in brain. Science 1997, 277:1990-1993.
262. Waelter S., Boeddrich A., Lurz R., Scherzinger E., Lueder G., Lehrach H., Wanker E.E. Accumulation of mutant huntingtin fragments in aggresome-like inclusion bodies as a result of insufficient protein degradation. Mol. Biol. Cell 2001, 12:1393-1407.
263. Borden K.L. Pondering the promyelocytic leukemia protein (PML) puzzle: possible functions for PML nuclear bodies. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002, 22:5259-5269.
264. Jensen K., Shiels C., Freemont P.S. PML protein isoforms and the RBCC/TRIM motif. Oncogene 2001, 20:7223-7233.
265. Negorev D., Maul G.G. Cellular proteins localized at and interacting within ND10/PML nuclear bodies/PODs suggest functions of a nuclear depot. Oncogene 2001, 20:7234-7242.
266. Fu L., Gao Y.S., Tousson A., Shah A., Chen T.L., Vertel B.M., Sztul E. Nuclear aggresomes form by fusion of PML-associated aggregates. Mol. Biol. Cell 2005, 16:4905-4917.
267. Lafarga M., Berciano M.T., Pena E., Mayo I., Castano J.G., Bohmann D., Rodrigues J.P., Tavanez J.P., Carmo-Fonseca M. Clastosome: a subtype of nuclear body enriched in 19S and 20S proteasomes, ubiquitin, and protein substrates of proteasome. Mol. Biol. Cell 2002, 13:2771-2782.
268. Janer A., Martin E., Muriel M.P., Latouche M., Fujigasaki H., Ruberg M., Brice A., Trottier Y., Sittler A. PML clastosomes prevent nuclear accumulation of mutant ataxin-7 and other polyglutamine proteins. J. Cell Biol. 2006, 174:65-76.
269. Voos W., Rottgers K. Molecular chaperones as essential mediators of mitochondrial biogenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2002, 1592:51-62.
270. Strub A., Lim J.H., Pfanner N., Voos W. The mitochondrial protein import motor. Biol. Chem. 2000, 381:943-949.
271. Walter S. Structure and function of the GroE chaperone. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2002, 59:1589-1597.
272. Leidhold C., von Janowsky B., Becker D., Bender T., Voos W. Structure and function of Hsp78, the mitochondrial ClpB homolog. J. Struct. Biol. 2006, 156:149-164.
273. Van Dyck L., Pearce D.A., Sherman F. PIM1 encodes a mitochondrial ATP-dependent protease that is required for mitochondrial function in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269:238-242.
274. Suzuki C.K., Suda K., Wang N., Schatz G. Requirement for the yeast gene LON in intramitochondrial proteolysis and maintenance of respiration. Science 1994, 264:891.
275. Bender T., Lewrenz I., Franken S., Baitzel C., Voos W. Mitochondrial enzymes are protected from stress-induced aggregation by mitochondrial chaperones and the Pim1/LON protease. Mol. Biol. Cell 2011, 22:541-554.
276. Bender T., Leidhold C., Ruppert T., Franken S., Voos W. The role of protein quality control in mitochondrial protein homeostasis under oxidative stress. Proteomics 2010, 10:1426-1443.
277. Erjavec N., Bayot A., Gareil M., Camougrand N., Nystrom T., Friguet B., Bulteau A.L. Deletion of the mitochondrial Pim1/Lon protease in yeast results in accelerated aging and impairment of the proteasome. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2013, 56:9-16.
278. Baker M.J., Tatsuta T., Langer T. Quality control of mitochondrial proteostasis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011, 3.
279. Koppen M., Langer T. Protein degradation within mitochondria: versatile activities of AAA proteases and other peptidases. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2007, 42:221-242.
280. Dunn C.D., Tamura Y., Sesaki H., Jensen R.E. Mgr3p and Mgr1p are adaptors for the mitochondrial i-AAA protease complex. Mol. Biol. Cell 2008, 19:5387-5397.
281. Korbel D., Wurth S., Kaser M., Langer T. Membrane protein turnover by the m-AAA protease in mitochondria depends on the transmembrane domains of its subunits. EMBO Rep. 2004, 5:698-703.
282. Heo J.M., Livnat-Levanon N., Taylor E.B., Jones K.T., Dephoure N., Ring J., Xie J., Brodsky J.L., Madeo F., Gygi S.P., Ashrafi K., Glickman M.H., Rutter J. A stress-responsive system for mitochondrial protein degradation. Mol. Cell 2010, 40:465-480.
283. Azzu V., Brand M.D. Degradation of an intramitochondrial protein by the cytosolic proteasome. J. Cell Sci. 2010, 123:578-585.
284. Margineantu D.H., Emerson C.B., Diaz D., Hockenbery D.M. Hsp90 inhibition decreases mitochondrial protein turnover. PLoS One 2007, 2:e1066.
285. Okamoto K., Kondo-Okamoto N., Ohsumi Y. Mitochondria-anchored receptor Atg32 mediates degradation of mitochondria via selective autophagy. Dev. Cell 2009, 17:87-97.
286. Tanaka A., Cleland M.M., Xu S., Narendra D.P., Suen D.F., Karbowski M., Youle R.J. Proteasome and p97 mediate mitophagy and degradation of mitofusins induced by Parkin. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 191:1367-1380.
287. Chan N.C., Salazar A.M., Pham A.H., Sweredoski M.J., Kolawa N.J., Graham R.L., Hess S., Chan D.C. Broad activation of the ubiquitin-proteasome system by Parkin is critical for mitophagy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2011, 20:1726-1737.
288. Imai Y., Soda M., Takahashi R. Parkin suppresses unfolded protein stress-induced cell death through its E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275:35661-35664.
289. Imai Y., Soda M., Inoue H., Hattori N., Mizuno Y., Takahashi R. An unfolded putative transmembrane polypeptide, which can lead to endoplasmic reticulum stress, is a substrate of Parkin. Cell 2001, 105:891-902.
290. Narendra D., Tanaka A., Suen D.F., Youle R.J. Parkin is recruited selectively to impaired mitochondria and promotes their autophagy. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 183:795-803.
291. Kim Y., Park J., Kim S., Song S., Kwon S.K., Lee S.H., Kitada T., Kim J.M., Chung J. PINK1 controls mitochondrial localization of Parkin through direct phosphorylation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 377:975-980.
292. Matsuda N., Sato S., Shiba K., Okatsu K., Saisho K., Gautier C.A., Sou Y.S., Saiki S., Kawajiri S., Sato F., Kimura M., Komatsu M., Hattori N., Tanaka K. PINK1 stabilized by mitochondrial depolarization recruits Parkin to damaged mitochondria and activates latent Parkin for mitophagy. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 189:211-221.
293. Karbowski M., Neutzner A., Youle R.J. The mitochondrial E3 ubiquitin ligase MARCH5 is required for Drp1 dependent mitochondrial division. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 178:71-84.
294. Rosen D.R. Mutations in Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase gene are associated with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nature 1993, 364:362.
295. Yonashiro R., Sugiura A., Miyachi M., Fukuda T., Matsushita N., Inatome R., Ogata Y., Suzuki T., Dohmae N., Yanagi S. Mitochondrial ubiquitin ligase MITOL ubiquitinates mutant SOD1 and attenuates mutant SOD1-induced reactive oxygen species generation. Mol. Biol. Cell 2009, 20:4524-4530.