Prediction of One-Dimensional Structural Properties Of Proteins by Integrated Neural Networks

Introduction to Protein Structure Prediction: Methods and Algorithms

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 45-74

  Zhou, Yaoqi ^a,b   Faraggi, Eshel ^a,b  

^a Indiana University   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Direct prediction of three dimensional structures from protein sequences, being challenging; Prediction of one dimensional structural properties of proteins by integrated neural networks; Protein structure prediction, challenging problems more accurate prediction of one dimensional structural properties

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878372856     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470882207.ch4     Document Type: Chapter

References (222)

1. O. Dor and Y. Zhou. Achieving 80% ten - fold cross - validated accuracy for secondary structure prediction by large - scale training. Proteins, 66: 838 - 845, 2007.
2. O. Dor and Y. Zhou. Real - SPINE: An integrated system of neural networks for real - value prediction of protein structural properties. Proteins, 68: 76 - 81, 2007.
3. B. Xue, O. Dor, E. Faraggi, and Y. Zhou. Real - value prediction of backbone torsion angles. Proteins, 72: 427 - 433, 2008.
4. E. Faraggi, B. Xue, and Y. Zhou. Improving the accuracy of predicting real - value backbone torsion angles and residue solvent accessibility by guided learning through two - layer neural networks. Proteins, 74: 857 - 871, 2009.
5. J. Cheng, M.J. Sweredoski, and P. Baldi. DOMpro: Protein domain prediction using profiles, secondary structure, relative solvent accessibility, and recursive neural networks. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 13: 1 - 10, 2006.
6. J. E. Gewehr and R. Zimmer. SSEP - Domain: Protein domain prediction by alignment of secondary structure elements and profiles. Bioinformatics, 22: 181 - 187, 2006.
7. M. Tress, J. Cheng, P. Baldi, K. Joo, J. Lee, J. - H. Seo, J. Lee, D. Baker, D. Chivian, D. Kim, and I. Ezkurdia. Assessment of predictions submitted for the casp7 domain prediction category. Proteins, 69 (8): 137 - 151, 2007.
8. A. Schlessinger and B. Rost. Protein fl exibility and rigidity predicted from sequence. Proteins, 61: 115 - 126, 2005.
9. Z. Yuan, T. L. Bailey, and R. D. Teasdale. Prediction of protein B - factor profiles. Proteins, 58: 905 - 912, 2005.
10. M. Young, K. Kirshenbaum, K.A. Dill, and S. Highsmith. Predicting conformational switches in proteins. Protein Science, 8: 1752 - 1764, 1999.
11. M. Gross. Proteins that convert from alpha helix to beta sheet: Implications for folding and disease. Current Protein & Peptide Science, 1: 339 - 347, 2000.
12. I. B. Kuznetsov. Ordered conformational change in the protein backbone: Prediction of conformationally variable positions from sequence and low -resolution structural data. Proteins, 72: 74 - 87, 2008.
13. F. Ferron, S. Longhi, B. Canard, and D. Karlin. A practical overview of protein disorder prediction methods. Proteins, 65: 1 - 14, 2006.
14. Z. Dosztanyi, M. Sandor, P. Tompa, and I. Simon. Prediction of protein disorder at the domain level. Current Protein & Peptide Science, 8: 161 - 171, 2007.
15. J. M. Bourhis, B. Canard, and S. Longhi. Predicting protein disorder and induced folding: From theoretical principles to practical applications. Current Protein & Peptide Science, 8: 135 - 149, 2007.
16. P. Radivojac, L.M. Iakoucheva, C.J. Oldfield, Z. Obradovic, V.N. Uversky, and A. K. Dunker. Intrinsic disorder and functional proteomics. Biophysical Journal, 92: 1439 - 1456, 2007.
17. H. Rangwala, C. Kauffman, and G. Karypis. A kernel framework for protein residue annotation. In T. Theeramunkong, B. Kijsirikul, N. Cercone, and T. - B. Ho (Eds.), Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 13th Pacific - Asia Conference, PAKDD 2009. Bangkok, Thailand, April 27 - 30, 2009, Proceedings; Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5476, pp. 439 - 451. Springer, 2009.
18. C. - H. Chan, H. - K. Liang, N. - W. Hsi, M. - T. Ko, P. - C. Lyu, and J. - K. Hwang. Relationship between local structural entropy and protein thermostabilty. Proteins, 57: 684 - 691, 2004.
19. S. W. Huang and J. K. Hwang. Computation of conformational entropy from protein sequences using the machine - learning method - Application to the study of the relationship between structural conservation and local structural stability. Proteins, 59: 802 - 809, 2005.
20. S. Liang, C. Zhang, S. Liu, and Y. Zhou. Protein binding site prediction with an empirical scoring function. Nucleic Acids Research, 34: 3698 - 3707, 2006.
21. C.W. Tung and S.Y. Ho. Computational identification of ubiquitylation sites from protein sequences. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 310, 2008.
22. J.D. Fischer, C.E. Mayer, and J. Soeding. Prediction of protein functional residues from sequence by probability density estimation. Bioinformatics, 24: 613 - 620, 2008.
23. S. Hwang, Z. Gou, and I.B. Kuznetsov. DP - Bind: a web server for sequence - based prediction of DNA - binding residues in DNA - binding proteins. Bioinformatics, 23: 634 - 636, 2007.
24. S. Ahmad and A. Sarai. PSSM - based prediction of DNA binding sites in proteins. BMC Bioinformatics, 6: 33, 2005.
25. C. Ferrer - Costa, M. Orozco, and X. de la Cruz. Sequence - based prediction of pathological mutations. Proteins, 57: 811 - 819, 2004.
26. H. Lin, H. Ding, F.B. Guo, A.Y. Zhang, and J. Huang. Predicting subcellular localization of mycobacterial proteins by using Chou ' s pseudo amino acid composition. Protein & Peptide Letters, 15: 739 - 744, 2008.
27. J. Liu, J. Gough, and B. Rost. Distinguishing protein - coding from non - coding RNAs through support vector machines. PLOS Genetics, 2: 529 - 536, 2006.
28. N.V. Petrova and C.H. Wu. Prediction of catalytic residues using Support Vector Machine with selected protein sequence and structural properties. BMC Bioinformatics, 7: 312, 2006.
29. T. Zhang, H. Zhang, K. Chen, S. Shen, J. Ruan, and L. Kurgan. Accurate sequence - based prediction of catalytic residues. Bioinformatics, 24: 2329 - 2338, 2008.
30. A. Godzik, M. Jambon, and I. Friedberg. Computational protein function prediction: Are we making progress? Cellular & Molecular Life Sciences, 64: 2505 - 2511, 2007.
31. Z.R. Yang. Biological applications of support vector machines. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 5: 328 - 338, 2004.
32. G. Lopez, A. Rojas, M. Tress, and A. Valencia. Assessment of predictions submitted for the CASP7 function prediction category. Proteins, 69 (8): 165 - 174, 2007.
33. D. Voet and J.G. Voet. Biochemistry. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1995.
34. W. Kabsch and C. Sander. Dictionary of protein structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen - bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers, 22: 2577 - 2637, 1983.
35. L. Pauling, R.B. Corey, and H.R. Branson. The structure of proteins: Two hydrogenbonded helical configurations of the polypeptide chain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science U S A, 37: 205 - 234, 1951.
36. L. Pauling and R.B. Corey. Configurations of the polypeptide chains with favored orientations around single bonds: Two new pleated sheets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science U S A, 37: 729 - 740, 1951.
37. A.G. Szent - Gyorgyi and C. Cohen. Role of proline in polypeptide chain configuration of proteins. Science, 126: 697 - 698, 1957.
38. J.C. Kendrew, R.E. Dickerson, B.E. Strandberg, R.G. Hart, and D.R. Davies. Structure of Myoglobin: A Three - Dimensional Fourier Synthesis at 2 Å. Resolution. Nature, 185: 422 - 427, 1960.
39. M.F. Perutz, M.G. Rossmann, A.F. Cullis, G. Muirhead, G. Will, and A.T North. Structure of Haemoglobin: A Three - Dimensional Fourier Synthesis at 5.5 Å. Resolution. Nature, 185: 416 - 422, 1960.
40. H.A. Scheraga. Structural studies of ribonuclease III. A model for the secondary and tertiary structure. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 82: 3847 - 3852, 1960.
41. A.V. Finkelstein and O.B. Ptitsyn. Statistical analysis of the correlation among amino acid residues in helical, β - structural and non - regular regions of globular proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology, 62: 613 - 624, 1971.
42. P.Y. Chou and U.D. Fasman. Prediction of protein conformation. Biochemistry, 13: 211 - 215, 1974.
43. E.A. Kabat and T.T. Wu. The infl uence of nearest - neighbor amino acids on the conformation of the middle amino acid in proteins: Comparison of predicted and experimental determination of β - sheets in concanavalin A. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science U S A, 70: 1473 - 1477, 1973.
44. F.R. Maxfield and H.A. Scheraga. Status of empirical methods for the prediction of protein backbone topography. Biochemistry, 15: 5138 - 5153, 1976.
45. H.L. Holley and M. Karplus. Protein secondary structure prediction with a neural network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science U S A, 86: 152 - 156, 1989.
46. G.E. Arnold, A.K. Dunker, S.J. Johns, and R.J. Douthart. Use of conditional probabilities for determining relationships between amino acid sequence and protein secondary structure. Proteins, 12: 382 - 399, 1992.
47. M.J. Zvelebil, G.J. Barton, W.R. Taylor, and M.J E. Sternberg. Prediction of protein secondary structure and active - sites using the alignment of homologous sequences. Journal of Molecular Biology, 195: 957 - 961, 1987.
48. B. Rost. Review: Protein secondary structure prediction continues to rise. Journal of Structural Biology, 134: 204 - 218, 2001.
49. V.A. Simossis and J. Heringa. Integrating secondary structure prediction and multiple sequence alignment. Current Protein and Peptide Science, 5: 1 - 15, 2004.
50. J. Heringa. Computational methods for protein secondary structure prediction using multiple sequence alignments. Current Protein and Peptide Science, 1: 273 - 301, 2000.
51. P.D. Yoo, B.B. Zhou, and A.Y. Zomaya. Machine learning techniques for protein secondary structure prediction: An overview and evaluation. Current Bioinformatics, 3: 74 - 86, 2008.
52. S. Hua and Z. Sun. A novel method of protein secondary structure prediction with high segment overlap measure: support vector machine approach. Journal of Molecular Biology, 308 (2): 397 - 407, 2001.
53. J.J. Ward, L.J. McGuffin, B.F. Buxton, and D.T. Jones. Secondary structure prediction with support vector machines. Bioinformatics, 19: 1650 - 1655, 2003.
54. H. Kim and H. Park. Protein secondary structure prediction based on an improved support vector machines approach. Protein Engineering, 16: 553 - 560, 2003.
55. H.J. Hu, Y. Pan, R. Harrison, and P.C. Tai. Improved protein secondary structure prediction using support vector machine with a new encoding scheme and an advanced tertiary classifier. IEEE Transactions on Nanobioscience, 3: 265 - 271, 2004.
56. L.H. Wang, Y.F. Li, J. Liu, and H.B. Zhou. Predicting protein secondary structure by a support vector machine based on a new coding scheme. Genome Informatics, 15: 181 - 190, 2004.
57. J. Guo, H. Chen, Z.R. Sun, and Y.L. Lin. A novel method for protein secondary structure prediction using dual - layer SVM and profiles. Proteins, 54: 738 - 743, 2004.
58. G. Karypis. YASSPP: Better kernels and coding schemes lead to improvements in protein secondary structure prediction. Proteins, 64: 575 - 586, 2006.
59. M.N. Nguyen and J.C. Rajapakse. Prediction of protein secondary structure with two - stage multi - class SVMs. International Journal of Data Mining and Bioinformatics, 1: 248 - 269, 2007.
60. N. Qian and T.J. Sejnowski. Predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins using neural network models. Journal of Molecular Biology, 202: 865 - 884, 1988.
61. B. Rost and C. Sander. Improved prediction of protein secondary structure by use of sequence profiles and neural networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science U S A, 90: 7558 - 7562, 1993.
62. D.T. Jones. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position - specific scoring matrices. Journal of Molecular Biology, 292: 195 - 202, 1999.
63. J.A. Cuff and G.J. Barton. Application of multiple sequence alignment profiles to improve protein secondary structure prediction. Proteins, 40: 502 - 511, 2000.
64. G.M. Chandonia and M. Karplus. New methods for accurate prediction of protein secondary structure. Proteins, 35: 293 - 306, 1999.
65. T.N. Petersen, C. Lundegaard, M. Nielsen, H. Boher, J. Boher, S. Brunak, G.P. Gippert, and O. Lund. Prediction of protein secondary structure at 80% accuracy. Proteins, 41: 17 - 20, 2000.
66. G. Pollastri, D. Przybylski, B. Rost, and P. Baldi. Improving the prediction of protein secondary structure in three and eight classes using recurrent neural networks and profiles. Proteins, 47: 228 - 235, 2002.
67. G. Pollastri and A. McLysaght. Porter: A new, accurate server for protein secondary structure prediction. Bioinformatics, 21: 1719 - 1720, 2005.
68. K. Lin, V.A. Simossis, W.R. Taylor, and J. Heringa. A simple and fast secondary structure prediction method using hidden neural networks. Bioinformatics, 21: 152 - 159, 2005.
69. J. Chen and N.S. Chaudhari. Cascaded bidirectional recurrent neural networks for protein secondary structure prediction. IEEE - ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, 4: 572 - 582, 2007.
70. S. Botelho, G. Simas, and P. Silveira. Prediction of protein Secondary Structure using nonlinear method. In I. King and J. Wang, and L. Chan, and D.L. Wang (Eds.), Neural Information Processing, Part 3, Proceedings; Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4234, pp. 40 - 47. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, 2006.
71. X. Zhang, J.P. Mesirov, and D.L. Waltz. Hybrid system for protein secondary structure prediction. Journal of Molecular Biology, 225: 1049 - 1063, 1992.
72. B. Rost and C. Sander. Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy. Journal of Molecular Biology, 232: 584 - 599, 1993.
73. J.A. Cuff, M.E. Clamp, A.S. Siddiqui, M. Finlay, and G.J. Barton. Jpred: A consensus secondary structure prediction server. Bioinformatics, 14: 892 - 893, 1998.
74. R.D. King, M. Ouali, A.T. Strong, A. Aly, A. Elmaghraby, M. Kantardzic, and D. Page. Is it better to combine predictions? Protein Engineering, 13: 15 - 19, 2000.
75. M. Albrecht, S.C.E. Tosatto, T. Lengauer, and G. Valle. Simple consensus procedures are effective and sufficient in secondary structure prediction. Protein Engineering, 16: 459 - 462, 2003.
76. A. Ceroni, P. Frasconi, A. Passerini, and A. Vullo. A combination of support vector machines and bidirectional recurrent neural networks for protein secondary structure prediction. In A. Cappelli and F. Turini (Eds.), AIIA 2003: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Proceedings; Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2829, pp. 142 - 153. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, 2003.
77. Y. Liu, J. Carbonell, J. Klein - Seetharaman, and V. Gopalakrishnan. Comparison of probabilistic combination methods for protein secondary structure prediction. Bioinformatics, 20: 3099 - 3107, 2004.
78. Y. Guermeur, G. Pollastri, A. Elisseeff, D. Zelus, H. Paugam - Moisy, and P. Baldi. Combining protein secondary structure prediction models with ensemble methods of optimal complexity. Neurocomputing, 56: 305 - 327, 2004.
79. M. Kazemian, B. Moshiri, H. Nikbakht, and C. Lucas. Protein secondary structure classifiers fusion using OWA. In J.L. Oliveira and V. Maojo, and F. Martin Sanchez and A.S. Pereira (Eds.), Biological and Medical Data Analysis, Proceedings; Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3745, pp. 338 - 345. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, 2005.
80. H.N. Lin, J.M. Chang, K.P. Wu, T.Y. Sung, and W.L. Hsu. Hyprosp II - A knowledge - based hybrid method for protein secondary structure prediction based on local prediction confidence. Bioinformatics, 21: 3227 - 3233, 2005.
81. K. - H. Liu, J. - F. Xia, and X. Li. Efficient ensemble schemes for protein secondary structure prediction. Protein and Peptide Letters, 15: 488 - 493, 2008.
82. W. Chu, Z. Ghahramani, A. Podtelezhnikov, and D.L. Wild. Bayesian segmental models with multiple sequence alignment profiles for protein secondary structure and contact map prediction. IEEE - ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, 3: 98 - 113, 2006.
83. Z. Aydin, Y. Altunbasak, and M. Borodovsky. Protein secondary structure prediction for a single - sequence using hidden semi - Markov models. BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 2006.
84. Z. Aydin, Y. Altunbasak, and H. Erdogan. Bayesian protein secondary structure prediction with near - optimal segmentations. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 55: 3512 - 3525, 2007.
85. X. - Q. Yao, H. Zhu, and Z. - S. She. A dynamic Bayesian network approach to protein secondary structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9, 2008.
86. X.M. Pan. Multiple linear regression for protein secondary structure prediction. Proteins, 43: 256 - 259, 2001.
87. S. Qin, Y. He, and X.M. Pan. Predicting protein secondary structure and solvent accessibility with an improved multiple linear regression method. Proteins, 61: 473 - 480, 2005.
88. J. Sim, S.Y. Kim, and J. Lee. Prediction of protein solvent accessibility using fuzzy k - nearest neighbor method. Bioinformatics, 21: 2844 - 2849, 2005.
89. M. Sadeghi, S. Parto, S. Arab, and B. Ranjbar. Prediction of protein secondary structure based on residue pair types and conformational states using dynamic programming algorithm. FEBS Letters, 579: 3397 - 3400, 2005.
90. G. Armano, G. Mancosu, L. Milanesi, A. Orro, M. Saba, and E. Vargiu. A hybrid genetic - neural system for predicting protein secondary structure. BMC Bioinformatics, 6: S3, 2005.
91. F. Jiang. Prediction of protein secondary structure with a reliability score estimated by local sequence clustering. Protein Engineering, 16: 651 - 657, 2003.
92. S.H. Doong and C.Y. Yeh. Cluster - based local modeling approach to protein secondary structure prediction. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 2: 551 - 560, 2005.
93. J.L. Shao, D. Xu, L.Z. Wang, and Y.F. Wang. Bayesian neural networks for prediction of protein secondary structure. In X. Li and S. Wang, and Z.Y. Dong, (Eds.), Advanced Data Mining and Applications, Proceedings; Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3584, pp. 544 - 551. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, 2005.
94. L. Budagyan and R. Abagyan. Weighted quality estimates in machine learning. Bioinformatics, 22: 2597 - 2603, 2006.
95. J. Chen and N.S. Chaudhari. Bidirectional segmented - memory recurrent neural network for protein secondary structure prediction. Soft Computing, 10: 315 - 324, 2006.
96. P. Baldi and G. Pollastri. The principled design of large - scale recursive neural network architectures - DAG - RNNs and the protein structure prediction problem. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 4: 575 - 602, 2004.
97. K.P. Wu, H.N. Lin, J.M. Chang, T.Y. Sung, and W.L. Hsu. HYPROSP: A hybrid protein secondary structure prediction algorithm - a knowledge - based approach. Nucleic Acids Research, 32: 5059 - 5065, 2004.
98. S. Montgomerie, S. Sundararaj, W.J. Gallin, and D.S. Wishart. Improving the accuracy of protein secondary structure prediction using structural alignment. BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 2006.
99. R. Bondugula and D. Xu. MUPRED: A tool for bridging the gap between template based methods and sequence profile based methods for protein secondary structure prediction. Proteins, 66: 664 - 670, 2007.
100. G. Pollastri, A.J.M. Martin, C. Mooney, and A. Vullo. Accurate prediction of protein secondary structure and solvent accessibility by consensus combiners of sequence and structure information. BMC Bioinformatics, 8: 201, 2007.
101. H. Cheng, T.Z. Sen, R.L. Jernigan, and A. Kloczkowski. Consensus data mining (CDM) protein secondary structure prediction server: Combining GOR V and fragment database mining (FDM). Bioinformatics, 23: 2628 - 2630, 2007.
102. J.M. Pei and N.V. Grishin. Combining evolutionary and structural information for local protein structure prediction. Proteins, 56: 782 - 794, 2004.
103. A. Figureau, M.A. Soto, and J. Toha. A pentapeptide - based method for protein secondary structure prediction. Protein Engineering, 16: 103 - 107, 2003.
104. G.T. Kilosanidze, A.S. Kutsenko, N.G. Esipova, and V.G. Tumanyan. Analysis of forces that determine helix formation in alpha - proteins. Protein Science, 13: 351 - 357, 2004.
105. S.K. Woo, C.B. Park, and S.W. Lee. Protein secondary structure prediction using sequence profile and conserved domain profile. In D.S. Huang and X. P. Zhang, and G.B. Huang (Eds.), Advances in Intelligent Computing, Part 2, Proceedings; Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3645, pp. 1 - 10. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, 2005.
106. F. Birzele and S. Kramer. A new representation for protein secondary structure prediction based on frequent patterns. Bioinformatics, 22: 2628 - 2634, 2006.
107. M.J. Wood and J.D. Hirst. Protein secondary structure prediction with dihedral angles. Proteins, 59: 476 - 481, 2005.
108. C. Mooney, A. Vullo, and G. Pollastri. Protein structural motif prediction in multidimensional phi - psi space leads to improved secondary structure prediction. J. Computational Biology, 13: 1489 - 1502, 2006.
109. U. Midic, A.K. Dunker, and Z. Obradovic. Exploring alternative knowledge representations for protein secondary - structure prediction. International Journal of Data Mining and Bioinformatics, 1: 286 - 313, 2007.
110. A. Momen - Roknabadi, M. Sadeghi, H. Pezeshk, and S. - A. Marashi. Impact of residue accessible surface area on the prediction of protein secondary structures. BMC Bioinformatics, 9, 2008.
111. J. Meiler and D. Baker. Coupled prediction of protein secondary and tertiary structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science U S A, 100: 12105 - 12110, 2003.
112. B. Gassend, C.W. O'Donnell, W. Thies, A. Lee, M. van Dijk, and S. Devadas. Learning biophysically - motivated parameters for alpha helix prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 8, 2007.
113. B.I. Baello, P. Pancoska, and T.A. Keiderling. Enhanced prediction accuracy of protein secondary structure using hydrogen exchange Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Analytical Biochemistry, 280: 46 - 57, 2000.
114. J.A. Hering, P.R. Innocent, and P.I. Haris. Neuro - fuzzy structural classification of proteins for improved protein secondary structure prediction. Proteomics, 3: 1464 - 1475, 2003.
115. J.G. Lees and R.W. Janes. Combining sequence - based prediction methods and circular dichroism and infrared spectroscopic data to improve protein secondary structure determinations. BMC Bioinformatics, 9, 2008.
116. J. Meiler, M. Muller, A. Zeidler, and F. Schmaschke. Generation and evaluation of dimension reduced amino acid parameter representations by artificial neural networks. Journal of Molecular Modeling, 7: 360 - 369, 2001.
117. M. Mezei. Chameleon sequences in the PDB. Protein Engineering, 11: 411 - 414, 1998.
118. S. Yoon and W.J. Welsh. Rapid assessment of contact - dependent secondary structure propensity: Relevance to amyloidogenic sequences. Proteins, 60: 110 - 117, 2005.
119. M. Boden, Z. Yuan, and T.L. Bailey. Prediction of protein continuum secondary structure with probabilistic models based on NMR solved structures. BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 2006.
120. S. Costantini, G. Colonna, and A.M. Facchiano. PreSSAPro: A software for the prediction of secondary structure by amino acid properties. Computational Biology and Chemistry, 31: 389 - 392, 2007.
121. J. - T. Guo, J.W. Jaromczyk, and Y. Xu. Analysis of chameleon sequences and their implications in biological processes. Proteins, 67: 548 - 558, 2007.
122. I. Jacoboni, P.L. Martelli, P. Fariselli, M. Compiani, and R. Casadio. Predictions of protein segments with the same aminoacid sequence and different secondary structure: A benchmark for predictive methods. Proteins, 41: 535 - 544, 2000.
123. F. FarzadFard, N. Gharaei, H. Pezeshk, and S. - A. Marashi. Beta - sheet capping: Signals that initiate and terminate beta - sheet formation. Journal of Structural Biology, 161: 101 - 110, 2008.
124. C.L. Wilson, P.E. Boardman, A.J. Doig, and S.J. Hubbard. Improved prediction for N - termini of alpha - helices using empirical information. Proteins, 57: 322 - 330, 2004.
125. U. Midic, K. Dunker, and Z. Obradovic. Improving protein secondary - structure prediction by predicting ends of secondary - structure segments. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, CIBCB 2005. Embassy Suites Hotel La Jolla, La Jolla, CA, November 14 - 15, 2005, pp. 490 - 497. IEEE, 2005.
126. D. Kihara. The effect of long - range interactions on the secondary structure formation of proteins. Protein Science, 14: 1955 - 1963, 2005.
127. A. Fiser, Z. Dosztanyi, and I. Simon. The role of long - range interactions in defining the secondary structure of proteins is overestimated. Computer Applications in the Biosciences, 13: 297 - 301, 1997.
128. G.E. Crooks and S.E. Brenner. Protein secondary structure: Entropy, correlations and prediction. Bioinformatics, 20: 1603 - 1611, 2004.
129. A. Ceroni and P. Frasconi. On the role of long - range dependencies in learning protein secondary structure. IEEE Proceedings on Neural Network, 3: 1899 - 1904, 2004.
130. A. Ceroni, P. Frasconi, and G. Pollastri. Learning protein secondary structure from sequential and relational data. Neural Networks, 18: 1029 - 1039, 2005.
131. C.A. Andersen and B. Rost. Secondary structure assignment. Methods of Biochemical Analysis, 44: 341 - 363, 2003.
132. D. Frishman and P. Argos. Knowledge - based protein secondary structure assignment. Proteins, 23: 566 - 579, 1995.
133. F.M. Richards and C.E. Kundrot. Identification of structural motifs from protein coordinate data: Secondary structure and first level supersecondary structure. Proteins, 3: 71 - 84, 1988.
134. G. Labesse, N. Colloc'h, J. Pothier, and J.P. Mornon. P - SEA: A new efficient assignment of secondary structure from C alpha trace of proteins. Computer Applications in the Biosciences, 13: 291 - 295, 1997.
135. J. Martin, G. Letellier, A. Marin, J.F. Taly, A G. de Brevern, and G.F. Gibrat. Protein secondary structure assignment revisited: a detailed analysis of different assignment mthods. BMC Structural Biology, 5, 2005.
136. H. Sklenar, C. Etchebest, and R. Lavery. Describing protein structure: a general algorithm yielding complete helicoidal parameters and a unique overall axis. Proteins, 6: 46 - 60, 1989.
137. S.M. King and W.C. Johnson. Assigning secondary structure from protein coordinate data. Proteins, 3: 313 - 320, 1999.
138. M.N. Fodje and S. Al - Karadaghi. Occurrence, conformational features and amino acid propensities for the pi - helix. Protein Engineering, 15: 353 - 358, 2002.
139. M.V. Cubellis, F. Cailliez, and S.C. Lovell. Secondary structure assignment that accurately refl ects physical and evolutionary characteristics. BMC Bioinformatics, 6: S8, 2005.
140. F. Dupuis, J.F. Sadoc, and J.P. Mornon. Protein secondary structure assignment through Voronoi tessellation. Proteins, 55: 519 - 528, 2004.
141. B. Offmann, M. Tyagi, and A.G. de Brevern. Local protein structures. Current Bioinformatics, 2: 165 - 202, 2007.
142. N. Colloc'h, C. Etchebest, E. Thoreau, B. Henrissat, and J. - P. Mornon. Comparison of three algorithms for the assignment of secondary structure in proteins: The advantages of a consensus assignment. Protein Engineering, 6: 377 - 382, 1993.
143. G.E. Schulz, C.D. Barry, J. Friedman, P.Y. Chou, G.D. Fasman, A.V. Finkelstein, V.I. Lim, O.B. Pititsyn, E.A. Kabat, T.T. Wu, M. Levitt, B. Robson, and K. Nagano. Comparison of predicted and experimentally determined secondary structure of adenyl kinase. Nature, 250: 140 - 142, 1974.
144. B. Robson and J. Garnier. Introduction to Proteins and Protein Engineering. Amsterdam: Elsevier Press, 1986.
145. D.J. Barlow and J.M. Thornton. Helix geometry in proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology, 201: 601 - 619, 1988.
146. W. Zhang, K. Dunker, and Y. Zhou. Assessing secondary - structure assignment of protein structures by using pairwise sequence - alignment benchmarks. Proteins, 71: 61 - 67, 2008.
147. P.F.J. Fuchs and A.J.P. Alix. High accuracy prediction of beta - turns and their types using propensities and multiple alignments. Proteins, 59: 828 - 839, 2005.
148. Y. Wang, Z. Xue, and J. Xu. Better prediction of the location of alpha - turns in proteins with support vector machine. Proteins, 65: 49 - 54, 2006.
149. A. Kirschner and D. Frishman. Prediction of beta - turns and beta - turn types by a novel bidirectional Elman - type recurrent neural network with multiple output layers (MOLE - BRNN). Gene, 422: 22 - 29, 2008.
150. H. Kaur and G.P.S. Raghava. Prediction of alpha - turns in proteins using PSI -BLAST profiles and secondary structure information. Proteins, 55: 83 - 90, 2004.
151. G.N. Ramachandran and V. Sasisekharan. Conformation of polypeptides and proteins. Advances in Protein Chemistry, 23: 283 - 437, 1968.
152. J.F. Gibrat, B. Robson, and J. Garnier. Infl uence of the local amino acid sequence upon the zones of the torsional angles phi and psi adopted by residues in proteins. Biochemistry, 30: 1578 - 1586, 1991.
153. H.S. Kang, N.A. Kurochkina, and B. Lee. Estimation and use of protein backbone angle probabilities. Journal of Molecular Biology, 229: 448 - 460, 1993.
154. R. Karchin, M. Cline, Y. Mandel - Gutfreund, and K. Karplus. Hidden Markov models that use predicted local structure for fold recognition: alphabets of backbone geometry. Proteins, 51: 504 - 514, 2003.
155. R. Kuang, C. S. Lesliei, and A. - S. Yang. Protein backbone angle prediction with machine learning approaches. Bioinformatics, 20: 1612 - 1621, 2004.
156. S. Katzman, C. Barrett, G. Thiltgen, R. Karchin, and K. Karplus. PREDICT -2ND: A tool for generalized protein local structure prediction. Bioinformatics, 24: 2453 - 2459, 2008.
157. J.N. Song, K. Burrage, Z. Yuan, and T. Huber. Prediction of cis/trans isomerization in proteins using PSI - BLAST profiles and secondary structure information. BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 2006.
158. R.A. Abagyan, M.M. Totrov, and D.A. Kuznetsov. ICM: A new method for structure modeling and design: Applications to docking and structure prediction from the distorted native conformation. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 15: 488 - 506, 1994.
159. L.M. Rice and A.T. Brunger. Torsion angle dynamics: reduced variable conformational sampling enhances crystallographic structure refinement. Proteins, 19: 277 - 290, 1994.
160. J.S. Evans, A.M. Mathiowetz, S.I. Chan, and W.A. Goddard III. De novo prediction of polypeptide conformations using dihedral probability grid Monte Carlo methodology. Protein Science, 4: 1203 - 1216, 1995.
161. M.J. Rooman, J.P. Kocher, and S.J. Wodak. Prediction of protein backbone conformation based on seven structure assignments. Infl uence of local interactions. Journal of Molecular Biology, 221: 961 - 979, 1991.
162. B.H. Park and M. Levitt. The complexity and accuracy of discrete state models of protein structure. Journal of Molecular Biology, 249: 493 - 507, 1995.
163. X.F. de la Cruz, M.W Mahoney, and B. Lee. Discrete representations of the protein C α chain. Folding & Design, 2: 223 - 234, 1997.
164. A.G. de Brevern, C. Etchebest, and S. Hazout. Bayesian probabilistic approach for predicting backbone structures in terms of protein blocks. Proteins, 41: 271 - 287, 2000.
165. H. Gong, P.J. Fleming, and G.D. Rose. Building native protein conformation from highly approximate backbone torsion angles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science U S A, 102: 16227 - 16232, 2005.
166. Y. Yang and H. Liu. Genetic algorithms for protein conformation sampling and optimization in a discrete backbone dihedral angle space. Journal Computational Chemistry, 27: 1593 - 1602, 2006.
167. C. Bystroff and D. Baker. Prediction of local structure in proteins using a library of sequence - structure motifs. Journal of Molecular Biology, 281: 565 - 577, 1998.
168. C. Bystroff, V. Thorsson, and D. Baker. HMMSTR: A hidden Markov model for local sequence - structure correlations in proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology, 301: 173 - 190, 2000.
169. A.G. de Brevern, C. Benros, R. Gautier, H. Valadie, S. Hazout, and C. Etchebest. Local backbone structure prediction of proteins. In Silico Biology, 4: 31, 2004.
170. C. Etchebest, C. Benros, S. Hazout, and A.G. de Brevern. A structural alphabet for local protein structures: Improved prediction methods. Proteins, 59: 810 - 827, 2005.
171. O. Sander, I. Sommer, and T. Lengauer. Local protein structure prediction using discriminative models. BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 2006.
172. C. Benros, A.G. de Brevern, C. Etchebest, and S. Hazout. Assessing a novel approach for predicting local 3D protein structures from sequence. Proteins, 62: 865 - 880, 2006.
173. A.G. De Brevern, C. Etchebest, C. Benros, and S. Hazout. " Pinning strategy ": A novel approach for predicting the backbone structure in terms of protein blocks from sequence. Journal of Biosciences, 32: 51 - 70, 2007.
174. O. Zimmermann and U.H.E. Hansmann. Support vector machines for prediction of dihedral angle regions. Bioinformatics, 22: 3009 - 3015, 2006.
175. O. Zimmermann and U.H.E. Hansmann. LOCUSTRA: Accurate prediction of local protein structure using a two - layer support vector machine approach. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 48: 1903 - 1908, 2008.
176. Q. Dong, X. Wang, L. Lin, and Y. Wang. Analysis and prediction of protein local structure based on structure alphabets. Proteins, 72: 163 - 172, 2008.
177. W. Boomsma, K.V. Mardia, C.C. Taylor, J. Ferkinghoff - Borg, A. Krogh, and T. Hamelryck. A generative, probabilistic model of local protein structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science U S A, 105 (26): 8932 - 8937.
178. S. Wu and Y. Zhang. MUSTER: Improving protein sequence profile - profile alignments by using multiple sources of structure information. Proteins, 72: 547 - 556, 2008.
179. W. Zhang, S. Liu, and Y. Zhou. SP 5: Improving protein fold recognition by using predicted torsion angles and profile - based gap penalty. PLoS ONE, 6: e2325, 2008.
180. Y.M. Huang and C. Bystroff. Improved pairwise alignments of proteins in the twilight zone using local structure predictions. Bioinformatics, 22: 413 - 422, 2006.
181. T.G. Pedersen, B.W. Sigurskjold, K.V. Andersen, M. Kjaer, F.M. Poulsen, C.M. Dobson, and C. Redfield. A nuclear magnetic resonance study of the hydrogen -exchange behavior of lysozyme in crystals and solution. Journal of Molecular Biology, 218: 413 - 426, 1991.
182. S. Chakravarty and R. Varadarajan. Residue depth: a novel parameter for the analysis of protein structure and stability. Structure with Folding and Design, 15: 723 - 732, 1999.
183. G. Pollastri, P. Baldi, P. Fariselli, and R. Casadio. Prediction of coordination number and relative solvent accessibility in proteins. Proteins, 47: 142 - 153, 2002.
184. T. Hamelryck. An amino acid has two sides: A new 2D measure provides a different view of solvent exposure. Proteins, 59: 38 - 48, 2005.
185. M. Stout, J. Bacardit, J.D. Hirst, and N. Krasnogor. Prediction of recursive convex hull class assignments for protein residues. Bioinformatics, 24: 916 - 923, 2008.
186. Z. Yuan and Z.X. Wang. Quantifying the relationship of protein burying depth and sequence. Proteins, 70: 509 - 516, 2008.
187. H. Zhang, T. Zhang, K. Chen, S. Shen, J. Ruan, and L. Kurgan. Sequence based residue depth prediction using evolutionary information and predicted secondary structure. BMC Bioinformatics, 9, 2008.
188. P. Fariselli and R. Casadio. RCNPRED: Prediction of the residue co - ordination numbers in proteins. Bioinformatics, 17: 202 - 203, 2001.
189. C.T. Zhang and R. Zhang. Q(9), a content - balancing accuracy index to evaluate algorithms of protein secondary structure prediction. International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, 35: 1256 - 1262, 2003.
190. A.R. Kinjo and K. Nishikawa. CRNPRED: Highly accurate prediction of one -dimensional protein structures by large - scale critical random networks. BMC Bioinformatics, 7: 401, 2006.
191. T. Ishida, S. Nakamura, and K. Shimizu. Potential for assessing quality of protein structure based on contact number prediction. Proteins, 64: 940 - 947, 2006.
192. J. Song, H. Tan, K. Takemoto, and T. Akutsu. HSEpred: Predict half - sphere exposure from protein sequences. Bioinformatics, 24: 1489 - 1497, 2008.
193. S.R. Hobrook, S.M. Mushal, and S.H. Kim. Predicting surface exposure of amino acids from protein sequence. Protein Engineering, 3: 659 - 665, 1990.
194. B. Rost and C. Sander. Conservation and prediction of solvent accessibility in protein families. Proteins, 20: 216 - 226, 1994.
195. M.H. Mucchielli - Giorgi, P. Tuffery, and S. Hazout. Prediction of solvent accessibility of amino acid residues: critical aspects. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, 101: 186 - 193, 1999.
196. S. Pascarella, R. De Persio, F. Bossa, and P. Argos. Easy method to predict solvent accessibility from multiple protein sequence alignments. Proteins, 32: 190 - 199, 1999.
197. X. Li and X. Pan. New method for accurate prediction of solvent accessibility from protein sequence. Proteins, 42: 1 - 5, 2001.
198. S. Ahmad and M.M. Gromiha. NETASA: Neural network based prediction of solvent accessibility. Bioinformatics, 18: 819 - 824, 2002.
199. A. Garg, H. Kaur, and G.P.S. Raghava. Real value prediction of solvent accessibility in proteins using multiple sequence alignment and secondary structure. Proteins, 61: 318 - 324, 2005.
200. M.F. Raih, S. Ahmad, R. Zheng, and R. Mohamed. Solvent accessibility in native and isolated domain environments: general features and implications to interface predictability. Biophysical Chemistry, 114: 63 - 69, 2005.
201. Z. Yuan, K. Burrage, and J.S. Mattick. Prediction of protein solvent accessibility using support vector machines. Proteins, 48: 566 - 570, 2002.
202. Z. Yuan and B. Huang. Prediction of protein accessible surface areas by support vector regression. Proteins, 57: 558 - 564, 2004.
203. G. Gianese, F. Bossa, and S. Pascarella. Improvement in prediction of solvent accessibility by probability profiles. Protein Engineering, 16: 987 - 992, 2003.
204. H. Kim and H. Park. Prediction of protein relative solvent accessibility with support vector machines and long - range interaction 3D local descriptor. Proteins, 54: 557 - 562, 2004.
205. S. Ahmad, M.M. Gromiha, and A. Sarai. Real value prediction of solvent accessibility from amino acid sequence. Proteins, 50: 629 - 635, 2003.
206. R. Adamczak, A. Porollo, and J. Meller. Accurate prediction of solvent accessibility using neural networks - based regression. Proteins, 56: 753 - 767, 2004.
207. J. Wang, H. Lee, and S. Ahmad. Prediction and evolutionary information analysis of protein solvent accessibility using multiple linear regression. Proteins, 61: 481 - 491, 2005.
208. Z. Xu, C. Zhang, S. Liu, and Y. Zhou. QBES: Predicting real values of solvent accessibility from sequences by efficient, constrained energy optimization. Proteins, 63: 961 - 966, 2006.
209. H. Naderi - Manesh, M. Sadeghi, S. Arab, and A.A.M. Movahedi. Prediction of protein surface accessibility with information theory. Proteins, 42: 452 - 459, 2001.
210. S. Liu, C. Zhang, S. Liang, and Y. Zhou. Fold recognition by concurrent use of solvent accessibility and residue depth. Proteins, 68: 636 - 645, 2007.
211. H.L. Chen and H.X. Zhou. Prediction of solvent accessibility and sites of deleterious mutations from protein sequence. Nucleic Acids Research, 33: 3193 - 3199, 2005.
212. J. Qiu and R. Elber. SSALN: An alignment algorithm using structure - dependent substitution matrices and gap penalties learned from structurally aligned protein pairs. Proteins, 62: 881 - 891, 2006.
213. R. Adamczak, A. Porollo, and J. Meller. Combining prediction of secondary structure and solvent accessibility in proteins. Proteins, 59: 467 - 475, 2005.
214. V.G. Krishnan and D.R. Westhead. A comparative study of machine - learning methods to predict the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms on protein function. Bioinformatics, 19: 2199 - 2209, 2003.
215. R.J. Dobson, P.B. Munroe, M.J. Caulfield, and M.A.S. Saqi. Predicting deleterious nsSNPs: an analysis of sequence and structural attributes. BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 2006.
216. Y. Bromberg, G. Yachdav, and B. Rost. SNAP predicts effect of mutations on protein function. Bioinformatics, 24: 2397 - 2398, 2008.
217. Y. Ofran and B. Rost. Predicted protein - protein interaction sites from local sequence information. FEBS Letters, 544: 236 - 239, 2003.
218. A. Porollo and J. Meller. Prediction - based fingerprints of protein - protein interactions. Proteins, 66: 630 - 645, 2007.
219. G. Wang and R.L. Jr. Dunbrack. PISCES: a protein sequence culling server. Bioinformatics, 19: 1589 - 1591, 2003.
220. D.E. Rumelhart, G.E. Hinton, and R.J. Williams. Learning representations by backpropagating errors. Nature, 323: 533 - 536, 1986.
221. S.F. Altschul, T.L. Madden, A.A. Schäffer, J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Miller, and D.J. Lipman. Gapped BLAST and PSI - BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Research, 25: 3389 - 3402, 1997.
222. E. Faraggi, Y. Yang, S. Zhang, and Y. Zhou. Predicting continuous local structure and the effect of its substitution for secondary structure in fragment - free protein structure prediction. Structure, 17: 1515 - 1527, 2009.