Analysis of chameleon sequences and their implications in biological processes

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 548-558

  Guo, Jun Tao ^a,b   Jaromczyk, Jerzy W ^c   Xu, Ying ^a,b  

^a University of Georgia   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Alternative splicing; Amyloid fibril; Amyloidosis; Chameleon he; Chameleon hs; Isoforms; Molecular dynamics simulations; Secondary structure

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; AMYLOID; ISOPROTEIN; PEPTIDE;

ALGORITHM; ALTERNATIVE RNA SPLICING; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PREDICTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DATA BANK; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

3-HYDROXYACYL COA DEHYDROGENASES; ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; OLIGOPEPTIDES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID; SOFTWARE;

EID: 34247223063     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21285     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Anfinsen CB. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science 1973;181:223-230.
2. Han KF, Baker D. Global properties of the mapping between local amino acid sequence and local structure in proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:5814-5818.
3. Kabsch W, Sander C. On the use of sequence homologies to predict protein structure: identical pentapeptides can have completely different conformations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1984;81:1075-1078.
4. Mezei M. Chameleon sequences in the PDB. Protein Eng 1998;11:411-414.
5. Minor DL, Jr, Kim PS. Context-dependent secondary structure formation of a designed protein sequence. Nature 1996;380:730-734.
6. Yang WZ, Ko TP, Corselli L, Johnson RC, Yuan HS. Conversion of a β-strand to an α-helix induced by a single-site mutation observed in the crystal structure of Fis mutant Pro26Ala. Protein Sci 1998;7:1875-1883.
7. Tidow H, Lauber T, Vitzithum K, Sommerhoff CP, Rosch P, Marx UC. The solution structure of a chimeric LEKTI domain reveals a chameleon sequence. Biochemistry 2004;43:11238-11247.
8. Abel K, Yoder MD, Hilgenfeld R, Jurnak F. An α to β conformational switch in EF-Tu. Structure 1996;4:1153-1159.
9. Carr CM, Kim PS. A spring-loaded mechanism for the conformational change of influenza hemagglutinin. Cell 1993;73:823-832.
10. Kelly JW. The alternative conformations of amyloidogenic proteins and their multi-step assembly pathways. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1998;8:101-106.
11. Serpell LC. Alzheimer's amyloid fibrils: structure and assembly. Biochim Biophys Acta 2000;1502:16-30.
12. Cohen BI, Presnell SR, Cohen FE. Origins of structural diversity within sequentially identical hexapeptides. Protein Sci 1993;2:2134-2145.
13. Zhou X, Alber F, Folkers G, Gonnet GH, Chelvanayagam G. An analysis of the helix-to-strand transition between peptides with identical sequence. Proteins 2000;41:248-256.
14. Rost B. Review: protein secondary structure prediction continues to rise. J Struct Biol 2001;134:204-218.
15. Chou PY, Fasman GD. Prediction of the secondary structure of proteins from their amino acid sequence. Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol 1978;47:45-148.
16. Garnier J, Osguthorpe DJ, Robson B. Analysis of the accuracy and implications of simple methods for predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1978;120:97-120.
17. Rost B, Sander C. Combining evolutionary information and neural networks to predict protein secondary structure. Proteins 1994;19:55-72.
18. Jones DT. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol 1999;292:195-202.
19. Hua S, Sun Z. A novel method of protein secondary structure prediction with high segment overlap measure: support vector machine approach. J Mol Biol 2001;308:397-407.
20. Karplus K, Barrett C, Hughey R. Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies. Bioinformatics 1998;14:846-856.
21. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235-242.
22. Modrek B, Lee C. A genomic view of alternative splicing. Nat Genet 2002;30:13-19.
23. Hanke J, Brett D, Zastrow I, Aydin A, Delbruck S, Lehmann G, Luft F, Reich J, Bork P. Alternative splicing of human genes: more the rule than the exception? Trends Genet 1999;15:389-390.
24. Stolc V, Gauhar Z, Mason C, Halasz G, van Batenburg MF, Rifkin SA, Hua S, Herreman T, Tongprasit W, Barbano PE, Bussemaker HJ, White KP. A gene expression map for the euchromatic genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 2004;306:655-660.
25. Wang P, Yan B, Guo JT, Hicks C, Xu Y. Structural genomics analysis of alternative splicing and application to isoform structure modeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:18920-18925.
26. Garcia J, Gerber SH, Sugita S, Sudhof TC, Rizo J. A conformational switch in the Piccolo C2A domain regulated by alternative splicing. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2004;11:45-53.
27. Wang G, Dunbrack RL, Jr. PISCES: a protein sequence culling server. Bioinformatics 2003;19:1589-1591.
28. Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983;22:2577-2637.
29. Hutchinson EG, Thornton JM. PROMOTIF - a program to identify and analyze structural motifs in proteins. Protein Sci 1996;5:212-220.
30. Kim D, Xu D, Guo JT, Ellrott K, Xu Y. PROSPECT II: protein structure prediction program for genome-scale applications. Protein Eng 2003;16:641-650.
31. Kissinger CR, Rejto PA, Pelletier LA, Thomson JA, Showalter RE, Abreo MA, Agree CS, Margosiak S, Meng JJ, Aust RM, Vanderpool D, Li B, Tempczyk-Russell A, Villafranca JE. Crystal structure of human ABAD/HSD10 with a bound inhibitor: implications for design of Alzheimer's disease therapeutics. J Mol Biol 2004;342:943-952.
32. Sali A, Blundell TL. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 1993;234:779-815.
33. Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J Appl Crystallogr 1993;26:283-291.
34. Kale L, Skeel R, Bhandarkar M, Brunner R, Gursoy A, Krawetz N, Phillips J, Shinozaki A, Varadarajan K, Schulten K. NAMD2: greater scalability for parallel molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 1999;151:283-312.
35. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, Karplus M. Charmm - a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J Comput Chem 1983;4:187-217.
36. Darden T, York D, Pedersen L. Particle mesh Ewald: an N.log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J Chem Phys 1993;98:10089-11009.
37. Sayle RA, Milner-White EJ. RASMOL: biomolecular graphics for all. Trends Biochem Sci 1995;20:374-376.
38. Andreeva A, Howorth D, Brenner SE, Hubbard TJ, Chothia C, Murzin AG. SCOP database in 2004: refinements integrate structure and sequence family data. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:D226-D229.
39. Chou PY, Fasman GD. Prediction of protein conformation. Biochemistry 1974;13:222-245.
40. Yang JK, Park MS, Waldo GS, Suh SW. Directed evolution approach to a structural genomics project: Rv2002 from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:455-460.
41. Minor DL, Jr, Kim PS. Context is a major determinant of β-sheet propensity. Nature 1994;371:264-267.
42. Baldwin RL, Rose GD. Is protein folding hierarchic? I. Local structure and peptide folding. Trends Biochem Sci 1999;24:26-33.
43. Kuznetsov IB, Rackovsky S. On the properties and sequence context of structurally ambivalent fragments in proteins. Protein Sci 2003;12:2420-2433.
44. Davletov B, Jimenez JL. Sculpting a domain by splicing. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2004;11:4-5.