Protein Secondary Structure Assignment Through Voronoï Tessellation

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 519-528

  Dupuis, Franck ^a   Sadoc, Jean François ^b   Mornon, Jean Paul ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SUD   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

helices; strands; Contact matrices; Vorono tessellation

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; GEOMETRY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; OPTICAL RESOLUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; RESIDUE ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VORONOI TESSELLATION ASSIGNMENT PROCEDURE;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACIDS; CARBON; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS;

EID: 2442596233     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.10566     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Pauling L, Corey RB, Branson HR. The structure of proteins: two hydrogen-bonded helical configurations of the polypetptide chain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1951;37:205-234.
2. Pauling L, Corey RB. Configurations of polypeptide chains with favored orientations around single bonds: two new pleated sheets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1951;37:729-740.
3. Lewis PN, Momany FA, Scheraga HA. Folding of polypeptide chains in proteins: a proposed mechanism for folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1971;68:2293-2297.
4. Kuntz ID. Protein folding. J Am Chem Soc 1972;94:4009-4012.
5. Crawford JL, Lipscomb WN, Schellman CG. The reverse turn as a polypeptide conformation in globular proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1973;70:538-542.
6. Levitt M, Greer J. Automatic identification of secondary structure in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1977;114:181-239.
7. Rose GD, Seltzer JP. A new algorithm for finding the peptide chain turns in a globular protein. J Mol Biol 1977;113:153-164.
8. Chou PY, Fasman GD. Beta-turns in proteins. J Mol Biol 1977;115: 135-175.
9. Kolaskar AS, Ramabrahmam V, Soman KV. Reversals of polypeptide chain in globular proteins. Int J Pept Protein Res 1980;16:1-11.
10. Ramakrishnan C, Soman KV. Identification of secondary structures in globular proteins-a new algorithm. Int J Pept Protein Res 1982;20:218-237.
11. Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983;22:2577-2637.
12. Richards FM, Kundrot CE. Identification of structural motifs from protein coordinate data: secondary structure and first-level super-secondary structure. Proteins 1988;3:71-84.
13. Sklenar H, Etchebest C, Lavery R. Describing protein structure: a general algorithm yielding complete helicoidal parameters and a unique overall axis. Proteins 1989;6:46-60.
14. Frishman D, Argos P. Knowledge-based protein secondary structure assignment. Proteins 1995;23:566-579.
15. Colloc'h N, Etchebest C, Thoreau E, Henrissat B, Mornon JP. Comparison of three algorithms for the assignment of secondary structure in proteins: the advantages of a consensus assignment. Protein Eng 1993;6:377-382.
16. Labesse O, Colloc'h N, Pothier J, Mornon JP. P-SEA: a new efficient assignment of secondary structure from C α trace of proteins. Comput Appl Biosci 1997;13:291-295.
17. Voronoï G. Recherches sur les paralleloedres primitifs. J Reine Angew Math 1908;134:198-287.
18. Finney JL. Volume occupation, environment and accessibility in proteins. The problem of the protein surface. J Mol Biol 1975;96: 721-732.
19. Tsai J, Voss N, Gerstein M. Determining the minimum number of types necessary to represent the sizes of protein atoms. Bioinformatics 2001;17:949-956.
20. Quillin ML, Matthews BW. Accurate calculation of the density of proteins. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2000;56:791-794.
21. Lo Conte L, Chothia C, Janin J. The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J Mol Biol 1999;285:2177-2198.
22. Gerstein M, Chothia C. Packing at the protein-water interface. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:10167-10172.
23. Richards FM. The interpretation of protein structures: total volume, group volume distributions and packing density. J Mol Biol 1974;82:1-14.
24. Zimmer R, Wohler M, Thiele R. New scoring schemes for protein fold recognition based on Voronoi contacts. Bioinformatics 1998;14: 295-308.
25. Zheng W, Cho SJ, Vaisman II, Tropsha A. A new approach to protein fold recognition based on Delaunay tessellation of protein structure. Pac Symp Biocomput 1997;486-497.
26. Munson PJ, Singh RK. Statistical significance of hierarchical multi-body potentials based on Delaunay tessellation and their application in sequence-structure alignment. Protein Sci 1997;6: 1467-1481.
27. Singh RK, Tropsha A, Vaisman, II. Delaunay tessellation of proteins: four body nearest-neighbor propensities of amino acid residues. J Comput Biol 1996;3:213-221.
28. Wako H, Yamato T. Novel method to detect a motif of local structures in different protein conformations. Protein Eng 1998;11: 981-990.
29. Angelov B, Sadoc JF, Jullien R, Soyer A, Mornon JP, Chomilier J. Nonatomic solvent-driven Voronoi tessellation of proteins: an open tool to analyze protein folds. Proteins 2002;49:446-456.
30. Soyer A, Chomilier J, Mornon JP, Jullien R, Sadoc JF. Voronoi tessellation reveals the condensed matter character of folded proteins. Phys Rev Lett 2000;85:3532-3535.
31. Phillips DC. The development of crystallographic enzymology. Biochem Soc Symp 1970;30:11-28.
32. Nishikawa K, Ooi T. Comparison of homologous tertiary structures of proteins. J Theor Biol 1974;43:351-374.
33. Singer MS, Vriend G, Bywater RP. Prediction of protein residue contacts with a PDB-derived likelihood matrix. Protein Eng 2002;15:721-725.
34. Selbig J. Contact pattern-induced pair potentials for protein fold recognition. Protein Eng 1995;8:339-351.
35. Go M. Correlation of DNA exonic regions with protein structural units in haemoglobin. Nature 1981;291:90-92.
36. Galaktionov S, Nikiforovich GV, Marshall GR. Ab initio modeling of small, medium, and large loops in proteins. Biopolymers 2001;60:153-168.
37. Kim MK, Jernigan RL, Chirikjian GS. Efficient generation of feasible pathways for protein conformational transitions. Biophys J 2002;83:1620-1630.
38. Holm L, Sander C. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J Mol Biol 1993;233:123-138.
39. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235-242.
40. Stec B, Rao U, Teeter MM. Refinement of purothionins reveals solute particles important for lattice formation and toxicity. Part 2. Structure of beta-purothionin at 1.7 Å resolution. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 1995;51:914-924.
41. Callebaut I, Labesse G, Durand P, Poupon A, Canard L, Chomilier J, Henrissat B, Mornon JP. Deciphering protein sequence information through hydrophobic cluster analysis (HCA): current status and perspectives. Cell Mol Life Sci 1997;53:621-645.
42. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 1995;247:536-540.
43. Imada K, Inagaki K, Matsunami H, Kawaguchi H, Tanaka H, Tanaka N, Namba K. Structure of 3-isopropylmalate dehydrogenase in complex with 3-isopropylmalate at 2.0 A resolution: the role of Glu88 in the unique substrate-recognition mechanism. Structure 1998;6:971-982.
44. Hutchinson EG, Thornton JM. PROMOTIF-a program to identify and analyze structural motifs in proteins. Protein Sci 1996;5: 212-220.
45. Parkin S, Rupp B, Hope H. Structure of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor at 125 K definition of carboxyl-terminal residues Gly57 and Ala58. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 1996;52:18-29.
46. Colloc'h N, Cohen FE. Beta-breakers: an aperiodic secondary structure. J Mol Biol 1991;221:603-613.
47. Presnell SR, Cohen BI, Cohen FE. A segment-based approach to protein secondary structure prediction. Biochemistry 1992;31:983-993.
48. Weichsel A, Gasdaska JR, Powis G, Montfort WR. Crystal structures of reduced, oxidized, and mutated human thioredoxins: evidence for a regulatory homodimer. Structure 1996;4:735-751.
49. Durley RCE, Mathews FS. Refinement and structural analysis of bovine cytochrome B(5) at 1.5 angstrom resolution. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 1996;52:65-76.
50. King RD, Ouali M, Strong AT, Aly A, Elmaghraby A, Kantardzic M, Page D. Is it better to combine predictions? Protein Eng 2000;13:15-19.